This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Relationship between total phenolic contents and biological properties of propolis from 20 different regions in South Korea
- Xue Wang†1,
- Karuppasamy Sankarapandian†2,
- Yizhe Cheng3,
- Soon Ok Woo4,
- Hyung Wook Kwon2,
- Haribalan Perumalsamy†2 and
- Young-Joon Ahn3Email author
© Wang et al. 2016
Received: 2 September 2015
Accepted: 12 February 2016
Published: 18 February 2016
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|2 Sep 2015||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|12 Oct 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Balogun Wasiu Gbolahan|
|30 Oct 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ibrahim Turan|
|29 Nov 2015||Author responded||Author comments - Xue Wang|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|29 Nov 2015||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|18 Jan 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ibrahim Turan|
|19 Jan 2016||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Balogun Wasiu Gbolahan|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|12 Feb 2016||Editorially accepted|
|18 Feb 2016||Article published||10.1186/s12906-016-1043-y|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.