This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
A cross-sectional internet-based patient survey of the management strategies for gout
© Singh et al. 2016
Received: 3 September 2015
Accepted: 23 February 2016
Published: 1 March 2016
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|3 Sep 2015||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|21 Sep 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Yan Zhang|
|8 Oct 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Amie Steel|
|23 Oct 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jane Frawley|
|17 Nov 2015||Author responded||Author comments - Jasvinder singh|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|17 Nov 2015||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|6 Dec 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jane Frawley|
|26 Dec 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Amie Steel|
|4 Jan 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Jasvinder singh|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|4 Jan 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|2 Feb 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Jasvinder singh|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|2 Feb 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|23 Feb 2016||Editorially accepted|
|1 Mar 2016||Article published||10.1186/s12906-016-1067-3|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.