This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Identification of more objective biomarkers for Blood-Stasis syndrome diagnosis
© The Author(s). 2016
Received: 25 August 2015
Accepted: 12 September 2016
Published: 22 September 2016
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|25 Aug 2015||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|2 Dec 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jenny Wilkinson|
|13 Feb 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Angshuman Bagchi|
|28 Feb 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Jiangquan Liao|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|28 Feb 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|30 Mar 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Angshuman Bagchi|
|20 May 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Beata Burzyńska|
|18 Jun 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Jiangquan Liao|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|18 Jun 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|5 Jul 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Beata Burzyńska|
|3 Sep 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Jiangquan Liao|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|3 Sep 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|12 Sep 2016||Editorially accepted|
|22 Sep 2016||Article published||10.1186/s12906-016-1349-9|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.