Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Tyrosinase inhibition and antioxidant properties of Asphodelus microcarpus extracts

  • Amalia Di Petrillo1,
  • Ana Maria González-Paramás2,
  • Benedetta Era1,
  • Rosaria Medda1,
  • Francesca Pintus1Email author,
  • Celestino Santos-Buelga2 and
  • Antonella Fais1
BMC Complementary and Alternative MedicineBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201616:453

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-016-1442-0

Received: 21 June 2016

Accepted: 25 October 2016

Published: 9 November 2016

Abstract

Background

Asphodelus microcarpus belongs to the family Liliaceae that include several medicinal plants. In the traditional medicine plants of the genus Asphodelus are used to treat skin disorders such as ectodermal parasites, psoriasis, microbial infection and for lightening freckles. In order to find novel skin depigmenting agents, the present work was carry out to evaluate antioxidant activity and tyrosinase inhibitory potential of leaves, flowers and tubers extracts of A. microcarpus. The phytochemical composition of the active extract was also evaluated.

Methods

Three different extracts (water, methanol and ethanol) from leaves, flowers and tubers of A. microcarpus were evaluated for their inhibitory effect on tyrosinase activity using l-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (l-DOPA) as substrate. Inhibition of cellular tyrosinase activity and melanin production was also investigated in melanoma B16F10 cells. Antioxidant activity, total phenolic and flavonoids contents were determined using standard in vitro methods. HPLC-DAD-MS was used to identify phenolic profile of the active extract.

Results

The results showed that all extracts have a direct inhibitory anti-tyrosinase activity, with ethanolic extract from flowers (FEE) exhibiting the stronger effect. Kinetic analysis revealed that FEE acts as an uncompetitive inhibitor with a Ki value of 0.19 mg/mL. The same effect was observed in murine melanoma B16F10 cells. Cellular tyrosinase activity as well as melanin content were reduced in FEE-treated cells. The results were comparable to that of the standard tyrosinase inhibitor (kojic acid). Furthermore, the same extract showed the highest antioxidant activity and an elevated levels of total phenolics and flavonoid content. Eleven phenolic components were identified as chlorogenic acid, luteolin derivates, naringenin and apigenin.

Conclusions

Our findings showed that FEE from A. microcarpus inhibits tyrosinase and exerted antimelanogenesis effect in B16F10 cells. This extract also showed the highest scavenging activity, which could be mainly attributed to its high levels of total polyphenols and flavonoids. These results suggest that A. microcarpus has a great potential as sources of bioactive compounds which could be used as depigmenting agents in skin disorders.

Keywords

Antioxidants Asphodelus microcarpus B16F10 melanoma cellsFlavonoidsPolyphenolsTyrosinase inhibitors

Background

Melanin is a pigment which plays an important role in the protection against UV damage and represents an important defense system of the skin against harmful factors. Despite its advantages, melanin is also involved in abnormal pigmentation and melanoma; therefore, different approaches to the study of skin disorders has been developed [13].

Tyrosinase (EC 1.14.18.1) is the key enzyme in the first two steps of melanin biosynthesis, catalyzing the hydroxylation L-tyrosine to the 3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (DOPA) and the oxidation of DOPA to dopaquinone.

Overproduction and accumulation of melanin occur in several skin disorders including solar melanosis, ephelides, melasma, senile lentigos and postinflammatory hyperpigmentation [4]. Since tyrosinase is the limiting step enzyme in melanogenesis, its inhibitors have become increasingly important as depigmenting agents in hyperpigmentation disorders.

However, currently available tyrosinase inhibitors suffer from toxicity and/or a lack of efficacy and there is a constant quest for better inhibitors from natural sources as they are expected to be free of harmful side effects [5, 6].

Several investigations have been done for identification of many naturally occurring substances in higher plants with antioxidant and other protective biochemical functions. The raw extracts or chemical constituents might be used for treatment of various human diseases [7]. Reactive oxygen species are considered as a major contributor to age-related symptoms and pathogenesis of many diseases. The skin is also vulnerable to oxidative stress, and exposure to repeated oxidative stress contributes to its aging [8]. Many synthetic antioxidants have potential hazards to health [9], therefore, there is a tendency to develop and utilize effective natural antioxidants to reduce the health risks.

In the traditional medicine, plants of genus Asphodelus are used to treat skin disorders, as well as ectodermal parasites, psoriasis, microbial infection and for lightening freckles [10, 11]. Various biological activities have been reported for A. microcarpus, [12, 13]. Phytochemical studies on A. microcarpus revealed the presence of lipids, carbohydrates, sterols, anthraquinones and arylcoumarins [13, 14]. It is well known that the last two compounds have tyrosinase inhibitory activity [1517] and plant extracts with antimelanogenic activity typically possess polyphenols such as flavonoids, which are usually the factors responsible for the activities in plant extracts [18]. The aim of this study was to investigate the inhibitory activity of three different extracts of A. microcarpus on tyrosinase activity and on melanogenesis in B16F10 melanoma cells. In addition, total phenols, flavonoids contents and antioxidant capacities of the extracts have also been analyzed.

Methods

Reagents

All chemicals for antioxidant and enzyme activity were obtained as pure commercial products from Sigma Chemical Co (St. Louis, MO, USA) and used without further purification. HPLC-grade acetonitrile was obtained from Merck KgaA (Darmstadt, Germany) and formic acid was purchased from Prolabo (VWR International, France). Water was treated in a Milli-Q water purification system (TGI Pure Water Systems, USA). The phenolic compounds standards (5-O-caffeoylquinic acid, luteolin-6-C-glucoside, luteolin-7-O-glucoside and apigenin) were from Extrasynthese (Genay, France).

Plant material

Asphodelus microcarpus subsp. microcarpus Salzm. et Viv. leaves, flowers and tubers (L, F and T respectively) were collected in southern Sardinia (Quartu Sant’Elena, Cagliari, Italy). The GPS coordinates were 39° 22′41.5″ N and 09° 19′62.3″ E. The plant was identified by Dr. Cecilia Loi, Professor of Plant Taxonomy, University of Cagliari, Italy. A voucher specimen (1405/16 Herbarium CAG) has been deposited in the Life and Environmental Sciences Department.

Plant materials were washed with deionized water, frozen at −80 °C and then lyophilized in intact condition. The dried plant was stored at −80 °C until required.

Extraction procedure

The lyophilized plant materials (1 g) were extracted in 10 mL of water (AE, aqueous extract) or ethanol (EE, ethanol extract) or methanol (ME, methanol extract) for 24 h at room temperature under continuous stirring. After filtration, ethanol or methanol extracts were diluted 10-fold with water and then all extracts were lyophilized. Dried powders (1 mg) were dissolved in 1 mL of the apposite solvent (water or 1 % ethanol:water or 1 % methanol:water for AE, EE and ME respectively) before use. For HPLC–DAD–ESI/MS analyses dried extract was dissolved in 1 mL of 0.1 % formic acid:acetonitrile (70:30, v/v) and filtered through a 0.22 μm disposable LC filter disk for HPLC analysis.

Antioxidant assays

In each extract total free radical-scavenging molecules were determined by ABTS+ (2,2′-azinobis-(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) and DPPH (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl) methods as previously reported [19, 20]. For both free radical methods, 6-hydroxy-2,5,7,8-tetramethylchromane-2-carboxylic acid (Trolox) was used as standard reference. The concentration range of extract used for the antioxidant tests was 0–0.3 mg/mL.

The activity was expressed as concentration of sample necessary to give a 50 % reduction in the original absorbance (IC50).

Determination of the total polyphenols and flavonoids

Total content of polyphenols and flavonoids in the extracts was determined as previously reported [21]. Polyphenol concentration was calculated using gallic acid as a referred standard and was expressed as mg of gallic acid equivalent (GAE) per 1 g of dry weight (dw). Flavonoid concentration was expressed as mg of quercetin equivalent (QE) per 1 g of dry extract.

Mushroom tyrosinase inhibition assay

Tyrosinase inhibition assays were performed with l-DOPA as substrate. The reaction mixture (1000 μL) contained 685 μL of phosphate buffer (0.05 M, pH 6.5), 15 μL of mushroom tyrosinase (2500 U mL−1), 200 μL of plant extract solution and 100 μL of 5 mM l-DOPA. After the addition of l-DOPA the reaction was immediately monitored at 492 nm for dopachrome formation in the reaction mixture. Kojic acid was used as a positive control. The concentration range of extract used for the mushroom tyrosinase inhibition assay was 0–0.3 mg/mL. Each measurement was made in triplicate. The IC50 value, a concentration giving 50 % inhibition of tyrosinase activity, was determined by interpolation of concentration-response curves.

Cell viability

B16F10 mouse melanoma cells (CRL-6475) were purchased from the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA). The cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle Medium (DMEM) supplemented with 10 % fetal bovine serum (FBS, Gibco, NY, USA), and 1 % penicillin/streptomycin at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere with 5 % CO2. The colorimetric 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay was performed to determine cell viability [22].

α-MSH treatment

B16F10 cells were seeded in 6-well plates (105 cells/mL). After 24 h, the medium was substituted by fresh one supplemented with 100 nM α-melanocyte stimulating hormone (α-MSH) and different concentration of plant extract (0.05-0.15 mg/mL) and incubated for 48 h. Cells treated with 100 nM α-MSH and kojic acid were used as positive control and for comparing the inhibitory strength of the extracts.

Intracellular tyrosinase activity and melanin content assay

The tyrosinase activity and melanin content in B16F10 cells were performed following a previously described method [23]. α-MSH-stimulated cells were plated in 60π-dishes (105 cells/mL) and incubated for 48 h in absence or presence of sample (0.05–0.15 mg/mL). The protein content of cellular lysates were calculated by the Bradford method using BSA as a standard [24].

l-DOPA staining assay

The DOPA-staining assay was performed as previously reported [23]. B16F10 cells were treated for 48 h with either α-MSH alone or α-MSH plus flowers extracts at different concentration or kojic acid (100 or 150 μg/mL) as positive control. After treatment, cells were lysed and protein extracts (5 μg) were analysed by 8 % SDS-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. After staining with DOPA, tyrosinase activity was visualized in the gel as dark melanin-containing bands.

HPLC-DAD-ESI/MS analyses

The ethanolic extract of A. microcarpus flowers was analyzed using a Hewlett-Packard 1200 chromatograph (Agilent Technologies, Waldbronn, Germany) equipped with a binary pump and a diode array detector (DAD) coupled to an HP Chem Station (rev. A.05.04) data-processing station. The HPLC system was connected via the DAD cell outlet to an API 3200 Qtrap (Applied Biosystems, Darmstadt, Germany) mass spectrometer (MS) consisting of an ESI source and a triple quadrupole-ion trap mass analyzer, which was controlled by the Analyst 5.1 software. An Aqua C18 125 Å column (5 μm, 250 × 4.6 mm I.D.; Phenomenex) thermostated at 35 °C was used. The solvents were: (A) 0.1 % formic acid, and (B) acetonitrile.

The elution gradient established was isocratic 15 % B for 5 min, 15–20 % B over 5 min, 20–35 % B over 10 min, 35–50 % B over 10 min, 50–60 % B over 2 min, isocratic 60 % B for 5 min and re-equilibration the column, using a flow rate of 0.5 mL/min. Double online detection was carried out in the DAD using 280 nm and 370 nm as preferred wavelengths and in the MS operated in the negative ion mode. Spectra were recorded between m/z 100 and 1000. Zero grade air served as the nebulizer gas (30 psi) and as turbo gas (400 °C) for solvent drying (40 psi). Nitrogen served as the curtain (20 psi) and collision gas (medium). Both quadrupols were set at unit resolution and EMS and EPI analyses were also performed. The EMS parameters were: ion spray voltage 4500 V, DP −50 V, EP −6 V, CE −10 V and cell exit potential (CXP) -3 V, whereas EPI settings were: DP −50 V, EP −6 V, CE −25 V and CES 0 V.

The phenolic compounds present in the samples were identified according to their UV and mass spectra and by comparison with commercial standards when available.

Statistical analysis

Data are expressed as mean ± SD from three independent experiments. The analysis average of the treatment using multiple comparisons was determined by using Duncan’s multiple range tests, and the data were compared using the p values: p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The least significant difference (LSD) was used to determine the difference between the methods used to the investigation of the various antioxidant capacities. The statistical analysis of differences between various treatments on cells was determined by the Student’s t-test. Values of p < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. Statistical analysis was performed with GraphPad Prism 6 software (GraphPad Software, San Diego, California, USA).

Results

Total antioxidant activity

The IC50 values of leaves, flowers and tubers extracts and positive control (trolox) were calculated in the present study and are depicted in Table 1. The extracts scavenged the ABTS and DPPH radicals in a concentration dependent manner. For DPPH assay, ethanolic extracts from flowers and leaves (FEE and LEE respectively) showed the best activity (IC50 = 28.4 ± 0.85 μg/mL for FEE and IC50 = 55.9 ± 1.55 μg/mL for LEE) compared to the other extracts (p < 0.05). Likewise, for ABTS radical scavenging assay, FEE and LEE showed an IC50 of 33.1 ± 1.55 μg/mL and 74.5 ± 7.77 μg/mL, respectively. The water extracts of tubers showed the smallest scavenging capacity.
Table 1

Free radical-scavenging content of A. microcarpus extracts

Extracts

IC50 values (μg/mL)

ABTS scavenging

DPPH scavenging

Leaves

Aqueous

174.35 ± 7.99e

134.75 ± 7.85b

Ethanolic

74.5 ± 7.77b

55.9 ± 1.55a

Methanolic

131.1 ± 1.27d

140.85 ± 0.49b

Flowers

Aqueous

126.4 ± 5.09c

108 ± 2.83b

Ethanolic

33.1 ± 1.55a

28.4 ± 0.85a

Methanolic

107.6 ± 1.27de

113.25 ± 1.77b

Tubers

Aqueous

720.45 ± 13.5h

670.4 ± 27.72e

Ethanolic

257.75 ± 10.96f

360 ± 56.57c

Methanolic

680.25 ± 14.35g

579 ± 29.7d

Trolox

 

3.4 ± 0.3

3.2 ± 0.4

Note: The results are expressed as IC50 values (μg/mL). The data are given as mean ± standard deviation (SD) of triplicate experiments. The statistical comparison between values from the different plant extracts applied using the post hoc Duncan test. Means followed by distinct letters in the same column were found to be significantly different (p < 0.05)

The IC50 values are high if compared with the standard (IC50 ~ 3.3 μg/mL). The crude extracts examined probably contain pro-oxidants agents which may compete with the antioxidants in the reaction with ABTS and DPPH radicals.

Phenolic and flavonoid contents

The phenolic and flavonoid amount of each extract is showed in Table 2. For each part of the plant, the best results were obtained with ethanolic extracts with a total phenolic contents of 39.35 ± 4.2, 54.44 ± 13.6 and 68.62 ± 9.8 mg GAE/g dw, for TEE, LEE and FEE respectively. Tubers extracts displayed the lowest level of total phenolics.
Table 2

Polyphenol and flavonoid content in leaves, flowers and roots extracts from A. microcarpus

Extracts

Total polyphenols(*)

Flavonoids(**)

Leaves

Aqueous

36.83 ± 0.6d

5.90 ± 2.52c

Ethanolic

54.44 ± 13.6e

31.13 ± 1.96g

Methanolic

35.48 ± 0.4d

17.27 ± 1.28e

Flowers

Aqueous

36.58 ± 1.2d

3.33 ± 0.41b

Ethanolic

68.62 ± 9.8f

27.28 ± 2.33f

Methanolic

26.37 ± 1.2c

11.43 ± 1.07d

Tubers

Aqueous

5.10 ± 0.5a

1.99 ± 0.42ab

Ethanolic

39.35 ± 4.2d

1.4 ± 0.33a

Methanolic

15.31 ± 7.8b

3.94 ± 1.05b

Data are expressed as mean of three measurements ± standard deviation

(*) mg GAE/g of dry weight

(**) mg QE/g of dry weight

Note: The data are given as mean ± standard deviation (SD) of triplicate experiments. The statistical comparison between values from the different plant extracts applied using the post hoc Duncan test. Means followed by distinct letters in the same column were found to be significantly different (p < 0.05)

There were significant differences in the plant extracts in terms of contents of total flavonoid, which varied from 1.4 (TEE) to 31.13 (LEE) mg QE/g dw. The highest flavonoid content was found in LEE (31.13 ± 1.96 mg QE/g dw) followed by FEE (27.28 ± 2.33 mg QE/g dw). The results showed that tubers are the part of the plant with lowest polyphenol and flavonoids contents.

Tyrosinase inhibition

Table 3 shows the inhibition of tyrosinase activity by extracts and kojic acid (positive control) at 0.2 mg/mL. The tyrosinase inhibition ranges of AE, EE and ME were 6.55–10.65, 8.4–40.25, and 2.25–20.4 %, respectively.
Table 3

Inhibition of tyrosinase by A. microcarpus extracts

Extracts

% Inhibition at 0.2 mg/mL

Leaves

Aqueous

9.85 ± 0.21b

Ethanolic

29.9 ± 0.14d

Methanolic

20.4 ± 1.4c

Flowers

Aqueous

6.55 ± 0.21b

Ethanolic

40.25 ± 4.4e

Methanolic

13.9 ± 2.4b

Tubers

Aqueous

10.65 ± 1.34b

Ethanolic

8.4 ± 1.3b

Methanolic

2.25 ± 1a

Kojic Acid

97.4 ± 2.8

Note: The data are given as mean ± standard deviation (SD) of triplicate experiments. The statistical comparison between values from the different plant extracts applied using the post hoc Duncan test. Means followed by distinct letters in the same column were found to be significantly different (p < 0.05)

The results indicated that the ethanolic extracts showed good activity, while the water and methanolic extracts showed only moderate activity at the concentration tested. The attention was, therefore, focused on ethanolic extract from flowers that show the best enzyme inhibition when compared with other extracts (p < 0.05). An IC50 value of 0.27 mg/mL was determined and the kinetic behaviour of tyrosinase at different concentration of l-DOPA and FEE was also investigated (Fig. 1). The Lineweaver-Burk plot gave a family of parallel straight lines with the same slope (Fig. 1a). With the increasing of the inhibitor concentration, the values of both Km and Vmax are reduced, while the ratio Km/Vmax remains quite the same. The slopes are independent from the concentration of FEE, which indicates that the compound is an uncompetitive inhibitor of the enzyme. The inhibition constant (Ki) of 0.19 mg/mL was obtained from a plot of the vertical intercept (1/Vmax) versus the inhibitor concentration (Fig. 1b).
Fig. 1

Inhibition of tyrosinase activity by A. microcarpus flowers extract. a Lineweaver-Burk plot for inhibition of ethanol extract on mushroom tyrosinase activity using l-DOPA as substrate. Reaction mixtures contained mushroom tyrosinase in 25 mM phosphate buffer (pH 6.8) and l-DOPA, in the absence or presence of extract at different extract concentrations. b Replot of the 1 ⁄Vmax values versus extract concentration

Cell viability

The FEE showed the best scavenging capacity and mushroom tyrosinase inhibitory activity, so its ability to affect the viability of B16F10 melanoma cells was also evaluated. B16-F10 cells were treated with EE of flowers at concentrations ranging from 5 to 400 μg/mL for 48 h at 37 °C and were examined using the MTT test. The results showed that FEE did not have a significant cytotoxic effect until 150 μg/mL (viability of 80 %), while 200 and 400 μg/mL resulted in a loss of viability of 35 and 50 % respectively (Fig. 2). Thus, further experiments using up to 150 μg/mL extract concentration were performed.
Fig. 2

Effect of A. microcarpus flowers extract on cell viability in B16F10 melanoma cells. After 48 h incubation with FEE, cell viability was determined by MTT assay. Data are expressed as mean ± SD from three independent experiments

Effect of FEE on intracellular tyrosinase activity and melanin content in melanoma cells

To obtain information about the inhibiting potency of FEE in the cellular model, the inhibitory effect of the extract on the tyrosinase activity of B16F10 cells treated with 100 nM α-MSH was examined. Upon exposure to α-MSH alone, the tyrosinase activity was significantly increased, compared to untreated cells (Fig. 3a). After 48 h of incubation with FEE, tyrosinase inhibition at 50, 100 and 150 μg/mL was 2.85 ± 1.2, 37.14 ± 1.1 and 48.4 ± 2.26 % respectively. Thus, FEE significantly reduced the tyrosinase activity in murine cells in a concentration-dependent manner. The inhibitory effect of the ethanolic extract was even much stronger than that of kojic acid, the positive control, that showed a tyrosinase inhibition of 8.65 ± 1.44 and 22.61 ± 4.13 % at 100 and 150 μg/mL respectively.
Fig. 3

Effect of flowers extract on B16F10 melanoma cells. Tyrosinase activity (a) and melanin production (b) are expressed as percentage of the control and the effects of FEE were compared with Kojic acid as standard inhibitor

The melanin content of α-MSH-stimulated B16F10 cells in presence of the extract was also evaluated. Fig. 3b shows that FEE also reduced cellular melanin in a concentration-dependent manner. Comparing the results obtained with the extracts and with kojic acid at the same concentrations of 100 μg/mL and 150 μg/mL, FEE exerted the highest cellular antimelanogenesis effect with an inhibition of 35.92 ± 2.77 and 48.77 ± 2.11 % versus 15.45 ± 0.64 and 41.2 ± 2.12 % of the standard inhibitor.

DOPA staining

Effect of FFE on the intracellular tyrosinase activity was also confirmed by tyrosinase zymography. B16F10 cells were treated with α-MSH alone or α-MSH plus substances (extract or kojic acid). Tyrosinase activity in non-treated cells was very low while α-MSH-stimulated cells showed dark band with higher activity. FEE seemed to be almost ineffective at the concentration of 50 μg/mL while at 100 and 150 μg/mL of extracts, activity of tyrosinase decreased and lighter bands were observed (Fig. 4a and b). Results are in agreement with the data of intracellular tyrosinase inhibition, confirming the anti-melanogenic effect of the extract, ever better than kojic acid.
Fig. 4

Effect of flowers extract on B16F10 cells by L-DOPA staining. Tyrosinase activity was estimated by zymography (a) and the relative intensity of bands was determined with ImageJ software (b)

Characterization of phenolic compounds in A. microcarpus flowers extract

The HPLC phenolic profile of A. microcarpus FEE is shown in Fig. 5 and identification for each peak of the phenolic compounds detected are listed in Table 4.
Fig. 5

HPLC chromatogram of FEE recorded at 330 nm for phenolic compounds. Peak identification is given in Table 4

Table 4

Identification of polyphenolic compounds in A. microcarpus flowers ethanolic extract by HPLC-DAD-ESI/MS analysis

Peak

Rt (min)

λmax (nm)

Pseudomolecular ion [M-H] (m/z)

MS2 (m/z), (%)

Tentative identification

1

5.9

326

353

191 (100)

3-O-caffeoylquinic acid

353 (94)

179 (71)

135 (48)

173 (9)

2

8.3

326

353

191 (100)

5-O-caffeoylquinic acid

3

15.4

346

447

447 (100)

Luteolin-6-C-glucoside

357 (98)

327 (97)

285 (25)

429 (20)

4

19

340

447

447 (100)

Luteolin-O-hexoside

285 (40)

5

21.5

338

447

285 (100)

Luteolin-7-O-glucoside

6

23.9

338

489

285 (100)

Luteolin O-acetylglucoside

7

26.8

345

285

285 (100)

Luteolin

8

27.9

324

593

285 (100)

Luteolin O-deoxyhexosylhexoside

9

29.9

288

271

151 (100)

Naringenin

119 (56)

10

30.2

338

269

269 (100)

Apigenin

151 (36)

11

30.8

348

299

300 (100)

Methyl-luteolin

285 (88)

Peaks 1 and 2 were tentatively assigned as 3-O-caffeoylquinic acid and 5-O-caffeoylquinic acid based on their chromatographic characteristics and fragmentation patterns according to the identification keys described by Clifford [25]. The identity of 5-O-caffeoylquinic acid was further confirmed by comparison with an authentic standard. Peak 3 showed a molecular ion [M-H] at m/z 447 giving place to four MS2 fragment ions, a major one at m/z 357 [M-H-90], and other three at m/z 327 [M-H-120], m/z 285 [M-H-162] and at m/z 429 [M-H-18].

This fragmentation pattern is characteristic of C-glycosylated flavones at C-6/C-8, according to the data previously reported [26]. Thus, the peak was identified as luteolin-6-C-glucoside, which was also confirmed by comparison with a standard. The same pseudomolecular ion [M-H] was found for peaks 4 and 5 ([M-H] at m/z 447), but in both cases only a characteristic fragment at m/z 285 [M-162] was produced, indicating the correspondence to O-hexosides. They were tentatively assigned as luteolin O-hexoside and luteolin 7-O-glucoside, respectively; the identity of this latter was confirmed by comparison with a standard. Peaks 6 and 8 presented pseudomolecular [M-H] ions at m/z 489 and 593, respectively, and were identified as luteolin derivatives owing to the production of a common luteolin MS2 fragment at m/z 285. They were assigned as luteolin O-acetylglucoside and luteolin O-deoxyhesylhexoside, respectively, based on the losses of 204 mu (162 + 42 mu) and 380 mu (146 + 162 mu) to produce the MS2 fragment. The remaining four peaks were assigned as different flavonoid aglycone based on their UV spectra and mass characteristics. Thus, the majority peak 7 was identified as luteolin, peak 9 as the flavanone narigenin, and peak 10 as apigenin, as also confirmed by comparison with standards. Finally, peak 11, with a pseudomolecular ion [M − H] at m/z 299 releasing a fragment at m/z 285 from the loss of a methyl residue (14 mu), was assigned as methyl-luteolin.

Discussion

The interest in finding novel antimelanogenic agents from natural sources with antioxidant activity is of great interest. Since the key role of tyrosinase in melanin pathway, research of molecules that inhibit tyrosinase have become increasingly important for medicinal and cosmetic products that may be used as powerful skin-whitening agents for treating skin disorders.

In this study the antioxidant capacity of different extracts of A. microcarpus was analyzed and their effects on the tyrosinase activity and melanin synthesis was evaluated.

A. microcarpus extracts showed significant antioxidant activity. In particular, the ethanolic extract of the flowers showed the highest scavenging activity, which could be attributed mainly to its high levels of total polyphenols and flavonoids. Inhibitory effects of A. microcarpus extracts on mushroom tyrosinase were evaluated, and also in this case FEE revealed the highest inhibitory activity with an uncompetitive mode of inhibition. Antimelanogenic effect of this extract was confirmed in assays in B16F10 cells, being even more active than the positive control (kojic acid).

It is well known that polyphenols, and namely flavonoids, behave as inhibitors of ROS generation and could be responsible for the antimelanogenic activity of plant extracts [2730].

The major compound in the extract was the aglycone luteolin, a compound that in a previous study was reported to show whitening activity. This compound did not inhibit directly tyrosinase and its activity was attributed to the inhibition of adenyl cyclase involved in the signalling pathway of α-MSH in B16F10 melanoma cells. In α-MSH-stimulated B16 melanoma cells, luteolin inhibited both tyrosinase activity and melanin production in a concentration-dependent manner [27].

This might explain the greater inhibition of FEE on B16F10 cells compared to the effect towards mushroom tyrosinase.

The inhibition of tyrosinase has an important role in order to prevent melanin accumulation in skin. Therefore, tyrosinase inhibitors are an attractive target in cosmetics and treatments for pigmentation disorders. The A. microcarpus extract may be used for the production of herbal preparations containing phytochemicals with significant bioactivity or as a source of inspiration for the development of new drug with less toxic side effects.

Conclusion

In conclusion, our results demonstrated that ethanolic flower extract of A. microcarpus has strong tyrosinase inhibitory activity. This effect is even better than the standard inhibitor in cellular system. Moreover, it also shows the highest scavenging activity, which could be attributed mainly to its high levels of total polyphenols and flavonoids. These results suggest that FEE may be helpful such as source of bioactive compounds for controlling hyperpigmentation and as skin whitening agents.

Abbreviations

ABTS: 

2,2′-azinobis-(3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid)

BSA: 

Bovine serum albumin

DOPA: 

3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine

DPPH: 

2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl radical

GAE: 

Gallic acid equivalent

MTT: 

3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide

QE: 

Quercetin equivalent

Trolox: 

6-hydroxy-2,5,7,8-tetramethylchromane-2-carboxylic acid

α-MSH: 

α-melanocyte stimulating hormone

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to Dr. Cecilia Loi (University of Cagliari) for plant authentication.

Funding

This work was supported by University of Cagliari.

Availability of data and material

All data and materials are contained and described in the manuscript.

Authors’ contributions

AD, FP and AF conceived and designed the experiments. AD, BE, RM, FP and AF were responsible for the preparation of plant extracts and biological assays. AMG and CS performed the HPLC analysis. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Cagliari
(2)
Grupo de Investigación en Polifenoles, Unidad de Nutrición y Bromatología, Facultad de Farmacia, Universidad de Salamanca

References

  1. Riley PA. Melanogenesis and melanoma. Pigment Cell Res. 2003;16:548–52.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Abdel-Daim M. FunasakaY, Komoto M, Nakagawa Y, Yanagita E, Nishigori C. Pharmacogenomics of metabotropic glutamate receptor subtype 1 and in vivo malignant melanoma formation. J Dermatol. 2010;37:635–46.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Chung KW, Park YJ, Choi YJ, Park MH, Ha YM, Uehara Y, Yoon JH, Chun P, Moon HR, Chung HY. Evaluation of in vitro and in vivo anti-melanogenic activity of a newly synthesized strong tyrosinase inhibitor(E)-3-(2,4 dihydroxybenzylidene)pyrrolidine-2,5-dione (3-DBP). Biochim Biophys Acta. 1820;2012:962–9.Google Scholar
  4. Ortonne JP, Bissett DL. Latest insights into skin hyperpigmentation. J Investig Dermatol Symp Proc. 2008;13:10–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Chan YY, Kim KH, Cheah SH. Inhibitory effects of Sargassum polycystum on tyrosinase activity and melanin formation in B16F10 murine melanoma cells. J Ethnopharmacol. 2011;137:1183–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Rashed R, Medda R, Spanò D, Pintus F. Evaluation of antioxidant, anti-tyrosinase potentials and phytochemical composition of four Egyptian plants. Int Food Res J. 2016;23:203–10.Google Scholar
  7. Jayavelu A, Natarajan A, Sundaresan S, Devi K, Senthilkumar B. Hepatoprotective activity of Boerhavia diffusa L. (Nyctaginaceae) against ibuprofen induced hepatotoxicity in wistar albino rats. Int J Pharm Res Rev. 2013;2:1–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Rinnerthaler M, Bischof J, Streubel MK, Trost A, Richter K. Oxidative stress in aging human skin. Biogeosciences. 2015;5:545–89.Google Scholar
  9. Lobo V, Patil A, Phatak A, Chandra N. Free radicals, antioxidants and functional foods: impact on human health. Pharmacogn Rev. 2010;4:118–26.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Tackholm V. Students’flora of Egypt. 2nd ed. Cairo: Cairo University Press; 1974.Google Scholar
  11. Chiej R. The Macdonald Encyclopaedia of Medicinal Plants. London: Macdonald & Co; 1984.Google Scholar
  12. Ghoneim MM, Ma G, El-Hela AA, Mohammad AE, Kottob S, El-Ghaly S, Cutler SJ, Ross SA. Biologically active secondary metabolites from Asphodelus microcarpus. Nat Prod Commun. 2013;8:1117–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Ghoneim MM, Elokely KM, El-Hela AA, Mohammad AE, Jacob M, Radwan MM, Doerksen RJ, Cutler SJ, Ross SA. Asphodosides A-E, anti-MRSA metabolites from Asphodelus microcarpus. Phytochemistry. 2014;105:79–84.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  14. El-Seedi HR. Antimicrobial arylcoumarins from Asphodelus microcarpus. J Nat Prod. 2007;70:118–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Fais A, Corda M, Era B, Fadda MB, Matos MJ, Quezada E, Santana L, Picciau C, Podda G, Delogu G. Tyrosinase inhibitor activity of coumarin-resveratrol hybrids. Molecules. 2009;14:2514–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Leu YL, Hwang TL, Hu JW, Fang JY. Anthraquinones from Polygonum cuspidatum as tyrosinase inhibitors for dermal use. Phytother Res. 2008;22:552–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Matos MJ, Varela C, Vilar S, Hripcsak G, Borges F, Santana L, Uriarte E, Fais A, Di Petrillo A, Pintus F, Era B. Design and discovery of tyrosinase inhibitors based on a coumarin scaffold. RSC Adv. 2015;5:94227–35.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Chang TS. An updated review of tyrosinase inhibitors. Int J Mol Sci. 2009;10:2440–75.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Delogu GL, Matos MJ, Fanti M, Era B, Medda R, Pieroni E, Fais A, Kumar A, Pintus F. 2-Phenylbenzofuran derivatives as butyrylcholinesterase inhibitors: synthesis, biological activity and molecular modeling. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2016;26:2308–13.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Pintus F, Spanò D, Mascia C, Macone A, Floris G, Medda R. Acetylcholinesterase inhibitory and antioxidant properties of Euphorbia characias latex. Rec Nat Prod. 2013;7:147–51.Google Scholar
  21. Pisano MB, Cosentino S, Viale S, Spanò D, Corona A, Esposito F, Tramontano E, Montoro P, Tuberoso CIG, Medda R, Pintus F. Biological activities of aerial parts extracts of Euphorbia characias. Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:1–11.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  22. Mosmann T. Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays. J Immunol Methods. 1983;65:55–63.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Pintus F, Spanò D, Corona A, Medda R. Antityrosinase activity of Euphorbia characias extracts. PeerJ. 2015;3:e1305.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Bradford MM. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem. 1976;72:248–54.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Clifford MN, Johnston KL, Knight S, Kuhnert N. Hierarchical scheme for LC-MSn identification of chlorogenic acids. J Agric Food Chem. 2003;51:2900–11.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Ferreres F, Silva BM, Andrade PB, Seabra RM, Ferreira MA. Approach to the study of C-glycosyl flavones by ion trap HPLC-PAD-ESI/MS/MS: application to seeds of quince (Cydonia oblonga). Phytochem Anal. 2003;14:352–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Choi MY, Song HS, Hur HS, Sim SS. Whitening activity of luteolin related to the inhibition of cAMP pathway in alpha-MSH-stimulated B16 melanoma cells. Arch Pharm Res. 2008;31:1166–71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Nasr Bouzaiene N, Chaabane F, Sassi A, Chekir-Ghedira L, Ghedira K. Effect of apigenin-7-glucoside, genkwanin and naringenin on tyrosinase activity and melanin synthesis in B16F10 melanoma cells. Life Sci. 2016;144:80–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Shan J, Fu J, Zhao Z, Kong X, Huang H, Luo L, Yin Z. Chlorogenic acid inhibits lipopolysaccharide-induced cyclooxygenase-2 expression in RAW264.7 cells through suppressing NF-kappaB and JNK/AP-1 activation. Int Immunopharmacol. 2009;9:1042–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Ye Y, Chou GX, Wang H, Chu JH, Yu ZL. Flavonoids, apigenin and icariin exert potent melanogenic activities in murine B16 melanoma cells. Phytomedicine. 2010;18:32–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2016

Advertisement