Skip to main content

Table 1 Zone of inhibition (in mm) of the different concentrations of crude extract and solvent fractions of the leaves of Rhamnus prinoides against gram positive bacteria

From: Evaluation of the in vitro antibacterial activity of the solvent fractions of the leaves of Rhamnus prinoides L’Herit (Rhamnaceae) against pathogenic bacteria

Category of test

Concentration

Bacteria

S. aureus

S. pyogen

S. pneumoniae

Stand

Clinic

Stand

Clinic

Stand

Clinic

Crude

19.5 mg/well

16.67 ± 0.88a3d2

16.67 ± 0.33a3c1d3

13.67 ± 0.88a3c2d3

12.33 ± 0.33a3c1d2

13.33 ± 0.33a3d2

11.67 ± 0.33a3c2d3

39 mg/well

19.67 ± 0.88a3

19.00 ± 0.58a3d1

18.33 ± 0.67a3

16.33 ± 0.67a3

16.00 ± 1.00a2

15.33 ± 0.33a3d2

78 mg/well

22.00 ± 0.58a2

21.67 ± 0.33a2

20.33 ± 0.33a3

18.67 ± 0.33a3

19.33 ± 1.20a1

18.00 ± 0.00a3

Cef 0.03 mg/disc*

28.33 ± 0.58

26.33 ± 0.67

NT

NT

NT

NT

Amp 0.01 mg/disc*

NT

NT

27.33 ± 0.67

26.33 ± 1.20

24.00 ± 0.58

23.00 ± 0.58

Methanol

19.5 mg/well

13.00 ± 0.58a3d2e2

11.67 ± 0.33 a3d2e3

12.67 ± 0.33a3d1

11.67 ± 0.33a3d2

12.33 ± 0.88a3d1

11.33 ± 0.33a3d3

39 mg/well

14.33 ± 0.33a3f3

13.33 ± 0.33a3f3

14.00 ± 0.58a3f2

12.67 ± 0.33a3d1f3

14.33 ± 0.33a3

13.67 ± 0.33a3d1

78 mg/well

16.17 ± 0.44a3g3

15.33 ± 0.67a3g3

15.00 ± 0.58a3g3

15.00 ± 0.58a3g3

16.00 ± 0.58a3

15.33 ± 0.33a3g2

Cef 0.03 mg/disc*

27.67 ± 0.33

26.33 ± 0 .33

NT

NT

NT

NT

Amp 0.01 mg/disc*

NT

NT

28.00 ± 0.00

26.33 ± 0 .67

25.00 ± 0 .58

23.67 ± 0.33

Chloroform

19.5 mg/well

11.67 ± 0.33a3d1e3

11.67 ± 0.33a3d1e3

12.00 ± 0.58 a3d2

10.67 ± 0.33a3d2

12.00 ± 0.58a3d2

11.00 ± 0.00a3d2

39 mg/well

13.00 ± 0.58a3f3

13.33 ± 0.33a3f3

13.67 ± 0.33 a3f3

12.00 ± 0.58 a3f3

14.00 ± 0.58a3

13.00 ± 0.58a3f2

78 mg/well

14.33 ± 0.33a3g3

14.00 ± 0.58a3g3

15.00 ± 0.58 a3g3

13.67 ± 0.58a3g3

15.67 ± 0.33a3g1

15.00 ± 0.58a3g3

Cef 0.03 mg/disc*

27.00 ± 0.57

26.33 ± 0.33

NT

NT

NT

NT

Amp 0.01 mg/disc*

NT

NT

27.67 ± 0.33

27.00 ± 0.58

25.00 ± 0.58

23.67 ± 0.33

  1. Values are expressed as Mean ± S.E.M (n = 3), analysis was performed with One-Way ANOVA followed by Tukey test; acompared to positive control, bto 19.5 mg/well, cto 39 mg/well, dto 78 mg/well, eto crude 19.5 mg/well, fto crude 39 mg/well, gto crude 78 mg/well; 1P < 0.05, 2P < 0.01, 3P < 0.001. The negative control has shown no antibacterial activity. * = positive controls, Stand = standard (ATCC) strains, Clinic. = clinically isolated strains, NT = not tested, Cef = Cefoxitin, Amp = ampicillin, Cip = Ciprofloxacin