Skip to main content
Download PDF
  • Research article
  • Open access
  • Published:

Antidiabetic potential of two medicinal plants used in Gabonese folk medicine

BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine volume 16, Article number: 71 (2016) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Diabetes mellitus is a metabolic disorder which is rising globally in rich and developing countries. In the African region this rate is the highest, with 20 million diagnosed diabetics. Despite a noticeable progress in the treatment of diabetes mellitus by synthetic drugs, the search for new natural anti-diabetic agents is going on. Nauclea diderrichii (De Wild.) Merr. (ND) and Sarcocephalus pobeguinii Hua ex Pellegr. (SP) are used as traditional medicines in Gabon for the treatment of different diseases, especially in the case of diabetes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the antidiabetic potential of these two medicinal plants traditionally used in Gabon.

Methods

Pharmacological (inhibitory action on α and β-glucosidases) and toxicological (effect on human T cell proliferation) studies were conducted on aqueous extracts of ND (leaves and bark) and SP (bark) collected in Gabon. All raw extracts were analyzed by HPTLC and their content in phenolic compounds was determined by using standard method. The most active extracts were submitted to preparative HPLC in order to evidence the most efficient subfractions by biological evaluation.

Results

The results showed that two extracts from ND were potent α-glucosidase inhibitors, the leaf extract being more active that the bark extract: the first one was more than 60 fold more active than Acarbose, which is an oral medication used to treat type 2 diabetes; the extract from SP bark was less efficient. The HPLC subfractions of the extracts of ND leaves and SP bark were tested in the same experimental conditions. In each case, the most active subfractions still show very potent inhibitory effect on α-glucosidase (80-90 % inhibition at 0.1 mg/mL). The most efficient extract, from ND leaves, was also characterized by the highest percentage of phenolic compounds, which suggests a relationship between its inhibitory potential on α-glucosidase and its content in phenolic compounds. Conversely, only a moderate inhibitory activity of the three extracts was observed on β-glucosidase.

Conclusion

These results clearly indicated that active compounds present in N. diderrichii and S. pobeguinii leaves or/and bark were selective and highly potent inhibitors of α-glucosidase and validate their popular use for the treatment of diabetes.

Peer Review reports

Background

Diabetes mellitus is a metabolic disorder, mainly of two types (1 and 2) and characterized by chronic hyperglycemia with disturbances of carbohydrate, fat and protein metabolism resulting from defects in insulin secretion, insulin action or both [1–3]. Currently, the number of diabetics sharply increases in rich and developing countries. In 2013, the overall prevalence of diabetes in the world’s population was estimated to 8.3 % approximately [4]. In the African region, and particularly in Sub-Saharan Africa, this rate is the highest, with 20 million diagnosed diabetics [5].

Oral hypoglycemic agents, such as α-glucosidase inhibitors, exert their effects via a variety of mechanisms, which include the reduction of hepatic glucose production, the enhancement of insulin secretion by pancreatic β-cells and the improvement of insulin sensitivity. Glucosidase inhibitors have been the subject of extensive interest [6] because of their potential as drugs for the treatment of diabetes [7]. Alpha-glucosidase is a membrane-bound enzyme, at the epithelium of the small intestine; it hydrolyses the cleavage of glucose from disaccharides and oligosaccharides. The inhibitors of this enzyme delay carbohydrate hydrolysis, prolong the overall carbohydrate digestion time and thus cause a reduction in glycaemia [8]. Therefore, inhibition of α-glucosidase is considered as an important way to treat non-insulin-dependent diabetes. This hypothesis was successfully confirmed in animal and clinical studies by the administration of various α-glucosidase inhibitors [9, 10].

Despite considerable progress in the treatment of diabetes mellitus by synthetic drugs, the search for new natural anti-diabetic agents is going on. The world health organization (WHO) estimates that 80 % of the population in some developing countries, especially in Sub-Saharan Africa, still use the traditional medicine [11]. Several plants are used in folk medicine for their hypoglycemic activity and they were investigated using different experimental methods [12]. Thanks to these studies, natural glycosidase inhibitors have been discovered and tested for their activity [13, 14].

Gabon has remarkable biodiversity and rich cultural traditions of plant use. Scientific understanding of medicinal plants is however largely unexplored and pharmacological investigation of Gabonese flora only gained momentum recently. Rubiaceae are among plants of wide usage in traditional medicine in the Sub-Saharan region [15] more particularly Nauclea and Sarcocephalus species, which belong to the tribe Naucleae, subtribe Naucleinae [16]. In Gabon, the species Nauclea diderrichii and Sarcocephalus pobeguinii (syn. Nauclea pobeguinii) are used in folk medicine for the treatment of different diseases, especially in the case of diabetes associated or not to hypertension. In the Eviya area, S. pobeguinii is also used in leaf infusions as febrifuge, while bark maceration is indicated for urogenital infections [17]. The traditional use of both species is also mentioned in ethnomedicinal reports from other African countries: N. diderrichii is used in Nigeria against arthritis and malaria [18, 19] while S. pobeguinii was reported for several indications in Cameroon [20], Nigeria [21, 22], Guinea [23] and Senegal [24].

N. diderrichii is an evergreen tree that reaches a height of 30-40 m and a diameter of 0.9-1.5 m; its natural habitat is subtropical or tropical moist lowland forests; the wood of this tree, which is known as bilinga, is dense and resistant to fungi and insects [25]. S. pobeguinii is a forest tree or shrubby tree 6–30 m tall; its bark is whitish, grey or pale brown, roughly fissured, flaking in papery scales about 2 cm in diameter; its fruits are edible [26].

The chemical investigations on these two species are numerous: they concern alkaloids from N. pobeguinii [27, 28] whereas alkaloids [29–31], saponins [32, 33] and other chemical classes [34, 35] were obtained from different plant parts of N. diderrichii. A few biological studies have been conducted on these species. Water or/and ether extracts of N. diderrichii from Gabon were evaluated for their anti-malarial [36] and anti-leshmanial [37] activities. The same species collected in the West African region was screened for its antiplasmodial activity [38].

Finally, ethanol extracts from N. pobeguinii bark were also tested for their antimalarial activity [39–42].

Nevertheless, to the best of our knowledge, N.diderrichii and S. pobeguinii were not screened for their hypoglycemic activity despite their traditional use for diabetes. A literature survey shows only some studies in this field on plants belonging to the same genera, such as Sarcocephalus latifolius from the Central Region of Togo [43] and Nigeria [44] or Nauclea latifolia collected in Benin (roots and stem) [45] or in Nigeria (leaves) [46]. This led us to carry out phytochemical and biological investigations on the two species collected in Gabon: bark and leaf extracts of N. diderrichii as well as bark extract of S. pobeguinii.

Plant extracts were prepared and tested in human cells to determine their capacity to inhibit α- and β-glucosidases, to investigate their biocompatibility with cells and to provide pharmacological basis for their traditional use as anti-diabetic agent.

Methods

Plants materials

The plant selection was based on their use by local population and traditional healers. Thirty people were interviewed in 10 villages located in the Nkomo Mondah department (Province de l’Estuaire), in the Ogooué as well as in the Lakes departments (Province du Moyen Ogooué). These data were supplemented by literature information [17, 23, 47–49]. The plants were collected during the short dry season: N. diderrichii was collected in Libreville in December 2009 (department of Nkomo-Mondah) and S. pobeguinii was collected in Lambarene in January 2010 (department of Ogooue). They were identified by Y. Issembe and R. Niangadouma, botanists at the National Herbarium of the Institute of Pharmacopea and Traditional Medicine (IPHAMETRA) where voucher specimens were deposited under the following numbers: Nauclea diderrichii (De Wild.) Merr. [Wilks: 8836 (WAG), 1988; 2438 (LBV, WAG), 1991] and Sarcocephalus pobeguinii Hua ex Pellegr. [Azizet Issembé 172 (LBV, WAG), 2000; Wilks: 1035 (LBV, WAG)]. Leaves and bark of N. diderrichii as well as bark pieces of S. pobeguinii were collected and air dried in a room maintained at a controlled temperature (25 °C) using an air-conditioning unit; then, the samples were stored in a dry place until use.

Preparation of plants extracts

In the case of N. diderrichii, two parts of the plant were extracted: raw leaves and ground bark. Plant material was macerated in water (100 g of plant sample in 1 L of water at room temperature). After filtration on büchner (paper Whatman N°3, medium porosity, particle retention 6 μm, diam. 9 cm), the filtrates were lyophilized to give the samples E 14 (leaves) and E 15 (bark) with 13.9 % yield and 15.0 % yield respectively. The ground bark of S. pobeguinii was extracted by decoction. Briefly, 100 g of plant material was boiled in 1 L of water for 30 min. After filtration on paper Whatman N°3 (medium porosity, particle retention 6 μm, diam. 9 cm), the filtrate was cooled at room temperature and lyophilized to obtain 10.34 g of the extract E 10.

Phytochemical analysis by HPTLC

Phytochemical analysis of the extracts was undertaken by HPTLC method using HPTLC plate silica gel F254s (Merck) 20×10 cm and different derivatizations. All reagents and solvents were of analytic grade.

The samples were tested following the CAMAG Standard Operating Procedures (SOP): 200 mg of dry extracts were dissolved in 10 mL of ethanol:water 1:1, sonicated twice during 10 min and centrifuged. The supernatant was used for the analyses; applications volumes: 2 and/or 5 μL for samples and standard solutions with Automated TLC Sampler 4, band length 8 mm, distance from lower edge 8 mm, distance from left and right edge 20 mm, track distance min. 10 mm; development in the Automatic Developing Chamber ADC2 with chamber saturation during 20 min and with adjustment of relative humidity to 33%rH. The migration distance (from lower edge of plate) was 70 mm; different mobile phases and derivatization reagents were used: S1 (toluene : ethyl acetate 19:1), S2 (chloroform : methanol : water 35:15:2), S3 (ethyl acetate : acetic acid : formic acid : water100:11:11:27), S4 (1-butanol : acetic acid : water 7:1:2) and S5 (chloroform : methanol : water 70:30:4).

The most suitable solvent system combined with the adequate derivatization was selected for the performance: the best resolution was most often observed with mobile phases S2 and S3 for N. diderrichii and mobile phase S2 in the case of S. pobeguinii.

The HPTLC plates were dipped in the following derivatization reagents:

  • Anisaldehyde sulphuric acid reagent (AAS) (for mobile phases S1, S2 and S4) for saponins detection under white light

  • NP/PEG reagent (S3) for flavonoids detection under 366 nm

  • Dragendorff reagent (S5) for alkaloids detection under white light

  • 2,2-Diphenyl-picrylhydrazyl reagent (DPPH) for screening of antioxidant properties of substances (S3).

Observation was performed using TLC Visualizer under UV 254 and 366 nm prior to derivatization and under UV 366 nm and white light illumination (remission and transmission mode) after derivatization.

Determination of total phenolic compound content

Folin-Ciocalteu reagent F 9252 lot # BCBF 2476 was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Co (France). Total phenols content was performed by the Folin-Ciocalteu (FC) colorimetry method (FC) [50] which is based on a chemical reduction of the reagent, a mixture of tungsten and molybdenum oxides. Although not very specific for phenolics, the protocol gives a good idea of the total phenols content. Gallic acid was employed as calibration standard and results were expressed as gallic acid equivalents. Briefly, 0.5 mL of gallic acid solution (10-100 mg/L) was mixed with 0.25 mL FC reagent (1 N). After five minutes, 1.25 mL sodium carbonate (20 % w/v) was added. The mixture was shaken and left during one hour at room temperature. Absorbance A was measured at 725 nm with different concentrations (c) of gallic acid. The linear regression A = f(c) was carried out with Microsoft Excel. The same protocol was used with the plants extracts (0.2-1 g/L) to evaluate their phenols content. The results were expressed in mg of gallic acid equivalents (GAE) per g extract. All experiments were repeated three times. The results are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD).

Fractionation by HPLC

The HPLC purifications were run on a Waters 4000 preparative apparatus on a C18 Deltapak column (100 mm × 40 mm, 15 μm, 100 Å), with UV detection at 214 nm, at a flow rate of 50 mL/min of a mixture of A (water with 0.1 % TFA) and B (acetonitrile with 0.1 % TFA) in a gradient mode. E 10 was purified starting from 100 % A to 100 % B in 20 min after an isocratic run of 5 min in 100 % A. E 14 was purified in a gradient mode from 100 % A to 50 % B in 25 min. The samples were collected manually every two minutes and the fractions were lyophilized.

α-Glucosidase and β-glucosidase inhibitory assays

Acarbose, α-glucosidase from Saccharomyces cerevisiae and β-glucosidase from almond were obtained from Sigma, isofagomine was synthesized as previously reported [51]. Typical procedure for inhibition studies: α- and β-glucosidase activities were assayed with either 8 mM solution of 4-methyl umbelliferyl α-D-glucopyranoside or 4-methyl-umbelliferyl β-D-glucopyranoside (Carbosynth) in 100 mM NaHPO4 buffer, pH 6.8 at 30 °C in a 384-well microplate. 10 mM Acarbose and 1 μM isofagomine were used as reference inhibitors for α- and β-glucosidases, respectively. Fluorescence was monitored (λexcitation = 364 nm, λemission = 445 nm) over a 20 min period, in the presence of the extract/compound solutions in DMSO compared to the same volume of DMSO alone. The fluorescence increase reflected the cleavage of umbelliferyl glucopyranosides: the value 100 % was attributed to the fluorescence obtained with enzymes in the presence of DMSO alone. In incubations with extracts or compounds, remaining activity (RA, expressed as a percentage) was calculated as the ratio [fluorescence released in the presence of extracts/compounds]/[fluorescence released in the presence of DMSO alone] × 100 and shown in Figs. 2, 3, 4 and 5 for every concentration of extract/compound. Finally, the percentage inhibition was calculated from these values following the equation: 100-RA.

For the initial screening, extracts dissolved in DMSO were added at a final concentration of 1 mg/mL. Active extracts and separated fractions were diluted in DMSO and added at concentrations ranging 0.01 to 1 mg/mL in duplicate.

Cell culture and cytotoxicity assay

Human breast (MCF-7) cancer cells were purchased from ATCC (American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA). MCF-7 cells were cultured in DMEM-F12 culture medium supplemented with 10 % foetal bovine serum and gentamycin 50 μg/mL. These cells were allowed to grow in humidified atmosphere at 37 °C under 5 % CO2. For cytotoxicity analysis, MCF-7 cells were seeded into 96-well plates at 2.104 cells per well in 200 μL culture medium and allowed to grow for 24 h. Then cells were treated for 48 h with or without extracts at 0.5 and 1 mg/mL. After incubation, a MTT assay was performed to evaluate the cytotoxicity [52]. The assay detects the reduction of MTT [3-(4,5-dimethylthiazolyl)-2,5-diphenyl-tetrazolium bromide] by mitochondrial dehydrogenase to blue formazan products, which reflects the normal functioning of mitochondrial and cell viability [53]. Briefly, 0.5 mg/mL MTT reagent (20 μL) was added to each well and incubated for additional 4 h. Then, the medium was removed and 150 μL of EtOH/DMSO (1:1) was added to MTT precipitates in each well to solubilize the formazan crystals. The plates were read for optical density at 540 nm, using microplates reader (Multiskan).

Results and discussion

Ethnobotanical survey

Of all the collected information, it appears firstly that populations refer to the experiences of others to use medicinal plants as a remedy against well-defined diseases in accordance with a transmission of traditional practices from one generation to another, or refer to traditional healers. Usually, the dose remains uncertain. In addition, the traditional healers do not generally identify stricto sensu the diabetic or hypertensive pathology, but they treat the characteristic symptoms associated with them. Among all the data, S. pobeguinii and N. diderrichii were the most cited for the various therapeutic applications mentioned above, and ethnobotanical survey reported the use of macerate or decoction of bark of both species to cure diabetes as well as hypertension. Finally, these species were harvested in their natural habitat.

Chemical screening

The phenols content of the three extracts obtained from the equation A = 19.392c − 0.0153 (in which A represents the absorbance and c the gallic acid concentration, in g/L) were expressed as gallic acid equivalent (GAE) by gram of extract as follows:

  • E 10 = 84.5 mg ± 1.5 GAE/g extract

  • E 14 = 148 mg ± 3 GAE/g extract

  • E 15 = 75.2 mg ± 2.6 GAE/g extract

Extract 14, obtained from N. diderrichii leaves, is characterized by the highest percentage of phenolic components while both extracts from bark of N. diderrichii (E 15) and S. pobeguinii (E 10) contained lower amounts of compounds belonging to this chemical class. These results are corroborated by the HPTLC analysis using DPPH reagent which shows some nice defined white zones for the three extracts, mainly in the case of E14, indicating a high radical scavenging effect, mainly located in the polar fraction (see Additional file 1).

The other HPTLC experiments using different derivatization reagents (HPTLC plates not shown) revealed the presence of flavonoids, alkaloids and saponosids in the extracts (Table 1). These results confirm the literature data which report the presence of alkaloids, flavonoids, steroids and glycosides [27, 28] in S. pobeguinii. The isolation of alkaloids and saponins (quinovic acid glycosides) from N. diderrichii has also been reported [29–34].

Table 1 Phytochemical test results by HPTLC of S. pobeguinii and N. diderrichii extracts
Full size table

Cytotoxicity evaluation

Finally, in order to verify the safety of these extracts, cytotoxicity experiments were performed on human MCF-7 cell line. Cells were incubated 48 h with the extracts 10, 14 and 15 previously dissolved in phosphate buffer, at final concentrations of 0.5 and 1 mg/mL. Cell viability results are represented in Fig. 1. Compared to the control incubated with phosphate buffer alone, there is no decrease in the number of living cells after treatment with E 10, E 14 and E 15. Data show that, in the conditions used in this study, no cytotoxicity was observed on human cells treated with the extracts 10, 14 and 15. However, this is only preliminary experiments performed to verify the absence of intrinsic toxicity of the products studied. Data need to be reproduced on pancreatic cells.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Cytotoxicity of extracts 10, 14 and 15 on the human cell line MCF-7. Cells were incubated or not (Control) with 0.5 or 1 mg/mL of each extract for 48 h. Cell viability was quantified by MTT assay. Data are mean ± SD of 2 independent experiments

Full size image

Preliminary screening of raw extracts on α-glucosidase activity

The two extracts from N. diderrichii (E 14 and E 15) and the one from S. pobeguinii (E 10) were tested for their capacity to inhibit α-glucosidase. The extracts from N. diderricchii were very potent α-glucosidase inhibitors and totally impede the enzymatic activity at 1 mg/mL concentration (Fig. 2a). Both still retained a high activity at 0.1 mg/mL (Fig. 2b), the leaf extract (E 14) being more active than the bark extract (E 15). Tested in the same conditions, extract 10 isolated from S. pobeguinii was less active (45 and 0 % inhibition at 1 and 0.1 mg/mL). Finally, the inhibiting capacity of the most active samples (E14 and E 15) was severely reduced at 0.01 mg/mL (see Additional file 2).

Fig. 2
figure 2

Inhibition of α-glucosidase by extracts 10, 14 and 15. α-Glucosidase was incubated with extracts at a concentration of 1 (panel a) and 0.1 mg/mL (panel b). Remaining activities in the presence of extracts are expressed as a percentage of enzyme activity incubated in DMSO alone and are the mean ± SE of three separate determinations. 10 mM Acarbose was used as specific inhibitor of α-glucosidase

Full size image

Nevertheless, it is noteworthy that the extracts from N. diderrichii (E 14 and E 15) displayed a higher inhibitory potency than the reference compound acarbose, which is an oral medication used to treat type 2 diabetes. Indeed, E14, which induced 100 % inhibition at 0.1 mg/mL, was more than 60 fold more active than Acarbose (63 % inhibition at 10 mM final concentration = 6.45 mg/mL).

The high activity observed for the extract obtained from of N. diderrichii leaves (E 14), which is the richest in phenolic components, suggests a direct relationship between its inhibitory potential of α-glucosidase and its content in phenolic compounds.

Selective inhibition by raw extracts

We further evaluated the inhibitory potential of raw extracts on the β-hydrolysis of glucopyranosides to ascertain the stereospecificity of the active compounds. Evaluation of inhibitory efficiency of the three extracts on β-glucosidase indicated a moderate activity of E 14 and E 15 at 1 mg/mL (with a maximal inhibition of 62 and 37 %) while E 10 did not inhibit at all the enzyme at this concentration (Fig. 3). When decreasing the concentrations, the inhibitory effect was almost completely lost at 0.01 mg/mL (see Additional file 3). Clearly, even at the higher concentration, the extracts were much less efficient than isofagomine.

Fig. 3
figure 3

Inhibition of β-glucosidase by extracts 10, 14 and 15. β-Glucosidase was incubated with extracts at a concentration of 1 mg/mL. Remaining activities in the presence of extracts are expressed as a percentage of enzyme activity incubated in DMSO alone and are the mean ± SE of three separate determinations. 1 μM Isofagomine was used as specific inhibitor of β-glucosidase

Full size image

Fractionation of extracts and screening on α-glucosidase activity

To go further in the identification of active compounds, the most efficient raw extract from N. diderrichii (E 14, Fig. 4a) and that from S. pobeguinii (E 10, Fig. 4b) were submitted to preparative HPLC in order to evidence the most efficient fractions by biological evaluation (see Additional files 4 and 5). The subfractions were tested on α-glucosidase activity and compared to the raw extracts 10 and 14. The head hydrophilic fractions as well as the queue lipophilic fractions displayed a moderate inhibitory potency at a concentration of 1 mg/mL, whereas fractions 10.10 and 10.11 as well as 14.8-14.11 showed the highest activity against α-glucosidase (Fig. 4).

Fig. 4
figure 4

Inhibition of α-glucosidase by subfractions separated from extracts 14 (panel a) and 10 (panel b). α-Glucosidase was incubated with extracts at a concentration of 1 mg/mL. Remaining activities in the presence of extracts are expressed as a percentage of enzyme activity incubated in DMSO alone and are the mean ± SE of three separate determinations. 10 mM Acarbose was used as specific inhibitor of α-glucosidase

Full size image

These results have been corroborated by testing the active fractions at concentrations 1.0, 0.1 and 0.01 mg/mL; extract 14 remained more efficient than extract 10. The most active fractions were F 10.10, F 14.9 and F14.10, which still show very potent inhibitory effect at 0.1 mg/mL (78-93 % inhibition) (Fig. 5).

Fig. 5
figure 5

Inhibition of α-glucosidase by extracts 10 and 14 and by the most active subfractions tested at 1, 0.1 and 0.01 mg/mL (from left to right). Remaining activities in the presence of extracts are expressed as a percentage of enzyme activity incubated in DMSO alone and are the mean ± SE of three separate determinations. 10 mM Acarbose was used as specific inhibitor of α-glucosidase

Full size image

Conclusion

The present study clearly indicates that compounds present in extracts of N. diderrichii (E 14 and E 15) and S. pobeguinii (E 10) are potent and selective inhibitors of α-glucosidase. A comparison with the results obtained with acarbose, which is used as oral medication to treat type 2 diabetes, indicates that the most active extract, obtained from N. diderrichii leaves, is more than 60-fold more active than the commercial antidiabetic drug. In addition, at the concentration inducing the highest effect on α-glucosidase inhibition, no toxicity was observed on human cell line. This demonstrates the safety of these extracts and permits to allow their use.

Recently, extracts with high phenolic contents have shown a strong capacity to inhibit α-glucosidase activity [54–56] and to treat diabetic rats [57]. The same correlation is observed in our study, the most active extract (E14), obtained from N. diderrichii leaves, being also the richest in phenols. Therefore, we can postulate that the antidiabetic activity of N. diderrichii and S. pobeguinii extracts might be related to their phenolic compounds content, even if we cannot exclude the participation of other classes of compounds.

Finally, our results validate the folk medicinal use of S. pobeguinii and N. diderrichii for their hypoglycemiant effect. Since these plants are widely available in Gabon, they could be a source of cheap and effective medication for persons with high blood glucose levels.

References

  1. Ralph A, De Fronzo MD. Pathogenesis of type diabetes mellitus. Med Clin N Am. 2004;88:787.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. American Diabetes Association. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2009;32 Suppl 1:562–7.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Warren RE. The step wise approach to the management of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2004;65:53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Fédération Internationale du Diabète. Atlas du Diabète de la FID (6e Ed. FID). Bruxelles. 2013.

  5. Wild S, Roglic G, Green A, Sicree R, King H. Global prevalence of diabetes: estimates for the year 2000 and projections for 2030. Diabetes Care. 2004;27:1047.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lillelund VH, Jensen HH, Liang X, Bols M. Recent developments of transition-state analogue glycosidase inhibitors of non-natural product origin. Chem Rev. 2002;102:515.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wagman AS, Nuss JM. Current therapies and emerging targets for the treatment of diabetes. Curr Pharm Des. 2001;7:417.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chiba S. Molecular mechanism of α-glucosidase and glucoamylase. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 1997;61:1233.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chehade JM, Mooradian AD. A rational approach to drug therapy of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Drugs. 2000;60:95.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bischoff H. The mechanism of α-glucosidase inhibition in management of diabetes. Clin Invest Med. 1995;18:303.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. WHO. Traditional medicine strategy 2002-2005. Geneva: WHO; 2002. www.who.int/medicinedocs/en/d/Js2297e/. (accessed on 2016/02/17).

  12. Mannan A, Rupa BA, Azam NK, Ahmed N, Hasan N. A quick review on anti-diabetic plants and action of phytochemicals. Inter J Adv Res. 2014;2:227.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Asano N, Kato A, Watson AA. Therapeutic applications of sugar-mimicking glycosidase inhibitors. Mini Rev Med Chem. 2001;1:145.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kouam SF, Khan SN, Krohn K, Ngadjui BT, Kapche DG, Yapna DB, et al. Alpha-glucosidase inhibitory anthranols, kenganthranols A-C, from the stem bark of Harungana madagascariensis. J Nat Prod. 2006;69:229.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Karou SD, Tchacondo T, Ilboudo DP, Simpore J. Sub-Saharian Rubiaceae: a review of their traditional uses, phytochemistry and biological activities. Pak J Biol Sci. 2011;14:149.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Razafimandimbison SG, Bremer B. Phylogeny and classification of Naucleae S. L. (Rubiaceae) inferred from molecular (ITS, rBCL, and tRNT-F) and morphological data. Am J Bot. 2002;89:1027.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Raponda-Walker A. Usages pharmaceutiques des plantes spontanées du Gabon. Bull Inst Etudes Centr. 1952, Nouvelle série (4), 181-186, 1953,(5), 19-40 et 1953(6), 360-361.

  18. Kubmawara D, Ajoku GA, Enwerem NM, Okorie DA. Preliminary phytochemical and antimicrobial screening of 50 medicinal plants from Nigeria. Afr J Biotechnol. 2007;6:1690.

    Google Scholar 

  19. LawalI O, Uzokwe NE, Igbaoanugo AF, Adio AF, Awosan EA, et al. Ethnomedicinal information on collation and identification of some medicinal plants in Research Institutes of South-West Nigeria. Afr J Pharm Pharmacol. 2010;4:1.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jiofack TI, Ayissi L, Fokunang C, Guedje N, Kemeuze V. Ethnobotany and phytomedicine of the upper Nyong valley forest in Cameroon. Afr J Pharm Pharmacol. 2009;3:144.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Igoli JO, Ogadji OG, Tor-Anyiin TA, Igoli NP. Traditional medicine practice amongst the Igede people of Nigeria. Part II. Afr J Trad CAM. 2005;2:134.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mac-Donald I, Olorunfemi DI. Plants used for medicinal purposes by Koma people of Adamawa State, Nigeria. Indigenous knowledge and development monitor. 2000.

  23. Baldé NM, Youla A, Baldé MD, Kaké A, Diallo MM, Baldé MA, et al. Herbal medicine and treatment of diabetes in Africa: an example from Guinea. Diabetes Metab. 2006;32:171.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kerharo J, Adam JG. La pharmacopée sénégalaise traditionnelle. Plantes médicinales et toxiques. Paris: Editions Vigot Frères; 1974.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Burkill HM. The useful plants of West Tropical Africa, Families M–R, vol. 4. 2nd ed. Richmond: Royal Botanic Gardens; 1997. p. 969.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Bridson DM, Verdcourt B. Rubiaceae, part 3, Flora Zambesiaca. 2003; 5(3).

  27. Anam EM. Novel nauclequinine from the root extract of Nauclea pobeguinii (Pob. & Pellegr.) Petit (Rubiaceae). Ind J Chem B Org Chem Med Chem. 1997;36B:54.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Xu YJ, Foubert K, Dhooghe L, Lemiere F, Cimanga K, Mesia K, et al. Chromatographic profiling and identification of two new iridoid-indole alkaloids by UPLC-MS and HPLC-SPE-NMR analysis of an antimalarial extract from Nauclea pobeguinii. Phytochem Lett. 2012;5:316.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Dimitrienko GI, Murray DG, McLean S. Constituent of Nauclea diderrichi. V. A glycoside alkaloid. Tetrahedron Lett. 1974;23:1961.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Lamidi M, Ollivier E, Faure R, Debrauwer L, Nze-Ekekang L, Balansard G. 3α-5α-Tetrahydrodesoxycordifoline from Nauclea diderrichii (de Wild) Merr. bark. Pharmaceut Pharmacol Lett. 1995;5:8.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Lamidi M, Ollivier E, Mahiou V, Faure R, Debrauwer L, Nze Ekekang L, et al. Gluco-indole alkaloids from the bark of Nauclea diderrichii. 1H and 13C NMR assignments of 3α-5α-tetrahydrodeoxycordifoline lactam and cadambine acid. Magn Reson Chem. 2005;43:427.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ollivier E, Gasquet M, Delmas F, Balansard G. Triterpenic saponins from Nauclea diderrichii. Book of abstracts, 210th ACS National Meeting; Chicago. August 20-24, 1995, (Pt. 1), AGFD-124.

  33. Lamidi M, Ollivier E, Faure R, Debrauwer L, Nze-Ekekang L, Balansard G. Revised structures of four saponins from Nauclea diderrichii. Planta Med. 1997;63:284.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Richard B, Zeches M, Le Men-Olivier L, Delaude C. Constituents from leaves of Nauclea diderrichii. Bulletin de la Société Royale des Sciences de Liège. 1992;61:423.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Adeoye AO, Hemingway SR, Waigh RD. A rapid method for the identification of fatty acid and sterol constituents of complex sterol ester mixtures. J Pharm Pharmacol. 1981;33:53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Lamidi M, Ollivier E, Gasquet M, Faure R, Nze-Ekekang L, Balansard G. Structural and antimalarial studies of saponins from Nauclea diderrichii bark. Adv Exp Med Biol. 1996;404:383.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Di Giorgio C, Lamidi M, Delmas F, Balansard G, Ollivier E. Antileishmanial activity of quinovic acid glycosides and cadambine acid isolated from Nauclea diderrichii. Planta Med. 2006;72:1396.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Mustofa, Valentin A, Benoit-Vical F, Pélissier Y, Kone-Bamba D, Mallié M. Antiplasmodial activity of plant extracts used in West African traditional medicine. J Ethnopharmacol. 2000;73:145.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Mesia K, Cimanga RK, Dhooghe L, Cos P, Apers S, Totté J, et al. Antimalarial activity and toxicity evaluation of a quantified Nauclea pobeguinii extract. J Ethnopharmacol. 2010;131:10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Mesia K, Cimanga K, Tona L, Mampunza MM, Ntamabyaliro N, Muanda T, et al. Assessment of the short-term safety and tolerability of a quantified 80 % ethanol extract from the stem bark of Nauclea pobeguinii (PR 259 CT1) in healthy volunteers: a clinical phase I study. Planta Med. 2011;77:111.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Mesia K, Tona L, Mampunza M, Ntamabyaliro N, Muanda T, Muyembe T, et al. Antimalarial efficacy of a quantified extract of Nauclea pobeguinii stem bark in human adult volunteers with diagnosed uncomplicated falciparum malaria. Part 1: a clinical phase IIA trial. Planta Med. 2012;78:211.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Mesia K, Tona L, Mampunza M, Ntamabyaliro N, Muanda T, Muyembe T, et al. Antimalarial efficacy of a quantified extract of Nauclea pobeguinii stem bark in human adult volunteers with diagnosed uncomplicated falciparum malaria. Part 2: a clinical phase IIB trial. Planta Med. 2012;78:853.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Karou SD, Tchacondo T, Djikpo Tchibozo MA, Abdoul-Rahaman S, Anani K, Koudouvo K, et al. Ethnobotanical study of medicinal plants used in the management of diabetes mellitus and hypertension in the Central Region of Togo. Pharm Biol. 2011;49:1286.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Igwe CU, Okwu GN, Nwogu LA, Nwodo OFC, Iwueke AV, Ojiako OA. Modification of lipid peroxidation and oxidative stress in hepatocytes of diabetic rats treated with root extract of Sarcocephalus latifolius and Daniella oliveri. Aust J Basic Appl Sci. 2010;4:3578.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Yessoufou A, Gbenou J, Grissa O, Hichami A, Simonin AM, Tabka Z, et al. Anti-hyperglycemic effects of three medicinal plants in diabetic pregnancy: modulation of T cell proliferation. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2013;13:77.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Gidado A, Ameh DA, Atawodi SE, Ibrahim S. A preliminary study of the mechanism of hypoglycaemic activity of Nauclea latifolia leaf ethanolic extract. J Complement Integr Med. 2012;9:1553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Raponda-Walker A, Sillans R. Les plantes utiles du Gabon. Ed. Sépia. 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Bouquet A. Féticheurs et médecines traditionnelles du Congo (Brazzaville), Orstom; Paris. 1969.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Adjanohoun E, Ahyi MRA, Ake Assi L, Dramane K, Elewude JA, Fadoju SO, Gbile ZO, Goudote E, Johnson CLA, Keita A, Morakinyo O, Ojewole JAO, Olatunjia AO, Sofowora EA. Contribution to ethnobotanical and floristic studies in Western Nigeria. CSTR-OUA, 1991.

  50. Singleton VL, Orthofer R, Lamuela-Raventos RM. Analysis of total phenols and other oxidation substrates and antioxidants by means of Folin-Ciocalteu reagent. Methods Enzymol. 1999;299C:152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Malik G, Ferry A, Guinchard X, Cresteil T, Crich D. N-O bond as a glycosidic bond surrogate: synthetic studies toward polyhydroxylated N-alkoxypiperidines. Chem Eur J. 2013;19:2168.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Gallud A, Vaillant O, Maillard LT, Arama DP, Dubois J, Maynadier M, et al. Imidazopyridine-fused [1,3]-diazepinones: synthesis and antiproliferative activity. Eur J Med Chem. 2014;75:382.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Lau CBS, Ho CY, Kim CF, Leung KN, Fung KP, Tse TF, et al. Cytotoxic activities of Coriolus versicolor (Yunzhi) extract on human leukemia and lymphoma cells by induction of apoptosis. Life Sci. 2004;75:797.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Kunyanga CN, Imungi JK, Okoth MW, Biesalski HK. Total phenolic content, antioxidant and antidiabetic properties of methanolic extract of raw and traditionally processed Kenyan indigenous food ingredients. LWT Food Sci Technol. 2012;45:26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Saliu JA, Ademiluyi AO, Akinyemi AJ, Oboh G. In vitro antidiabetes and antihypertension properties of phenolic extracts from bitter leaf (Vernonia amygdalina Del.). J Food Biochem. 2012;36:569.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Yao Y, Cheng XZ, Wang LX, Wang SH, Ren G. Major phenolic compounds, antioxidant capacity and antidiabetic potential of Rice bean (Vigna umbellata L.) in China. Int J Mol Sci. 2012;13:2707.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Gandhi GR, Ignacimuthu S, Paulraj MG. Solanum torvum Swartz fruit containing phenolic compounds shows antidiabetic and antioxidant effects in streptozotocin induced diabetic rats. Food Chem Toxicol. 2011;49:2725.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are mostly grateful to Mr Y. Issembe and Mr R. Niangadouma, from the National Herbarium of the Institute of Pharmacopea and Traditional Medicine (IPHAMETRA) for their assistance with the collection and identification of plant materials.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratoire de Substances Naturelles et de Synthèses Organométalliques (LASNSOM), Université des Sciences et Techniques de Masuku, Faculté des Sciences B.P. 943, Franceville, Gabon

    Huguette Agnaniet, Elvis Jolinom Mbot & Jacques Lebibi

  2. Institut des Sciences Appliquées (ISA)-Département de Génie Biologique (GB)-Biochimie-Université des Sciences, des Techniques et des Technologies de Bamako (USTTB) BPE, 423 Bamako - Hamdallaye ACI 2000 - Rue : 405, Porte, 359, Mali

    Ousmane Keita

  3. Institut des Biomolécules Max Mousseron (IBMM) UMR 5247 CNRS-Université Montpellier-ENSCM, Bâtiment E, Faculté de Pharmacie, 15, avenue Charles Flahault BP14491, 34093, Montpellier, cedex 5, France

    Jean-Alain Fehrentz, Audrey Gallud, Marcel Garcia, Magali Gary-Bobo & Chantal Menut

  4. CAMAG Laboratory, Sonnenmattstrasse 11, 4132, Muttenz, Switzerland

    Anita Ankli

  5. CIBLOT, IPSIT - IFR141, 5 rue Jean Baptiste Clément, 92290, Chatenay-Malabry, France

    Thierry Cresteil

Authors
  1. Huguette Agnaniet
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Elvis Jolinom Mbot
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ousmane Keita
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jean-Alain Fehrentz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Anita Ankli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Audrey Gallud
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Marcel Garcia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Magali Gary-Bobo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Jacques Lebibi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Thierry Cresteil
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Chantal Menut
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Huguette Agnaniet.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

HA, EJM, OK, CM, MG and LB designed the study and participated in plant selection and collection, chemical investigations and in the drafting and correction of the manuscript. HA, CM, TC, JAF, AG, MGB and AA performed HPLC and HPTLC experiments and carried out the biological assays. They also contributed to data analysis and critically revised the manuscript. HA, EJM and OK prepared the plant extracts. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Additional files

Additional file 1:

HPTLC of extracts 10, 14 and 15 using DPPH derivatization reagent. The DPPH test shows some very prominent antioxidant zones. (PDF 17 kb)

Additional file 2:

Diagram showing inhibition of α-glucosidase by extracts 14 and 15 at three concentrations. α-Glucosidase was incubated with extracts at a concentration of 1, 0.1 and 0.01 mg/mL. Remaining activities in the presence of extracts are expressed as a percentage of enzyme activity incubated in DMSO alone and are the mean ± SE of three separate determinations. 10 mM Acarbose was used as specific inhibitor of α-glucosidase. (PDF 30 kb)

Additional file 3:

Diagram showing inhibition of β-glucosidase by extracts 14 and 15 at three concentrations. β-Glucosidase was incubated with extracts at a concentration of 1, 0.1 and 0.01 mg/mL. Remaining activities in the presence of extracts are expressed as a percentage of enzyme activity incubated in DMSO alone and are the mean ± SE of three separate determinations. 1 μM Isofagomine was used as specific inhibitor of β-glucosidase. (PDF 30 kb)

Additional file 4:

Preparative HPLC fractionation curve of the raw extract from N. diderrichii leaves (E14). (PDF 207 kb)

Additional file 5:

Preparative HPLC fractionation curve of the raw extract from S. pobeguinii bark (E10). (PDF 189 kb)

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Agnaniet, H., Mbot, E.J., Keita, O. et al. Antidiabetic potential of two medicinal plants used in Gabonese folk medicine. BMC Complement Altern Med 16, 71 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-016-1052-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-016-1052-x

Keywords

BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies

ISSN: 2662-7671

Contact us