Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Susceptible gene of stasis-stagnation constitution from genome-wide association study related to cardiovascular disturbance and possible regulated traditional Chinese medicine

BMC Complementary and Alternative MedicineThe official journal of the International Society for Complementary Medicine Research (ISCMR)201515:229

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-015-0761-x

Received: 8 July 2014

Accepted: 2 July 2015

Published: 14 July 2015

Abstract

Background

This study identified susceptible loci related to the Yu-Zhi (YZ) constitution, which indicates stasis-stagnation, found in a genome-wide association study (GWAS) in patients with type 2 diabetes and possible regulated traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) using docking and molecular dynamics (MD) simulation.

Methods

Non-aboriginal Taiwanese with type 2 diabetes were recruited. Components of the YZ constitution were assessed by a self-reported questionnaire. Genome-wide SNP genotypes were obtained using the Illumina HumanHap550 platform. The world’s largest TCM database (http://tcm.cmu.edu.tw/) was employed to investigate potential compounds for PON2 interactions.

Results

The study involved 1,021 unrelated individuals with type 2 diabetes. Genotyping data were obtained from 947 of the 1,021 participants. The GWAS identified 22 susceptible single nucleotide polymorphisms on 13 regions of 11 chromosomes for the YZ constitution. Genotypic distribution showed that PON2 on chromosome 7 was most significantly associated with the risk of the YZ constitution. Docking and MD simulation indicated 13-hydroxy-(9E_11E)-octadecadienoic acid was the most stable TCM ligand.

Conclusions

Risk loci occurred in PON2, which has antioxidant properties that might protect against atherosclerosis and hyperglycemia, showing it is a susceptible gene for the YZ constitution and possible regulation by 13-hydroxy-(9E_11E)-octadecadienoic acid.

Keywords

Type 2 diabetes Genome-wide association study Body constitution Traditional Chinese medicine Type 2 diabetes Molecular dynamics (MD) simulation

Background

Differences exist between traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) and conventional western medicine. These differences include not only the treatment approach (such as herbal medicine and acupuncture in TCM) but also the underlying theories. A principle component of TCM theory is the concept of constitution, which provides a method for classifying patients according to type. Constitution demonstrates individual differences in structure and function, temperament, and environmental adaptability. Patients with different constitutions have different susceptibilities, development, and prognoses for certain diseases. According to Huang Di Nei Jing, a textbook of TCM internal medicine written approximately 2,000 years ago, a certain constitution is partially developed from congenital factors [1]. This view is similar to “personalized medicine,” which highlights the genetic background for disease susceptibility. Genetic studies to investigate the congenital factors of constitution are increasing in the post-genome era. Chen et al. reported that allele frequencies of human leukocyte antigens including DPB1*0501 in the Yin-deficiency group (Frequency 51.6 % vs 35.6 %, relative risk 1.9), DRB1*09012 in the Phlegmwetness group (Frequency 23.4 % vs 12.8 %, relative risk 2.1), and DQB1*03032 in the Qi-deficiency (Frequency 22.2 % vs 8.1 %, relative risk 3.2) and Phlegm-wetness groups (Frequency 19.9 % vs 8.1 %, relative risk 2.8) differ significantly from those in the normal constitution [2]. Wang et al. conducted an expression array and identified 785 upregulated genes and 954 downregulated genes in the Yang-deficiency constitution, compared with those in normal individuals. The most significant enriched Gene Ontology Cluster of upregulated genes is “response to stress” which contained interleukin factors and their receptors. The most significant enriched Gene Ontology Cluster of downregulated genes is “nucleobase, nucleoside, nucleotide and nucleic acid metabolism” which contained thyroid hormone receptor signal pathway [3]. A study of polymorphisms further identified the biased distribution of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in PPARD (peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors delta) rs2267669 and rs2076167 and APM1 (adipose most abundant gene transcript 1) rs7627128 and rs1063539 in the Yang-deficiency constitution; PPARD rs2076167 and APM1 rs266729 and rs7627128 in Phlegm-wetness constitution; and in PPARG (peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors gamma) Pro12Ala in the Yin-deficiency constitution [4]. Gene expression is influenced by environmental factors in the posttranscriptional process and candidate gene studies are limited to a certain viewing region.

Cardiovascular disease is a major complication in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM), especially in those with type 2 diabetes, resulting in both comorbidity and mortality [5]. One meta-analysis reported that DM tends to double the risk of cardiovascular disease [6]. Screening for high cardiovascular risk in patients and providing more effective protection for these patients are important in clinical practice. The Yu-Zhi (YZ) constitution in TCM indicates stasis and stagnation, which expressed dull, lusterless skin color; dry, cracked, scaly or tough skin; dull purple lips or tongue; localized pain or numbness; knotted, intermittent, or uneven pulse. It is one of the body constitutions that tend to express blood stasis syndrome (BSS), a morbid state caused by blood circulation disturbance, included extravasated blood, blood circulating sluggishly, or blood congested in viscera, that may turn into pathogenic factors. BSS is usually considered a link to cardiovascular complications. A study of hospitalized patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) noted that BSS was the most common TCM pattern in over three-quarters of the patients [7]. The risk of BSS increases with the carotid intima-media thickness in patients with dyslipidemia [8]. According to TCM theory, BSS constitutes the main mechanism of cardiovascular diseases, including diabetic cardiovascular complications. The pathogenesis of BSS includes microcirculation disturbance, abnormal hemorheological factors, and hemodynamic changes. Some small samples molecular studies also detected differences in cell surface antigens and gene expression between those with BSS and healthy controls [9, 10]. As mentioned earlier, congenital factors are considered to be a principal component of constitutional formation; possible genetic variations underlying the YZ constitution are of interest. In the present study, a genome-wide association study was conducted to identify susceptible loci related to the YZ constitution in patients with type 2 diabetes. Genes related to the susceptible loci are considered susceptible genes of the YZ constitution. Computer-aided drug design (CADD) has been widely used in studies investigating new treatments [1113], and could help accelerate the development of leading drugs [14, 15]. CADD could be employed to approaches in the design of drugs for anti-inflammation [16], anti-virus [17, 18], pain regulation [19], weight loss [20, 21], stroke therapy [2224], and cancer therapy [2528]. Hence, we employed a TCM database (http://tcm.cmu.edu.tw) [29] and natural compounds to conduct virtual screening for proteins of susceptible genes by molecular docking to find potential TCM or natural compounds. Then we performed molecular dynamics (MD) simulation to study the protein-ligand interactions and stabilized conformations for the top candidates.

Methods

Study participants

Our study population comprised adult patients with type 2 diabetes in Taiwan. Patients willing to participate in a genetic study in nonaboriginal Taiwanese were recruited from the outpatient clinic of China Medical University Hospital (Taiwan) between September 2006 and June 2007. Type 2 diabetes was diagnosed according to the criteria of the 1997 American Diabetes Association [30]. Patients with type 1 diabetes, gestational diabetes, or maturity-onset diabetes of the young were all excluded. This research was approved by the China Medical University Hospital Institutional Review Board, and all participants gave informed consent.

Data collection

Patient information (age, sex, age at diagnosis of diabetes, smoking history) was collected by a questionnaire. Systolic and diastolic blood pressures were obtained by averaging two measurements with a resting interval of at least 5 min. Patients with hypertension were defined as having a systolic pressure of more than 130 mmHg, and a diastolic pressure of more than 80 mmHg, or those who were receiving antihypertensive agents. The body height and weight of subjects (wearing light clothing and no shoes) were measured by experienced research staff. The body mass index was calculated by dividing the body weight (kg) by the square of the body height (m). Blood samples were drawn between 8:00 and 10:00 a.m. after the patients had fasted overnight, and separated serum was stored at −70 °C until assayed. Fasting plasma glucose was detected by the hexokinase method. Serum total cholesterol, triglycerides, high- (HDL) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, creatinine, and uric acid levels were measured by standard laboratory methods. High-sensitivity C-reactive protein was measured by immunoturbidimetry (Integra 700; Roche, Mannheim, Germany). Hemoglobin A1c was gauged by the high-performance liquid chromatography method (HLC-723G7; TOSOH Bioscience, Tokyo, Japan). The albumin-to-creatinine ratio (ACR) was obtained from a morning spot urine test and data were categorized as normoalbuminuria (ACR 30 mg/g), microalbuminuria (30 mg/g < ACR < 300 mg/g) or macroalbuminuria (ACR 300 mg/g). Biochemical analyses were performed at the Taipei Institution of Pathology.

Yu-Zhi constitution questionnaire

The YZ body constitution was assessed by a questionnaire, which was developed using a psychometrically sound method as reported previously [31], and comprises eight self-reported symptomatic items(Supp.) [32]. Each item was assessed on a 5-point Likert scale (never, occasionally, sometimes, often, and always). The YZ score was obtained by a summation of the scores of the eight items, and a higher score indicated stronger intensity of the YZ constitution.

Genotyping

Genomic DNA was extracted from peripheral blood mononuclear cells for a genome-wide association study. The procedures for genomic DNA extraction, whole genome genotyping, genotype calling and quality control have been described previously [33]. PUREGENE DNA isolation kit (Gentra Systems, Minneapolis, MN) was use to extract genomic DNA from peripheral blood mononuclear cells, and Illumina HumanHap550-Duo BeadChips was used to perform the whole genome genotyping in deCODE genetics (Reykjavı’k, Iceland). The standard procedure implemented in BeadStudio, with default parameters suggested by the platform manufacturer was used to perform Genotype calling. Genotyping validation was performed using the Sequenom iPLEX assay (Sequenom MassARRAY system; Sequenom, San Diego, CA, USA). By examining several summary statistics, quality control of the genotype data was performed. First, by calculating the ratio of loci having heterozygous calls on the X chromosome, sex of the patients was double-checked. Second, total successful call rate and the minor allele frequency were also calculated for each SNP. The exclusion situations for SNPs were as follows: no polymorphism, a total call rate of < 95 %, or a minor allele frequency of < 5 % and a total call rate < 99 %. A total of 560,184 SNPs were genotyped, 38,700 SNPs were excluded due to quality control criteria, 12,723 SNPs were excluded due to Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium principle (P <0.0001) and 508,761 SNPs were used in final analysis.

Statistical analysis

Data from continuous variables were expressed as mean ± standard deviation and categorical variables were expressed as percentages. Participants were divided into high and low YZ score groups according to the median score (YZ score = 10). Differences between the high and low YZ score groups were compared using Student’s t-test for continuous variables and the χ2 test for categorical variables. Association analysis was carried out to compare allele frequency and genotype distribution between the high and low YZ score groups using 6 single point methods for each SNP: genotype, allele, trend (Cochran-Armitage test), additive, dominant, and recessive models using PLINK (PLINK 1.07, http://pngu.mgh.harvard.edu/~purcell/plink/contact.shtml#cite) and SAS (SAS Institute Inc., 100 SAS Campus Drive, Cary, NC 27513–2414, USA).

The associated SNPs were selected from those at least showing p-values < 10−5 under the most significant test statistic obtained from any of the 6 statistical models. We then used a multivariate logistic regression model to determine the genotype odds ratios (ORs) and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) of associated SNPs in the best model. For ORs, p-values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Structure preparation and docking study

Because the PON2 structure is not available in the PDB database, the sequence of PON2 (UniProt ID: Q15165) was obtained from the UniProt database for 3D structure modeling. The sequence of PON2 was submitted to the I-TASSER server [3436] (iterative threading assembly refinement algorithm) to generate a 3D structure of PON2. For 3D structure validation, we also employed a Ramachandran plot [37], profile-3D (Discovery Studio Client v2.5; Accelrys, San Diego, CA, USA.) and PONDR-FIT [38] (DisProt, http://www.disprot.org/) to validate the PON2 modelling structure. The residue His114 of PON2 was regarded as the binding site for screening TCM compounds based on protein-ligand interaction [39]. We used the LigandFit module of DS 2.5 to calculate docking poses of TCM compounds in the PON2 protein structure. Each binding pose of the TCM ligands was generated by Monte-Carlo techniques. The minimization of TCM compounds utilized the CHARMm force field [40]. The minimization step in each docking pose was performed with 1000 steps of the Steepest Descent and Conjugate Gradient. The generated conformations of ligands were docked into the defined binding site of the PON2 modeling structure. All of the TCM compounds with docking poses had various scoring functions including the piecewise linear potential (−PLP1, −PLP2), potential of mean force (−PMF), and Dock Scores.

Molecular dynamics simulation

The MD simulation was carried out by the GROMACS 4.5.5 package [41] to simulate the dynamic condition of the protein-ligand complex from the docking results of PON2. The edge of the box between the protein complexes was set as 1.2 nm. We choice the charmm27 force field for the simulation system [42]. The protein-ligand complex containing water molecules was placed by TIP3P model cubic cells. Non-bonded interactions included Coulomb terms and van der Waals (VDW). The particle mesh Ewald method [43, 44] was used to define Coulomb interactions as electrostatic in this experiment, and the cut-off distance of VDW residues was set at 1.4 nm. The linear constraint solver algorithm was used to fix all bond lengths among all atoms of the protein-ligand complexes. Topology files and parameters of TCM compounds in PON2 complexes were generated from the SwissParam web server [45] for the GROMACS simulation. For ion setting of solvent concentrations, the Na+ and Cl ions were randomly replaced the water molecules in the solvent system with a concentration of 0.145 M. The minimization of energy was used to stabilize the protein-ligand complex by the steepest descent method with 5000 steps, followed by equilibration performed under position restraints with 1 ns for balance of the water molecules between PON2 complexes. The condition of equilibration was under constant temperature dynamics (NVT type) at a temperature of 310 K. In the final step, a production run was performed for 20,000 ps with constant pressure and temperature dynamics (NPT type). The temperature of the production run was set at 310 K. All frames of MD conformation were sampled every 20 ps for trajectory analysis under GROMACS4.5.5.

Results

This study enrolled 1,021 patients with type 2 diabetes who were 20 years old or older. Participants were divided into a high YZ score group and low YZ score group according to the median (numbers of high YZ score: low YZ score = 583: 438). The patient information and clinical characteristics of the high and low YZ score groups are summarized in Table 1. Compared with the low YZ score group, the high YZ score group was significantly older (61.3 ± 11.4 vs 59.7 ± 10.5 years; p = 0.020), included more women (53.5 vs 47.3 %; p = 0.048), had a longer duration of diabetes (11.9 ± 7.4 vs 10.8 ± 6.8 years; p = 0.017), and displayed poorer control of serum glucose (hemoglobin A1c 8.0 ± 1.5 vs 7.8 ± 1.4 %; p = 0.015).
Table 1

Characteristic and clinical profiles of the study subjects

 

High YZ score (n = 583)

Low YZ score (n = 438)

p-value

Mean age (years)

61.3 ± 11.4

59.7 ± 10.5

0.020*

Male (%)

46.5

52.7

0.048*

Diabetes duration (years)

11.9 ± 7.4

10.8 ± 6.8

0.017*

Hypertension ratio (%)

73.9

79

0.060

Current smoking (%)

18.3

18.0

0.917

Body mass index (kg/m2)

25.6 ± 4.0

25.7 ± 3.5

0.722

Fasting plasma glucose (mmol/L)

8.0 ± 2.5

7.9 ± 2.3

0.590

Hemoglobin A1c %

8.0 ± 1.5

7.8 ± 1.4

0.015*

Total cholesterol (mmol/L)

4.9 ± 1.1

4.9 ± 1.0

0.845

Triglycerides (mmol/L)

1.9 ± 1.6

1.8 ± 1.3

0.322

HDL cholesterol (mmol/L)

1.2 ± 0.4

1.3 ± 0.4

0.181

LDL cholesterol (mmol/L)

3.1 ± 1.0

3.1 ± 0.9

0.912

hs-CRP (mg/L)

3.1 ± 6.5

3.0 ± 10.4

0.899

Creatinine (μmol/L)

80.4 ± 61.9

79.2 ± 47.4

0.747

Uric acid (μmol/L)

374.9 ± 113.1

374.9 ± 101.2

0.888

Normoalbuminuria (%)

56.7

61.6

0.101

Microalbuminuria (%)

28.7

28.0

Macroalbuminuria (%)

14.6

10.3

YZ, Yu-Zhi; HDL, High-density lipoprotein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; hs-CRP, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; ACR, urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio

Values are mean ± SD, or percentages

p value: t-test or χ2 test to sex, current smoking, hypertension ratio and ACR

* p < 0.05

Genotyping data were obtained from 947 (numbers of high YZ score: low YZ score = 539: 408) of the 1,021 participants using Illumina HumanHap550duov3 chips. Quantile–quantile plots for each model were shown that the distribution of observed p-values deviated from expected p-values in Fig. 1. Manhattan plots of p-values across all chromosomes for each model were shown in Fig. 2. SNPs in autosomal chromosomes with a p-value < 9.8 × 10−8 were not detected in all the 6 statistical models. Table 2 summarizes the SNPs selected from results showing p-values < 10−5 under the most significant test statistic obtained from any of the 6 statistical models. However, the false discovery rate was high. The SNP rs7694118 is located on chromosome 4 in the 5’ untranslated region (UTR) of PCDH10 (protocadherin 10). The SNP rs7493 is located on chromosome 7 in an exon region of PON2 (paraoxonase 2) and is in complete linkage disequlibrium with rs2299263 and rs17166875 (D’ = 1.0, r2 = 1.0) in intron regions. The SNP rs4526895 is in tight linkage disequlibrium with rs12865228 (D’ = 1; r2 = 0.97). Two of the SNPs are located in an intron of FREM2 (FRAS1 [Fraser syndrome 1] related extracellular matrix protein 2) on chromosome 13. The SNP rs8093481was strongly associated with the YZ constitution (p = 9.64 × 10−7) and in complete linkage disequilibrium with rs11660953 (D’ = 1; r2 = 1). Two of the SNPs are located in an intron region of the PIEZO2 (piezo-type mechanosensitive ion channel component 2) gene on chromosome 18. The SNP rs4801958 is located on chromosome 19 in an exon region of the ZNF665 (zinc finger protein 665) and is completely linked with rs12460170 (D’ = 1.0, r2 = 1.0), which is also in an exon region. It is also tightly linked with rs12971799 (D’ = 1.0, r2 = 0.989) and rs1133146 (D’ = 1.0, r2 = 0.989) in the 3’ UTR, and with rs4803055 (D’ = 0.987, r2 = 0.824) in an intron region of the ZNF665.
Fig. 1

Quantile–quantile plots of genotype, allele, trend (Cochran-Armitage test), additive, dominant, and recessive models. Observed p-values were compared with the expected p-values under the null distribution for each model

Fig. 2

Manhattan plots of genotype, allele, trend (Cochran-Armitage test), additive, dominant, and recessive models

Table 2

Summary of the SNPs associated with high Yu-Zhi score in type 2 diabetes

     

RA frequency

     

dbSNP ID

Chr.

Position (Mb)

Gene

RA* (NRA)

High YZ score

Low YZ score

p-value (Best model)

-log (p-value)

best model

Effect size (95 % CI)

FDR

rs12036718

1p

48.3

Unknow

T(C)

0.174

0.103

8.10 × 10−6

5.09

Trend

1.68 (0.95 -2.99)

1.00

rs1932064

1p

70.8

Unknow

T(C)

0.788

0.700

6.18 × 10−6

5.21

Dominant

1.62 (1.05 -2.51)

0.97

rs8179355

1p

70.9

Unknow

C(A)

0.782

0.699

7.53 × 10−6

5.12

Recessive

1.54 (1.25 -1.89)

0.86

rs9633289

1p

70.9

Unknow

T(A)

0.217

0.298

6.18 × 10−6

5.21

Recessive

1.55 (1.11 -2.15)

0.95

rs7565310

2q

128.9

Unknow

A(G)

0.484

0.380

8.63 × 10−6

5.06

Trend

1.53 (1.27 -1.84)

0.83

rs7694118

4q

134.3

PCDH10

C(T)

0.698

0.663

6.31 × 10−6

5.20

Genotype

1.30 (0.85 -1.99)

1.00

rs164368

5q

160.6

Unknow

T(C)

0.803

0.785

6.14 × 10−6

5.21

Genotype

1.12 (0.89 -1.40)

1.00

rs7493

7q

94.9

PON2

C(G)

0.180

0.177

5.33 × 10−6

5.27

Genotype

1.06 (0.74 -1.51)

1.00

rs2299263

7q

94.9

PON2

A(G)

0.180

0.177

5.33 × 10−6

5.27

Genotype

1.06 (0.74 -1.51)

1.00

rs17166875

7q

94.9

PON2

T(C)

0.180

0.177

5.33 × 10−6

5.27

Genotype

1.02 (0.81 -1.29)

1.00

rs12865228

13q

38.2

FREM2

G(T)

0.429

0.414

3.38 × 10−6

5.47

Genotype

1.06 (0.88 -1.28)

1.00

rs4526895

13q

38.2

FREM2

C(T)

0.428

0.414

1.79 × 10−6

5.75

Genotype

1.38 (0.93 -2.04)

1.00

rs17118382

14q

82.8

Unknow

A(G)

0.815

0.730

9.75 × 10−6

5.01

Allele

1.45 (1.03 -2.04)

0.98

rs194045

16p

29.2

Unknow

G(A)

0.943

0.888

6.31 × 10−6

5.20

Trend

2.13 (1.51 -3.02)

0.83

rs8093481

18p

10.7

PIEZO2

A(G)

0.757

0.656

9.64 × 10−7

6.02

Trend

1.79 (1.16 -2.77)

0.93

rs11660953

18p

10.7

PIEZO2

T(C)

0.756

0.656

1.60 × 10−6

5.79

Trend

1.79 (1.16 -2.77)

0.93

rs1133146

19q

58.4

ZNF665

A(G)

0.990

0.956

4.77 × 10−6

5.32

Allele

1.52 (1.01 -2.29)

0.99

rs12971799

19q

58.4

ZNF665

C(T)

0.700

0.599

4.77 × 10−6

5.32

Allele

1.49 (0.99 -2.25)

1.00

rs4801958

19q

58.4

ZNF665

T(C)

0.700

0.599

4.77 × 10−6

5.32

Allele

1.56 (1.29 -1.89)

0.83

rs12460170

19q

58.4

ZNF665

G(A)

0.699

0.600

7.56 × 10−6

5.12

Allele

1.56 (1.29 -1.89)

0.83

rs4803055

19q

58.4

ZNF665

C(T)

0.737

0.639

4.87 × 10−6

5.31

Allele

1.56 (1.02 -2.38)

0.98

rs871913

20p

16.1

Unknow

A(G)

0.099

0.045

8.24 × 10−6

5.08

Trend

1.86 (0.78 -4.44)

1.00

Table 3 shows the results of multiple logistic regression analysis of the genotypic distribution of susceptible SNPs in patients with high YZ scores among the high and low YZ score groups. The results showed that 20 SNPs in 11 regions of 10 chromosomes were significantly associated with high YZ scores in the best model, after controlling for age, sex, diabetes duration, and hemoglobin A1c. The risk genotypes were defined by homozygous risk alleles (higher allele frequency in the high YZ score group than in the low YZ score group). Under the best model, the risky CC genotype of rs7493, AA genotype of rs2299263 and TT genotype of rs17166875 within the PON2 gene in chromosome 7 were associated with a high YZ score, with an 8.62-fold (95 % CI, 2.60-28.52) increase in risk. The risky AA genotype of rs8093481 and TT genotype of rs11660953 within the PIEZO2 gene in chromosome 18 increased the risk of a high YZ score 2.33-fold (95 % CI, 1.31-4.14). The risky GG genotype of rs194045 in chromosome 16 increased the risk of a high YZ score 2.2-fold (95 % CI, 1.52-3.19). The risky AA genotype of rs7565310 in chromosome 2 was associated with a 2.11-fold (95 % CI, 1.49-2.99) increase in risk.
Table 3

Genotypic distribution between high and low Yu-Zhi score, and adjusted odds ratios of SNPs associated with high Yu-Zhi Score in type 2 diabetes

 

Gene

dbSNP ID

Risk allele

Genotype#

High YZ score (%)

Low YZ score (%)

OR (95 % CI)

Chr.

Unknown

rs12036718

T

CC

70.3

78.9

1.00(Ref)

1p

   

TT + CT

29.7

21.1

1.68 (0.87-3.24)

 

Unknown

rs1932064

T

CC + CT

43.2

57.9

1.00(Ref)

1p

   

TT

56.8

42.1

1.78 (1.01-3.13)*

 

Unknown

rs8179355

C

AA + AC

38.0

52.6

1.00(Ref)

1p

   

CC

62.0

47.4

1.78 (1.36-2.31)*

 

Unknown

rs9633289

T

AA + AT

40.7

54.9

1.00(Ref)

1p

   

TT

59.3

45.1

1.73 (1.13-2.63)*

 

Unknown

rs7565310

A

GG + AG

75.1

86.5

1.00(Ref)

2q

   

AA

24.9

13.5

2.11 (1.49-2.99)*

 

PCDH10

rs7694118

C

TT

4.1

13.3

1.00(Ref)

4q

   

CC + CT

95.9

86.7

0.27 (0.10-0.72) *

 

Unknown

rs164368

T

CC

6.7

2.2

1.00(Ref)

5q

   

TT + CT

93.3

97.8

0.30 (0.14-0.64)*

 

PON2

rs7493

C

GG + CG

94.2

99.3

1.00(Ref)

7q

   

CC

5.8

0.7

8.62 (2.60-28.52)*

 

PON2

rs2299263

A

GG + AG

94.2

99.3

1.00(Ref)

7q

   

AA

5.8

0.7

8.62 (2.60-28.52)*

 

PON2

rs17166875

T

CC + CT

94.2

99.3

1.00(Ref)

7q

   

TT

5.8

0.7

8.62 (2.60-28.52)*

 

FREM2

rs12865228

G

TT

29.2

38.7

1.00(Ref)

13q

   

GG + GT

70.8

61.3

1.59 (1.21-2.10)*

 

FREM2

rs4526895

C

TT

29.2

38.7

1.00(Ref)

13q

   

CC + CT

70.8

61.3

1.59 (1.21-2.10)*

 

Unknown

rs17118382

A

GG

4.0

8.8

1.00(Ref)

14q

   

AA + AG

96.0

91.2

0.42 (0.19-0.95)*

 

Unknown

rs194045

G

AA + AG

10.6

21.3

1.00(Ref)

16p

   

GG

89.4

78.7

2.20 (1.52-3.19)*

 

PIEZO2

rs8093481

A

GG + AG

39.6

58.9

1.00(Ref)

18p

   

AA

60.4

41.1

2.33 (1.31-4.12)*

 

PIEZO2

rs11660953

T

CC + CT

39.6

58.9

1.00(Ref)

18p

   

TT

60.4

41.1

2.33 (1.31-4.12)*

 

ZNF665

rs1133146

A

GG + AG

48.6

64.2

1.00(Ref)

19q

   

AA

51.4

35.8

1.94 (1.10-3.42)*

 

ZNF665

rs12971799

C

TT + CT

48.6

64.2

1.00(Ref)

19q

   

CC

51.4

35.8

1.94 (1.10-3.42)*

 

ZNF665

rs4801958

T

CC + CT

50.1

63.2

1.00(Ref)

19q

   

TT

49.9

36.8

1.67 (1.28-2.18)*

 

ZNF665

rs12460170

G

AA + AG

50.2

63.0

1.00(Ref)

19q

   

GG

49.8

37.0

1.65 (1.26-2.15)*

 

ZNF665

rs4803055

C

TT + CT

41.4

60.6

1.00(Ref)

19q

   

CC

58.6

39.4

2.25 (1.27-3.97)*

 

Unknown

rs871913

A

GG

84.5

91.6

1.00(Ref)

20p

   

AA + AG

15.5

8.4

2.18 (0.88-5.40)

Case number: High Yu-Zhi score = 538, Low Yu-Zhi score = 409

Chr, chromosome; dbSNP ID, SNP database indentification; YZ, Yu-Zhi; CI, confidence intervals of odds ratio; PCDH10, protocadherin 10; PON2, paraoxonase 2; FREM2, FRAS1 related extracellular matrix protein 2; PIEZO2, piezo-type mechanosensitive ion channel component 2; ZNF665, zinc finger protein 665

#Better of dominant or recessive model

Adjusted by age, sex, DM duration and hemoglobin A1c

*Significant difference of genotype distribution between high YZ group and low YZ group (p < 0.05)

The ZNF665 gene’s completely linked SNPs, the risky AA genotype of rs1133146 and the GG genotype of rs12971799, were associated with a 1.94-fold (95 % CI, 1.10-3.42) increase in risk. The risky TT genotype of rs4801958 and GG genotype of rs12460170 within the ZNF665 gene in chromosome 19 were associated with a 1.67-fold (95 % CI, 1.28-2.18) and 1.65-fold (95 % CI, 1.26-2.15) increase in risk for a high YZ score, respectively. The risky CC genotype of rs4803055 was associated with a 2.25-fold increase in risk (95 % CI, 1.27-3.97).

The risky TT genotype of rs1932064 in chromosome 1 was associated with a 1.78-fold increase in risk (95 % CI, 1.01-3.13). Two tightly linked SNPs, the CC genotype of rs8179355 and the TT genotype of rs9633289, carried a 1.78-fold (95 % CI, 1.36-2.31) and 1.73-fold (95 % CI, 1.13-2.63) increase in risk, respectively. The SNP rs12865228 within the FREM2 gene on chromosome 13 and its completely linked SNP rs4526895 were associated with a 1.59-fold (95 % CI, 1.21-2.10) increase in risk.

By contrast, rs7694118 in PCDH10 of chromosome 4, rs164368 in chromosome 5 and rs17118382 of chromosome 14 decreased the risk of high YZ score by 73 % (OR 0.27; 95 % CI, 0.10-0.72), 70 % (OR 0.30; 95 % CI, 0.14-0.64), and 58 % (OR 0.42; 95 % CI, 0.19-0.95), respectively, in the dominant model, after controlling for age, sex, diabetes duration, and hemoglobin A1c. For the remaining SNPs, no differences emerged between patients with high versus low YZ scores.

The PON2 protein was built from the I-TASSER server and we validated the simulated PON2 structural residues by Ramachandran plot (Fig. 3), with 86.6 % of residues of PON2 located in the favoured region, and only 5.1 % of residues in the disfavoured regions. We also used 3D-profiling to observe the reliability of each residue. Most PON2 residues had validation scores with positive score values (Fig. 4). The score for the active residue, His144, displayed that it was reliable from the modelling structure, indicating that this key residue was not affected by the docking screen process. For protein disorder analysis (Fig. 5), most of the sequence (including residue His114) revealed that the disorder disposition was below 0.5. The prediction of disorder analysis illustrated that the PON2 protein is a folded structure, and may not affect TCM compounds during the docking process [46, 47].
Fig. 3

Ramachandran plot of the PON2 modelling structure. The modelling structure was built from the ITASSER server. There are 86.6 % and 5.1 % of residues of PON2 in the *favoured and disfavoured regions, respectively

Fig. 4

3D-profile of the best PON2 modelling structure. A score above zero indicates the modelling residue is reliable

Fig. 5

The disorder analysis of the PON2 sequence by PONDR-FIT prediction. Values of disorder disposition under 0.5 denote ordered residues

The docking analysis was based on -PLP1, −PLP2, −PMF, and Dock Scores to select the docking poses of TCM compounds from database screening. From the scoring analysis, we analysed the top ten TCM ligands with high -PMF scores as candidates (Table 4). Furthermore, we found the docking poses of the top three candidates, divaricatacid, 13-hydroxy-(9E_11E)-octadecadienoic acid, and 9-hydroxy-(10E)-octadecenoic acid, were very close to the key residue His114 (Fig. 6). The docking poses showing that the three candidates can interact with His114, and have the potential to activate PON2 for antioxidation. In a further study, we performed MD simulation to observe the stability of TCM candidates in the PON2 structures under dynamic condition.
Table 4

Scoring functions of the top ten candidates from TCM database screening of PON2 protein structure

Name

-PLP1

-PLP2

-PMF

Dock Score

Divaricatacid

66.24

64.27

139.09

59.236

13-hydroxy-(9E_11E)-octadecadienoic acid

76.84

79.89

137.40

27.758

9-hydroxy-(10E)-octadecenoic acid

68.05

70.50

132.62

34.441

10-hydroxy-(8E)-octadecenoic acid

73.47

76.87

132.32

39.635

11-hydroxy-(9Z)-octadecenoic acid

86.85

85.40

130.44

32.403

Divaricataester A

75.03

66.69

124.91

55.187

8-hydroxy-(9E)-octadecenoic acid

51.03

59.33

124.80

36.94

Benzyl-O-beta-D-glucopyranoside

57.08

53.02

122.42

47.813

Alismorientols A

52.95

58.02

118.54

26.339

1-O-beta-D-glucopyranosyloxy-3-methylbut-2-en-1-ol

55.51

47.42

117.38

41.243

PMF; potential of mean force; PLP, piecewise linear potential

Fig. 6

The docking poses of the top three candidates from TCM database screening: (a) divaricatacid, (b)13-hydroxy-(9E_11E)-octadecadienoic acid, and (c) 9-hydroxy-(10E)-octadecenoic acid. The active residue His114 is in red

For the trajectory analysis of the MD simulation, the root mean square deviation (RMSD) and gyration of protein atoms were used to observe the stability of the protein structure for PON2 and protein-ligand complexes. The value of the protein RMSD was around 0.2 and 0.3 nm from 2 ns to 20 ns (Fig. 7a). The apo form of the PON2 and PON2 complexes with TCM candidates revealed stable fluctuation during all of the MD simulation time, and 20 ns of simulation time facilitated all simulation systems into constant conditions. The gyration of the PON2 structure was state in 2.05 from 8 ns to 20 ns (Fig. 7b). The apo form revealed a decreasing value of gyration, which was more compact than the PON2 complexes with TCM candidates, illustrating that TCM compounds not leave aware from the PON2 structure during all MD simulation times. For the ligand RMSD, we can found that 9-hydroxy-(10E)-octadecenoic acid displayed fluctuating RMSD values from 6 ns to 20 ns. Divaricatacid and 13-hydroxy-(9E_11E)-octadecadienoic acid revealed stable ligand RMSDs during the overall simulation time (Fig. 7c). Hence, 9-hydroxy-(10E)-octadecenoic acid may not be suitable to interact with the PON2 structure. The total energy of the PON2 complexes (Fig. 8) with divaricatacid, 13-hydroxy-(9E_11E)-octadecadienoic acid, and 9-hydroxy-(10E)-octadecenoic acid was −8.74 × 105 during the initial simulation time (from 0 ns to 2 ns), but in the final step of the simulation time, the total energy tended to be stable at −8.78 × 105 which was similar to the apo form of PON2. The results for total energy show that all systems of PON2 are stable after 20 ns of MD simulation time.
Fig. 7

Plots of (a) protein root mean square deviation (RMSD) and (b) radius of the gyration and ligand RMSD values in the analysis of PON2 systems during a simulation time of 20 ns

Fig. 8

Total energy of the PON2 systems for a simulation time of 20 ns

We further calculated the root mean square fluctuation (RMSF) values for each residue of the PON2 protein structure (Fig. 9). Interestingly, we found the residues revealed high fluctuations from 50 to 100 on the apo form of PON2 (Fig. 9a). The high RMSF values indicate the residue was flexible at all simulation times. The PON2 structure with docked TCM compounds was more stable than the apo form, which suggests that TCM compounds can stabilize the protein structure in the protein-ligand complex type. Because of the flexible residues on the apo form of PON2 near the key residue His114, reducing the variation of these residues denotes that TCM compounds could tightly interact with the PON2 structure. We also calculated the solvent accessible hydrophobic and hydrophilic surface areas for the three TCM compounds. The results show that divaricatacid is suitable for hydrophobic solvents, because the hydrophilic areas of 13-hydroxy-(9E_11E)-octadecadienoic acid and 9-hydroxy-(10E)-octadecenoic acid were wider than that of divaricatacid (Fig. 10).
Fig. 9

Root mean square fluctuation values for each residue of the PON2 structure in the apo form and protein-ligand complexes for a simulation time of 20 ns

Fig. 10

Solvent accessible hydrophilic (a) and hydrophobic (b) surface areas for the PON2 structure with TCM compounds

To analyze the migration of each TCM compound during the MD simulation time, we computed the mean square displacement (MSD) value to measure the variation of each ligand in the PON2 structure. 9-hydroxy-(10E)-octadecenoic acid displayed a significantly higher MSD value during the 20 ns simulation time than the other two candidates (Fig. 11a). In addition, we further calculated the distance between PON2 and the three candidates. The distance between 13-hydroxy-(9E_11E)-octadecadienoic acid and the PON2 structure did not change much during the simulation time of 20 ns (Fig. 11b), but divaricatacid and 9-hydroxy-(10E)-octadecenoic acid gradually moved away from the PON2 structure.
Fig. 11

The mean square displacement (MSD) of different ligands (a) for a simulation time of 20 ns. A high MSD value indicates the ligand has migrated farther from the initial site. The distance between the centers of mass of RbAp48 and each ligand (b) during a simulation time of 20 ns

We employed CAVER 3.0 software [48] to predict the ligand tunnels in the PON2 structure for the three TCM candidates (Fig. 12). The predicted tunnels are represented by red, blue, green, yellow, cyan and orange solid phases. The apo form of the PON2 structure revealed a broad space of tunnels (Fig. 12a), because there was no docked ligand in the PON2 binding site. A comparison of the MSD values showed that 13-hydroxy-(9E_11E)-octadecadienoic acid was the most stable for all MD simulation times, and hence, the predicted tunnel reveals a narrow space in Fig. 12c, which is represented by the green solid phase. For the other two TCM candidates, divaricatacid and 9-hydroxy-(10E)-octadecenoic acid, the predicted tunnels display spacious areas in Fig. 12b and 12c. In the 20 ns snapshot (Fig. 13), 13-hydroxy-(9E_11E)-octadecadienoic acid is still close to the key residue His114, which confirms the ligand RMSD, migration analysis and the measurement of the protein-ligand distance (Fig. 13b). The final snapshot showed large distances between His114 and both divaricatacid and 9-hydroxy-(10E)-octadecenoic acid (Fig.13a and 13c). This illustrates that 13-hydroxy-(9E_11E)-octadecadienoic acid is the best potential TCM compound to interact with the PON2 structure.
Fig. 12

Ligand tunnel prediction for the PON2 system in apo form (a) condition and protein-ligand complexes with TCM compounds: (a) divaricatacid, (b)13-hydroxy-(9E_11E)-octadecadienoic acid, and (c) 9-hydroxy-(10E)-octadecenoic acid

Fig. 13

The final snapshots of PON2 with three TCM compounds: (a) divaricatacid, (b)13-hydroxy-(9E_11E)-octadecadienoic acid, and (c) 9-hydroxy-(10E)-octadecenoic acid from the results of MD simulation

Discussion

The results of this genome-wide association study identified 22 YZ constitutionally susceptible SNPs, representing 13 regions of 11 chromosomes. Genotypic distribution showed that high YZ scores were significantly associated with PON2 on chromosome 7, PIEZO2 on chromosome 18, ZNF665 on chromosome 19, FREM2 on chromosome 13, and unknown genes on chromosomes 1p, 2q, and 16p. PCDH10 on chromosome 4q, and unknown genes on chromosome 5q and chromosome 14q were significantly associated with lower risk of the YZ constitution after controlling for age, sex, diabetes duration, and hemoglobin A1c.

Without doubt, the YZ constitution is a consequence of complicated polygenic influences. Genome-wide association studies can provide an overview of whole genomes, and this is an appropriate method for examining the genetic factors of the YZ constitution. This technique had been adapted to explore the genetic base of Korean Sasang constitutional medicine [49].

Common manifestations of YZ include dull, lusterless skin color; dry, cracked, scaly or tough skin; dull purple lips or tongue; and localized pain or numbness. A patient with a YZ constitution tends to express BSS, which according to TCM theory, indicates a morbid state of blood stagnancy in a certain area of the body. The various expressions of BSS are classified according to the severity and area of blood stagnancy. Given its characteristics of circulation disturbance, BSS is considered to be relevant to cardiovascular complications.

The rs7493, rs2299263, and rs17166875 polymorphisms, located in PON2 on chromosome 7q, belong to one of the paraoxonase (PON) gene families, which encode enzymes participating in the hydrolysis of organophosphates. The PON gene cluster contains 3 adjacent gene members, PON1, PON2, and PON3. All 3 PON genes share high sequential homology and a similar β propeller protein structure [50] and are thought to have antiatherosclerotic properties. Thus the PON gene cluster has been considered a target in the treatment of atherosclerosis [51, 52]. PON2 has been shown to prevent LDL oxidation, to reverse the oxidation of mildly oxidized LDL, and to inhibit oxidized LDL-induced monocyte chemotaxis [53]. It also increases cholesterol efflux [54] and decreases the size of atherosclerotic lesions [55].

PON2 is a ubiquitously expressed intracellular protein that is expressed in a wide range of tissues [56, 53]. PON2 exhibits antioxidant functions at the cellular level, in addition to a host of intracellular antioxidative enzymes that act against oxidative stress. PON2 is localized in the inner mitochondrial membrane, associated with respiratory complex III, and binds with high affinity to coenzyme Q10. Decreased activity of mitochondrial electron transport chain (ETC.) complexes is implicated in the development of many inflammatory diseases, including atherosclerosis. PON2 protects ETC. complexes against oxidative stress by lowering reactive oxygen species. The intracellular antioxidative effect plays a role in antiatherosclerosis by avoiding endothelial dysfunction caused by mitochondria dysfunction [57, 58]. A common polymorphism rs7493, also known as Ser311Cys, a missense SNP in PON2, has also been associated with the risk of CAD [59]. In addition, PON2 plays a role in hepatic insulin signalling. PON2-deficient mice display elevated hepatic oxidative stress, coupled with an exacerbated inflammatory response, because of PON2-deficient macrophages. PON2 deficiency is associated with inhibitory insulin-mediated phosphorylation of hepatic insulin receptor substrate-1. PON2 may enhance the influence of the macrophage-mediated inflammatory response in hepatic insulin sensitivity [60]. The PON2 G148 variant has been associated with elevated fasting plasma glucose in patients with type 2 diabetes [61]. The role of PON2 provides the genetic basis underlying the YZ constitution. Patients with a strongly YZ constitution may have PON2 polymorphism with a low protein function which tends to decrease its antioxidative efficacy, resulting in cardiovascular disturbance and hyperglycemia. Thus, PON2 may be a candidate gene for the YZ constitution. Treatment using herbal medicines or natural compounds that could potentially regulate PON2 might be useful in protecting type 2 diabetes patients with a YZ constitution from cardiovascular complications.

From the docking results of TCM database screening, we chose three potential TCM candidates based on -PMF scores, divaricatacid, 13-hydroxy-(9E_11E)-octadecadienoic acid and 9-hydroxy-(10E)-octadecenoic acid. We further simulated the interaction between PON2 and TCM compounds under dynamic conditions for 20 ns. 13-hydroxy-(9E_11E)-octadecadienoic acid was more stable than the other two candidates for binding with the PON2 structure, which was still connected with active residue His114 after an MD simulation time of 20 ns. According to this result, 13-hydroxy-(9E_11E)-octadecadienoic acid should be a ligand with the ability to regulate PON2. 13-hydroxy-(9E_11E)-octadecadienoic acid is isolated from the seed of Coix lacryma-jobi L. Coix oil had been reported the efficacy to decrease adipose tissue and LDL concentrations and increase the total antioxidant capacity in hyperlipidemic rats [62]. 13-hydroxy-(9E_11E)-octadecadienoic acid may play a role in antiatherosclerosis by avoiding endothelial dysfunction by regulating the antioxidant effect of PON2.

The polymorphisms of rs1133146, rs12971799, rs4801958, rs12460170, and rs4803055 are located in the ZNF665 of chromosome 19q, belonging to the Kruppel zinc finger family. Zinc fingers are the most abundant DNA-binding motifs in humans. The zinc finger protein families are mainly involved in recognizing DNA sequences, but are also able to bind RNA, DNA-RNA hybrids, and even proteins [63]. They work as transcription factors to interact with the control region and achieve gene expression. Kruppel type zinc finger genes are widely present in the human genome, and are usually involved in cell growth and differentiation. To date, specific details of the function of ZNF665 have not been documented. We speculated that the polymorphisms of ZNF665 might lead to poor gene expression because of poor DNA binding ability, which might disturb cell growth and differentiation; in turn, this disturbance might impede epithelial repair and lead to the dry, cracked, scaly, or tough skin that is characteristic of patients with the YZ constitution. In addition, poor cell growth and differentiation in endothelial progenitor cells might disturb epithelial repair and lead to endothelial dysfunction, which is thought to be a key event in the development of atherosclerosis [64, 65].

The rs12865228 and rs4526895 polymorphisms are located in FREM2 on chromosome 13q. This gene encodes a membrane protein that belongs to the FRAS1 family. This extracellular matrix protein forms a ternary complex localized on the basement membrane, and plays a role in epidermal-dermal interactions during morphogenetic processes [66]. The protein is thought to be necessary in maintaining the integrity of skin epithelium, vascular stability [67], and the differentiated state of renal epithelia [68]. The polymorphism of FREM2 in patients with high YZ scores might be implicated in skin changes and microcirculation disturbances, leading to dry, cracked, scaly, tough, and bruised skin, and a dull and lusterless face.

Our study found that SNPs located in PIEZO2 on chromosome 18p were also associated with high YZ scores among patients with type 2 diabetes. PIZEO2 is a large transmembrane protein with 24 to 36 predicted transmembrane domains, and is a component of the mechanosensitive channel. This channel is required for the rapid adaptation of mechanically activated currents in dorsal root ganglia [69]. Mechanical stimuli drive many physiological processes, including touch and pain sensation, hearing, and blood pressure regulation [70]. Dysfunction of PIZEO2 might be the source of the abnormal sensations reported by patients with the YZ constitution, including numbness, tightness, tingling pain, and a dull sensation.

PCDH10 on chromosome 4q was associated with a lower risk of the YZ constitution. PCDH10 belongs to the protocadherin gene family, a subfamily of the cadherin superfamily. PCDH10 is a putative tumor suppressor gene [71], and is also known to guide the development of axons [72]. Furthermore, several SNPs located in the intergenic area on chromosomes 1p, 2q, 5q, 14q, and 16p require further investigation to clarify their relationship with the YZ constitution.

Conclusions

The findings of this study contribute to an understanding of the genetic susceptibility of patients with type 2 diabetes to the YZ constitution. Risk loci occurred in PON2 that encoded intracellular proteins with antioxidant properties, which normally protect against atherosclerosis and hyperglycemia. Disturbance of this genetic function might constitute one of the mechanisms of cardiovascular disturbance induced by the YZ constitution. Docking and molecular dynamic simulation showed that 13-hydroxy-(9E_11E)-octadecadienoic acid is a stable ligand of PON2 that may have the ability to regulate the antioxidant effects of PON2. Other related genes included ZNF665, FREM2, PIZEO2, PCDH10 and several SNPs located in genes of unknown function.

Abbreviations

ACR: 

Albumin-to-creatinine ratio

APM1: 

Adipose most abundant gene transcript 1

BMI: 

Body mass index

BSS: 

Blood stasis syndrome

CAD: 

Coronary artery disease

CADD: 

Computer-aided drug design

CI: 

Confidence interval

DM: 

Diabetes mellitus

ETC.: 

Electron transport chain

FRAS1: 

Fraser syndrome 1

FREM2: 

FRAS1 related extracellular matrix protein 2

HDL: 

High-density lipoprotein

LDL: 

Low-density lipoprotein

MD: 

Molecular dynamics

MSD: 

Mean square displacement

OR: 

Odds ratio

PCDH10: 

Protocadherin 10

PIEZO2: 

Piezo-type mechanosensitive ion channel component 2

PLP: 

Piecewise linear potential

PMF: 

Potential of mean force

PON: 

Paraoxonase

PON1: 

Paraoxonase 1

PON2: 

Paraoxonase 2

PON3: 

Paraoxonase 3

PPARD: 

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors delta

PPARG: 

Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors gamma

RMSD: 

Root mean square deviation

RMSF: 

Root mean square fluctuation

SNP: 

Single nucleotide polymorphism

TCM: 

Traditional Chinese medicine

UTR: 

Untranslated region

VDW: 

Van der Waals

YZ: 

Yu-Zhi

ZNF665: 

Zinc finger protein 665

Declarations

Acknowledgements

We appreciate the participation of all patients involved in this study, the constitution questionnaire provided by Professor Yi-Chang Su and the assistance provided by personnel. The research was partially supported by a grant from the Department of Medical Research, China Medical University Hospital (No. DMR-97-102). The research was supported by grants from the National Science Council of Taiwan, as well as the National Clinical Core for Genomic Medicine at Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan (NSC96-3112-B-001-010, NSC102-2325-B039-001 and NSC102-2221-E-468-027-), Asia University (ASIA101-CMU-2, and 102-Asia-07), and China Medical University Hospital (DMR-103-058, DMR-103-001, DMR-104-084, DMR-104-118 and DMR-103-096). This study was also supported in part by the Taiwan Department of Health Clinical Trial and Research Center of Excellence (DOH102-TD-B-111-004), Taiwan Department of Health Cancer Research Center of Excellence (MOHW103-TD-B-111-03), and China Medical University under the Aim for the Top University Plan of the Ministry of Education, Taiwan.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Graduate Institute of Chinese Medicine, China Medical University
(2)
Department of Integration of Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine, China Medical University Hospital
(3)
Department of Chinese Pharmaceutical Sciences and Chinese Medicine Resources, College of Pharmacy, China Medical University
(4)
School of Chinese Medicine, College of Chinese Medicine, China Medical University
(5)
Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, China Medical University Hospital
(6)
Human Genetic Center, Department of Medical Research, China Medical University Hospital
(7)
Research Center for Chinese Medicine & Acupuncture, China Medical University
(8)
Department of Biotechnology, Asia University
(9)
Department of Medical Genetics, Medical Research and Pediatrics, China Medical University Hospital

References

  1. Wang Q, editor. Theories of Physical Constitutions of Traditional Chinese Medicine. 1st ed. Beijing: People’s Medical Publishing House; 2005.Google Scholar
  2. Chen S, Lv F, Gao J, Lin J, Liu Z, Fu Y, et al. HLA class II polymorphisms associated with the physiologic characteristics defined by Traditional Chinese Medicine: linking modern genetics with an ancient medicine. J Altern Complement Med. 2007;13(2):231–9. doi:10.1089/acm.2006.6126.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Wang Q, Yao S. Molecular basis for cold-intolerant yang-deficient constitution of traditional Chinese medicine. Am J Chin Med. 2008;36(5):827–34. doi:S0192415X08006272.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Wu Y, Cun Y, Dong J, Shao J, Luo S, Nie S, et al. Polymorphisms in PPARD, PPARG and APM1 associated with four types of traditional Chinese medicine constitutions. J Genet Genomics. 2010;37(6):371–9. doi:10.1016/S1673-8527(09)60055-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Grundy SM, Benjamin IJ, Burke GL, Chait A, Eckel RH, Howard BV, et al. Diabetes and cardiovascular disease: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 1999;100(10):1134–46.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Sarwar N, Gao P, Seshasai SR, Gobin R, Kaptoge S, Di Angelantonio E, et al. Diabetes mellitus, fasting blood glucose concentration, and risk of vascular disease: a collaborative meta-analysis of 102 prospective studies. Lancet. 2010;375(9733):2215–22. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60484-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Gao ZY, Xu H, Shi DZ, Wen C, Liu BY. Analysis on outcome of 5284 patients with coronary artery disease: the role of integrative medicine. J Ethnopharmacol. 2012;141(2):578–83. doi:10.1016/j.jep.2011.08.071.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Lei Y, Wang ZH, Zhao H, Liu JG. Study of the relationship between carotid intima-media thickness and traditional Chinese medicine syndrome of dyslipidemia. Chin J Integr Med. 2009;15(2):112–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Min MA. Expression of platelet CD62p gene and leucocyte HSP70 gene in patients with blood stasis syndrome MA. Zhongguo Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Za Zhi. 2005;25(4):307–10.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Ma XJ, Yin HJ, Chen KJ. [Investigation of gene expression profiles in patients with blood stasis syndrome]. Zhong Xi Yi Jie He Xue Bao. 2008;6(4):355–60. doi:167219772008040355.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Chang Y-M, Velmurugan BK, Kuo W-W, Chen Y-S, Ho T-J, Tsai C-T, et al. Inhibitory effect of alpinate Oxyphyllae fructus extracts on Ang II-induced cardiac pathological remodeling-related pathways in H9c2 cardiomyoblast cells. BioMedicine. 2013;3(4):148–52. doi:10.1016/j.biomed.2013.05.001.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Jao C-L, Huang S-L, Hsu K-C. Angiotensin I-converting enzyme inhibitory peptides: Inhibition mode, bioavailability, and antihypertensive effects. BioMedicine. 2012;2(4):130–6. doi:10.1016/j.biomed.2012.06.005.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Lin M-C, Tsai S-Y, Wang F-Y, Liu F-H, Syu J-N, Tang F-Y. Leptin induces cell invasion and the upregulation of matrilysin in human colon cancer cells. BioMedicine. 2013;3(4):174–80. doi:10.1016/j.biomed.2013.09.001.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Huang H-J, Yu HW, Chen C-Y, Hsu C-H, Chen H-Y, Lee K-J, et al. Current developments of computer-aided drug design. J Taiwan Inst Chem Eng. 2010;41(6):623–35. doi:10.1016/j.jtice.2010.03.017.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  15. Chen CY. A novel integrated framework and improved methodology of computer-aided drug design. Curr Top Med Chem. 2013;13(9):965–88. doi:CTMC-EPUB-20130506-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Chen KC, Sun MF, Yang SC, Chang SS, Chen HY, Tsai FJ, et al. Investigation into potent inflammation inhibitors from traditional Chinese medicine. Chem Biol Drug Des. 2011;78(4):679–88. doi:10.1111/j.1747-0285.2011.01202.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Chang SS, Huang HJ, Chen CY. Two birds with one stone? Possible dual-targeting H1N1 inhibitors from traditional Chinese medicine. PLoS Comput Biol. 2011;7(12):e1002315. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002315.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Chang SS, Huang HJ, Chen CY. High performance screening, structural and molecular dynamics analysis to identify H1 inhibitors from TCM Database@Taiwan. Mol Biosyst. 2011;7(12):3366–74. doi:10.1039/c1mb05320e.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Tou WI, Chang SS, Lee CC, Chen CY. Drug design for neuropathic pain regulation from traditional Chinese medicine. Sci Rep. 2013;3:844. doi:10.1038/srep00844.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Chen KC, Chang SS, Huang HJ, Lin TL, Wu YJ, Chen CY. Three-in-one agonists for PPAR-alpha, PPAR-gamma, and PPAR-delta from traditional Chinese medicine. J Biomol Struct Dyn. 2012;30(6):662–83. doi:10.1080/07391102.2012.689699.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Chen KY, Chang SS, Chen CY. In silico identification of potent pancreatic triacylglycerol lipase inhibitors from traditional Chinese medicine. PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e43932. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0043932.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Chang TT, Chen KC, Chang KW, Chen HY, Tsai FJ, Sun MF, et al. In silico pharmacology suggests ginger extracts may reduce stroke risks. Mol Biosyst. 2011;7(9):2702–10. doi:10.1039/c1mb05228d.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Chen KC, Chang KW, Chen HY, Chen CY. Traditional Chinese medicine, a solution for reducing dual stroke risk factors at once? Mol Biosyst. 2011;7(9):2711–9. doi:10.1039/c1mb05164d.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Chen K-C, Yu-Chian CC. Stroke prevention by traditional Chinese medicine? A genetic algorithm, support vector machine and molecular dynamics approach. Soft Matter. 2011;7(8):4001–8. doi:10.1039/c0sm01548b.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Tou WI, Chen CY. In silico investigation of potential SRC kinase ligands from traditional Chinese medicine. PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e33728. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0033728.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Tsou YA, Chen KC, Lin HC, Chang SS, Chen CY. Uroporphyrinogen decarboxylase as a potential target for specific components of traditional Chinese medicine: a virtual screening and molecular dynamics study. PLoS One. 2012;7(11), e50087. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0050087.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Yang SC, Chang SS, Chen CY. Identifying HER2 inhibitors from natural products database. PLoS One. 2011;6(12), e28793. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0028793.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Yang SC, Chang SS, Chen HY, Chen CY. Identification of potent EGFR inhibitors from TCM Database@Taiwan. PLoS Comput Biol. 2011;7(10), e1002189. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002189.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Chen CY. TCM Database@Taiwan: the world's largest traditional Chinese medicine database for drug screening in silico. PLoS One. 2011;6(1), e15939. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0015939.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Report of the Expert Committee. Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes Care. 1997;20(7):1183–97.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  31. Lin JD, Lin JS, Chen LL, Chang CH, Huang YC, Su YC. BCQs: A Body Constitution Questionnaire to assess Stasis in traditional Chinese medicine. Eur J Integr Med. 2012;4(4):E379–91. doi:10.1016/j.eujim.2012.05.001.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Huang K-C, Chen C-C, Su Y-C, Lin J-S, Chang C-T, Wang T-Y, et al. The Relationship between Stasis-Stagnation Constitution and Peripheral Arterial Disease in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2014;2014:6. doi:10.1155/2014/903798.Google Scholar
  33. Tsai FJ, Yang CF, Chen CC, Chuang LM, Lu CH, Chang CT, et al. A genome-wide association study identifies susceptibility variants for type 2 diabetes in Han Chinese. PLoS Genet. 2010;6(2), e1000847. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000847.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Zhang Y. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics. 2008;9:40. doi:10.1186/1471-2105-9-40.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Roy A, Kucukural A, Zhang Y. I-TASSER: a unified platform for automated protein structure and function prediction. Nat Protoc. 2010;5(4):725–38. doi:10.1038/nprot.2010.5.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Roy A, Yang J, Zhang Y. COFACTOR: an accurate comparative algorithm for structure-based protein function annotation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:471–7. doi:10.1093/nar/gks372.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Lovell SC, Davis IW, Arendall WB, de Bakker PIW, Word JM, Prisant MG, et al. Structure validation by Cα geometry: ϕ, ψ and Cβ deviation. Proteins: Struct Funct Bioinf. 2003;50(3):437–50. doi:10.1002/prot.10286.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  38. Xue B, Dunbrack RL, Williams RW, Dunker AK. Uversky VN. PONDR-FIT: a meta-predictor of intrinsically disordered amino acids. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2010;1804(4):996–1010. doi:10.1016/j.bbapap.2010.01.011 S1570-9639(10)00013-0.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Altenhofer S, Witte I, Teiber JF, Wilgenbus P, Pautz A, Li H, et al. One enzyme, two functions: PON2 prevents mitochondrial superoxide formation and apoptosis independent from its lactonase activity. J Biol Chem. 2010;285(32):24398–403. doi:10.1074/jbc.M110.118604.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Brooks BR, Brooks 3rd CL, Mackerell Jr AD, Nilsson L, Petrella RJ, Roux B, et al. CHARMM: the biomolecular simulation program. J Comput Chem. 2009;30(10):1545–614. doi:10.1002/jcc.21287.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Pronk S, Pall S, Schulz R, Larsson P, Bjelkmar P, Apostolov R, et al. GROMACS 4.5: a high-throughput and highly parallel open source molecular simulation toolkit. Bioinformatics. 2013;29(7):845–54. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btt055.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Priyakumar UD, MacKerell AD. Comparison of the CHARMM27, AMBER4.1 and BMS nucleic acid force fields via free energy calculations of base flipping. Abstr Pap Am Chem S. 2005;230:U1391–2.Google Scholar
  43. Darden T, York D, Pedersen L. Particle mesh Ewald: An Nlog(N) method for Ewald sums in large systems. J Chem Phys. 1993;98(12):10089–92. doi:10.1063/1.464397.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  44. Essmann U, Perera L, Berkowitz ML, Darden T, Lee H, Pedersen LG. A smooth particle mesh Ewald method. J Chem Phys. 1995;103(19):8577–93. doi:10.1063/1.470117.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  45. Zoete V, Cuendet MA, Grosdidier A, Michielin O. SwissParam: a fast force field generation tool for small organic molecules. J Comput Chem. 2011;32(11):2359–68. doi:10.1002/jcc.21816.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Tou WI, Chen CY. May disordered protein cause serious drug side effect? Drug Discov Today. 2013. doi:S1359-6446(13)00387-5 10.1016/j.drudis.2013.10.020.Google Scholar
  47. Chen CY, Tou WI. How to design a drug for the disordered proteins? Drug Discov Today. 2013;18(19–20):910–5. doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2013.04.008.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Chovancova E, Pavelka A, Benes P, Strnad O, Brezovsky J, Kozlikova B, et al. CAVER 3.0: a tool for the analysis of transport pathways in dynamic protein structures. PLoS Comput Biol. 2012;10:e1002708. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi. 1002708 PCOMPBIOL-D-12-00584.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  49. Kim BY, Jin HJ, Kim JY. Genome-wide association analysis of Sasang constitution in the Korean population. J Altern Complement Med. 2012;18(3):262–9. doi:10.1089/acm.2010.0764.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  50. Primo-Parmo SL, Sorenson RC, Teiber J, La Du BN. The human serum paraoxonase/arylesterase gene (PON1) is one member of a multigene family. Genomics. 1996;33(3):498–507. doi:S0888754396902256.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. She ZG, Zheng W, Wei YS, Chen HZ, Wang AB, Li HL, et al. Human paraoxonase gene cluster transgenic overexpression represses atherogenesis and promotes atherosclerotic plaque stability in ApoE-null mice. Circ Res. 2009;104(10):1160–8. doi:10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.108.192229. doi:CIRCRESAHA.108.192229.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. She ZG, Chen HZ, Yan Y, Li H, Liu DP. The human paraoxonase gene cluster as a target in the treatment of atherosclerosis. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2012;16(6):597–632. doi:10.1089/ars.2010.3774.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  53. Ng CJ, Wadleigh DJ, Gangopadhyay A, Hama S, Grijalva VR, Navab M, et al. Paraoxonase-2 is a ubiquitously expressed protein with antioxidant properties and is capable of preventing cell-mediated oxidative modification of low density lipoprotein. J Biol Chem. 2001;276(48):44444–9. doi:10.1074/jbc.M105660200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Ng CJ, Hama SY, Bourquard N, Navab M, Reddy ST. Adenovirus mediated expression of human paraoxonase 2 protects against the development of atherosclerosis in apolipoprotein E-deficient mice. Mol Genet Metab. 2006;89(4):368–73. doi:10.1016/j.ymgme.2006.07.004. doi:S1096-7192(06)00252-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Ng CJ, Bourquard N, Grijalva V, Hama S, Shih DM, Navab M, et al. Paraoxonase-2 deficiency aggravates atherosclerosis in mice despite lower apolipoprotein-B-containing lipoproteins: anti-atherogenic role for paraoxonase-2. J Biol Chem. 2006;281(40):29491–500. doi:10.1074/jbc.M605379200. doi:M605379200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Mochizuki H, Scherer SW, Xi T, Nickle DC, Majer M, Huizenga JJ, et al. Human PON2 gene at 7q21.3: cloning, multiple mRNA forms, and missense polymorphisms in the coding sequence. Gene. 1998;213(1–2):149–57.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Devarajan A, Bourquard N, Hama S, Navab M, Grijalva VR, Morvardi S, et al. Paraoxonase 2 deficiency alters mitochondrial function and exacerbates the development of atherosclerosis. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2011;14(3):341–51. doi:10.1089/ars.2010.3430.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  58. Madamanchi NR, Runge MS. Mitochondrial dysfunction in atherosclerosis. Circ Res. 2007;100(4):460–73. doi:10.1161/01.RES.0000258450.44413.96.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Sanghera DK, Aston CE, Saha N, Kamboh MI. DNA polymorphisms in two paraoxonase genes (PON1 and PON2) are associated with the risk of coronary heart disease. Am J Hum Genet. 1998;62(1):36–44. doi:10.1086/301669. doi:S0002-9297(07)60120-7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  60. Bourquard N, Ng CJ, Reddy ST. Impaired hepatic insulin signalling in PON2-deficient mice: a novel role for the PON2/apoE axis on the macrophage inflammatory response. Biochem J. 2011;436(1):91–100. doi:10.1042/BJ20101891. doi:BJ20101891.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  61. Hegele RA, Connelly PW, Scherer SW, Hanley AJ, Harris SB, Tsui LC, et al. Paraoxonase-2 gene (PON2) G148 variant associated with elevated fasting plasma glucose in noninsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1997;82(10):3373–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Yu F, Gao J, Zeng Y, Liu CX. Effects of adlay seed oil on blood lipids and antioxidant capacity in hyperlipidemic rats. J Sci Food Agric. 2011;91(10):1843–8. doi:10.1002/jsfa.4393.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Laity JH, Lee BM, Wright PE. Zinc finger proteins: new insights into structural and functional diversity. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2001;11(1):39–46. doi:S0959-440X(00)00167-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Kinlay S, Libby P, Ganz P. Endothelial function and coronary artery disease. Curr Opin Lipidol. 2001;12(4):383–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Sorrentino SA, Bahlmann FH, Besler C, Muller M, Schulz S, Kirchhoff N, et al. Oxidant stress impairs in vivo reendothelialization capacity of endothelial progenitor cells from patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: restoration by the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma agonist rosiglitazone. Circulation. 2007;116(2):163–73. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.684381. doi:CIRCULATIONAHA.106.684381.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. Pavlakis E, Chiotaki R, Chalepakis G. The role of Fras1/Frem proteins in the structure and function of basement membrane. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2011;43(4):487–95. doi:10.1016/j.biocel.2010.12.016. doi:S1357-2725(10)00428-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Timmer JR, Mak TW, Manova K, Anderson KV, Niswander L. Tissue morphogenesis and vascular stability require the Frem2 protein, product of the mouse myelencephalic blebs gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102(33):11746–50. doi:10.1073/pnas.0505404102. doi:0505404102.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  68. Jadeja S, Smyth I, Pitera JE, Taylor MS, van Haelst M. Bentley E et al. Identification of a new gene mutated in Fraser syndrome and mouse myelencephalic blebs. Nat Genet. 2005;37(5):520–5. doi:10.1038/ng1549. doi:ng1549.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Xiao R, Xu XZ. Mechanosensitive channels: in touch with Piezo. Curr Biol. 2010;20(21):R936–8. doi:S0960-9822(10)01171-1.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  70. Coste B, Mathur J, Schmidt M, Earley TJ, Ranade S, Petrus MJ, et al. Piezo1 and Piezo2 are essential components of distinct mechanically activated cation channels. Science. 2010;330(6000):55–60. doi:10.1126/science.1193270. doi:science.1193270.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  71. Li Z, Chim JC, Yang M, Ye J, Wong BC, Qiao L. Role of PCDH10 and its hypermethylation in human gastric cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2012;1823(2):298–305. doi:10.1016/j.bbamcr.2011.11.011. doi:S0167-4889(11)00313-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Williams EO, Sickles HM, Dooley AL, Palumbos S, Bisogni AJ, Lin DM. Delta Protocadherin 10 is Regulated by Activity in the Mouse Main Olfactory System. Front Neural Circuits. 2011;5:9. doi:10.3389/fncir.2011.00009.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Huang et al. 2015

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement