Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Making sense of “alternative”, “complementary”, “unconventional” and “integrative” medicine: exploring the terms and meanings through a textual analysis

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
18 Jul 2015 Submitted Original manuscript
26 Sep 2015 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Chi-Wai Lui
8 Dec 2015 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Byeongsang Oh
10 Dec 2015 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kalyani Premkumar
18 Feb 2016 Author responded Author comments - Jeremy Y Ng
Resubmission - Version 2
18 Feb 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 2
27 Feb 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Chi-Wai Lui
29 Feb 2016 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Byeongsang Oh
20 Mar 2016 Author responded Author comments
Resubmission - Version 3
20 Mar 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 3
12 Apr 2016 Author responded Author comments - Jeremy Y Ng
Resubmission - Version 4
12 Apr 2016 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
13 May 2016 Editorially accepted
20 May 2016 Article published 10.1186/s12906-016-1111-3

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement