This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Reasons for continuing use of Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) in students: a consumer commitment model
© Sirois et al. 2016
Received: 22 October 2015
Accepted: 16 February 2016
Published: 24 February 2016
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|22 Oct 2015||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|11 Nov 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Felicity Bishop|
|23 Nov 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Lynda Balneaves|
|27 Nov 2015||Author responded||Author comments - Agnete Kristoffersen|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|27 Nov 2015||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|10 Feb 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Agnete Kristoffersen|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|10 Feb 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|16 Feb 2016||Editorially accepted|
|24 Feb 2016||Article published||10.1186/s12906-016-1059-3|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.