Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Nutritional supplements modulate fluorescent protein-bound advanced glycation endproducts and digestive enzymes related to type 2 diabetes mellitus

BMC Complementary and Alternative MedicineBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201616:338

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-016-1329-0

Received: 26 April 2016

Accepted: 26 August 2016

Published: 1 September 2016

Abstract

Background

Chronic hyperglycemia enhances the formation of advanced glycation endproducts (AGEs) and reactive oxygen species (ROS), contributing to diabetic complications. Thus, controlling blood glucose levels, inhibiting the formation of AGEs and reducing ROS are key therapeutic targets in early stage type 2 diabetes.

Methods

The inhibitory effects of seven commercial liquid nutritional supplements against carbohydrate hydrolysing enzymes, α-amylase and α-glucosidase, was determined by dinitrosalicylic (DNS) reagent and p-nitrophenyl-α-D-glucopyranoside solution, respectively. Antiglycation activity was determined using the formation of fluorescent protein-bound AGEs. Total phenolic and flavonoid content and antioxidant properties (1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl antioxidant activity (DPPH) and ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP)) were determined for correlation among these components and inhibitory activities.

Results

Samoan noni juice showed the greatest inhibitory effects against α-amylase, whereas chlorophyll extracts showed the greatest inhibitory effect against α-glucosidase. Inhibition of α-glucosidase correlated with TFC (r2 = 0.766; p < 0.01) and FRAP (r2 = 0.750; p < 0.01) whereas no correlation was observed for α-amylase inhibition. All supplements inhibited fluorescent protein-bound AGEs, with the greatest effect exerted by Olive Leaf Extract, Blood Sugar Support (IC50 = 0.5 mg/ml). The IC50 values negatively correlated with TPC (r2 = −0.707; p < 0.001) and DPPH scavenging activities (r2 = 0.515; p < 0.05).

Conclusion

The findings of this study highlight the potential of liquid nutritional supplements in managing and treating type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Keywords

Liquid nutritional supplements Antiglycation α-amylase α-glucosidase Phenolic Flavonoids Antioxidant activities

Background

The early stages of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is characterised by postprandial hyperglycemia due to increased breakdown of starch by α-amylase, absorption of glucose by α-glycosidase, insulin resistance and defects with insulin secretion from beta cells of the pancreas [1, 2]. If unmanaged, chronic hyperglycemia can promote protein glycation and the formation of advanced glycation endproducts (AGEs). Protein glycation is initiated by the nucleophilic attack from a carbonyl group of a reducing sugar to a free amine group present on proteins, lipids and nucleic acids. This forms a freely reversible Schiff base and rearranges to form a more stable and irreversible ketoamine or Amadori product that leads to the formation of AGEs [3, 4]. Elevated levels of AGEs in the body contribute to diabetic complications and age related disease by directly causing the cross-linking of long lived proteins such as collagen, leading to vascular stiffness and affecting vascular structure and function. AGEs can also interact with receptors, such as the receptor for AGEs, to induce intracellular signalling that amplifies oxidative stress and transcription of pro-inflammatory markers [1, 4]. Chronic hyperglycemia also promotes the formation of free radicals, that further increases oxidative stress and the formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS), which in turn accelerates AGE formation [3, 5].

Improving glycaemic control and preventing postprandial hyperglycemia is one of the main targets for the treatment and management of the early stage of T2DM. Salivary and pancreatic α-amylase and intestinal α-glucosidase are responsible for the digestion and absorption of glucose from the diet. By inhibiting either of these enzymes the amount of glucose absorbed into the blood following a meal can be reduced, thus preventing the postprandial surge in glucose and maintaining glucose homeostasis [6, 7]. Acarbose, a synthetic drug and a known α-glucosidase and α-amylase inhibitor, is currently prescribed to type 2 diabetic patients. Whilst acarbose is effective in controlling blood glucose levels, its adverse side effects includes gastrointestinal disturbances such as diarrhoea, flatulence and abdominal distension [8]. Recently, there has been an increasing search for natural alternatives including neutraceutical formulations for their potent antioxidant activities and health related benefits. Polyphenols, abundant in plant based foods and beverages, are well known for their potent antioxidant effects [9, 10]. Recent studies have also shown polyphenols from plant extracts to be effective inhibitors of α-amylase [11, 12], α-glucosidase [11, 12] and protein glycation based on in vitro and in vivo studies [5, 13, 14].

Liquid nutritional supplements, a class of neutraceuticals including herbal extracts and plant-based extracts, claim to contain high levels of polyphenols and may be a suitable and cost-effective alternative to synthetic drugs. Very little scientific evidence exists concerning dietary supplements and their health benefits, and none to our knowledge on commercial liquid nutritional supplements on their potential role in the management of hyperglycemia and T2DM. Thus, this study was aimed to investigate the inhibitory effect of commonly consumed liquid nutritional supplements against α-amylase, α-glucosidase, and AGE formation using in vitro model. Total phenolic and flavonoid content, and antioxidant properties were evaluated for correlation among these components and inhibitory activities.

Methods

Reagents

Chemicals and solvents were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Sydney, Australia) unless otherwise specified. All chemicals were either analytical or HPLC grade.

Samples

Liquid nutritional supplements, purchased from local retailers and online included: Acai Power, Acai Juice Blend (APNG, containing acai concentrate, pear and cherry juice); Chlorophyll, Detox Health Drink (CHC, containing chlorophyll powder); Olive Leaf Extract, Natural High Strength (OLE01, containing olive leaf extracts with 4.4 mg/ mL oleuropein); Olive Leaf Extract, High Strength, (OLE02, containing olive leaf extracts with 4.4 mg/mL oleuropein and mixed berries); Olive Leaf Extract, Blood Sugar Support (OLE03, containing olive leaf extracts with 4.4 mg/mL oleuropein and 0.25 mg/mL hydroxytyrosol); Noni Juice, Samoan (NJ01, containing 100 % noni fruit extracts); Fijian Noni (NJ02, containing 100 % Fijian noni extracts).

Inhibition of α-amylase assay

The α-amylase inhibitory action was determined as described previously with some modifications [15]. Samples (125μL, 1 mg/mL) were incubated with porcine pancreatic α-amylase solution (125μL, 0.5 mg/mL in 0.1 M phosphate buffer saline (pH 6.9)), at 37 °C for 10 min. After pre-incubation starch solution (125μL, 1 %) was added at timed intervals (~30μL every 10 s) and the reaction mixture was further incubated at 37 °C for 30 min. The reaction was stopped by adding DNS reagent (250μL, containing 1 % 3,5-dinitrosalicylic acid, 0.2 % phenol, 0.5 % sodium sulphite and 1 % sodium hydroxide) and heating in a boiling water bath (100 °C) for 10 min. After boiling the colour was stabilized with the addition of potassium sodium tartarate solution (250μL, 40 %). The mixture was cooled to room temperature and the absorbance was measured at 540 nm. Acarbose was used in the assay as positive control. Inhibitory activity was expressed as % inhibition = ((Acontrol – Asample)/Acontrol) × 100.

Inhibition of α-glucosidase assay

The α-glucosidase inhibitory action was determined as described previously with some modifications [15]. Diluted samples (50μL, 1 mg/mL) and α-glucosidase solution (100μL, 0.2 units/mL in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 6.9)), were mixed in a 96 well plate and incubated at 37 °C for 30 min. After pre-incubation, p-nitrophenyl-α-D-glucopyranoside solution (50μL, 5 mM in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 6.9)), was added to the reaction mixture and incubated at 37 °C for 30 min. Sodium carbonate solution (60 μL, 0.1 M) was added and the reaction mixture was further incubated at 37 °C for 20 min. Absorbance was measured at 450 nm. Acarbose was used as a positive control. Inhibitory activity of α-glucosidase was expressed as the % inhibition = (Acontrol – Asample)/Acontrol) × 100.

Fluorescence AGE formation assay

Fluorescent protein-bound AGEs were measured according to a previous method with modification [5]. Briefly, 1000μL of bovine serum albumin (BSA, 10 mg/mL final concentration), prepared with 0.2 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.4), was incubated with nutritional supplements (200μL, 0.5-5 mg/mL final concentration) at room temperature for 30 mins. After pre-incubation, glucose (800μL, 100 mM final concentration) was added to each reaction vessel, flushed with nitrogen and incubated at 37 °C for 3 weeks. Aminoguanidine (30μM final concentration) was included as a positive control. All reaction vessels contained 0.02 % sodium azide (final concentration) to prevent any microbial growth. After 3 weeks incubation, protein was isolated by slowly adding trichloroacetic acid (400μL, 20 %) to 500μL of glycated sample. The mixture was kept on ice for 10 min before centrifugation (10000 × g) for 10 mins. Pellet was dissolved in alkaline phosphate buffer (1000μL, 0.2 M, pH 10) and fluorescence was read at excitation and emission wavelengths of 370 nm Ex and 440 nm, respectively. Percent inhibition was determined and IC50 values were calculated as % inhibition = ((Fnegative control – Fsample)/Fnegative control) × 100.

Total phenolic and total flavonoid content

Total phenolic content was determined using Folin–Ciocalteu assay and total flavonoid content was determined by aluminium chloride colorimetric technique as described previously [16].

Determination of 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl antioxidant activity (DPPH)

The radical scavenging activity was measured according to an assay described previously with modifications [15]. Briefly, diluted samples (50μL, 0.5–5 mg/mL) were added with DPPH (150μL, 0.2 mM) and incubated for 30 min in the dark. After incubation the absorbance was measured at 490 nm. Butyl hydroxyl toluene (BHT, 500μg/mL) was used as a positive control. DPPH activity was expressed as percent inhibition (%) = ((Acontrol – Asample)/Acontrol × 100).

Determination of ferric reducing antioxidant power (FRAP)

The reducing power of the samples was determined as described previously [17]. Ascorbic acid (0-250μg/mL) was used to develop a standard curve and results calculated and expressed as ascorbic acid equivalents (μg AAE/g).

Statistical analysis

Results were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) or standard error of the mean (SEM) from three independent experiments. IC50 values were calculated by non-linear regression using Graphpad Prism Version 6.0 for Windows. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was determined using Tukey’s or Dunnet’s multiple comparison tests and linear relationship was determined with Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r2). Difference were considered to be significant at p < 0.05.

Results and discussion

Natural products containing polyphenols and antioxidants may be an effective way of reducing oxidative stress and delaying the onset of diabetic complications. Dietary or nutritional supplements are commonly used for general wellness and prevention of disease. Nutritional supplements including herbal extracts and fruit juices may contain pharmacoactive components, and whilst manufacturers claim that these components provide health benefits, very little scientific evidence is available to-date to support these claims. In this study we aimed to investigate the antiglycation, α-amylase and α-glucosidase inhibitory potential of selected liquid nutritional supplements.

α-amylase and α-glucosidase inhibition

One of the primary targets for the management of early stage T2DM is to maintain steady blood glucose levels and prevent the postprandial surge of glucose, and an effective way of achieving this is by inhibiting α-amylase or α-glucosidase [7]. In our study, α-amylase and α-glucosidase inhibitory potential of liquid nutritional supplements were compared with a positive control (acarbose). Inhibition of α-amylase ranged from 15.22 ± 1.46 to 24.14 ± 2.23 % (Fig. 1). Samoan noni juice (NJ01) showed moderate but significant α-amylase inhibition (p < 0.001) whereas APNG and CHC showed no difference when compared to acarbose. Olive leaf supplements (OLE01, OLE02 and OLE 03) showed similar level of inhibition and were significantly higher (p < 0.01) than acarbose. Our study supports the findings of Komaki and co-workers [18] who found ethanolic extracts of olive leaf to effectively inhibit α-amylase and determined oleuropein to be one of the main phenolic compounds responsible for this inhibitory effect. In our study, all olive leaf supplements contained 4.4 mg/mL of oleuropein (determined on the product label). A previous study using noni juice when taken twice a day for 20 days also demonstrated hypoglycaemic effects in diabetic rats but α-amylase levels were not measured [19].
Fig. 1

The percentage inhibition of liquid dietary supplements on α-amylase and α-glucosidase activity. Values are expressed as mean ± SEM, n = 3. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 are significant different when compared to α-amylase values for acarbose. #p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01, ###p < 0.001 are significantly different when compared to α-glucosidase values for acarbose. Supplements include acai powder (APNG), chlorophyll (CHC), olive leaf extracts (OLE01, OLE02 OLE03) and noni juice (NJ01, NJ02)

Inhibition of α-glucosidase ranged from 10.33 ± 0.25 to 35.29 ± 0.93 %, with CHC showing the highest inhibition (Fig. 1). All olive leaf supplements (OLE01, OLE02 and OLE03) demonstrated inhibitory effects that were significantly greater than acarbose. APNG, NJ01 and NJ02 exhibited inhibitory activity at levels similar to that of acarbose. Previous reports have shown the use olive leaf extracts for improving diabetic complications [20, 21], however, this is the first study to report on α-glucosidase inhibitory activity by chlorophyll and olive leaf extracts. Previous studies investigated various plant and fruit extracts for the inhibition of α-glucosidase and attributed their potential inhibitory activities to anthocyanin content [12, 22]. In our study, CHC extract contained chlorophyll including anthocyanin, ascorbic acid and potassium sorbate, which may have played a role in its inhibitory effects. Isolation of key components from CHC and their enzyme inhibitory potentials needs further investigation. Another limitation in our study was that the inhibitory potential against both enzymes were investigated only at one concentration thus a concentration dependent study would allow comparisons with other studies and known inhibitors.

Antiglycation

The use of pharmacological compounds that could inhibit the formation of AGEs is another approach in delaying or preventing the onset of diabetic complications. Aminoguanidine, a well investigated inhibitor of protein glycation prevents AGE formation by reacting with carbonyl groups on reducing sugars [3] however this clinical inhibitor has numerous side effects [23]. In our study, the inhibitory potential of liquid nutritional supplements on fluorescent protein-bound AGEs was explored using BSA-glucose models. IC50 values ranged from 0.5 ± 0.03 to 4.70 ± 0.67 mg/mL (Table 1).
Table 1

Total phenolic content, total flavonoid content, ferric reducing antioxidant potential and antiglycation activities of liquid nutritional supplements

 

TPC

(mgGAE/mL)

TFC

(mgQE/mL)

FRAP

(mgAAE/mL)

Fluorescent AGE

(IC50, mg/mL)

APNG

1.77 ± 0.12b

0.86 ± 0.35b

2.52 ± 0.16c

2.84 ± 1.01c

CHC

2.35 ± 0.09c

1.15 ± 0.29c

3.16 ± 0.14d

1.60 ± 0.57bc

OLE01

1.98 ± 0.06bc

1.03 ± 0.21b

2.01 ± 0.25b

2.14 ± 0.21bc

OLE02

2.65 ± 0.13d

1.52 ± 0.12c

1.70 ± 0.06b

1.03 ± 0.10ab

OLE03

3.00 ± 0.36e

1.57 ± 0.97c

1.95 ± 0.17b

0.50 ± 0.03a

NJ01

0.48 ± 0.03a

0.09 ± 0.00a

0.73 ± 0.06a

4.70 ± 0.67d

NJ02

0.05 ± 0.02a

0.06 ± 0.03a

0.94 ± 0.08a

1.89 ± 0.43bc

Data values are expressed as mean ± SD, n = 3. Different superscripts indicate significant difference (p < 0.05) within each column. Supplements include acai powder (APNG), chlorophyll (CHC), olive leaf extracts (OLE01, OLE02 OLE03) and noni juice (NJ01, NJ02)

OLE03 showed to be the most effective inhibitor with the lowest IC50. These results support the findings of a previous study which found methanolic olive leaf extract to be a successful inhibitor of protein glycation in BSA-ribose models (3 weeks incubation), inhibiting fluorescent AGE formation [24]. The authors suggested that luteolin, luteolin-4’-O-β- D-glucopyranoside, oleuropein and hydroxytyrosol may be responsible for the inhibitory effect. In our study, olive leaf supplement (OLE03) sold as blood sugar support supplement contained oleuropein (4.4 mg/mL) and hydroxytyrosol (250 μg/mL) that may have contributed to lower AGE formation.

Correlations between inhibitory activities and phenolic or flavonoid or antioxidant activities

TPC ranged from 0.48 ± 0.03 to 3.00 ± 0.36 mg GAE/ mL whereas TFC ranged from 0.06 ± 0.03 to 1.52 ± 0.97 mg QE/mL in liquid nutritional supplement (Table 1). The free radical scavenging activities of liquid nutritional supplements showed a dose dependent response (Fig. 2). FRAP values ranged from 0.73 ± 0.06 to 3.16 ± 0.14 mg AAE/mL of sample (Table 1). Pearson’s correlation analysis detected several significant relationships among the investigated variables. Correlation analysis showed DPPH free radical scavenging activity to be positively correlated with TPC (r2 = 0.6329, p = 0.0021) but not with TFC. Interestingly, FRAP results showed a strong positive correlation with TPC (r2 = 0.647, p < 0.001) and TFC (r2 = 0.840, p < 0.0001). These relationships show that the total phenolic content defines their antioxidant activities.
Fig. 2

The percentage inhibition of liquid dietary supplements on 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl antioxidant activity (DPPH). Values are expressed as mean ± SD, n = 3. Samples include acai powder (APNG), chlorophyll (CHC), olive leaf extracts (OLE01, OLE02 OLE03), noni juice (NJ01, NJ02) and Butyl hydroxyl toluene (BHT)

The α-amylase inhibition did not correlate with TPC, TFC or antioxidant activities however, α-glucosidase inhibition positively correlated with TFC (r2 = 0.766, p < 0.01) and FRAP (r2 = 0.750, p < 0.01) (Table 2). There was no significant correlation between α-glucosidase inhibition and TPC or DPPH scavenging activity (Table 2).
Table 2

Pearson’s correlation coefficient between different variables

 

TPC

TFC

FRAP

DPPH

Antiglycation (IC50)

−0.707***

ns

ns

−0.515*

α-amylase inhibition

ns

ns

ns

ns

α-glucosidase inhibition

ns

0.766**

0.750**

ns

*p < 0.05,**p < 0.01, **p < 0.001, ns correlation not significant

Various levels of correlation between TPC, TFC and antioxidant activities and enzyme inhibition are reported in the literature. For example, no linear relationship was identified between α-glucosidase inhibitory activities of native Australian herb fractions and their FRAP values [25]. A moderate positive relationship between TPC and α-glucosidase inhibition for commonly used medicinal plants (r2 = 0.393) and herbal teas (r2 = 0.371) has been reported [26]. In the present study, the result shows different affinities of evaluated variables to enzyme inhibition that relates to different relationships reported in the literature, suggesting that the total phenolic, flavonoids and their antioxidant capacities do not always define enzyme inhibitory activities. IC50 values for fluorescent AGE inhibitions negatively correlated with TPC (r2 = −0.707, p < 0.001) and DPPH scavenging activity (r2 = −0.515, p < 0.05). Positive relationships were observed with wild berries, where % AGE inhibition correlated with TPC (r2 = 0.760) and DPPH (r2 = 0.452) [5]. Antiglycation agents may exert their effects by blocking free amino groups on proteins, or carbonyl groups on reducing sugars so that they cannot bind; acting as antibodies to block Amadori products; as enzymes deglycating Amadori products and intermediates; and chelating transition metals, reducing glycation-derived free radicals [3]. In our study antiglycation activity correlated with TPC and DPPH, suggesting that phenolic compounds may protect against glycation; preventing the conversion of Amadori products into AGEs that occurs in the presence of transition metals and oxygen.

Conclusion

Commercial nutritional supplements analysed in this study exhibited different levels of inhibitory activity against α-amylase, α-glucosidase and protein-bound AGEs. While some supplements were more effective than others these inhibitory activities did not always correlate with phenolic content, flavonoid or antioxidant activities, suggesting that the inhibition may occur via different pathways. This study highlights promising potential of liquid nutritional supplements as a therapeutic approach to managing T2DM. As this study was the first to investigate antiglycation potential of liquid nutritional supplements, it provides opportunity to explore more neutraceutical supplements and their relevant metabolites in cells, animal or humans to determine the bioavailability and the mechanism of action.

Abbreviations

AGEs: 

Advanced glycation endproducts

APNG: 

Acai power, Acai juice blend

CHC: 

Chlorophyll, Detox health drink

DPPH: 

1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl antioxidant activity

FRAP: 

Ferric reducing antioxidant power

NJ01: 

Noni Juice, Samoan

NJ02: 

Fijian Noni

OLE01: 

Olive leaf extract, Natural High Strength

OLE02: 

Olive leaf extract, High Strength

OLE03: 

Olive Leaf Extract, Blood Sugar Support

ROS: 

Reactive oxygen species

T2DM: 

Type 2 diabetes mellitus

TFC: 

Total flavonoid content

TPC: 

Total phenolic content

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We thank University of South Australia for awarding a High Achiever Research Scholarship to ERK. This work was financially supported by the University of South Australia Teaching and Research grant.

Funding

This research work is part of the University of South Australia Teaching and Research grant.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets supporting the conclusions of this article are included within the manuscript.

Authors’ contributions

ERK and PD contributed equally for the design, conducting experiments and drafting of manuscript. Both authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ information

ERK is a final year undergraduate student at University of South Australia. PD is an academic and researcher in School of Pharmacy and Medical Science, University of South Australia.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of the South Australia

References

  1. Goh SY, Cooper ME. The role of advanced glycation End products in progression and complications of diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93(4):1143–52.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Baron AD. Postprandial hyperglycaemia and alpha-glucosidase inhibitors. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 1998;40(Suppl):S51–55.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Ahmed N. Advanced glycation endproducts—role in pathology of diabetic complications. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2005;67(1):3–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Zong H, Ward M, Stitt A. AGEs, RAGE, and Diabetic Retinopathy. Curr Diab Rep. 2011;11(4):244–52.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Harris CS, Cuerrier A, Lamont E, Haddad PS, Arnason JT, Bennett SA, Johns T. Investigating wild berries as a dietary approach to reducing the formation of advanced glycation endproducts: chemical correlates of in vitro antiglycation activity. Plant Foods Hum Nutr. 2014;69(1):71–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Hanhineva K, Torronen R, Bondia-Pons I, Pekkinen J, Kolehmainen M, Mykkanen H, Poutanen K. Impact of dietary polyphenols on carbohydrate metabolism. Int J Mol Sci. 2010;11(4):1365–402.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Tan BKH, Ong KW. Influence of Dietary Polyphenols on Carbohydrate Metabolism. In: Watson RR, Preedy VR, Zibadi S, editors. Polyphenols in Human Health and Disease. San Diego: Academic; 2014. p. 95–111.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Laube H. Acarbose. Clin Drug Investig. 2002;22(3):141–56.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Giacco F, Brownlee M. Oxidative stress and diabetic complications. Circ Res. 2010;107:1058–70.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Dalar A, Turker M, Zabaras D, Konczak I. Phenolic composition, antioxidant and enzyme inhibitory activities of Eryngium bornmuelleri leaf. Plant Foods Hum Nutr. 2014;69(1):30–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Adisakwattana S, Lerdsuwankij O, Poputtachai U, Minipun A, Suparpprom C. Inhibitory activity of cinnamon bark species and their combination effect with acarbose against intestinal alpha-glucosidase and pancreatic alpha-amylase. Plant Foods Hum Nutr. 2011;66(2):143–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. McDougall GJ, Shpiro F, Dobson P, Smith P, Blake A, Stewart D. Different polyphenolic components of soft fruits inhibit α-amylase and α-glucosidase. J Agric Food Chem. 2005;53(7):2760–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Soman S, Rauf AA, Indira M, Rajamanickam C. Antioxidant and antiglycative potential of ethyl acetate fraction of Psidium guajava leaf extract in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. Plant Foods Hum Nutr. 2010;65(4):386–91.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Perez-Gutierrez RM, Muniz-Ramirez A, Gomez YG, Ramirez EB. Antihyperglycemic, antihyperlipidemic and antiglycation effects of Byrsonima crassifolia fruit and seed in normal and streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. Plant Foods Hum Nutr. 2010;65(4):350–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Gulati V, Harding IH, Palombo EA. Enzyme inhibitory and antioxidant activities of traditional medicinal plants: potential application in the management of hyperglycemia. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2012;12:77–85.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Adisakwattana S, Ruengsamran T, Kampa P, Sompong W. In vitro inhibitory effects of plant-based foods and their combinations on intestinal α-glucosidase and pancreatic α-amylase. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2012;12(110):1–8.Google Scholar
  17. Fawole OA, Amoo SO, Ndhlala AR, Light ME, Finnie JF, Van Staden J. Anti-inflammatory, anticholinesterase, antioxidant and phytochemical properties of medicinal plants used for pain-related ailments in South Africa. J Ethnopharmacol. 2010;127(2):235–41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Komaki E, Yamaguchi S, Maru I, Kinoshita M, Kakehi K, Ohta Y, Tsukada Y. Identification of Anti-.ALPHA.-Amylase Components from Olive Leaf Extracts. Food Sci Technol Res. 2003;9(1):35–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Nayak BS, Marshall JR, Isitor G, Adogwa A. Hypoglycemic and hepatoprotective activity of fermented fruit juice of (noni) in diabetic rats. Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine. 2010;2011:875293.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Liu YN, Jung JH, Park H, Kim H. Olive leaf extract suppresses messenger RNA expression of proinflammatory cytokines and enhances insulin receptor substrate 1 expression in the rats with streptozotocin and high-fat diet-induced diabetes. Nutr Res. 2014;34(5):450–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Wainstein J, Ganz T, Boaz M, Bar Dayan Y, Dolev E, Kerem Z, Madar Z. Olive leaf extract as a hypoglycemic agent in both human diabetic subjects and in rats. J Med Food. 2012;15(7):605–10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. da Silva PM, Kwon Y-I, Apostolidis E, Lajolo FM, Genovese MI, Shetty K. Functionality of bioactive compounds in Brazilian strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa Duch.) cultivars: evaluation of hyperglycemia and hypertension potential using in vitro models. J Agric Food Chem. 2008;56(12):4386–92.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Thornalley PJ. Use of aminoguanidine (Pimagedine) to prevent the formation of advanced glycation endproducts. Arch Biochem Biophys. 2003;419(1):31–40.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Kontogianni VG, Charisiadis P, Margianni E, Lamari FN, Gerothanassis IP, Tzakos AG. Olive leaf extracts are a natural source of advanced glycation end product inhibitors. J Med Food. 2013;16(9):817–22.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Sakulnarmrat K, Konczak I. Composition of native Australian herbs polyphenolic-rich fractions and in vitro inhibitory activities against key enzymes relevant to metabolic syndrome. Food Chem. 2012;134(2):1011–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Ranilla LG, Kwon YI, Apostolidis E, Shetty K. Phenolic compounds, antioxidant activity and in vitro inhibitory potential against key enzymes relevant for hyperglycemia and hypertension of commonly used medicinal plants, herbs and spices in Latin America. Bioresour Technol. 2010;101(12):4676–89.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2016

Advertisement