Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Perception of risk and communication among conventional and complementary health care providers involving cancer patients’ use of complementary therapies: a literature review

  • Trine Stub1, 2, 4Email author,
  • Sara A. Quandt1,
  • Thomas A. Arcury2,
  • Joanne C. Sandberg2,
  • Agnete E. Kristoffersen3,
  • Frauke Musial3 and
  • Anita Salamonsen3
BMC Complementary and Alternative MedicineBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201616:353

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-016-1326-3

Received: 6 August 2015

Accepted: 25 August 2016

Published: 8 September 2016

Back to article

Open Peer Review reports

Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
6 Aug 2015 Submitted Original manuscript
15 Oct 2015 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lisa H. Lubomski
22 Feb 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Erin Sweet
21 Mar 2016 Author responded Author comments - Trine Stub
Resubmission - Version 2
21 Mar 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
11 May 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lisa H. Lubomski
23 Aug 2016 Author responded Author comments - Trine Stub
Resubmission - Version 3
23 Aug 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
25 Aug 2016 Editorially accepted
8 Sep 2016 Article published 10.1186/s12906-016-1326-3

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Epidemiology and Prevention, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Division of Public Health Sciences
(2)
Department of Family and Community Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine
(3)
Department of Community Medicine, The National Research Center in Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NAFKAM), UiT The Arctic University of Norway
(4)
Present address: Department of Community Medicine, The National Research Center in Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NAFKAM), UiT The Arctic University of Norway

Advertisement