Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Plant-growth regulators alter phytochemical constituents and pharmaceutical quality in Sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas L.)

  • Ali Ghasemzadeh1Email author,
  • Daryush Talei2,
  • Hawa Z. E. Jaafar1,
  • Abdul Shukor Juraimi1,
  • Mahmud Tengku Muda Mohamed1,
  • Adam Puteh1 and
  • Mohd Ridzwan A. Halim1
BMC Complementary and Alternative MedicineBMC series – open, inclusive and trusted201616:152

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-016-1113-1

Received: 10 December 2015

Accepted: 13 May 2016

Published: 28 May 2016

Abstract

Background

Sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas L.) is one of the most important consumed crops in many parts of the world because of its economic importance and content of health-promoting phytochemicals.

Methods

With the sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas L.) as our model, we investigated the exogenous effects of three plant-growth regulators methyl jasmonate (MeJA), salicylic acid (SA), and abscisic acid (ABA) on major phytochemicals in relation to phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL) activity. Specifically, we investigated the total phenolic content (TPC), total flavonoid content (TFC), total anthocyanin content (TAC), and total β-carotene content (TCC). Individual phenolic and flavonoid compounds were identified using ultra-high performance liquid chromatography (UHPLC). Antioxidant activities of treated plants were evaluated using a 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) assay and a β-carotene bleaching assay. Anticancer activity of extracts was evaluated against breast cancer cell lines (MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231) using MTT assay.

Results

TPC, TFC, TAC, and TCC and antioxidant activities were substantially increased in MeJA-, SA-, and ABA-treated plants. Among the secondary metabolites identified in this study, MeJA application significantly induced production of quercetin, kaempferol, myricetin, gallic acid, chlorogenic acid, 3,5-dicaffeoylquinic acid, and 4,5-dicaffeoylquinic acid. Luteolin synthesis was significantly induced by SA application. Compared with control plants, MeJA-treated sweet potato exhibited the highest PAL activity, followed by SA and ABA treatment. The high DPPH activity was observed in MeJA followed by SA and ABA, with half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) values of 2.40, 3.0, and 3.40 mg/mL compared with α-tocopherol (1.1 mg/mL). Additionally, MeJA-treated sweet potato showed the highest β-carotene bleaching activity, with an IC50 value of 2.90 mg/mL, followed by SA (3.30 mg/mL), ABA (3.70 mg/mL), and control plants (4.5 mg/mL). Extracts of sweet potato root treated with MeJA exhibited potent anticancer activity with IC50 of 0.66 and 0.62 mg/mL against MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 cell lines respectively, compared to that of extracts of sweet potato treated with SA (MDA-MB-231 = 0.78 mg/mL; MCF-7 = 0.90 mg/mL) and ABA (MDA-MB-231 = 0.94 mg/mL; MCF-7 = 1.40 mg/mL). The results of correlation analysis showed that anthocyanins and flavooids are corresponding compounds in sweet potato root extracts for anticancer activity against breast cancer cell lines.

Conclusions

MeJA has great potential to enhance the production of important health-promoting phytochemicals in sweet potato.

Keywords

Plant-growth regulators Sweet potato Phenylalanine ammonia lyase DPPH assay β-carotene blenching assay UHPLC

Background

Sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas L.) is a dicotyledonous plant with tubers derived from swollen roots. It is widely consumed in many parts of the world and is considered a major crop [1]. The sweet potato has been widely studied both because of its economic importance and because it is associated with numerous health benefits [2]. The sweet potato contains phytochemicals with various pharmaceutical activities, which have antioxidant [3], anticancer activity [4], antidiabetic activity [5] and anti-inflammatory activity [6]. The pharmaceutical activity of the sweet potato is correlated with its phytochemical compounds. It has long been known that the sweet potato contains β-carotene, a precursor to vitamin A that helps prevent night blindness and other symptoms of vitamin A deficiency [7]. Besides carotenoids, sweet potatoes also contain bioactive compounds, including carotenoids, anthocyanins, phenolic acids, other flavonoids, and vitamin C [8]. Sweet potatoes also contain a unique blend of phenolic compounds, including hydroxycinnamic acids, which represent the primary phenolic antioxidant in most commercially available cultivars [9]. Among these phytochemicals, flavonoids and phenolics are particularly noted for having antioxidant and anticancer benefits because they exhibit strong superoxide-radical scavenging activity [1012]. Thus, researchers are extremely interested in the effect of dietary phenolics. It is of particular interest whether phenol and flavonoid synthesis can be increased in crops through agronomic management techniques. Plants are able to integrate a wide variety of stimuli from both internal and environmental sources to alter their metabolic activities. Compounds known as elicitors can trigger the synthesis of phytochemicals, including phenolics and flavonoids, in fruits, vegetables, and herbs. Some major elicitors are jasmonic acid (MeJA), salicylic acid (SA), and abscisic acid (ABA) are known to be potent elicitors and defense phytohormones, and play significant roles as plant-growth regulators (PGRs) and regulators of plant defense responses against various biotic and abiotic stresses [1315]. Phenolic and flavonoids synthesis is regulated by PGRs such as MeJA and SA [1618]. Exogenous SA and ABA positively influence the levels of phytochemicals in ginger [16] and lettuces [19] respectively. Phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL) catalyzes the non-oxidative deamination of L-phenylalanine to trans-cinnamic acid and ammonia. This step directs carbon flow in the plant from the shikimate pathway to phenylpropanoid metabolism, a secondary metabolic pathway in higher plants and some other organisms that is mainly involved in defense mechanisms [20]. This pathway produces malonyl-CoA and p-coumaroyl-CoA, from which all phenols and flavonoids derive their carbon skeletons [21]. The first committed step for biosynthesis of the phenylpropanoid skeleton in higher plants is the deamination of L-phenylalanine to yield trans-cinnamic acid and ammonia. This reaction is catalyzed by phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL) and is often regarded as a key step in the biosynthesis of the flavonoids [22]. Concomitant increases in the levels of PAL and flavonoid compounds have been demonstrated by previous studies [22, 23]. Accordingly, previous studies have demonstrated concomitant increases in PAL levels and phenolic or flavonoid compounds [24, 25]. Nakatani and Koda [26] demonstrated that jasmonic acid and its related compounds play an important physiological role in development of storage root. The result of recent study showed that foliar application of SA at concentration of 10−5M induced significantly antioxidant and anticancer activity of Malaysian young ginger varieties [16]. Also, exogenous ABA was found to stimulate anthocyanin and phenolics biosynthesis and increase antioxidant activity of muscadine grapes [27]. Poor nutrition is a major problem worldwide and there is considerable incentive to develop food-crops with improved nutritional content. Currently, it is important to gather relevant evidence on food-crops with high levels of potentially beneficial components. The high beneficial value of sweet potato renders it an excellent candidate for the investigation of how PGRs may alter phytochemical production. Specifically, we can test whether improving plant resistance to biotic and abiotic stresses through elicitor stimulation will result in improved synthesis of bioactive compounds beneficial to human health, thus improving the quality of edible plants. Currently, we know little about the effect of PGRs on secondary-metabolite production in sweet potato. The present study aimed to investigate the effects of MeJA, ABA and SA on assessment of synthesis of phenolic and flavonoid compounds, anthocyanin and β-carotene in relation to PAL enzyme activity as well as the antioxidant and anticancer activities in sweet potato, Garnet yam cultivar.

Methods

Plant sampling and treatments

Seeds of the sweet potato cultivar Garnet Yam were sterilized with 1 % hypochlorite solution for 2–3 min, and then washed thoroughly with tap water. Clean seeds were sown in plastic boxes filled with compost. After 7 days, seedlings were transplanted into 10-L pots containing garden soil and sand (4:1 v/v), with two plants per pot. The plants were grown in a greenhouse at 25–31 °C and 70 % relative humidity, with a photosynthetic photon flux density (PPFD) of 600–800 μmol/m2/s at plant level. The plants were watered every two days (1.2 L).  Fertilizers (Nitrogen 100kg/ha; Phosphorus 90 kg/ha; Potassium 200 kg/ha and Calcium 200kg/ha) and all necessary micronutrients was applied in recommended dose. We selected three groups of equally sized, 21-day-old plants for treatment with 100 μM of MeJA, SA, and ABA. A control group of plants was also selected. Phytohormone concentrations (MeJA: 13 × 10−6 M; SA: 10−5 M; ABA: 10−4 M) were chosen based on previous screening experiments (data not published) demonstrating that these concentrations did not negatively affect plant health and growth. The PGRs were applied as a foliar spray once per week for 16 weeks. Control plants were irrigated with pure water. After 16 weeks, plants were harvested and immediately transported to the laboratory. Fresh samples (light-purple-fleshed root) were washed with pure water and were used to measure enzymatic activity. A second set of samples was frozen and lyophilized in a freeze dryer, then stored at −20 °C for further analyses. Seeds of sweet potato Garnet yam cultivar were donated from seed and plant certification institute (SPSRI, Tehran, Iran). Plant samples were submitted to SPSRI and were identified as sweet potato Garnet yam cultivar with voucher specimen of IK455/02. Voucher specimens deposited at herbarium of SPSRI.

Extraction

Dried samples (5 g) were grounded into powder followed by extraction with distilled water (100 mL). Solutions were refluxed for 2 h at 65 °C, then cooled and filtered through Whatman filter paper (No. 1) in a filter funnel, followed by evaporation under reduced pressure in an Eyela rotary evaporator to remove excess solvent. Residue was freeze dried and dried extracts were kept at −20 °C for future analysis.

Estimation of total phenolic contents (TPC)

Total phenolic content was determined by a spectrophotometric method according to Folin–Ciocalteu assay. Crude extracts (0.25 mg) was dissolved in methanol (10 mL) and 200 μL of solution were diluted in 20 mL of distilled water. Folin-Ciocalteu reagent (10-fold diluted; 1 mL) was added and the mixture was incubated in total darkness for 10 min at room temperature. After this time, sodium carbonate 7.5 % (1 mL) was added and incubated for 30 min, then the absorbance of the solution was read at 765 nm using a spectrophotometer (UV2550, Shimadzu, Japan). Different concentrations of gallic acid (0.062, 0.125, 0.250, 0.500 and 1 mg/mL) were used to prepare a calibration curve. Results were expressed as milligram gallic acid equivalents (GAE)/g dry matter (DM). Measurement was performed in triplicate and values are the average of three replicates.

Estimation of total flavonoid contents (TFC)

Total flavonoid content of the crude extracts was determined by using the aluminium chloride spectrophotometric method. Crude extract (0.25 mg) was dissolved in methanol (10 mL). Extracts (1 mL) were mixed with NaNO2 solution (4 mL, 1:5, w/v) and incubated at room temperature for 6 min. After this time, 0.3 mL of AlCl3 solution (1:10, w/v) was added, the reagents were mixed well, and the reaction was allowed to stand for another 6 min. Immediately after that, 1 M NaOH solution (2.0 mL) was added to each extract and incubated for 10 min at room temperature. The absorbance of the solutions was read at 510 nm using a spectrophotometer (UV2550, Shimadzu, Japan). Different concentrations (0.031, 0.062, 0.125, 0.250, 0.500 mg/mL) of quercetin standard were used to prepare a calibration curve. Results were expressed as milligram quercetin equivalents (QE)/ g DM. Measurement was performed in triplicate and values are the average of three replicates.

Estimation of total anthocyanin content (TAC)

Sweet potato root samples (50 mg) were extracted with methanol/HCl (99:1 v/v) solution at 4 °C for overnight. The observation of each sample were measured at 530 and 657 nm using a spectrophotometer (UV-2120 Optizen, Mecasys, Korea), and relative anthocyanin levels were determined with the equation OD530 − (0.25× OD657) × extraction volume (mL) × 1/weight of sample (g). Cyanidin 3-glucoside was used as a standard and results were expressed as miligrams of cyanidin 3-glucoside equivalents (Cy3-GE)/g DM.

β-Carotene extraction and analysis

Freeze-dried sweet potato powder (5 g) was mixed with 2 g of calcium carbonate, 1 g of diatomaceous earth, and 25 ml of methanol. A hexane–acetone (1:1) mixture (50 ml) was added and stirred. The mixture was filtered under vacuum through a funnel with a fritted disk. The residue in the funnel was washed twice with 25 ml of methanol and then by 50 ml of the hexane– acetone mixture. All of the extracts were combined in a 250 ml separating funnel and washed with water. A few drops of saturated sodium chloride solution were added to the funnel to facilitate phase separation. The aqueous phase was discarded and the upper layer was transferred to a 50 ml volumetric flask and made to volume with hexane [3]. Samples were stored in dark vials at 20 °̊C until analysis.

The carotene content was analysed by a UHPLC system (1290 Infinity Quaternary LC System, Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The chromatographic system conditions were set as follows: mobile phase, methanol, acetonitrile and chloroform (42.5/42.5/15 v/v) HPLC grade; detector, UV 450 nm; column, C18 column (3.5 μm, 4.6 mm inner diameter [ID] × 100 mm); column oven temperature, 35 °C; injection volume 20 μl, and flow rate, 1.2 mL/min. Standard solutions of β-carotene with concentrations from 0.5 to 10 μg/mL were used to obtain a standard curve. Linear regression equations were calculated using Y = aX ± b, where X is the concentration of the related compound and Y the peak area of the compound obtained from UHPLC. The linearity was established by the coefficient of determination (R2). UHPLC analysis was performed in triplicate and values are the average of three replicates.

Separation and analysis of flavonoids and phenolic acids

Ultra-high performance liquid chromatography (UHPLC, 1290 Infinity Quaternary LC System, Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA) was used to separate and identify the phenolic acids. The chromatographic system conditions were set as follows: mobile phase, 0.03 M orthophosphoric acid (A) and methanol HPLC grade (B); detector, UV 280-360 nm; column, C18 column (5.0 μm, 4.6 mm inner diameter [ID] × 250 mm); column oven temperature, 35 °C; and flow rate, 1.0 mL/min. Gradient elution was performed as follows: 0–10 min, 10 % B; 10–15 min, 50 % B; 15–20 min, 100 % B; and finally 5 min for washing. All standards (quercetin, luteolin, myricetin, kaempferol, gallic acid, chlorogenic acid, 3,5-Di-caffeoylquinic acid and 4,5-Di-caffeoylquinic acid were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (M) Sdn Bhd, Selangor, Malaysia) were dissolved in methanol HPLC grade. Linear regression equations were calculated using Y = aX ± b, where X is the concentration of the related compound and Y the peak area of the compound obtained from UHPLC. The linearity was established by the coefficient of determination (R2). UHPLC analysis was performed in triplicate and values are the average of three replicates.

PAL extraction and assay

Sweet potato was ground with pestle and mortar and was well mixed with acetone, placed in a freezer for 15 min, and then centrifuged at 20,000 × g at 4̊C for 15 min. The pellet was dried under vacuum and extracted at 4̊C by gentle stirring with 100 mM sodium borate buffer (5 ml/g ), pH 8.8, containing 5 mM ß-mercaptoethanol, 2 mM EDTA. After 1 h, the solution was filtered through one layer of nylon cloth and centrifuged at 20,000 × g at 4̊C for 15 min. PAL activity in the buffer supernatant was determined by the production of cinnamate during 1 h at 30̊C, as measured by the absorbance change at 290 nm. The assay mixture contained 15 mol L-phenylalanine, 30 mM sodium borate buffer (pH 8.8), and 0.2 to 0.5 ml buffer supernatant, depending on the PAL activity level, in a total volume of 3.0 ml. The substrate was added after 10 min of pre incubation and the reactions stopped with 0.1 ml 6 N HCl. Assays were performed in triplicate [28].

In vitro evaluation of antioxidant activity

1,1-Diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) assay

The DPPH assay was used in order to evaluate the free radical scavenging activity of sweet potato extracts. DPPH was dissolved in methanol at a concentration of 100 μM. The DPPH solution (3 mL) was mixed with 3 mL of various concentrations of plant extracts and incubated in a dark room for 20 min at 27 °C. After incubation, the absorbance of the samples was read at 517 nm using a spectrophotometer (UV2550, Shimadzu, Japan). α-tocopherol was used as a positive control. The scavenging activity was calculated using the following formula:
$$ \%\ \mathrm{inhibition} = \kern0.5em \left[\left(\mathrm{absorbanc}{\mathrm{e}}_{\mathrm{control}}\hbox{--}\ \mathrm{absorbanc}{\mathrm{e}}_{\mathrm{sample}}\right)/\mathrm{absorbanc}{\mathrm{e}}_{\mathrm{control}}\right)\Big] \times 100 $$

β-carotene bleaching assay

β-carotene (2 mg) was dissolved in 10 ml of chloroform linoleic acid (40 mg) and Tween 40 (400 mg) were added to the flask with vigorous shaking. The chloroform was removed at 40 °̊C under vacuum and 100 mL of distilled water was then added to the residue. Aliquots (4.8 ml) of this emulsion were transferred into different test tubes containing 0.2 ml of different concentrations of the sweet potato extracts. The tubes were shaken and incubated at 50 ̊C in a water bath. As soon as the emulsion was added to each tube, the zero time absorbance was measured at 470 nm using a spectrophotometer. Absorbance readings were then recorded at 20 min intervals until the control sample had changed colour (for 2h). A blank, devoid of β -carotene, was prepared for background subtraction. Antioxidant activity was calculated using the following equation:

Antioxidant activity = (β -carotene content after 2 h of assay/initial β -carotene content) × 100. Where β -carotene content after 2 h of assay is : (the absorbance of the antioxidant at 2h - absorbance of the control at 2h), and initial β -carotene content is: (the absorbance of the control at 0 h - absorbance of the control at 2h). The assays were carried out in triplicate and the results expressed as mean values ± standard deviations.

Determination of anticancer activity

Cell culture and treatment

Estrogen receptor (ER)-positive MCF-7, ER-negative MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells and normal cell line (MCF-10A) were procured from the laboratory of Molecular Biomedicie, Institute Bio-sience, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia. Cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 media containing 10 % fetal bovine serum (FBS). Cell lines were incubated overnight at 37 °C in 5 % CO2 for cell attachment. The cells were maintained by sub-culturing in 25 cm2 tissue culture flasks. Cells growing in the exponential phase were used for cell viability assay.

MTT (3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) assay

The assay was conducted as follows: Cancer cells were seeded in 96-well plates at a density of 1 × 104 cells/well in 100 μL of media. After 24 h, the medium was removed and the cells were incubated for 3 days in the presence and absence of various concentrations of sweet potato root extract [test extracts were prepared in 0.1 % Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) and serially diluted with media to obtain appropriate concentrations]. The following concentrations of extracts were used: 0.25, 0.50, 1, 2 and 4 mg/mL. Cells in the control group received only media containing 0.1 % DMSO. After incubation, the test compound containing media was removed and washed with 200 μL of PBS followed by addition of 20 μL of MTT reagent (5 mg/mL MTT in PBS) and incubated for 4 h at 37 °C. The medium was removed and 100 μL DMSO was added and the absorbance measured using a micro plate reader at 540 nm followed by the calculation of percentage viability. 0.1 % (v/v) DMSO in medium was used as negative control. The cell viability was determined using the formula:
$$ \mathrm{Cell}\ \mathrm{viability}\ \left(\%\right) = 100\kern0.5em \hbox{--} \kern0.5em \left(\left[\mathrm{X}-\mathrm{Y}\right]/\mathrm{X}\right) \times 100 $$
where X = absorbance of cells treated with 0.1% DMSO medium, Y = absorbance of cells treated with extracts.

Each point represents the mean of triplicate experiments.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using Statistical Analysis System (SAS version 9.2, SAS Institute Inc.). Mean separation test between treatments was performed using Duncanʼs Multiple Range Test and P-value of < 0.05 was regarded as significant.

Results and discussion

Effect of PGR treatments on total phenolic content (TPC), total flavonoid content (TFC), total anthocyanin content (TAC) and β-carotene content

The results of present study showed that PGR treatments induced the accumulation of TPC, TFC, TAC, and β-carotene in sweet potato root (Table 1). MeJA resulted in the highest TPC (9.42 mg GAE/g DM), followed by SA (8.26 mg GAE/g DM) and ABA (7.60 mg GAE/g DM); the differences were significant compared with those in the control plants (5.74 mg GAE/g DM). Similarly, PGR application led to significantly higher TFC than in the control (1.78 mg QE/g DM). As with the phenolic acids, MeJA treatment yielded the highest TFC (5.96 mg QE/g DM), followed by SA (5.17 mg QE/g DM) and ABA (4.88 mg QE/g DM). Our data demonstrated that total phenolic and flavonoid contents rose in PGR-treated plants. MeJA and SA treatments have been previously reported to increase total phenolic content in Brassica alboglabra [29] and Lactuca sativa [30]. Consistent with our results, total phenolic and flavonoid contents were increased by MeJA, SA, and ABA in Panax ginseng [31], Ocimum basilicum [25] and Lactuca sativa [19] respectively.
Table 1

Effects of MeJA, SA and ABA on assessment of total phenolic content, total flavonoid content, total anthocyanin content and β-carotene content in sweet potato root

Treatments

TPC (mg GAE /g DM)

TFC (mg QE /g DM)

TAC (mg Cy3GE/g DM)

β-carotene (mg/g DM)

Control

5.74 ± 0.35d

1.78 ± 0.02d

0.20 ± 0.01d

20.90 ± 2.11c

MeJA

9.42 ± 0.33a

5.96 ± 0.31a

0.66 ± 0.04a

56.77 ± 3.56a

SA

8.26 ± 0.31b

5.17 ± 0.22b

0.28 ± 0.03c

41.29 ± 2.88b

ABA

7.60 ± 0.27c

4.88 ± 0.02c

0.52 ± 0.02b

40.11 ± 3.15b

Data are means of triplicate measurements ± standard deviation. Means not sharing a common single letter in each column for each measurement were significantly different at P < 0.05

Significant differences between treatments were observed for TAC. MeJA-treatment resulted in the highest TAC (0.66 mg Cy3GE/g DM), followed by ABA (0.52 mg Cy3GE/g DM), then SA (0.28 mg Cy3GE/g DM) compared to levels in control plants (0.2 mg Cy3GE/g DM; Table 1). Anthocyanins are pigment-containing compounds responsible for colors such as purple, red, or black in plants; in sweet potatoes, they are noted for their stability and physiological function [32]. Consistent with this observation, anthocyanin content in MeJA-treated Arabidopsis [33] and Kalanchoe blossfeldiana [34] seedlings were greater than in control. Similarly, SA induced anthocyanin [16], flavonoids and phenolics [35] synthesis in Zingiber officinale, and total anthocyanin content in red lettuce treated with ABA was significantly higher than in controls [19]. In sweet potatoes, jasmonic-acid treatment changed the root color to red, while control roots maintained the original white color [26]. Our study is consistent with these previous outcomes, and together the data suggest jasmonate involvement in the anthocyanin metabolic pathway of sweet potato. The presence of MeJA might trigger the expression of anthocyanin-synthesis genes in non-pigmented cells, causing an increase in total pigment accumulation.

Sweet potato root treated with MeJA exhibited the highest beta-carotene content (56.77 mg/g DM) followed by SA (41.29 mg/g DM) and ABA (40.11 mg/g DM) compared to control plants (20.90 mg/g DM); the differences were all significant compared with control. Barickman et al. [36] reported that higher ABA concentrations caused significant increases in β-carotene, lutein, and neoxanthin in tomato leaf tissue. Plant color and variety can influence the concentrations and profiles of phenolics, as well as of anthocyanins [37] and carotenoids [7]. For example, the roots of purple sweet potato cultivars have high anthocyanin content, and these anthocyanins are also more stable than those of other plants that are purple-red in color [38].

Effect of PGR treatments on individual phenolic and flavonoid compounds

Table 2 shows the results of UHPLC analyses on phenolics and flavonoids in treated- and control-plant extracts. We identified four flavonoids and four phenolic acids from sweet potato roots. Flavonoids and phenolics synthesis were induced by PGR application on sweet potato. With the exception of luteolin, MeJA treatment resulted in the highest flavonoid and phenolic content. Specifically, quercetin content was highest under MeJA treatment (1.16 mg/g DM), followed by ABA (0.95 mg/g DM) and SA (0.83 mg/g DM) as against levels in control plants (0.32 mg/g DM). Kaempferol content was highest under MeJA treatment (0.93 mg/g DM), followed by ABA (0.82 mg/g DM) and SA (0.79 mg/g DM) as against levels in control plants (0.28 mg/g DM). Myricetin was higher in MeJA treatments (0.98 mg/g DM), followed by SA (0.86 mg/g DM) and ABA (0.77 mg/g DM); all were significantly higher than control (0.34 mg/g DM). Sweet potato treated with SA exhibited highest content of luteolin (0.84 mg/g DM) followed by MeJA (0.75 mg/g DM) and ABA (0.61 mg/g DM) compared to control plants (0.22 mg/g DM).
Table 2

Identification of flavonoids and phenolic acids compounds from sweet potato root extract treated by MeJA, SA and ABA

Compounds

Control

MeJA

SA

ABA

Quercetin

0.32 ± 0.08d

1.16 ± 0.14a

0.83 ± 0.04c

0.95 ± 0.05b

Kaempferol

0.28 ± 0.08c

0.93 ± 0.09a

0.79 ± 0.05b

0.82 ± 0.07b

Myricetin

0.34 ± 0.02d

0.98 ± 0.09a

0.86 ± 0.05b

0.77 ± 0.03c

Luteolin

0.22 ± 0.06d

0.75 ± 0.05b

0.84 ± 0.07a

0.61 ± 0.04c

Gallic acid

0.31 ± 0.07c

0.81 ± 0.08a

0.46 ± 0.07b

0.40 ± 0.06b

Chlorogenic acid

0.52 ± 0.04c

0.98 ± 0.14a

0.61 ± 0.05b

0.55 ± 0.03c

3,5-dicaffeoylquinic acid

0.38 ± 0.05d

0.75 ± 0.08a

0.59 ± 0.05b

0.49 ± 0.04c

4,5-dicaffeoylquinic acid

0.50 ± 0.02c

0.89 ± 0.10a

0.65 ± 0.06b

0.60 ± 0.08b

Data are means of triplicate measurements ± standard deviation. Means not sharing a common single letter in each row for each measurement were significantly different at P < 0.05

Sweet potato treated with MeJA exhibited the highest concentrations of gallic acid, chlorogenic acid, 3,5- dicaffeoylquinic acid, and 4,5- dicaffeoylquinic acid (0.81, 0.98, 0.75, and 0.89 mg/g DM, respectively), followed by SA (0.46, 0.61, 0.59, and 0.65 mg/g DM) and ABA (0.40, 0.55, 0.49, and 0.60 mg/g DM) treatments. These values were significantly higher than those of the control. Quercetin and chlorogenic acid were identified as abundant flavonoid and phenolic compound respectively in sweet potato.

Oki et al. [39] identified the following phenolic compounds in sweet potatoes: chlorogenic acid, isochlorogenic acid, cinnamic acid, anthocyanins, cyanidin, and peonidin aglycones Polyphenols are bioactive molecules universally distributed in different plant species that play important roles in plant responses to biotic and abiotic stresses and can be induced by environmental stresses and elicitors [40]. Several phenylpropanoid derivatives play a role in plant defense against biotic and abiotic stresses [41].

SA treatment enhances rutin accumulation in India buckwheat (Fagopyrum tartaricum) [42] and MeJA treatment induces myricetin, quercetin, and kaempferol in red raspberries (Rubus idaeus L.) [43] and kale (Brassica oleracea L.) leaves [44]. Consistent with our current study, chlorogenic acid was lower in MeJA-treated lettuce than in the control [30]. Notably, PGRs appeared to exert a stronger effect on flavonoid synthesis than on phenol synthesis. Figure 1 show full chromatogram of UHPLC analysis of sweet potato root extracts (treated with MeJA).
Fig. 1

Full chromatogram of UHPLC analysis of sweet potato root extract (treated with MeJA) showing peak corresponding to gallic acid (1), chlorogenic acid (2), myricetin (3), luteolin (4), kaempferol (5), quercetin (6), 3,5-dicaffeoylquinic acid (7) and 4,5-dicaffeoylquinic acid (8)

Effect of PGR treatments on PAL activity

PAL plays a crucial role at the interface between plant primary and secondary metabolism by catalysing the deamination of l-phenylalanine to form trans-cinnamic acid, the first step in the general phenylpropanoid way. Thousands of secondary metabolic products in plants such as flavonoids, anthocyanins, lignins, and phytoalexins are derived from phenylpropanoid [23]. Treatment with PGRs significantly influenced PAL activity in sweet potato (P < 0.05), (Fig. 2). PAL activity was highest in plants treated with MeJA (87.0 pkat/mg protein), followed by that in plants treated with SA (64.0 pkat/mg protein) and ABA (49.0 pkat/mg protein) and that in control plants (27.0 pkat/mg protein). Hung and Kao [45] reported that ABA increases the activity of PAL, a key regulatory enzyme of anthocyanin biosynthesis, and thereby promotes senescence of rice leaves. Moreover, gibberellic acid enhanced PAL activity in young plants of Fragaria ananassa ‘Chandler’ [46]. Here, PGR application greatly induced PAL activity and thus enhanced the production of phenolic acids, flavonoids, and anthocyanins. When PAL activity was low (in control plants), flavonoid content was also low and vice versa. Thus, our data suggest that under normal conditions, post-PAL intermediates are unavailable for use in flavonoid synthesis, and high PAL activity is required for flavonoid accumulation. This conclusion is consistent with the commonly held view that PAL is the main limiting factor in the biosynthesis of flavonoids, cinnamic acids, and other phenylpropanoids [22, 24]. Because the enzyme is likely key in channeling phenylalanine to phenolic synthesis, and hence to flavonoid synthesis.
Fig. 2

Effects of MeJA, SA and ABA on PAL activity in sweet potato root extracts

Effect of PGR treatments on antioxidant activity

The antioxidant capacity of treated and control plants were determined using a DPPH free-radical scavenging assay and a β-carotene bleaching assay. The former assay measures the hydrogen-donating ability of antioxidants, and activity is calculated as the relative decrease in DPPH absorbance as it reacts with the antioxidant [47]. As can be seen from the Fig. 3, DPPH radical scavenging activity of sweet potato was increased significantly (P < 0.05) as sample concentration increased. Furthermore, treatment with PGRs influenced free-radical scavenging activity—the highest scavenging activity was observed in plants treated with MeJA, followed by plants treated with SA and ABA, and was lowest in the control plants (Fig. 3). At a sample concentration of 5 mg/mL, MeJA-treated plants exhibited the highest DPPH activity (88.21 %), followed by SA (84.11 %), ABA (75.32 %), and control plants (67.84 %). The half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) values across the four conditions were, respectively, 2.40, 3.0, 3.40, and 4.20 mg/mL, as compared with that of α-tocopherol (98.12 %; 1.1 mg/mL)., Table 3). Our results are comparable to the range of IC50 values (0.49–5.23 mg/mL) obtained by Huang et al. [48], using the same method on various sweet potato genotypes. The IC50 for all PGR treatments were significantly different (P < 0.05) in terms of radical scavenging activity. Lower IC50 values represent stronger free radical inhibition—strong free-radical inhibitors are active at low concentrations.
Fig. 3

Effects of MeJA, SA and ABA on antioxidant activity of sweet potato root using DPPH assay

Table 3

IC50 value (mg/mL) of antioxidant activity of sweet potato extract

 

DPPH asssay

β-carotene bleaching assay

Control

4.2 ± 0.11a

4.5 ± 0.25a

MeJA

2.4 ± 0.20d

2.9 ± 0.15d

SA

3.0 ± 0.27c

3.3 ± 0.21c

ABA

3.4 ± 0.25b

3.7 ± 0.22b

α-tocopherol

1.1 ± 0.18e

1.3 ± 0.12e

Data are means of triplicate measurements ± standard deviation. Means not sharing a common single letter in each column for each measurement were significantly different at P < 0.05

Several studies have reported on the antioxidant activity of sweet potato extracts [3, 48, 49], which is mainly ascribed to the concentration of phenolic and flavonoid compounds in the plants [50, 51]. In this study, the antioxidant activity of sweet potato extracts treated with different PGRs was evaluated using the β-carotene-linoleate bleaching method because β-carotene was detected from extracts. Moreover, based on previous studies, β-carotene shows strong biological activity and constitutes a physiologically important compound [52, 53]. Antioxidant activity is measured through the loss of the yellow color from β-carotene as it reacts with radicals formed from linoleic acid oxidation in emulsion. The antioxidant activity of sweet potato increased significantly (P < 0.05) as sample concentration increased (Fig. 4). Furthermore, treatment with PGRs significantly influenced free-radical scavenging activity; all extracts had lower antioxidant activities than α-tocopherol. MeJA-treated plants showed the highest β-carotene blenching activity (with an IC50 value of 2.90 mg/mL), followed by SA (3.30 mg/mL) and ABA (3.70 mg/mL) as against that of the control plants (4.5 mg/mL), (Table 3). In summary, antioxidant activity was high in the PGR-treated plants, corroborating previous research demonstrating that MeJA and SA treatment significantly increased antioxidant activity in Brassica alboglabra [29]. Agarwal et al. [54] determined that the exogenous effect of SA and ABA increased the activity of the antioxidant enzymes of wheat genotypes. Finally, results from our previous studies have revealed that foliar application of SA enhanced antioxidant activity in ginger varieties via inducing antioxidant enzymes activities [55] and phytochemical production [16, 17].
Fig. 4

Effects of MeJA, SA and ABA on antioxidant activity of sweet potato root using β-carotene bleaching assay

Anticancer activity

Root extracts of sweet potato (0.25-4 mg/mL) were tested for anticancer activity against the breast cancer cell lines MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 (Figs. 5 and 6). Significant differences (P < 0.05) between the IC50 values of sweet potato extracts treated with different PGRs were observed. Extracts of sweet potato treated with MeJA exhibited more potent anticancer activity against MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 cell lines with IC50 value of 0.66 and 0.62 mg/mL, respectively followed by SA (0.78 and 0.90 mg/mL) and ABA (0.94 and 1.40 mg/mL) treated plants (Table 4). The IC50 values of all extracts were higher than that of Tamoxifen (MDA-MB-231 = 0.038 mg/mL; MCF-7 = 0.038 mg/mL), an anticancer drug. Extracts treated with PGRs at concentrations of 0.25–4 mg/mL were not toxic to a normal cell line, which exhibited a viability range of 83–92 % (Fig. 7). In an herbal supplement, one ingredient may provide the desired therapeutic benefits while others may have toxic effects for humans. For example, many Malaysian herbs and spices may also contain toxic components that have been poorly investigated. In this study, we evaluated sweet-potato-root extracts and found that they were nontoxic for normal (MCF-10A) cells. The ~80–90 % cell viability falls well above the range recommended by the American National Cancer Institute, which considers crude herbal extracts that do not decrease the viability of normal cells below 76 % as safe for human consumption [56]. Additionally, our findings in this study are in accordance with research by Sugata et al. [57] who showed that extracts of purple-fleshed sweet potatoes inhibited 50 % of the MCF-7 cancer cell line at concentrations of 3.4–5.9 mg/mL.
Fig. 5

Anticancer activity of sweet potato root extracts treated with MeJA, SA and ABA against MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cell

Fig. 6

Anticancer activity of sweet potato root extracts treated with MeJA, SA and ABA against MCF-7 breast cancer cell

Table 4

IC50 value (mg/mL) of anticancer activity of sweet potato extract

 

MDA-MB-231

MCF-7

Control

3.40 ± 0.314a

2.68 ± 0.221a

MeJA

0.66 ± 0.095d

0.62 ± 0.150d

SA

0.78 ± 0.103c

0.90 ± 0.131c

ABA

0.94 ± 0.161b

1.40 ± 0.264b

Tamoxifen

0.038 ± 0.007e

0.037 ± 0.004e

Data are means of triplicate measurements ± standard deviation. Means not sharing a common single letter in each column for each measurement were significantly different at P < 0.05

Fig. 7

Toxicity effect of sweet potato root extracts treated with MeJA, SA and ABA

Previous reports have suggested that sweet potato extracts exert significant antiproliferative and antimetastatic effects on human colorectal cancer cell lines, both in vitro and in vivo [58]. Moreover, the constituent polyphenolics of sweet potato greens have displayed antimutagenic, antidiabetic, antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, and anticancer activity [4]. We now know that the anticancer properties of herbs and spices are directly related to their phytochemical content [59]. As we have described, sweet potato roots with the highest concentrations of secondary metabolites (e.g., anthocyanin, β-carotene, phenolics, and flavonoids) exhibited the most potent antioxidant and anticancer activity, strongly suggesting that the potent antioxidant and anticancer activity observed in MeJA-treated sweet potatoes can be attributed to the phytohormone inducing high phytochemical content. Although more research is needed to better understand the association between sweet-potato phytochemicals and anticancer activity, this study corroborates the findings of a great deal of the previous work on this topic.

Correlation analysis

It is important to examine correlation between phytochemical content and biological activity of crops and herbs in order to introduce corresponding compound for biological activity in each plants. Knowing of this could help researcher to establish suitable condition or to use suitable techniques in order to enhance this highlighted compounds. In current study, correlation coefficient analyses showed a significant relationship between phytochemical content and breast cancers proliferation. A negative and significant correlation coefficient was also found between breast cancers proliferation and activities of antioxidants ranging from R2 = −0.7947 to −0.9100 (Table 5). Significant correlation between antioxidant activity and breast cancer cell line (MCF-7) proliferation of the five herbal extracts was reported previously [60]. Between identified phytochemicals, TAC and TFC showed a strong negative correlation with MCF-7 (R2 TAC = −0.9226; R2 TFC = −0.9128) and MDA-MB-231 (R2 TAC = −0.9371; R2 TFC = −0.9233) cancer proliferation. In current study, correlation between identified phytochemicals and MCF-7 cancer proliferation decreased in the following order: TAC > myrecitin > TFC > kaempferol > TPC > gallic acid > quercetin > 4,5-dicaffeoylquinic acid > chlorogenic acid > luteolin > 3,5-dicaffeoylquinic acid. Also, correlation between identified phytochemicals and MDA-MB-231 cancer proliferation decreased in the following order: TAC > TFC > gallic acid > kaempferol > TPC > quercetin > 4,5-dicaffeoylquinic acid > chlorogenic acid > myrecitin >3,5-dicaffeoylquinic acid > luteolin.
Table 5

Correlations (R2) among human breast cancer cell proliferation, and identified phytochemicals from root extracts of sweet potato

 

MCF-7

MDA-MB-231

TFC

−0.9128**

−0.9233**

TPC

−0.8872**

−0.9024**

quercetin

−0.8563**

−0.8931**

kaempferol

−0.8927**

−0.9077**

myrecitin

−0.9162**

−0.8255**

luteolin

−0.7311*

−0.7174*

gallic acid

−0.8841**

−0.9129**

chlorogenic acid

−0.7499*

−0.8335**

4,5-dicaffeoylquinic acid

−0.7626*

−0.8825**

3,5-dicaffeoylquinic acid

−0.7129*

−0.8104**

TAC

−0.9226**

−0.9371**

β-carotene

−0.8744**

−0.8969**

DPPH

−0.9100**

−0.7947**

β-carotene blenching assay

−0.8864**

−0.8812**

* and ** are significant at P < 0.05 and 0.01 respectively

Several studies reported a significant correlation between the pharmaceutical activity (antioxidant and anticancer activities) of herbs and the phytochemical content [27, 59, 61]. Based on correlation analysis it seems that anthocyanins and flavonoids are corresponding compounds in sweet potato root extracts for anticancer activity against breast cancer cell lines.

Conclusion

This study clearly demonstrated that the sweet potato is a suitable source of natural bioactive compounds, possessing antioxidant and anticancer activity that could be attractive to the food or pharmaceutical industries. We evaluated whether PGR treatments (MeJA, ABA, and SA) could enhance the content of health-promoting phytochemicals in sweet potato root. We found that compared with the other two PGR treatments, MeJA-treated plants possessed higher concentrations of total phenolics, flavonoids, anthocyanins, and β-carotene, as well as higher amounts of individual phenolics and flavonoids. The antioxidant activity of sweet potato root extracts improved significantly over that of untreated plants with foliar application of MeJA, with less improvement seen following treatment with SA and ABA. Furthermore, the data presented here on the composition of bioactive compounds and related antioxidant activity should prove useful in standardizing sweet potato extracts for pharmaceutical applications. Additionally, a major finding to emerge from this study is that the sweet-potato-root extracts exhibited a promising anticancer activity against the MDA-MB-231 and MCF-7 breast-cancer cell lines. The extracts contained substantial amounts of flavonoid compounds, such as myricetin, quercetin, and anthocyanin, all of which potently inhibited the growth of breast cancer cells. Subsequently, our MTT assay indicated that MeJA-treated sweet potatoes are a potential source of anticarcinogenic compounds. In closing, we observed strong potential for the enhanced production of health-promoting phytochemicals using PGRs such as MeJA, which has important implications for improving the health benefits of sweet potato-based functional food.

Abbreviations

ABA: 

abscisic acid

DMSO: 

dimethyl sulfoxide

DPPH: 

1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl

FBS: 

fetal bovine serum

IC50

half-maximal inhibitory concentration

MeJa: 

methyl jasmonate

MTT: 

(3-(4,5-Dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide)

PAL: 

phenylalanine ammonia-lyase

SA: 

salicylic acid

TAC: 

total anthocyanin content

TCC: 

total β-carotene content

TFC: 

total flavonoid content

TPC: 

total phenolic content

UHPLC: 

ultra-high performance liquid chromatography

Declarations

Acknowledgement

The authors are grateful to the seed and plant certification institute, Tehran, Iran. We would also like to thank all staff of laboratory of nutrition, department of nutrition and dietetics, faculty of medicine and health sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia for all the helps and guidance in order to accomplish this project.

Availability of data and materials

We have presented all our main data in the form of tables and figures. The datasets supporting the conclusions of this article are included within the article.

Authors’ contributions

Study design and experimental work was by AG and HJ. DT performed plantation and sampling. MH was participated in statistical analysis. The first draft of the paper was written by AG and reviewed by all authors. All authors reviewed and approved the final version.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Crop Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Universiti Putra Malaysia
(2)
Medicinal Plants Research Center, Shahed University

References

  1. Bovell‐Benjamin AC. Sweet potato: a review of its past, present, and future role in human nutrition. Adv Food Nutr Res. 2007;52:1–59.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Cho J, Kang JS, Long PH, Jing J, Back Y, Chung K-S. Antioxidant and memory enhancing effects of purple sweet potato anthocyanin and cordyceps mushroom extract. Arch Pharm Res. 2003;26(10):821–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Teow CC, Truong V-D, McFeeters RF, Thompson RL, Pecota KV, Yencho GC. Antioxidant activities, phenolic and β-carotene contents of sweet potato genotypes with varying flesh colours. Food Chem. 2007;103(3):829–38.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Karna P, Gundala SR, Gupta MV, Shamsi SA, Pace RD, Yates C, Narayan S, Aneja R. Polyphenol-rich sweet potato greens extract inhibits proliferation and induces apoptosis in prostate cancer cells in vitro and in vivo. Carcinogenesis. 2011;32(12):1872-80. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/carcin/bgr215.
  5. Kusano S, Abe H. Antidiabetic activity of white skinned sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas L.) in obese Zucker fatty rats. Biol Pharm Bull. 2000;23(1):23–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Zhang Z-F, Fan S-H, Zheng Y-L, Lu J, Wu D-M, Shan Q, Hu B. Purple sweet potato color attenuates oxidative stress and inflammatory response induced by D-galactose in mouse liver. Food Chem Toxicol. 2009;47(2):496–501.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Van den Berg H, Faulks R, Granado HF, Hirschberg J, Olmedilla B, Sandmann G, Southon S, Stahl W. The potential for the improvement of carotenoid levels in foods and the likely systemic effects. J Sci Food Agric. 2000;80(7):880–912.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  8. Truong VD, McFeeters R, Thompson R, Dean L, Shofran B. Phenolic acid content and composition in leaves and roots of common commercial sweet potato (Ipomea batatas L.) cultivars in the United States. J Food Sci. 2007;72(6):C343–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Padda MS, Picha DH. Quantification of phenolic acids and antioxidant activity in sweet potato genotypes. Sci Hortic. 2008;119(1):17–20.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Ren W, Qiao Z, Wang H, Zhu L, Zhang L. Flavonoids: promising anticancer agents. Med Res Rev. 2003;23(4):519–34.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Ghasemzadeh A, Ghasemzadeh N. Flavonoids and phenolic acids: Role and biochemical activity in plants and human. J Med Plants Res. 2011;5(31):6697–703.Google Scholar
  12. Gomes CA, Girão da Cruz T, Andrade JL, Milhazes N, Borges F, Marques MPM. Anticancer activity of phenolic acids of natural or synthetic origin: a structure-activity study. J Med Chem. 2003;46(25):5395–401.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Bari R, Jones JD. Role of plant hormones in plant defence responses. Plant Mol Biol. 2009;69(4):473–88.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Fujita M, Fujita Y, Noutoshi Y, Takahashi F, Narusaka Y, Yamaguchi-Shinozaki K, Shinozaki K. Crosstalk between abiotic and biotic stress responses: a current view from the points of convergence in the stress signaling networks. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2006;9(4):436–42.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Horváth E, Szalai G, Janda T. Induction of abiotic stress tolerance by salicylic acid signaling. J Plant Growth Regul. 2007;26(3):290–300.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Ghasemzadeh A, Jaafar HZ. Effect of salicylic acid application on biochemical changes in ginger (Zingiber officinale Roscoe). J Med Plants Res. 2012;6(5):790–5.Google Scholar
  17. Ghasemzadeh A, Jaafar HZ, Karimi E. Involvement of salicylic acid on antioxidant and anticancer properties, anthocyanin production and chalcone synthase activity in ginger (Zingiber officinale Roscoe) varieties. Int J Mol Sci. 2012;13(11):14828–44.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Zhang W, Curtin C, Kikuchi M, Franco C. Integration of jasmonic acid and light irradiation for enhancement of anthocyanin biosynthesis in Vitis vinifera suspension cultures. Plant Sci. 2002;162(3):459–68.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  19. Li Z, Zhao X, Sandhu AK, Gu L. Effects of exogenous abscisic acid on yield, antioxidant capacities, and phytochemical contents of greenhouse grown lettuces. J Agric Food Chem. 2010;58(10):6503–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. MacDonald MJ, D’Cunha GB. A modern view of phenylalanine ammonia lyase. Biochem Cell Biol. 2007;85(3):273–82.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Koes RE, Quattrocchio F, Mol JN. The flavonoid biosynthetic pathway in plants: function and evolution. BioEssays. 1994;16(2):123–32.Google Scholar
  22. Lister CE, Lancaster JE, Walker JR. Phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL) activity and its relationship to anthocyanin and flavonoid levels in New Zealand-grown apple cultivars. J Am Soc Horticult Sci. 1996;121(2):281–5.Google Scholar
  23. Aydas SB, Ozturk S, Aslim B. Phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL) enzyme activity and antioxidant properties of some cyanobacteria isolates. Food Chem. 2013;136(1):164–9.Google Scholar
  24. Jiang Y, Joyce DC. ABA effects on ethylene production, PAL activity, anthocyanin and phenolic contents of strawberry fruit. Plant Growth Regul. 2003;39(2):171–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Koca N, Karaman Ş. The effects of plant growth regulators and l-phenylalanine on phenolic compounds of sweet basil. Food Chem. 2015;166:515–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Nakatani M, Koda Y. Identification of jasmonic acid and its effects on root development in sweet potato, Low-input Sustainable Crop Production Systems in Asia, KSCS, Korea. 1993. p. 523–31.Google Scholar
  27. Wojdyło A, Oszmiański J, Czemerys R. Antioxidant activity and phenolic compounds in 32 selected herbs. Food Chem. 2007;105(3):940–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Cheng GW, Breen PJ. Activity of phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL) and concentrations of anthocyanins and phenolics in developing strawberry fruit. J Am Soc Horticult Sci. 1991;116(5):865–9.Google Scholar
  29. Sun B, Yan H, Zhang F, Wang Q. Effects of plant hormones on main health-promoting compounds and antioxidant capacity of Chinese kale. Food Res Int. 2012;48(2):359–66.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  30. Kim H-J, Fonseca JM, Choi J-H, Kubota C. Effect of methyl jasmonate on phenolic compounds and carotenoids of romaine lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.). J Agric Food Chem. 2007;55(25):10366–72.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Ali MB, Hahn E-J, Paek K-Y. Methyl jasmonate and salicylic acid induced oxidative stress and accumulation of phenolics in Panax ginseng bioreactor root suspension cultures. Molecules. 2007;12(3):607–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Kano M, Takayanagi T, Harada K, Makino K, Ishikawa F. Antioxidative activity of anthocyanins from purple sweet potato, Ipomoera batatas cultivar Ayamurasaki. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2005;69(5):979–88.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Shan X, Zhang Y, Peng W, Wang Z, Xie D. Molecular mechanism for jasmonate-induction of anthocyanin accumulation in Arabidopsis. J Exp Bot. 2009;60(13):3849–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Saniewski M, Horbowicz M, Puchalski J, Ueda J. Methyl jasmonate stimulates the formation and the accumulation of anthocyanin in Kalanchoe blossfeldiana. Acta Physiol Plant. 2003;25(2):143–9.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Ghasemzadeh A, Jaafar HZ, Karimi E, Ibrahim MH. Combined effect of CO2 enrichment and foliar application of salicylic acid on the production and antioxidant activities of anthocyanin, flavonoids and isoflavonoids from ginger. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2012;12(1):1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Barickman TC, Kopsell DA, Sams CE. Abscisic acid increases carotenoid and chlorophyll concentrations in leaves and fruit of two tomato genotypes. J Am Soc Horticult Sci. 2014;139(3):261–6.Google Scholar
  37. Steed L, Truong VD. Anthocyanin content, antioxidant activity, and selected physical properties of flowable purple‐fleshed sweet potato purees. J Food Sci. 2008;73(5):S215–21.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Cevallos-Casals BA, Cisneros-Zevallos L. Stability of anthocyanin-based aqueous extracts of Andean purple corn and red-fleshed sweet potato compared to synthetic and natural colorants. Food Chem. 2004;86(1):69–77.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  39. Oki T, Masuda M, Furuta S, Nishiba Y, Terahara N, Suda I. Involvement of anthocyanins and other phenolic compounds in radical scavenging activity of purple fleshed sweet potato cultivars. J Food Sci. 2002;67(5):1752–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Bahorun T, Luximon‐Ramma A, Crozier A, Aruoma OI. Total phenol, flavonoid, proanthocyanidin and vitamin C levels and antioxidant activities of Mauritian vegetables. J Sci Food Agric. 2004;84(12):1553–61.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  41. Dixon RA, Paiva NL. Stress-induced phenylpropanoid metabolism. Plant Cell. 1995;7(7):1085.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Sun Z, Hou S, Yang W, Han Y. Exogenous application of salicylic acid enhanced the rutin accumulation and influenced the expression patterns of rutin biosynthesis related genes in Fagopyrum tartaricum Gaertn leaves. Plant Growth Regul. 2012;68(1):9–15.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. de la Peña Moreno F, Blanch GP, del Castillo ML R. (+)-Methyl jasmonate-induced bioformation of myricetin, quercetin and kaempferol in red raspberries. J Agric Food Chem. 2010;58(22):11639–44.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Ku KM, Juvik JA. Environmental stress and methyl jasmonate-mediated changes in flavonoid concentrations and antioxidant activity in broccoli florets and kale leaf tissues. Hortscience. 2013;48(8):996–1002.Google Scholar
  45. Hung KT, Kao CH. Hydrogen peroxide is necessary for abscisic acid-induced senescence of rice leaves. J Plant Physiol. 2004;161(12):1347–57.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Montero T, Mollá E, Mart Cabrejas MA, Là pez Andru FJ. Effects of gibberellic acid (GA3) on strawberry PAL (phenylalanine ammonia-lyase) and TAL (tyrosine ammonia-lyase) enzyme activities. J Sci Food Agric. 1998;77(2):230–4.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  47. Huang D-J, Chun-Der L, Hsien-Jung C, Yaw-Huei L. Antioxidant and antiproliferative activities of sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas [L.] LamTainong 57’) constituents. Bot Bull Acad Sin. 2004;45:179-86.Google Scholar
  48. Huang Y-C, Chang Y-H, Shao Y-Y. Effects of genotype and treatment on the antioxidant activity of sweet potato in Taiwan. Food Chem. 2006;98(3):529–38.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Rumbaoa RGO, Cornago DF, Geronimo IM. Phenolic content and antioxidant capacity of Philippine sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas) varieties. Food Chem. 2009;113(4):1133–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  50. Ghasemzadeh A, Jaafar HZ, Rahmat A, Ashkani S. Secondary metabolites constituents and antioxidant, anticancer and antibacterial activities of Etlingera elatior (Jack) RM Sm grown in different locations of Malaysia. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2015;15(1):335Google Scholar
  51. Ghasemzadeh A, Jaafar HZ. Profiling of phenolic compounds and their antioxidant and anticancer activities in pandan (Pandanus amaryllifolius Roxb.) extracts from different locations of Malaysia. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2013;13(1):341.Google Scholar
  52. Kumazawa S, Taniguchi M, Suzuki Y, Shimura M, Kwon M-S, Nakayama T. Antioxidant activity of polyphenols in carob pods. J Agric Food Chem. 2002;50(2):373–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Sakanaka S, Tachibana Y, Okada Y. Preparation and antioxidant properties of extracts of Japanese persimmon leaf tea (kakinoha-cha). Food Chem. 2005;89(4):569–75.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  54. Agarwal S, Sairam R, Srivastava G, Meena R. Changes in antioxidant enzymes activity and oxidative stress by abscisic acid and salicylic acid in wheat genotypes. Biol Plant. 2005;49(4):541–50.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  55. Ghasemzadeh A, Jaafar HZ. Interactive effect of salicylic acid on some physiological features and antioxidant enzymes activity in ginger (Zingiber officinale Roscoe). Molecules. 2013;18(5):5965–79.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Itharat A, Houghton PJ, Eno-Amooquaye E, Burke P, Sampson JH, Raman A. In vitro cytotoxic activity of Thai medicinal plants used traditionally to treat cancer. J Ethnopharmacol. 2004;90(1):33–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Sugata M, Lin C-Y, Shih Y-C. Anti-Inflammatory and Anticancer Activities of Taiwanese Purple-Fleshed Sweet Potatoes (Ipomoea batatas L. Lam) Extracts. BioMed Res Int. 2015;2015:10. http://www.hindawi.com/journals/bmri/2015/768093/abs/.
  58. Li P-G, Mu T-H, Deng L. Anticancer effects of sweet potato protein on human colorectal cancer cells. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19(21):3300.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  59. Nile SH, Park SW. Edible berries: Bioactive components and their effect on human health. Nutrition. 2014;30(2):134–44.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Li W-Y, Chan S-W, Guo D-J, Yu PH-F. Correlation between antioxidative power and anticancer activity in herbs from traditional Chinese medicine formulae with anticancer therapeutic effect. Pharm Biol. 2007;45(7):541–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  61. Heim KE, Tagliaferro AR, Bobilya DJ. Flavonoid antioxidants: chemistry, metabolism and structure-activity relationships. J Nutr Biochem. 2002;13(10):572–84.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Ghasemzadeh et al. 2016

Advertisement