Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Selenium added unripe carica papaya pulp extracts enhance wound repair through TGF-β1 and VEGF-a signalling pathway

BMC Complementary and Alternative MedicineThe official journal of the International Society for Complementary Medicine Research (ISCMR)201515:369

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-015-0900-4

Received: 11 July 2015

Accepted: 7 October 2015

Published: 15 October 2015

Abstract

Background

Increased wound healing efficiency by Se2+ added Carica papaya L. (Caricaceae) fruit extract was linked to increased antioxidant and anti-inflammatory responses during healing.

We investigated the impact of Se2+ or Zn2+ added papaya water (WE) and phosphate-buffered saline (PE) extracts on cells recruitment and bio-molecular alterations on days 4 and 10 post wounding in an in vivo excision wound.

Methods

Excision wounds were created on the dorsum of Sprague Dawley rats and treated topically twice/day with 20 μL of PE and WE (5 mg extract/mL), 0.5 μgSe2+ added PE and WE (PES and WES), or 100 μMZn2+ added PE and WE (PEZ and WEZ). Deionised water (negative) and Solcoseryl (positive) were applied on the control groups. Histochemical and biochemical assays were used to evaluate cellular and bio-molecular changes in the wound.

Results

PES (PE + 0.5 μg Se2+) only increased significantly (p < 0.05) wound total protein content (95.14 ± 1.15 mg/g tissue vs positive control; 80.42 ± 0.86 mg/g tissue) on day 10 post wounding. PES increased significantly (p < 0.05) the number of fibroblasts/high power field (HPF) (75.60 ± 9.66) but decreased significantly (p < 0.05) the number of polymorphonuclear leukocytes/HPF (59.20 ± 12.64) in the wound compared to positive control (50.60 ± 12.58 fibroblasts/HPF, 101.00 ± 27.99 polymorphonuclear leukocytes/HPF) on day 4. Similar results were recorded for WES. PES demonstrated increased neovascularization, TGF-β1 and VEGFA expressions at day 4 and increased collagen at day 10.

Conclusion

Papaya extract improved wound repair by increasing fibroblasts recruitment and reducing polymorphonuclear leukocytes infiltration through early transient expressions of TGF-β1 and VEGFA at the wound area. The processes were amplified with Se2+ addition.

Keywords

Collagen synthesis Transforming growth factor (TGF) Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) Polymorphonuclear neutrophil Fibroblasts Wound repair Inflammation

Background

Wound healing property of Carica papaya L (papaya) has been attributed to its high content of cystein endopeptidase, mineral nutrients and vitamins [13]. Wound healing potential of papaya based extracts is mainly linked to its anti-inflammatory and anti-oxidant properties [4, 5]. We reported improved wound healing by unripe C. papaya when selenium (Se2+) was added to the extract. This was linked to increased antioxidant and anti-inflammatory responses during healing [5].

Wound healing involves a cascade of events through overlapping phases which include inflammation, repair or proliferation, and tissue remodelling [6]. The inflammatory phase is characterized by the presence of polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNLs), while the repair phase is characterised by fibroblast migration and proliferation, new blood vessel formation, protein synthesis, collagen deposition, epithelialisation, and wound contraction [7].

Balance in the inflammatory phase is crucial for increased cellular activities and angiogenesis under the influence of cytokines and growth factors, mainly vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) [8]. Again, transforming growth factor (TGF-β), produced by macrophages dictates fibroblasts recruitment to the wound site at early wound repair phase. Fibroblasts synthesize ground substances i.e., components of extracellular matrix on which collagens are deposited [9]. Hexosamines (HAM) and hexuronic acids (HUA) are primary molecules of ground substances which play significant role in re-organization and stabilization of collagen fibres [9]. Altogether, these contribute to efficient wound healing.

In the present study, the impact of Se2+ or Zn2+ added papaya extracts on the events at late inflammatory phase and early repair phase in an in vivo excision wound model is reported. Notably, Se2+ is essential for cell growth and differentiation by controlling redox-sensitive molecules [10]. While Zn2+ is an essential component of intracellular signalling pathways for cell proliferation [11]. Finally, we proposed how Se2+ addition to papaya extract enhances transient expression of TGF-β and VEGFA for improved wound repair.

Methods

Ethics statement

All handling and management procedures were carried out in accordance with the guidelines for the care and use of laboratory animals of International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM) and approved by IIUM research ethics committee [Reference: IIUM/305/20/4/10].

Fruit collection and extract preparation

Fully developed (matured) unripe papaya fruit, with white pulp and green skin (initial ripening stage) at 12 weeks after anthesis, was collected from a farm at Jabatan Pertanian, Perak, Malaysia. The fruit was identified and authenticated by Dr Nurziana of Herbal Laboratory, Faculty of Pharmacy, International Islamic University Malaysia (IIUM). Voucher specimen (no. Eiium 34) was deposited at the herbarium of the Faculty of Pharmacy, IIUM for future reference. Small pieces of the pulps were homogenized (1:3 w/w) in either sterile phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) or deionized water (dH2O); gently shaken at 37 °C for 8 h, centrifuged at 200 × g for 30 min at 4 °C and finally freeze-dried [3]. The freeze drying involves the complete removal of water from the pre-frozen extracts at a very low temperature and pressure until it become dried powder (lyophilised). Freeze drying preserves the chemical integrity, potency and effectiveness of the extract. The resulting solid powder form can be handled with ease for analytical purposes. The freeze-dried extracts were prepared for topical application on the animals’ excision wound as described previously [5]. Briefly, the preparations (20 μL) were used for the treatment. To obtain 0.5 μg Se2+ in 20 μL of treatment, a hydrous Na2SeO3 (172.94 g/mole) was used as the Se2+ source compound. A stock solution of Na2SeO3 (1.095 mg/mL) was prepared and diluted to 20 mL (54.75 μg/mL) which is equivalent to 0.5 μgSe2+/20 μL of the solution. The Na2SeO3 solution (54.75 μg/ml) was used to prepare papaya PBS and water extracts (5 mg/mL) used for the treatment. Double concentration of the stock solution was used to prepare the 1 μgSe2+/20 μL of the solution.

Separately, 100 and 200 μM Zn2+ from ZnSO4 solution were used to prepare the PBS and water extracts (5 mg/mL) of papaya. The resulting preparations (20 μL) were used for the topical treatment.

Animals

Female Sprague Dawley rats weighing 200 ± 20 g (purchased either from UKM or USM, Malaysia) were used for wound induction. They were kept separately in cages for 7 days for acclimatization and fed with standard rat chow, filtered tap water and maintained under standard housing conditions (room temperature 24-27 °C and humidity 60–65 % with 12:12 light: dark cycles), before use.

Wound induction and treatment

Uniform circular full thickness excision wound was created at the shaved dorsal region using 6 mm biopsy punch under light ethyl ether anesthesia. One wound per animal was induced to analyze the number of PMNL and fibroblasts; collagen deposition; neovascualrization; TGF-β and VEGFA expression. Same wound tissue sample (section) from each animal was used to analyze all parameters. Four full thickness excision wounds (6 mm in diameter) were inflicted on each rat using 6 mm biopsy punch under light ethyl ether anesthesia. Two wounds were created on both sides of the paravertebra region of the animals’ dorsum (the two wounds on both sides were separated by 2.5 cm and are 2 cm away from the spine) in the second experiment to analyze total protein, hydroxyproline (HOP), HUA and HAM. Rats showing any sign of skin infection or abnormal skin appearance, were excluded from the study before they were randomly assigned [5] to different experimental groups (n = 5 for each group).

Wounds were left undressed to the open environment while being treated with either PBS extracts (PE) or water extract (WE) with or without Se2+/Zn2+ dissolved in dH2O: 5 mg/ml WE, 5 mg/ml PE, 5 mg/ml PE + 0.5 μgSe2+ (PES), 5 mg/ml WE + 0.5 μgSe2+ (WES), 5 mg/ml PE + 100 μMZn2+ (PEZ), 5 mg/ml WE + 100 μMZn2+ (WEZ). Solcoseryl (a protein-free haemodialysate from calf’s blood) ointment and dH2O were used as positive (PC) and negative (NC) controls respectively. All wounds were treated topically in the morning and evening hours (twice/day).

Wound tissue sample collection

The tissue samples were collected at day 4 i.e., at late inflammatory phase of wound healing and at day 10 i.e., at early wound repair phase from different animals. Wound samples were excised using scissors to ensure sufficient and regular amount of granulation tissue and the surrounding wound margin [12]. Animals were sacrificed by deep ethyl ether anesthesia before wound tissue samples were collected.

Hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining

Wound tissues, fixed in 4 % paraformaldehyde for 12 h and embbeded in wax, were cut (5 μm) using rotary microtome (Leica, Biosystems). The tissue sections mounted onto Superfrost Plus slides (Fisher Scientific) were stained in H&E following standard protocol. Histological examination was performed morphometrically in high power field (HPF; 400× magnification) using Nikon light microscope (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan) with in-built camera attached to a monitor. Number of fibroblasts and PMNL was counted per HPF in 5 fields with NIS-element D software (Nikon, Tokyo, Japan): 2 fields laterally at the adjacent epidermis, 2 fields laterally deep in the dermis and 1 field in the center of the wound area. Counting was blind to the experimental design and performed on 5 sections from each group.

van Gieson Staining

Mixture of saturated aqueous solution of picric acid and 1 % aqueous solution of acid fuchsin was used to visualize nuclei (stains brownish black to black), collagen (stains pink or deep red) and smooth muscle, cytoplasm, RBC and fibrin (stains yellow) [13]. Pink or red collagen stain intensity and small blood vessels yellow stained area were quantified using semi quantitative analysis as previously described [14]. The colour stain was scored on a 4 point scale (−, +, ++ and +++). The sign + or - represent presence or absence respectively.

Immunohistochemical staining

Sections were deparaffinised with xylene, dehydrated in graded concentrations of ethanol and then antigen retrieval was performed using 0.1 % trypsin (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) for 20 min at 37 °C. Tissue sections were treated with peroxidase blocking solution (Dako, REAL™ EnVision Detection System) and incubated with antibodies against anti TGF-β1 and VEGFA (Abcam) for 30 min at 37 °C. Thereafter, the sections were washed in Tris buffered saline containing 0.05 % (v/v) Tween 20; 3, 3’ diaminobenzidine (DAB) solution was used as the chromogen substrate, and hematoxylin was used as a counterstain.

Wound protein estimation

Wound tissue samples were homogenized 5:1 (w/v) in an ice-cold isotonic 0.01 mol/L sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4); centrifuged for 5 min at 12,000 × g at 4 °C and the supernatant was used to determined protein concentration following the Bradford assay and using bovine serum albumin as standard.

Estimation of wound hydroxyproline (HOP) content

Pre-weighed wound tissue samples were completely dried in oven and hydrolyzed in 5 N HCl for 12 h at 130 °C in sealed glass tubes. HOP content was determined using hydrolysate equivalent to 0.5 mg of wound samples as described earlier [15]. Colorimetric assay against HOP standards was performed and absorbance was read at 560 nm in Lambda 25 UV/Vis Spectrophotometer (Perkin Elmer, MA, USA).

Estimation of wound hexuronic acid (HUA) content

The tissue was digested with papain (10 mg/g dry weight of tissue) in 0.5 M acetate buffer (20 mL per gram of tissue) pH 5.5, containing 5 μM cysteine and 5 μM di-sodium salt of EDTA at 65 °C for 24 h. An aliquot of this digest was hydrolysed followed by the spectrophotometric estimation of the HUA estimation in the samples [16].

Estimation of wound hexosamine (HAM) content

Wound tissue samples were completely dried in oven at 60 °C and ground to powder. The HAM content was determined at 530 nm following the established protocol [17]. A correction factor of 0.829 was used to calculate and express amount of free HAM using the equation: HAM (mg) = (ASample/ASTD) × (0.05 × 0.829) [ASample = Absorbance of the samples, ASTD = Absorbance of the standard]. Glucosamine hydrochloride (0.05 mg) was used as a standard. Values were corrected to the initial wound tissue dry weight.

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed using the statistical software SPSS (version 17; SPSS, Inc.). Data were expressed as mean ± standard error of mean (SEM). One way-Anova was used to analyse all data and Tukey’s post-hoc test was used to find the mean differences within the groups at different time interval. Data were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05.

Results

Se2+ added extracts increases protein content in wound tissue

On day 10 post wounding, treatment with PES only, resulted in significant (p < 0.05) increase in the total protein content of the wound tissue (95.14 ± 1.15 mg/g tissue) as compared to the treatment with PC (80.42 ± 0.86 mg/g tissue). In contrast, Zn added extracts did not show any significant changes in the wound total protein content on day 4 and day 10 post wounding as compared to NC (19.43 ± 0.94 mg/g tissue day 4, 51.52 ± 1.55 mg/g tissue day 10) (Table 1).
Table 1

Changes in biochemical markers of wound healing at late inflammatory phase (day 4) and wound repair phase (day 10) during healing

Group

Day

Total protein

Hydroxyproline

Hexuronic acid

Hexosamine

  

(mg/g tissue)

(μg/mg tissue)

(mg/g tissue)

(mg/g tissue)

NC

4

19.43 ± 0.94

8.47 ± 1.50

20.71 ± 4.36

12.54 ± 4.53

10

51.52 ± 1.55

25.35 ± 1.04

5.82 ± 1.28

4.59 ± 1.57

PC

4

36.68 ± 1.06* *** ****

14.24 ± 1.31

49.39 ± 4.71*

28.41 ± 4.07

10

80.42 ± 0.86* *** ****

40.62 ± 0.60* ****

8.65 ± 2.03

10.55 ± 2.91

PE

4

23.47 ± 1.38

12.06 ± 2.97

53.41 ± 6.21* ****

30.31 ± 6.11

10

61.70 ± 1.37* ****

37.74 ± 1.24* ****

8.70 ± 1.70

10.12 ± 2.78

WE

4

23.18 ± 2.03

11.41 ± 2.70

25.45 ± 5.32

14.86 ± 3.60

10

53.43 ± 1.50

27.25 ± 1.03*

6.30 ± 1.83

5.62 ± 1.45

PES

4

39.47 ± 2.05* *** ****

20.07 ± 3.19*

60.84 ± 6.08* ****

35.23 ± 4.95*

10

95.14 ± 1.15* ** *** ****

55.15 ± 1.06* ** *** ****

18.12 ± 3.32*

18.21 ± 3.03* ****

WES

4

37.94 ± 1.15* *** ****

19.80 ± 2.51*

53.81 ± 7.36* ****

28.34 ± 3.87

10

85.35 ± 2.11* *** ****

52.61 ± 1.02* ** *** ****

16.62 ± 4.88

16.51 ± 4.08

PEZ

4

21.31 ± 1.41

8.97 ± 1.93

26.47 ± 3.32

18.90 ± 3.21

10

56.04 ± 1.48

30.52 ± 1.23*

6.85 ± 1.92

6.66 ± 2.12

WEZ

4

20.57 ± 1.60

10.83 ± 1.31

30.59 ± 6.27

20.06 ± 4.16

10

56.97 ± 1.70

31.32 ± 1.34*

5.24 ± 1.64

6.53 ± 2.25

Values are expressed as mean ± SEM (n = 5). *, **, *** and **** represent significantly increased (p < 0.05) wound content as compared to NC, PC, PE and WE respectively on the respective days

Se2+ added extracts increases HOP, HUA and HAM content

Treatment with PES and WES resulted in significant (p < 0.05) increase in HOP content (20.07 ± 3.19 μg/mg tissue and 19.80 ± 2.51 μg/mg tissue respectively) on day 4 compared to NC (8.47 ± 1.50 μg/mg tissue) and significantly (p < 0.05) increase HOP content (55.15 ± 1.06 μg/mg tissue and 52.61 ± 1.02 μg/mg tissue respectively) on day 10 compared to NC (25.35 ± 1.04 μg/mg tissue), PC (40.62 ± 0.60 μg/mg tissue), PE (37.74 ± 1.24 μg/mg tissue) and WE (27.25 ± 1.03 μg/mg tissue). Treatment with PEZ and WEZ also resulted in significant (p < 0.05) increase in HOP content (30.52 ± 1.23 μg/mg tissue and 31.32 ± 1.34 μg/mg tissue respectively) on day 10 compared to NC (25.35 ± 1.04 μg/mg tissue) (Table 2). HUA content was significantly increased (p < 0.05) after treatment with PE (53.41 ± 6.21 mg/g tissue), PES (60.84 ± 6.08 mg/g tissue) and WES (53.81 ± 7.36 mg/g tissue) compared to NC (20.71 ± 4.36 mg/g tissue) and WE (25.45 ± 5.32 mg/g tissue) on day 4 and only after treatment with PES (18.12 ± 3.32 mg/g tissue) compared to NC (5.82 ± 1.28 mg/g tissue) on day 10. Treatment with only PES resulted in significantly increased (p < 0.05) HAM content (35.23 ± 4.95 mg/g tissue and 18.21 ± 3.03 mg/g tissue) both on day 4 and day 10 respectively compared to NC (12.54 ± 4.53 mg/g tissue day 4 and 4.59 ± 1.57 mg/g tissue day 10) (Table 1).
Table 2

Changes in collagen synthesis and vascularisation during wound healing at late inflammatory phase (day 4) and wound repair phase (day 10)

Group

Collagen synthesis

Vascularization

Day 4

Day 10

Day 4

Day 10

NC

-

++

-

-

PC

+

++

-

+

PE

+

++

++

++

WE

-

++

-

-

PES

+

+++

++

+++

WES

+

+++

++

+++

PEZ

+

++

+

++

WEZ

+

+

-

+

Se2+ added extracts reduced PMNL infiltration but enhanced fibroblasts number

The mean number of PMNL/HPF in wound tissue was significantly (p < 0.05) lower both on day 4 (Fig. 1a) and on day 10 (Fig. 1c) in all groups except WE (126.00 ± 23.53 day 4, 80.80 ± 31.13 day 10) compared to NC (164.40 ± 25.93 day 4, 97.60 ± 30.44 day 10). However, treatment with only PES (59.20 ± 12.63) and WES (52.80 ± 18.81) resulted in significant reduction (p < 0.05) of the mean number of PMNL/HPF compared to NC (164.40 ± 25.93), PC (101.00 ± 27.99) and WE (126.00 ± 23.53) on day 4 (Fig. 1a).
Fig. 1

Effect of Zn2+ or Se2+ added papaya extracts on PMNL and fibroblast recruitment. On day 4, wounds treated with PE, WE, PEZ and WES showed reduced number of PMNL (a) and increased number of fibroblasts (b). On day 10, wounds treated with PE, WE, PEZ, and WEZ showed reduced number of infiltrating PMNL (c) with increased number of fibroblasts (d). *, #, † and show significant decrease of PMNL and increase of fibroblasts when compared to NC, PC, PE and WE respectively. (p < 0.05). [n = 5 per group]

The mean number of fibroblast/HPF was significantly (p < 0.05) higher on day 4 in all treatment groups compared to NC (5.60 ± 3.21). However, significantly increased (p < 0.05) number of fibroblasts/HPF was observed on day 4 in PES (75.60 ± 9.66) treated only group compared to that of PC, PE and WE groups (50.60 ± 12.58, 50.00 ± 7.45 and 12.40 ± 5.94 respectively) (Fig. 1b). On day 10, the mean number of fibroblasts/HPF was significantly higher (p < 0.05) when treated with PES (69.60 ± 13.07) as compared to NC (40.80 ± 9.09) (Fig. 1d).

On day 4, wound tissue sections from all groups exhibited disrupted wound-dermis interface, with the absence of overlying epithelia (Additional file 1: Figure S1A). Treatment with PES exhibited a more organised dermis with firm epidermis which interdigitate with the underlying dermis consistent with a moderate fibrogenic response determined by fibroblasts number at the wound site (Additional file 1: Figure S1B).

Se2+ added extract enhanced collagen synthesis and vascularization

Collagen deposition was detected on day 4 in all groups except NC and WE treated groups (Table 2, Additional file 2: Figure S2A). However, based on the semi quantitative scoring, collagen deposition was highest in PES and WES treated groups on day 4 (Table 2, Additional file 2: Figure S2B). On day 10, marked increase in pink or red collagen stain intensity was observed in WES and PES treated group with matured and well aligned collagen fibres (Additional file 2: Figure S2B). On day 4, appearance of new blood vessels was detected in PE, PES, WES and PEZ treated groups (Table 2, Additional file 2: Figure S2A). Again, on day 10, neovascularization was highest in PES and WES treated groups (Table 2, Additional file 2: Figure S2B).

TGF-β1 and VEGFA expression in response to Se2+ added extracts

Treatment with the PE, PES and PC were shown to increase TGF-β1 expression on day 4 compared to NC and PEZ (Fig. 2 row 1). On day 10, TGF-β1 expression remains low in PEZ treated group (Fig. 2 row 2). The expression of VEGF-A was increased in the PC, PE and PES treated group on day 4 as compared to NC and PEZ treated groups (Fig. 2 row 3). There was no marked difference in expression of VEGFA in the PE, PES and PEZ treated group as compared to the NC group on day 10 (Fig. 2 row 4).
Fig. 2

Effect of Zn2+ or Se2+ added papaya extracts on expression of TGF-β1 and VEGF A at the wound area. A marked increase in TGF-β1 expression in the wound area was observed only at day 4 (row 1) unlike at day 10 (row 2) after treatment with PC, PE and PES as compared to the NC and PEZ. A marked increase in VEGFA expression was observed in the wound area at day 4 (row 3) after treatment with either PC, PE or PES. Expression of VEGFA was similar in the wound at day 10 (row 4) for all treatment groups (i.e., PE, PES, PEZ and NC). [n = 5 per group; Scale bar = 5 μm]

Discussions

Green unripe papaya and the latex produced from it are rich sources of the four cysteine endopeptidases enzymes namely papain, chymopapain, glycyl endopeptidase and caricain. Therapeutic potential of papaya has been attributed to it endopeptidase enzyme content. Papain, chymopapain, and glycylendopeptidase enzymes are the most abundant enzymes in the unripe pulp and latex which are consistently implicated as the therapeutic and wound healing agent in papaya [1820].

Se2+, a cofactor for selenoproteins, prevents oxidative damage and protects redox-sensitive molecules involved in cell growth and differentiation [10, 21]. While Zn2+ is a well known functional and structural component of enzymes and transcription factors of the intracellular signaling pathways for cell proliferation [11]. Both Se2+ and Zn2+ are also involved in regulation of the concentrations of other elements (at the wound area) which are affected due to injury [22]. In relation to the current study, Se2+ supplementation was shown to improve healing of the wound caused by surgical incision, trauma, and burns [23]. Earlier we reported that Se2+ added unripe C. papaya improves healing of excision wound through enhanced anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effect [5].

The present study used female rats for the experimentation. Female rats are known to exhibit shorter period for complete wound healing and this has been linked to the circulating oestrogen level [2426]. Though many previous studies used male rats for their various investigations on wound healing to minimize the variability that fluctuating circulating oestrogen may have on the rate of wound closure, some studies have also used female rats to achieve shorter period of experimentation, reduce the stressful handling of relatively aggressive male rats during examination of wound and extend the relevance of the research data to female gender despite the effect of fluctuating circulating oestrogen on the rate of healing [27, 28].

Depending on the type and aetiology of wound, wound healing involves inflammation (day 1–4 or more), proliferative/repair (day 5–10 or 11), and remodelling phases (day 11–21 or more) [9, 10]. Prolonged or excessive inflammatory responses delay the repair mechanism and subsequently affect overall wound healing. Earlier we reported that Se2+ added papaya mediates improved wound healing by reducing inflammation associated oxidative damage apparently via cyclooxygenase specific inhibition, arginine metabolism and up-regulation of antioxidant enzymes. These could be linked to the added Se2+ [5] as well as the papaya cysteine endopeptidases. Papaya promotes granulation tissue formation, nectrotic tissue desloughing and prevent infection during wound healing through the proteolytic and antimicrobial activities of it cysteine endopeptidases [29].

PMNL infiltration of wound area was found to be reduced in Zn2+ added PE/WE treated groups albeit the reduction was not as significant as Se2+ added PE/WE treated groups (Fig. 1a, c). Zn2+ added PE/WE treated groups showed significant increase in HOP on day 10 only and was by far lower compared to Se2+ added extract treated groups (Table 1). A significant increase in total protein and HOP was recorded at days 4 and 10 among Se2+ added extract treated groups. The same group exhibited mature and well aligned collagen fibers at day 10 (Additional file 2: Figure S2). Notably, wound hydroxylproline concentration is a common quantitative index for collagen synthesis and is related to wound tensile strength (breaking force) that generally increases at the later phase of healing i.e., proliferative/repair phase [3, 7]. Again, in line with this view, WES and PES exhibited significantly increased amount of HOP compared to NC, PC, PE and WE both at day 4 and day 10 (Table 2). Despite the widely reported role of Zn2+ as co-factor for cellular proliferation, antioxidant enzyme system and tissue repair and regeneration, its role in non-deficient state is yet to be confirmed. An optimal concentration or supplemental dose required to produce healing effect is yet to be established. Studies have confirmed that supplemental Zn2+ beyond or below certain critical dose produced negative effect on wound healing by altering the activation of nuclear transcription factors to increase the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines leading to immunosuppression [30]. These may account for the insignificant or little benefit of Zn2+ added PE/WE treatment on wound total protein and hydroxyproline respectively.

Treatment with Se2+ added papaya extract markedly increased fibroblasts number at day 4 and day 10 while Zn2+ added PE/WE showed a far less increase fibroblasts number at day 4 only (Fig. 1b, d). Fibroblasts recruitment at the wound area with reduced infiltrating inflammatory cells enhances wound contraction hence decrease time for complete wound closure [31]. Se2+ added PE/WE treatment only, exhibited significant increase in HUA and HAM at day 4 and day 10 (Table 1). HUA and HAM are primary components of ground substances (glycosaminoglycans and proteoglycans), which are synthesized by fibroblasts at the wound area to form provisional matrix on which collagen fibres are embedded [9]. Since fibroblasts produce pro-fibrotic and angiogenic cytokines, collagen, matrix through which other cells migrate [31] and provide mechanical support for delicate new capillaries [8, 12], increased fibroblasts recruitment at the wound area could enhance wound repair.

Consistently, neovascularization is more noticeable at day 4 both in PE and PES treated groups (Table 2). The new blood vessel at the wound area supplies more nutrient and oxygen to the fibroblasts to support subsequent production of growth factors and collagen synthesis. Thus, these results demonstrated that the degree of dermal repair is consistent with fibroblasts recruitment at the wound site and papaya extracts added with Se2+ enhanced dermal repair.

In the current study we have reported that PES induces early neovascularization (Table 2) and enhance fibroblasts recruitment (Fig. 1b, d) at the wound area. The increased expressions of TGF-β1 and VEGFA, in response to PES at day 4 but not at day 10 (Fig. 2) thus, suggests that Se2+ addition improves wound healing by inducing early transient expressions of TGF-β1 and VEGFA followed by enhanced angiogenic sprouting and increased fibroblasts recruitment during the early phase of healing. Angiogenic factor VEGFA and TGF-β play key roles in the natural cutaneous wound healing by attracting inflammatory cells, stimulating cellular proliferation, neovascularization and epithelial migration [31]. Selenium has been reported to induce expression of VEGFA in diabetic wound [32]. Selenium as low as 10−7 M activate aortal and capillary endothelial cells; increase proliferation of aortal cells and migration of retinal capillary cells [33].

Based on the observed up and down regulation of the cellular (PMNL infiltration and fibroblast recruitment, neovascularization) and biochemical events (collagen synthesis, TGF-β1 and VEGFA expression), a model is proposed (Fig. 3) to describe the possible mechanisms by which Carica papaya extracts enhanced cutaneous wound repair.
Fig. 3

Events controlled by Se2+ added papaya extract in cutaneous wound healing cascade. Se2+ added papaya PBS extract treatment results in the transient up-regulation of (TGF-β and VEGFA at earlier phase of healing (Fig. 2) and consequently results in increased fibroblasts recruitment (Fig. 1b, d) and angiogenesis (Table 2). The expression of TGF-β in turn promotes synthesis of collagen and ground substances while expression of VEGF promotes new blood vessel formation through angiogenesis. Se2+ added papaya PBS extract either stops or reduces further PMNL infiltration (Fig. 1a, c) at the wound area thus subsides inflammatory reactions. All together these contribute to accelerated and improved wound healing without inflammation at later stages

PE through mechanisms associated with cyclooxygenase and prostaglanding E2 inhibition [5] reduced PMNLs infiltration of wound area in the early phase of wound repair. Reduction of PMNLs infiltration by PE, accelerate the inflammatory phase which consequently expedite the onset of proliferative/repair phase. This process is potentiated by Se addition to PE.

Consistently, PE induced a transient up-regulation of TGF-β1 and VEGFA on day 4 which in turn enhanced cellular activity (proliferation, differentiation, migration, angiogenesis and neovascularisation) as evidenced in the increased fibroblasts recruitment and early appearance of new blood vessels (indicator of endothelial cell differentiation) in PE treatment. These effect was more pronounced in Se added PE.

In addition, the establishment of new blood vessels enhanced nutrient delivery to the fibroblasts and enhanced fibroblastic synthesis of provisional matrix, primary molecules in the extracellular matrix and collagen. In line with this, Se added PE exclusively enhanced the synthesis of primary molecules of ground substances i.e. HUA and HAM. PE alone showed little effect in these regard. However, hydroxyproline an index for collagen turnover was found to be markedly increased, later on day 10, with PE treatment. Concurrently, well aligned collagen fibres and reconstructed dermis and epidermis were observed later on day 10 after treatment with PE and PES especially. Collectively, the increased recruitment of fibroblasts and their bio-molcular products resulted in the significant increase in wound total protein content later on day 10 in PE treated group.

Conclusions

Se2+ added papaya extracts might (i) reduce PMNL infiltration to speed up the inflammatory phase as well as (ii) induced transient up-regulation of TGF-β1 and VEGFA expression to enhance angiogenesis and fibroblast recruitment thereby enhanced cutaneous wound repair.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This research is supported by the grant under the research matching grant scheme (RMGS-09-01) from IIUM. We would like to express our gratitude to Nurul Wahid Saad and Syed Zahir Idid for their valuable advice at the beginning of the project. Izzati Abd Malik contributed to the preparation of plant extracts.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Faculty of Science, International Islamic University Malaysia
(2)
Faculty of Dentistry, University Malaya

References

  1. Pazyar N, Yaghoobi R, Rafiee E, Mehrabian A, Feily A. Skin wound healing and phytomedicine: A review. Skin Pharmacol Physiol. 2014;27:303–10.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Gurung S, Skalko-Basnet N. Wound healing properties of Carica papaya latex: in vivo evaluation in mice burn model. J Ethnopharmacol. 2009;121:338–41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Anuar NS, Zahari SS, Taib IA, Rahman MT. Effect of green and ripe Carica papaya epicarp extracts on wound healing and during pregnancy. Food Chem Toxicol. 2008;46:2384–89.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Waly MI, Guizani N, Ali A, Rahman MS. Papaya epicarp extract protects against aluminum-induced neurotoxicity. Exp Biol Med. 2012;237:1018–22.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Nafiu AB, Rahman MT. Anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties of unripe papaya extract in an excision wound model. Pharm Biol. 2014;53:662–71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Werner S, Grose R. Regulation of wound healing by growth factors and cytokines. Physiol Rev. 2003;83:835–70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Midwood KS, Williams LV, Schwarzbauer JE. Tissue repair and the dynamics of the extracellular matrix. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2004;36:1031–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Galiano RD, Tepper OM, Pelo CR, Bhatt KA, Callaghan M, Bastidas N, et al. Topical vascular endothelial growth factor accelerates diabetic wound healing through increased angiogenesis and by mobilizing and recruiting bone marrow-derived cells. Am J Pathol. 2004;164:1935–47.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Kasuya A, Tokura Y. Attempts to accelerate wound healing. J Dermatol Sci. 2014;76:169–72.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. McKenzie RC, Arthur JR, Beckett GJ. Selenium and the regulation of cell signalling, growth, and survival: molecular and mechanistic aspects. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2002;4:339–51.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Hershfinkel M, Silverman WF, Sekler I. The zinc sensing receptor, a link between zinc and cell signalling. Mol Med. 2007;13:331–6.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Gamelli RL, He LK. Incisional wound healing: Model analysis of wound breaking strength. In: DiPietro LA, Burns AL, editors. Methods in Molecular Medicine. New Jersey: Humana Press; 2003. p. 37–54.Google Scholar
  13. D’Andrea MR, Rogahn CJ, Damiano BP, Andrade-Gordon P. A combined histochemical and double immunohistochemical labelling protocol for simultaneous evaluation of four cellular markers in restenotic arteries. Biotech Histochem. 1999;74:172–80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Bayat M, Asgari-Moghadam Z, Maroufi M, Rezaie FS, Bayat M, Rakhshan M. Experimental wound healing using microamperage electrical stimulation in rabbits. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2006;43:219–26.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Reddy GK, Enwemeka CS. A simplified method for the analysis of hydroxyproline in biological tissues. Clin Biochem. 1996;29:225–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Filisetti-Cozzi TM, Carpita NC. Measurement of uronic acids without interference from neutral sugars. Anal Biochem. 1991;197:157–62.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Boas NF. Method for the determination of hexosamines in tissues. J Biol Chem. 1953;204:553–63.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Starley IF, Mohammed P, Schneider G, Bickler SW. The treatment of paediatric burns using topical papaya. Burns. 1999;25:636–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Azarkan M, EI Moussaoui A, Van Wuytswinkel D, Dehon G, Looze Y. Fractionation and purification of the enzymes stored in the latex of Carica papaya. J Chromatogr B. 2003;790:229–38.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  20. Krishna KL, Paridhavi M, Jagruti AP. Review on nutritional, medicinal and pharmacological properties of papaya (Carica papaya Linn.). Nat Prod Radiance. 2008;7:364–73.Google Scholar
  21. Kryukov GV, Castellano S, Novoselov SV, Lobanov AV, Zehtab O, Guigo R, et al. Characterization of mammalian selenoproteomes. Science. 2003;300:1439–43.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Agarwal A, Khanna P, Baidya DK, Arora MK. Trace elements in critical illness. J Endocrinol Metabol. 2011;1(2):57–63.Google Scholar
  23. Berger MM, Binnert C, Chiolero RL, Taylor W, Raffoul W, Cayeux MC, et al. Trace element supplementation after major burns increases burned skin trace element concentrations and modulates local protein metabolism but not whole-body substrate metabolism. Am J Clin Nutr. 2007;85:1301–06.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Ashcroft GS, Mills SJ, Lei K, Gibbons L, Jeong M, Taniguchi M, et al. Estrogen modulates cutaneous wound healing by downregulating macrophage migration inhibitory factor. J Clin Invest. 2003;111:1309–18.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Bruun JM, Nielsen CB, Pedersen SB, Flyvbjerg A, Richelsen B. Estrogen reduces pro-inflammatory cytokines in rodent adipose tissue: Studies in vivo and in vitro. Horm Metab Res. 2003;35:142–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Azzi L, El-Alfy M, Martel C, Labrie F. Gender differences in mouse skin morphology and specific effects of sex steroids and dehydroepiandrosterone. J Invest Derm. 2004;124:22–7.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Derici H, Yaman I, Kara C, Kamer E, Diniz G, Ortac R. Simvastatin improves incisional wound healing in a rat model: An experimental study. Wounds. 2012;24:195–200.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Otranto M, Souza-Netto I, Aguila MB, Monte-Alto-Costa A. Male and female rats with severe protein restriction present delayed wound healing. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2009;34:1023–31.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Hewitt H, Wint Y, Talabere L, Lopez S, Bailey E, Parshad O, et al. The use of papaya on pressure ulcers. Am J Nurs. 2002;102:73–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Lim Y, Levy M, Bray TM. Dietary zinc alters early inflammatory responses during cutaneous wound healing in weanling CD-1 mice. J Nutr. 2004;134:811–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Fu X, Li X, Cheng B, Chen W, Sheng Z. Engineered growth factors and cutaneous wound healing: success and possible questions in the past 10 years. Wound Repair Regen. 2005;13:122–30.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Bajpai S, Mishra M, Kumar H, Tripathi K, Singh SK, Pandey HP, et al. Effect of selenium on connexin expression, angiogenesis, and antioxidant status in diabetic wound healing. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2011;144:327–38.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. McAuslan BR, Reilly W. Selenium-induced cell migration and proliferation: relevance to angiogenesis and microangiopathy. Microvasc Res. 1986;32:112–20.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Nafiu and Rahman. 2015

Advertisement