- Study protocol
- Open Access
- Open Peer Review
This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Immediate changes in electroencephalography activity in individuals with nonspecific chronic low back pain after cranial osteopathic manipulative treatment: study protocol of a randomized, controlled crossover trial
© Martins et al. 2015
Received: 15 May 2015
Accepted: 18 June 2015
Published: 13 July 2015
Osteopathic medicine is based on a diagnostic and therapeutic system to treat tissue mobility/ motility dysfunctions in general, using different approaches (depending on the target tissue) known as osteopathic manipulative treatment. Among the available techniques those ones addressed to the cranial field are the most questioned because of the lack of scientific evidence; but the compression of the 4th ventricle technique has been largely studied in clinical trials. Studies have shown that the technique may affect both central and autonomous nervous system, modulating some reflexes (Traube-Hering baro signal), and modifying brain cortex electrical activity through central sensitization in subjects with chronic low back pain. Thus, investigators hypothesize that the compression of the 4th ventricle may modulate peak alpha frequency (eletroencephalographic assessment) and promote physical relaxation in subjects in vigil.
A randomized, controlled crossover trial with blinded assessor was designed to test the hypothesis. A total of 81 participants will be assigned to three treatment conditions, with seven days of washout: (I) compression of the 4th ventricle; (II) sham compression of the fourth ventricle; (III) control (no intervention). The (I) power amplitude and the (II) frequencies of the dominant peak in the alpha band will be the primary outcome measures of the study. All participants will be recruited at the Outpatient Rehabilitation Service of the University Hospital of Brasília – University of Brasília. All the electroencephalographic exams will be conducted by a blinded assessor.
The investigators hypothesize that patients with chronic low back pain submitted to the technique would have the peak alpha frequency modulated and, thus, would experience physical relaxation.
Osteopathic Medicine (OM) is based on a diagnostic and therapeutical system to treat tissue mobility dysfunctions in general . The Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment (OMT) uses different techniques according to the dysfunctional tissues. The World Health Organization considers OM as complementary or alternative medicine, and it is based on concepts and unique approaches that enable the self-healing and self-regulating process within the body [2, 3]. This increasing interest in osteopathic medicine may reflect the reality of the society because patients turn to complementary or alternative treatments whereas the conventional treatments seem to fail in producing the desired outcome, or to produce side effects . In the United States, the overall expenditure for complementary and alternative medicine is in the tens of billions of dollars per year .
Among the available OMT techniques, those addressed to the cranial field are the most questioned because of the lack of scientific evidence. A systematic review of 7 randomized controlled trials revealed studies heterogeneity, studies with poor methodology and not enough data to draw a conclusion about Osteopathy in the Cranial Field (OCF). One of the keystones of OCF teaching and practice is the presence of Primary Respiratory Mechanism (PRM) – which is partially represented by the movement of the cranial bones . So, much discussion remains on the hands ability to perceive PRM through the obliterated sutures of the skull in adults, besides the lack of evidence to support them [6, 7].
One of the most studied OCF techniques is the Compression of the 4th Ventricle (CV4) - the osteopath exerts a compression force on the lateral angles of the squama occipitalis. The CV4 technique affects both central and autonomous nervous system , assessed by change in the blood flow and in the tissue oxygen saturation [9, 10]. Another way to measure the effects of the CV4 technique is the brain cortex electrical activity by electroencephalography (EEG), which is a validated method to support the results [11–14]. Current literature has only 2 crossover studies with healthy participants: the work of Cutler et al.  showed a decrease in sleep latency; and Miana et al.  showed an increase in the absolute power of alpha frequency. The EEG exam is useful to detect changes in the central processing of pain  and in patients with chronic pain, one study showed increased power amplitude in alpha frequency bands and a shift towards lower frequencies of the dominant peak . These outcomes are important to develop new trials on diagnosis and therapeutics because of the increasing number of subjects with chronic pain in world [19, 20].
Therefore, this study aims to assess brain cortex electrical activity (alpha band frequency) in individuals with nonspecific chronic low back pain submitted to CV4 technique. The investigators hypothesize that patients with chronic low back pain submitted to the technique would have the peak alpha frequency (PAF) modulated and, thus, would experience physical relaxation.
Methods and design
Design and setting
This is a randomized, controlled crossover trial.
The participants will be instructed to keep their sleeping and eating habits, as well as their daily living activities. They also will be advised not seek any other therapies, like massaging, physiotherapy, stretching and yoga to prevent any intervening factors during the trial period.
Participants over 18 years old with self-reported chronic low back pain will be recruited from the University Hospital of Brasilia. To ensure the inclusion criteria, an orthopedic physician will do the assessments all individuals who has interested in the study. Participants with chronic, recurrent, or long-lasting pain on musculoskeletal system for at least 6 months will meet the definition of chronic low back pain and, so, will be eligible to the study. To inclusion in the study the participants needs to presents: (I) a primary back pain form (i.e. progressive degenerative joint disease that result in biomechanical stresses affecting articular and extra-articular tissue) diagnosed by the physician according clinical and radiological findings; (II) only low back pain, to the Quebec Task Force ; and (III) absence of mental impairment determined by obtaining a score of 27 on the Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) .
Participants suffering wiil be excluded if they present: (I) secondary chronic low back pain (ankylosing spondylitis, infections, malignancy, nephrolithiasis, pyelonephritis, aortic aneurysm, disease of the pelvic organs and gastrointestinal tract); (II) fever, chills, sweating, relate of weight loss superior of 5 % in the last 2 months without a clear cause, asthenia, anorexia; (III) cardiovascular and respiratory symptoms such as chest pain, dyspnea and cough; (IV) headache, dizziness, lightheadedness, fainting, tremors, dysarthria and aphasia; (V) surgery on the spine; (VI) diagnosis of any neurological, cardiac, respiratory and rheumatic disease; (VII) regular use of drugs with effects on the central nervous system (stimulants or depressors of CNS, examples: anxiolytics, anti-depressives, neuromodulators, etc.); (VIII) previous manual therapy treatment before data collection (in a four-eight weeks period of time); (IX) signs of nerve root involviment.
Participants randomization and allocation
After participants selection, randomization will be performed using a computerized random number generator through the stratified simple randomization method of a software program (Excel, Microsoft Office 2008) for sequence generation. Sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed assignment envelopes will be delivered at the Hospital and the researcher will open one envelope in front of the participant; each envelope contains a concealed allocation number.
The three researchers performing the interventions will not have access to the order of allocation file. The allocation electronic file will be password-protected and only the fourth researcher will have the password to access it (ST).
All participants will receive three interventions at the Outpatient Rehabilitation Service of the University Hospital of Brasília (room F49, blue hall), respecting a 7-days washout interval and the same appointment time, which may be scheduled between 8 and 11 a.m.
The flexion phase of the occipital bone comprises the perception of a centrifugal motion of the squama occipitalis and the flattening of its convexity. The extension phase comprises a centripetal motion of the squama occipitalis and an increase of its convexity. Thus, the practitioner intends to exaggerate the convexity of the squama occipitalis.
The CV4 technique will be performed by an osteopath D.O. - member of the Brazilian Register of Osteopaths.
The CV4 sham will be performed by a registered physiotherapist (ACBR).
The participants will be in supine position for the same time the CV4 duration without any visual or verbal contact. A third researcher (a 5th-year osteopathic medicine student) will conduct this phase (KFL).
Primary outcome measurement
The mean change in peak alpha frequency (PAF) will be the primary outcome measure to assess the effects of CV4 technique on nonspecific chronic low back pain. PAF is a measure derived from EEG analysis, and it is defined by two parameters: (1) its occurrence on the frequency axis; and 2) its amplitude on the power density axis. The participants assessment (EEG) and the results statistical analysis will conducted by a blinded researcher (WRM).
Secondary outcome measurement
Secondary outcomes include the mean change in pain intensity (0–10 numeric pain ranting scale) before and immediately after each protocol section. The measurement (pre and post intervention) will be conduced by a researcher blinded to patient allocation (WRM).
EEG recording and analysis
The EEG record will be done before and immediately after each protocol section.
The EEG will be recorded with the eyes closed and opened, and each recording will last 2 min. During the exam, the participants will be in seated position (16). The participants will be given only two verbal commands: to open and close their eyes.
A computerized Fourier analysis of the EEG waves will be made, using the Brain Wave Analyzer Software. The signal will be sampled at 500Hz rate, and filtered with a 1–50 Hz band-pass filter. The signal will be filtered to display alpha frequency (8–13 Hz). Electrode impedance will be kept below 5KΩ, and the ground electrode placed at the Fpz location.
Statistical analysis and sample size
Baseline and outcome data
The baseline characteristics will be shown as the mean ± SD for continuous data (i.e., participant’s age and duration of back pain), and n (%) for categorical data (i.e., gender). To analyze the baseline characteristics, we will perform a One Way analysis of variance, or a Kruskal-Wallis test for continuous data if the data are normally distributed. Shapiro-Wilk test will be used to test data normality. The primary and secondary (EEG and pain) outcomes will be analyzed by 3 × 2 mixed-effects model (group [CV4 - CV 4 sham - Control] x time [pre and post]) to repeated data measures for each continuous outcome variable, we will also assesses if the allocation order will interfere in results, for thus we’ll analyze the order of allocation of CV4 (1st, 2nd or 3rd) x pre values (CV4 – CV4 sham – Control) at the 3rd exposition, using a one-way Anova or Kruskal-Wallis test. When the analysis of variance indicates significant differences among groups, a post-hoc test (Bonferroni test) will be used to separate the differences between groups before and after the intervention period. Data will be analyzed using Prism 6 software for Mac OS X, and a significance level of p ≤ 0,05 will be considered to all variables.
Participants will be considered dropped-out if they do not attend the second and/or third day of intervention.
The sample size was calculated considering: (1) the two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA);  three groups; (3) type I error = 5 % (2-sided); (4) type II error = 20 %; (5) the power of the statistical test = 80 %; and (6) effect size = 20 %. The effect size was obtained considering: (I) the results from the pilot study of Miana et al. , which demonstrated a effect of 26 % (pre to post intervention) in the group that received the CV4 technique and (II) Cohen’s d which considers 20 % a small effect to calculate sample size and power analysis [27, 28]. Then, it was determined a total of 81 subjects. This calculation was performed in G Power 3 program, version for Mac OS X.
The participants will report every unexpected and unintentional response not related to CV4 technique at every visit.
It is important to establish that this study will not recruit participants suffering from any disease because of the nature of research and the strict exclusion criteria. Regarding CV4 technique, the side effects of cranial manipulation are rare, but described in patients with traumatic brain syndrome . The CV4 technique provides a smooth and gentle manual contact, promoting relaxation and wellness.
Participants protection and ethics
The protocol was developed according to the general ethical guidelines, such as Declaration of Helsinki and the new version (2012) of 196/96 resolution of the Brazilian National Health Council (National Research Ethics Committee) for regulatory guidelines for research involving human subjects. This research project and the informed consent were submitted and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Faculty of Health Sciences of University of Brasília. The statement of ethical approval had the code CAAE 27525814.1.0000.0030. For publication of images (Figs. 2 and 3) was obtained the consent of the participant in the first day of experiment.
The aim of the study is to assess the CV4 technique effects on nonspecific chronic low back pain measured by the mean change in the peak alpha frequency (PAF). For this purpose, it was designed a randomized, controlled crossover study with 81 participants.
The investigators hypothesize that CV4 technique can modulate brain cortex electrical activity measured by EEG mean change in the peak alpha frequency. Some studies have investigated CV4 effects on healthy individuals, and there is evidence of changes in the central pain processing – supported by increased power amplitude differences in the alpha band and a shift towards lower frequencies of the dominant peak, measured by resting state EEG; but there is no study on persistent nonspecific low back pain in the current literature.
Therefore, the positive outcomes that can be drawn from this study would support the use of the CV4 technique in designing a sustainable and cost-effective health service for people with chronic low back pain because of the positive effects on functional reorganization human cortex.
- Andresen TCB, Cristian CR. Efficacy of osteopathy and other manual treatment approaches for malocclusion - A systematic review of evidence. Int J Osteopath Med. 2013;16(2):99–113.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Benchmarks for training in traditional /complementary and alternativemedicine: benchmarks for training in osteopathy. [http://www.who.int/medicines/areas/traditional/BenchmarksforTraininginOsteopathy.pdf]
- Posadzki P, Ernst E. Osteopathy for musculoskeletal pain patients: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Clin Rheumatol. 2011;30(2):285–91.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Michelfelder AJ, Lee KC, Bading EM. Integrative medicine and gastrointestinal disease. Prim Care. 2010;37(2):255–67.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Magoun HI. Osteopathy in the Cranial Field. Kirksville: MO: Journal Printing Company; 1976.Google Scholar
- Sabini RCED. Significant differences in patency among cranial sutures. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2006;106:600–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sommerfeld P, Kaider A, Klein P. Inter- and intraexaminer reliability in palpation of the “primary respiratory mechanism” within the “cranial concept”. Man Ther. 2004;9(1):22–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jakel A, von Hauenschild P. Therapeutic effects of cranial osteopathic manipulative medicine: a systematic review. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2011;111(12):685–93.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Nelson KE, Sergueef N, Lipinski CM, Chapman AR, Glonek T. Cranial rhythmic impulse related to the Traube-Hering-Mayer oscillation: comparing laser-Doppler flowmetry and palpation. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2001;101(3):163–73.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Shi X, Rehrer S, Prajapati P, Stoll ST, Gamber RG, Downey HF. Effect of cranial osteopathic manipulative medicine on cerebral tissue oxygenation. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2011;111(12):660–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Abazov VM, Abbott B, Abolins M, Acharya BS, Adams M, Adams T, et al. Study of Zgamma events and limits on anomalous ZZgamma and Zgammagamma couplings in pp collisions at square root s = 1.96 TeV. Phys Rev Lett. 2005;95(5):051802.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Guosheng YJW, Hongrui B, Chunxiao H, Bin D, Xile W, Huiyan L. Multi-scale order recurrence quantification analysis of EEG signals evoked by manual acupuncture in healthy subjects. Cogn Neurodyn. 2013;7(1):79–88.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Huneke NT, Christopher AB, Edward B, Alison W, Nelson JT, Wael ED, et al. Experimental placebo analgesia changes resting-state alpha oscillations. PLoS One. 2013;8(10):e78278.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Tiffany FMD, Maria H. Tai chi/yoga effects on anxiety, heartrate, EEG and math computations. Complement Ther Clin Pract. 2010;16(4):235–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Cutler MJ, Holland BS, Stupinski BA. Cranial manipulation can alter sleep latency and sympathetic nerve activity in humans: a pilot study. J Altern Complement Med. 2005;11:103–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Miana LBV, Machado S, Arias Carrion O, Nardi AE, Almeida L, Ribeiro P, et al. Changes in alpha band activity associated with application of the compression of fourth ventricular (CV-4) osteopathic procedure: A qEEG pilot study. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2013;17(3):291–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jensen MPGK, Kupper AE, Braden AL, Howe JD, Hakimian S, Sherlin LH. Steps toward developing an EEG biofeedback treatment for chronic pain. Appl Psychophysiol Biofeedback. 2013;38(2):101–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Marjan V OW, Marijtje J, Emanuel VDB, Harry VG, Clementina VR. Altered resting state EEG in chronic pancreatitis patients: toward a marker for chronic pain. JPR. 2013;25(6):815-824.Google Scholar
- Johannes CBKL, Xiaolei Z, Joseph AJ, Robert DH. The prevalence of chronic pain in united states adults: results of an internet-based survey. J Pain. 2010;11(11):1230–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Harald BBC, Vittorio V, Rob C, Derek G. Survey of chronic pain in Europe: prevalence, impact on daily life, and treatment. Eur J Pain. 2006;10(4):287–333.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kongsted A, Kent P, Albert H, Jensen TS, Manniche C. Patients with low back pain differ from those who also have leg pain or signs of nerve root involvement–a cross-sectional study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012;13:236.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Velayudhan L, Ryu SH, Raczek M, Philpot M, Lindesay J, Critchfield M, et al. Review of brief cognitive tests for patients with suspected dementia. Int Psychogeriatr. 2014;26(8):1247–62.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Chaitow L. Cranial Manipulation Theory and Practice: Osseous and Soft Tissue Approaches. Toronto: Churchill Livingstone; 1999.Google Scholar
- Klem GH, Luders HO, Jasper HH, Elger C. The ten-twenty electrode system of the International Federation. The International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol Suppl. 1999;52:3–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Darvas F, Scherer R, Ojemann JG, Rao RP, Miller KJ, Sorensen LB. HIGH Gamma Mapping Using Eeg. NeuroImage. 2010;49(1):930–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ruden E, Reardon DA, Coan AD, Herndon 2nd JE, Hornsby WE, West M, et al. Exercise behavior, functional capacity, and survival in adults with malignant recurrent glioma. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(21):2918–23.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Rhea MR. Determining the magnitude of treatment effects in strength training research through the use of the effect size. J Strength Cond Res. 2004;18(4):918–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Lakens D. Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Front Psychol. 2013;4:863.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Greenman PE, McPartland JM. Cranial findings and iatrogenesis from craniosacral manipulation in patients with traumatic brain syndrome. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 1995;95(3):182–8. 191–182.PubMedGoogle Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.