This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
The use of ayurvedic medicine in the context of health promotion – a mixed methods case study of an ayurvedic centre in Sweden
© Niemi and Ståhle. 2016
Received: 19 August 2015
Accepted: 12 February 2016
Published: 17 February 2016
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|19 Aug 2015||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|23 Sep 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Jaspreet Brar|
|27 Sep 2015||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Holger Cramer|
|5 Nov 2015||Author responded||Author comments - Maria Niemi|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|5 Nov 2015||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|18 Jan 2016||Author responded||Author comments - Maria Niemi|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|18 Jan 2016||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|12 Feb 2016||Editorially accepted|
|17 Feb 2016||Article published||10.1186/s12906-016-1042-z|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.