This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Making sense of “alternative”, “complementary”, “unconventional” and “integrative” medicine: exploring the terms and meanings through a textual analysis
© Ng et al. 2016
Received: 18 July 2015
Accepted: 13 May 2016
Published: 20 May 2016
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|18 Jul 2015||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|26 Sep 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Chi-Wai Lui|
|8 Dec 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Byeongsang Oh|
|10 Dec 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Kalyani Premkumar|
|18 Feb 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Jeremy Y Ng|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|18 Feb 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|27 Feb 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Chi-Wai Lui|
|29 Feb 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Byeongsang Oh|
|20 Mar 2016||Author responded||Author comments|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|20 Mar 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|12 Apr 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Jeremy Y Ng|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|12 Apr 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|13 May 2016||Editorially accepted|
|20 May 2016||Article published||10.1186/s12906-016-1111-3|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.