This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Perception of risk and communication among conventional and complementary health care providers involving cancer patients’ use of complementary therapies: a literature review
© The Author(s). 2016
Received: 6 August 2015
Accepted: 25 August 2016
Published: 8 September 2016
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|6 Aug 2015||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|15 Oct 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Lisa H. Lubomski|
|22 Feb 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Erin Sweet|
|21 Mar 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Trine Stub|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|21 Mar 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|11 May 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Lisa H. Lubomski|
|23 Aug 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Trine Stub|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|23 Aug 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|25 Aug 2016||Editorially accepted|
|8 Sep 2016||Article published||10.1186/s12906-016-1326-3|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.