Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

Complementary and alternative medicine usage among cardiac patients: a descriptive study

BMC Complementary and Alternative MedicineThe official journal of the International Society for Complementary Medicine Research (ISCMR)201515:100

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-015-0610-y

Received: 28 August 2014

Accepted: 13 March 2015

Published: 31 March 2015

Abstract

Background

The use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) persists, despite the availability of conventional medicine (CM), modernisation, globalisation, technological advancement, and limited scientific evidence supporting CAM. People with cardiovascular diseases often use CAM, despite possible major adverse effects and lack of evidence supporting CAM claims. This study explored CAM use among cardiac patients, the types of CAM used, reasons and factors that influence its use, and the association between patient demographics and CAM use.

Methods

This cross-sectional quantitative study was conducted using quota sampling to survey 329 public clinic adult cardiac patients within the South–West Regional Health Authority (SWRHA) of Trinidad and Tobago. From 1 July 2012 to 31August 2012, each participant completed questionnaires, after consenting to participate. Data analysis included χ2 tests and binary logistic regression.

Results

One hundred eighty-five (56.2%; standard error [SE] = 2.74%) patients used CAM. Herbal medicine was the most common CAM (85.9%; SE = 2.56%), followed by spiritual therapy/mind-body systems (61.6%; SE = 3.58%), physical therapy/body manipulation (13.5%; SE = 2.51%), alternative systems (8.1%; SE = 2.01%), and other methods (3.8%; SE = 1. 41%). The patients believed that CAM promotes health and wellness (79.5%; SE = 2.97%), assists in fighting illness (78.9%; SE = 3.00%), addresses the limitations of CM (69.2%; SE = 3.56%), alleviates symptoms (21.6%; SE = 6.51%), costs less than CM (21.6 %, SE = 3.03), and has fewer adverse/damaging effects than CM (29.7, SE =3.36), or they were disappointed with CM (12.4%, SE = 2.42). Ethnicity and religion were associated with CAM usage, but only ethnicity was a useful predictor of CAM use.

Conclusions

Complementary and alternative medicine use was high among cardiac patients (56.2%, SE = 2.74%), and associated with ethnicity and religion. Friends, family, and perceived mode of action influenced a patient’s use of CAM.

Keywords

Cardiac patientsComplementary and alternative medicineSide effectsTreatment

Background

There is a high prevalence of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use, even with great advances in conventional medicine (CM). The global prevalence of CAM use is 9.8–76.0% [1]. The prevalence is estimated at 38.0% in the United States in adults 18 years and older [2], 51.8% in the United Kingdom [3], and 68.9% in Australia [4]. In Canada, 12.4% of people visit a CAM practitioner [5]. The prevalence of CAM use in Trinidad and Tobago is unknown, although it appears widespread. In 2001, the National Health Service (NHS) in London, England reported that British people invested £50 million in CAM [6]. Adult Americans pay $34 billion out-of-pocket costs annually [7]. For many decades, CAM practiced in Trinidad [8] represented a major (and sometimes the only) form of medical treatment because of the lack of available health care [9]. Nonconventional medicine use in Trinidad has its genesis many centuries ago in the form of traditional medicine, which represents nonconventional medical practices indigenous to the country of origin. Traditional medicine was practiced by Amerindians (e.g. Carib and Arawak) and later by migrants such as enslaved Africans, indentured East Indians, and Chinese immigrants who brought with them customs and practices that included “home medication/remedies” and unconventional medical practices [10]. The use of CAM remains prevalent in Trinidad, despite greater accessibility to free healthcare services, a better understanding of disease conditions, and widespread communication through electronic and print media. However, its usage is not necessarily the result of decreased effectiveness of CM [11]. Conventional medical treatment of cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) has improved patient outcomes in quality of life, decreased mortality, decreased morbidity, and increased life expectancy [12]. However, CVD mortality accounts for 33.7% of all deaths in the Americas, with Guyana and Trinidad and Tobago having the highest rates [13]. The prevalence of CAM use among cardiac patients with coronary artery disease is 4–63% [14]. However, no studies have been performed on CAM use among cardiac patients in Trinidad and Tobago. Clement et al. [15] found that 30.4% of asthmatic patients used herbal medicines.

Public health relevance

The use of CAM continues, even though there is a lack of necessary evidence to support many of its claims [7,16]. However, a new paradigm shift has led to the incorporation of relevant and tested CAM and CM into “integrative medicine” [17].

Many people continue to gravitate to unregulated CAM practitioners who use therapies of questionable safety and efficacy, and may even be injurious to health [18]. Complementary and alternative medicine therapies can even replace conventional therapies. The increasing use and cost of CAM with favourable and unfavourable consequences have made it a major public health problem because it affects the lives of individuals and communities.

Public safety and ensuring that the claims of CAM can stand up to scientific scrutiny should be emphasised, according to a former Chief Medical Officer of Trinidad and Tobago [19]. The World Health Organization (WHO) Traditional Medicine Strategy of 2002–2005 emphasised four public health areas of CAM: (1) policy; (2) safety, efficacy, and quality; (3) access; and (4) rational use [20]. To encourage more rational, safe, and effective CAM usage, the expanding use of CAM—even among conventional physicians—must therefore be redefined with regard to its role in light of an expanding public health movement [21]. To achieve these goals, the Minister of Health of Trinidad and Tobago disclosed that laws were being drafted to regulate herbal practice [22]. However, to date, such laws have not been enacted.

This study will focus on the use of CAM among cardiac patients. More specifically, this study aimed to explore the types of CAM used, the reasons and influences for its use, benefits and outcomes and the association between patient demographics and CAM use.

Methods

This cross-sectional study was conducted among cardiac clinic attendees within the South–West Regional Health Authority (SWRHA) of Trinidad and Tobago between 1 July 2012 and 31 August 2012. Quota sampling (i.e. successive sampling until the size of the sample is achieved) was used to select the participants. A total of 329 patients was the predetermined sample size required to estimate with a 5% margin of error the percentage of public cardiac clinic patients who use CAM [23]. To be eligible for participation, patients could not be confused (i.e. display problems with cognition or behaviour), as assessed by the student research assistant; had to be able to communicate verbally or in writing; and had to give consent. The data collection instrument was a self-completed questionnaire of 33 questions: seven questions on demographics; two questions on present cardiac condition; and the remaining questions on various aspects of CAM usage such as types, experiences, reasons, benefits, influences, effects and consequences, source, and access of CAM. Two medical students assisted participants who had difficulty understanding questions or who required clarification of questions.

Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS, version 20 (Chicago, IL, USA) using descriptive methods and inferential methods. The descriptive methods included frequency distribution tables and graphs. Inferential methods included tests of equality of proportions, chi-squared tests of association between selected sociodemographic and other attribute variables and CAM use (e.g. Fisher’s exact test and McNemar’s test of paired proportions). Binary logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with CAM use among patients. Eight independent variables were used such as sex, marital status, ethnicity, educational level, employment status, religion, religiosity, and area of residence. All hypotheses were tested at the 5% level of significance. Ethical approval was obtained from the Clinical Governance and Ethics Committee of South–West Regional Health Authority on 25 May 2012.

Results

All 329 of the returned questionnaires were usable, and the reliability of the instrument (i.e. Cronbach α) was 0.896. Five participants were excluded because of difficulty communicating (i.e. verbalising or documenting their responses). Table 1 gives the frequency distribution of the patients’ sociodemographic variables. The respondents were predominantly male (n = 207; 62.9%); older than 60 years (n = 185, 56.2%); married (n = 264, 80.2%); of Indo-Trinidadian ethnic background (n = 238; 72.3%); had up to a primary school education (n = 213; 64.7%); and were of the Hindu religious faith (n = 180; 54.7%). In addition, most participants (n = 197; 59.9%) reported incomes ranging from US$385.00 to $769.00 per month. Ischaemic heart disease (IHD), which includes congestive cardiac failure, had the highest prevalence (n =186; 56.5%) among the respondents. Cardiac arrhythmia had the lowest prevalence (n = 10; 3.0%) (Figure 1). The heart disease for which 54 (16.4%) patients were treated was not stated (Figure 1).
Table 1

Sociodemographic profile of the 329 patients

Variable

n

%

SE (P)

Sex

   

 Male

207

62.9

2.67

 Female

121

36.8

2.66

Age (y)

   

 <40

11

3.3

0.98

 41–50

58

17.6

2.10

 51–60

72

22.8

2.31

 >60

158

56.2

2.74

Marital status

   

 Single

14

4.3

1.12

 Married

264

8.2

1.51

 Other

16

4.8

1.18

Unknown

12

3.6

1.03

Ethnicity

   

 Afro-Trinidadian

80

24.3

2.36

 Indo-Trinidadian

238

72.3

2.47

 Other (including mixed race)

11

3.3

0.98

Highest level of education

   

 Primary

213

64.7

2.63

 Secondary

103

31.2

2.56

 Other

2

0.6

0.43

Unknown

6

1.8

0.73

Employment status

   

 Employed

62

18.8

2.15

 Unemployed

256

77.8

2.29

 Unknown

11

3.3

0.98

Religion

   

 Hindu

180

54.7

2.74

 Islam

27

8.2

1.51

 Christian

75

22.8

2.31

 Other

39

11.9

1.79

 Unknown

8

2.4

0.84

SE = standard error.

Note: The denominators do not add up to 100% because of missing values and rounding off.

Figure 1

Types of heart disease among the respondents.

Complementary and alternative medicine usage

Users of CAM accounted for 185 (56.2%) of the respondents. Among these, 115 (62.2%) respondents were male and 70 (37.8%) respondents were female. Most (98.9%) CAM users received CM. Drugs were the most common form of CM administered to the patients (93.0%). Complementary and alternative medicine and CM were used during the same period by 77.8% of CAM users. In addition, 78.9% of all respondents reported satisfaction with CM.

Table 2 compares the prevalence of selected types of heart disease between CAM users and CAM non-users. None of the differences between CAM users and non-users with respect to the prevalence of the various heart conditions was statistically significant. In addition, medicinal herbs was overall the most common type of CAM used (n = 159; 85.9%), followed by spiritual therapy/mind-body systems (n = 114; 61.6%), physical therapy/body manipulation (n = 25; 13.5%), alternative systems (n = 15; 8.1%), energy therapies (n = 3; 1.6%), and other (unspecified) forms of treatment (n = 7; 3.8%). The four leading CAM subtypes used were omega-3 fatty acids (54.6%), the B vitamins (50.4%), special diet/nutritional supplements (41.1%), and faith healing (54.1%). Some patients used more than one type of CAM simultaneously: 129 (69.7%) patients used two types of CAM and 44 (23.2%) patients used three types of CAM.
Table 2

Chi-squared analysis results for heart disease distribution among CAM users and non-CAM users

 

CAM Usage, n (%; SE [%])

 

Type of heart disease

Yes (n = 185)

No (n = 144)

Pvalue for the chi-squared test

Ischaemic heart disease

104 (62.7; 3.56)

82 (62.1; 4.04)

0.925

Cardiomyopathy

12 (7.2; 1.90)

10 (7.6; 2.01)

0.91

Cardiac arrhythmia

6 (3.6; 1.37)

4 (3.0; 1.42)

0.779

Valvular heart disease

13 (7.8; 1.97)

13 (9.8; 2.48)

0.544

Other

31 (18.7; 2.87)

23 (17.4; 3.16)

0.88

CAM = complementary and alternative medicine; SE = standard error.

The prevalence of medical herb use, which included unspecified herbs, was high for all reported heart disease types (Table 3), and ranged from 76.9% (valvular heart disease) to 100% (cardiac arrhythmia). This was followed by spiritual therapies with a prevalence ranging from 46.2% (valvular heart disease) to 100% (cardiac arrhythmia).
Table 3

Type of CAM used, based on cardiac condition

 

Type of CAM used, n (%; SE [%])

Type of heart disease

Medicinal herbs

Spiritual therapies/mind–body systems

Physical therapies/body manipulations

Alternative systems

Other (including energy therapies)

Ischaemic heart disease (n = 104)

94 (90.4; 2.89)

61 (58.7, 4.82)

15 (14.4; 3.44)

9 (8.7; 2.70)

0 (0.0)

Cardiomyopathy (n = 12)

11 (91.7; 7.96)

6 (50.0; 14.43)

1 (8.3; 7.96)

1 (8.3; 7.96)

0 (0.0)

Cardiac arrhythmia (n = 6)

6 (100.0; 0.00)

6 (100.0; 0.00)

3 (50.0; 20.41)

0 (0; 0.00)

0 (0.0)

Valvular heart disease (n = 13)

10 (76.9; 13.32)

6 (46.2; 15.77)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

Other, not specified (n = 31)

24 (77.4; 7.51)

24 (77.4; 7.51)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

6 (19.4, 7.10)

CAM = complementary and alternative medicine; SE = standard error.

Associated factors and useful predictors of CAM use

The patients’ main sources of information about CAM were family members (52.4%; n = 97) and friends (46.5%; n = 86); whereas only 2.2% of patients (n = 4) received information from clinic personnel (Figure 2). Chi-squared tests of association between the socioeconomic variables and the use or non-use of CAM showed that CAM use was associated with ethnicity (χ2 = 18.20; df = 2; P ≤ 0.001) and a patient’s religion (χ2 = 12.02; df = 3; P = 0.007). Furthermore, binary logistic regression analysis identified ethnicity as the only useful predictor of whether a patient would use CAM (odds ratio [OR] = 1.962; P = 0.028; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.094, 3.516) (Table 4).
Figure 2

Patients’ sources of information about complementary and alternative medicine.CAM = complementary and alternative medicine.

Table 4

Binary logistic regression model

Variable

OR

Pvalue

95% CI for OR

Sex

1.104

0.712

(0.653, 1.868)

Marital status

0.550

0.079

(0.282, 1.073)

Ethnicity

1.962

0.024

(1.094, 3.516)

Education

0.999

0.943

(0.971, 1.027)

Employment

0.691

0.335

(0.326, 1.465)

Religion

0.848

0.325

(0.612, 1.177)

Religiosity

1.400

0.313

(0.729, 2.689)

Residence

1.289

0.372

(0.738, 2.251)

95% CI = 95% confidence interval; OR = odds ratio.

Reasons for CAM use were explored further by asking participants to list factors that either pushed them away from CM or enticed them towards CAM (Table 5). Among the leading “push” factors were the inadequacies of CM treatment (n = 128; 69.2%), whereas the leading “pull” factor was their belief that CAM promotes general health and wellness (n = 147; 79.5%).
Table 5

The “push” and “pull” factors for using CAM in 185 patients

Push and pull factors for CAM usage

Number (n)

Percentage (%)

SE (%)

Push Factors

   

 Inadequacies of CM

128

69.2

3.39

 High cost of CM

40

21.6

3.03

 Adverse effects and the toxic or damaging nature of CM

55

29.7

3.36

 Disappointment with CM

23

12.4

2.42

 Mechanistic nature of CM

6

3.2

1.29

Pull Factors

   

 CAM promotes general health and wellness

147

79.5

2.97

 CAM specifically assists in fighting illness

146

78.9

3.00

 CAM is helpful

137

74.1

3.22

 Trying everything that can help

131

70.8

3.34

 CAM improves physical well-being

117

63.2

3.55

 CAM allows a user to relax and sleep

88

47.6

3.67

 CAM directly treats complications

41

22.2

3.06

 CAM improves psychological and emotional well-being

14

7.6

1.95

 CAM gives users control of their treatment and faith

8

4.3

1.49

 CAM is more in keeping with inner beliefs

7

3.8

1.41

CAM = complementary and alternative medicine; CM = conventional medicine; SE = standard error.

Outcome and satisfaction with CAM

Most patients (n = 137; 74.1%) reported that CAM use resulted in positive outcomes and that they were generally satisfied with its usage. Less than two percent of users (n = 3; 1.6%) experienced a bad outcome and only a few users (n = 4; 2.2%) experienced complications. Good outcomes were most common (83.3%, n =12) among cardiomyopathy patients, followed by patients with IHD (82%, n = 104). Among the 155 CAM users, 8 (5.2%) patients were very satisfied; 133 (85.8%) patients were satisfied; and 14 (7.6%) patients were disappointed with the outcome of CAM. Most (84.9%) CAM users were satisfied with medical herbs, followed by spiritual therapies (74.5%). Twelve (7.7%) of 155 CAM users experienced an unwanted effect. Most (88.1%) CAM users reported they would encourage others to use alternative therapies.

Discussion

The NCCAM defines complementary and alternative medicine as “a group of diverse medical and health care systems, practices, and products that are not generally considered part of conventional medicine” [24]. Complementary and alternative medicine includes herbs, dietary supplements, meditation, biofeedback, hypnosis, acupuncture, Ayurveda, homeopathy, naturopathy, Chinese medicine, chiropractic, massage, tai chi, yoga, electromagnetic therapy, kinesiology, reiki, and qigong. In the current study, which is the first conducted among cardiac patients in Trinidad, patients were not provided a definition of CAM. However, they were asked to choose from a wide list of options that captured nearly the entire spectrum of CAM.

The prevalence of CAM use among cardiac patients in this study was high (56.2%), males outnumbered females, and the number of Indo-Trinidadians was significantly higher than that of other ethnic groups. At least 69.7% of CAM users simultaneously used at least two types of CAM, and 23.2% of CAM users simultaneously used at least three types of CAM. In the United Kingdom in a group of West Midlands hospitals, the prevalence of CAM users among coronary artery disease (CAD) patients for the preceding 12 months was reportedly 31.7% [25], and in the state of Texas in the United States of America, the prevalence of CAM usage among cardiovascular patients is 54% [26]. Nicdao and Ai [27] found that the sociodemographic predictors of CAM use identified before cardiac surgery include income, religiosity, education, body mass index, employment, and congestive cardiac failure. Ethnicity and religion in this study were two factors associated with CAM use, but only ethnicity was predictive of CAM use.

The patients in this study recognised the perceived value of CAM, but most (77.8%) patients did not stop using CM. This may reflect a continued appreciation of the value of CM, fear of stopping CM, or lack of full trust in CAM. Complementary and alternative medicine usage is attributed to the increasing demand and expectations for more holistic and comprehensive care [28]. However, CAM practices depend on the social, cultural, economic, and traditional influences of societies [29]. As previously reported by similar studies, people were encouraged by one or more push or pull factors (Table 5). “Push” factors included dissatisfaction with conventional treatments, whereas “pull” factors included a desire for more holistic and “natural” approaches, and a greater philosophical congruence with CAM [30]. Complementary and alternative medicine is perceived as “natural” and “safe” [31], effective [32], and having fewer adverse effects [33]. Patients using CAM also experience a feeling of control, coping, and adjustment [34]. Bekke-Hassen et al. [35] found faith and motivational factors to be strong influences in CAM usage. As in this study, CAM was more likely to be used if patients held strong beliefs about traditional theories of health, illness, and remedies, or if family members encouraged them to use it [36].

Users of CAM have claimed better health and satisfaction. Its use has expanded because of the lack of regulations in Trinidad and Tobago [19], and because of support and encouragement, particularly from friends (46.5%), family (52.4%), CAM practitioners (21.1%), and mass media (29.7%). Such usage exists, even when there is little encouragement from health personnel (4.3%).

Complementary and alternative medicine is not as beneficial or safe as is proclaimed because its use may result in a significant cost financially or otherwise (e.g. by delaying treatment or by causing death). Its usage may have serious implications for patients and society by creating false hope, compounding adverse effects, and delaying CM treatment and utilisation of resources that could be channelled into evidenced-based practices. The cardiac conditions listed in Table 2 may require the use of blood thinners such as aspirin, heparin, warfarin, and clopidogrel, which may interact with many herbal products commonly used by cardiac patients. Herb–drug interactions can modify the actions of drugs (e.g., digoxin) that have a narrow therapeutic index or other commonly used drugs such as diuretics, beta-blockers, cholesterol-lowering drugs and amiodarone. Patients’ easy acceptance of natural products as “safe” has largely ignored the possibility of herb–herb interactions, herb–drug interactions, and herbal toxicity.

Herb–drug interactions include arrhythmias [37] or increased toxicity, particularly when drugs with a narrow therapeutic range such as digoxin or warfarin are coadministered with herbs [7]. Patients, CM practitioners, and CAM practitioners have to be mindful of the possibility of the increased risk of bleeding with ginkgo [38] and garlic (Allium sativum L) [39], both of which are used by cardiac patients, especially if these herbs are taken with blood thinning medications. However, claims of such adverse interactions have not been supported in other studies [40,41]. Folk remedies practiced in Trinidad can expose individuals to toxins that can be dangerous to health [42], and vigorous massage therapy can lead to negative adverse effects and should be avoided in patients with heart failure, kidney failure and bleeding disorders.

Rabito and Kaye [28] argue that CAM usage can lead to positive and significant benefits. This cannot be disregarded because in this study many of the most popular herbal medicines such as omega-3 fatty acids [43], CoQ10 [44], and fresh fruit and juices [45] have proven beneficial in reducing CAD. The B vitamins may be useful in preventing CAD; however, their value in CAD is unclear, according to some studies [46,47].

The high prevalence of CAM practiced concurrently with CM necessitates greater understanding, communication, and integration of both. In this study, most (71.9%, n = 133) patients were willing to disclose such information to their CM provider. The few patients who were unwilling to disclose such information believed their physician would stop their use (33%, n = 30); the remaining patients (60%, n = 30) believed that disclosure of information about CAM use was unnecessary or unimportant. This is in contrast to the findings of Liu et al. [48] who found that only 17% of patients disclosed CAM practices to their physician, but as many as 48% of patients were unprepared to discuss the topic at all. A study in the state of Texas in the United States revealed more than 50% of patients reported that they did not inform their cardiologists of CAM use [26]. Furthermore, more than 90% of physicians did not discuss CAM treatments with their patients [14]. There has thus been no meaningful integration of CAM and CM.

The limitations of this study include the selection of patients from a single public health cardiac clinic from South Trinidad. The attendees of the clinic tended to be of a lower socioeconomic status and educational level, which is not fully representative of the population. The sample was not randomised, which could increase bias. In addition, the questionnaire was not pilot-tested. Another weakness or limitation of the study is the chance of false-positive findings.

Conclusions

The prevalence of CAM use was high among cardiac patients, despite evidenced-based guidelines for CVD management. This research highlights the widespread use of CAM and patients’ perception of its benefit. The study findings are that most users are driven to CAM for general health and well-being, for fighting illness, and for addressing the inadequacies of CM. Patients are prepared to use CAM and CM simultaneously. Patients occasionally stop CM and use CAM alone. Therefore, patients, the community, and CM and CAM practitioners need to have adequate information to guide patients in effective and appropriate usage, to minimise the risks of CAM usage, and to give greater empowerment to CAM users. This will also assist in providing safe and effective health care.

Abbreviations

CAM: 

Complementary and alternative medicine

CM: 

Conventional medicine

CVD: 

Cardiovascular disease

IHD: 

Ischaemic heart disease

NCCAM: 

National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine

NHS: 

National Health Service

CAM: 

complementary and alternative medicine

Declarations

Acknowledgements

I wish to acknowledge Dr. George Legall, a statistician and lecturer at the University of the West Indies (Mt. Hope, Trinidad), who assisted in the statistical analysis and edited the methodology. I also wish to thank Professor Ralph Premdas for the initial preparation and critique of this article.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Arthur Lok Jack Graduate School of Business

References

  1. Harris PE, Cooper KL, Relton C, Thomas KJ. Prevalence of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) use by the general population: a systematic review and update. Int J Clin Pract. 2012;66:924–39. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22994327. Accessed on 22 Feb 2015.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Barnes PM, Bloom B, Nahin R. Complementary and alternative medicine use among adults and children: United States. CDC National Health Statistics Report #12. 2007. December 10, 2008. http://nccam.nih.gov/news/camstats/NHIS.htm. Accessed on 22 Feb 2015.
  3. Posadzki P, Watson LK, Alotaibi A, Ernst E. Prevalence of use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) by patients/consumers in the UK: systematic review of surveys. Clin Med. 2013;13:126–31.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Xue CC, Zhang AL, Lin V, Da Costa C, Story DF. Complementary and alternative medicine use in Australia: a national population-based survey. J Altern Complement Med. 2007;13:643–50.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Metcalfe A, Williams J, McChesney J, Patten SB, Jette N. Use of complementary and alternative medicine by those with a chronic disease and the general population—results of a national population based survey. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2010;10:58. doi:10.1186/1472-6882-10-58. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6882/10/58. Accessed on 22.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  6. Ong C-K, Banks B. Complementary and alternative medicine: the consumer perspective. London: The Prince of Wales’s Foundation for Integrated Health; 2003.Google Scholar
  7. Tachjian A, Maria V, Jahangir A. Use of herbal products and potential interactions in patients with cardiovascular diseases. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55:515–25.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Clement YN, Morton-Gittens J, Basdeo L, Blades A, Francis M, Gomes N, et al. Perceived efficacy of herbal remedies by users accessing primary healthcare in Trinidad. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2007;7:4.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Moyne L, Stubbs R, Crowdy RE, Citrine W, Mackinnon P, Blacklock MG, et al. West India Royal Commission Report. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office; 1945 (Command 6607).Google Scholar
  10. Clement Y. Limited clinical evidence to support the integration of Caribbean herbs into conventional medicine. Focus Altern Complement Ther. 2011;16:289–92.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Pagán JA, Pauly MV. Access to conventional medical care and the use of complementary and alternative medicine. Health Aff (Millwood). 2005;24:255–62. http://content.healthaffairs.org/content/24/1/255.full. Accessed on 26 Feb 2015.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. American Heart Association. What is cardiovascular disease? http://www.heart.org/HEARTORG/Caregiver/Resources/WhatisCardiovascularDisease/What-is-Cardiovascular-Disease_UCM_301852_Article.jsp. Accessed on 26 Feb 2015.
  13. de Souza MF M, Gawryszewski VP, Orduñez P, Sanhueza A, Espinal MA. Global burden of cardiovascular disease. Cardiovascular disease mortality in the Americas: current trends and disparities. Heart. 2012;98:1207–12.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Grant SJ, Bin YS, Kiat H, Chang DH. The use of complementary and alternative medicine by the people with cardiovascular disease: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2012;12:299.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Clement YN, Williams AF, Aranda D, Chase R, Watson N, Mohammed R, et al. Medicinal herb use among asthmatic patients attending a specialty care facility in Trinidad. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2005;5:3.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Power M, Hopayian K. Exposing the evidence gap for complementary and alternative medicine to be integrated into science-based medicine. J R Soc Med. 2011;104:155–61. doi:10.1258/jrsm.2011.100271. http://www.dcscience.net/JRSM-Apr-2011-CAM.pdf. Accessed on −26 Feb 2015.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  17. National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NCCAM). Complementary, alternative, or integrative health: what’s in a name? http://nccam.nih.gov/health/whatiscam. Accessed on 26 Feb 2015.
  18. Lin MC, Nahin P, Gershwin EM, Longhurst JC, Wu KK. State of complementary and alternative medicine in cardiovascular, lung, and blood research. Circulation. 2001;103:2038–41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Baldeosingh K. Cracking down on alternative medicine. Trinidad Express October 2, 2010. http://www.trinidadexpress.com/news/Cracking_down_on_alternative_medicine-104222959.html. Accessed on 26 Feb 2015.
  20. Bodeker G, Kronenberg F. A public health agenda for traditional, complementary, and alternative medicine. Am J Public Health. 2002;92:1582–91.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Hill FJ. Complementary and alternative medicine: the next generation of health promotion? Health Promot Int. 2003;18:265–72.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Gordon Z. Health Minister: laws coming to regulate herbal business. Guardian. 2012 May 16. https://guardian.co.tt/news/2012-05-16/health-minister-laws-coming-regulate-herbal-business. Accessed on 26 Feb 2015.
  23. Krejice RV, Morgan DW. Determining sample size for research activities. Educ Psychol Meas. 1970;30:607–10.Google Scholar
  24. National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NCCAM). Strategic object 3: increase understanding of ‘real world’ patterns and outcomes of CAM use and its integration into health care and health promotion. http://nccam.nih.gov/about/plans/2011/objective3.htm. Accessed on 26 Feb 2015.
  25. Greenfield S, Pattison H, Jolly K. Use of complementary and alternative medicine and self tests by coronary heart disease patients. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2008;8:47.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Krasuski RA, Michaelis K, Eckart RE. The cardiovascular patient’s perceptions of complementary and alternative medicine. Clin Cardiol. 2006;29:161–4.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Nicdao EG, Ai AL. Religion and the use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) among cardiac patients. J Relig Health. 2014;53:864–77.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Rabito MJ, Kaye DA. Complementary and alternative medicine and cardiovascular disease: an evidenced-based review. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2013;2013:672097. [http://www.hindawi.com/journals/ecam/2013/672097] (Accessed on 26 Feb 2015).View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Hussain S, Malik F. Integration of complementary and traditional medicines in public health care systems: challenges and methodology. J Med Plant Res. 2013;7:2952–9. http://www.academicjournals.org/article/article1382454987_Hussain%20and%20Malik.pdf. Accessed on 26 Feb 2015.Google Scholar
  30. Nichol J, Thompson EA, Shaw A. Beliefs, decision-making, and dialogue about complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) within families using CAM: a qualitative study. J Altern Complement Med. 2011;17:117–25.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Arslan IO, Ozer ZC, Kulakac O. Use of complementary and alternative medicine in cardiovascular diseases: a literature review. HealthMed. 2012;6:2190–9.Google Scholar
  32. White MA, Verhoef MJ, Davison BJ, Gunn H, Cooke K. Seeking mind, body and spirit healing—why some men with prostate cancer choose CAM (complementary and alternative medicine) over conventional cancer treatments. Integr Med Insights. 2008;3:1–11.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Chu FY, Yan X, Zhang Z, Xiong XJ, Wang J, Liu HX. Features of complementary and alternative medicine use by patients with coronary artery disease in Beijing: a cross-sectional study. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2013;13:287. http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6882/13/287. Accessed on 26 Feb 2015.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Suarez T, Reese FL. Alternative medicine use, perceived control, coping, and adjustment in African American and Caucasian males living with HIV and AIDS. Int J Rehabil Health. 1997;3:107–18.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Bekke-Hansen S, Pedersen CG, Thygesen K, Christensen S, Waelde LC, Zachariae R. Faith and use of complementary and alternative medicine among heart attack patients in a secular society. Complement Ther Med. 2012;20:306–15. doi:10.1016/j.ctim.2012.03.003. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22863645. Accessed on 26 Feb 2015.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Lee GBW, Charn TC, Chew ZH, Ng TP. Complementary and alternative medicine use in patients with chronic diseases in primary care is associated with perceived quality of care and cultural beliefs. Fam Pract. 2004;21:654–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Dharmananda S. Checking for possible herb–drug interactions. Portland, OR: Institute for Traditional Medicine; 2003. http://www.itmonline.org/arts/herbdrug2.htm. Accessed 26 Feb 2015.Google Scholar
  38. Bent S, Goldberg H, Padula H, Avins AL. Spontaneous bleeding associated with Ginkgo biloba: a case report and systematic review of the literature: a case report and systematic review of the literature. J Gen Intern Med. 2005;20:657–61. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16050865. Accessed on 26 Feb 2015.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  39. Ge B, Zhang Z, Zuo Z. Updates on the clinical evidenced herb–warfarin interactions. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med. 2014;2014:957362. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/957362. Accessed on 26-02-2015.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Jiang X, Williams KM, Liauw WS, Ammit AJ, Roufogalis BD, Duke CC, et al. Effect of ginkgo and ginger on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of warfarin in healthy subjects. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2005;59:425–32. doi:10.1111/j.1365–21. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15801937. Accessed on 26 Feb 2015.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Taki Y, Yokotani K, Yamada S, Shinozuka K, Kubota Y, Watanabe Y, et al. Ginkgo biloba extract attenuates warfarin-mediated anticoagulation through induction of hepatic cytochrome P450 enzymes by bilobalide in mice. Phytomedicine. 2012;19:177–82. http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Ginkgo+biloba+extract+attenuates+warfarinmediated+anticoagulation...-a0282347268. Accessed on 17 Dec 2014.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Paul JHA, Seaforth CE. Harmful plants in Caribbean folk medicine. Focus Altern Complement Ther. 2011;16:261–5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  43. Harris WS, Miller M, Tighee AP, Davidson MH, Schaefer EJ. Omega-3 fatty acids and coronary heart disease risk: clinical and mechanistic perspectives. Atherosclerosis. 2008;197:12–24. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18160071. Accessed on 26 Feb 2015.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Lee B, Tseng Y, Yen C, Lin P. Effects of coenzyme Q10 supplementation (300 mg/day) on antioxidation and anti-inflammation in coronary artery disease patients during statins therapy: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Nutr J. 2013;12:142. doi:10.1186/1475-2891-12-142. http://www.nutritionj.com/content/12/1/142. Accessed on 26 Feb 2015.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Joshipura KJ, Hu FB, Manson JE, Stampfer MJ, Rimm EB, Speizer FE, et al. The effect of fruit and vegetable intake on risk for coronary heart disease. Ann Intern Med. 2001;134:1106–14.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Moats C, Rimm EB. Vitamin intake and risk of coronary disease: observation versus intervention. Curr Atheroscler Rep. 2007;9:508–14. http://www.isom.eu/pdf/07MoatsRimmVitaminCVD.pdf. Accessed on 26 Feb 2015.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. JAMA and Archives Journals. Meta-analysis shows no heart benefits for folic acid supplements. Science Daily. 2010 Oct 12. http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/10/101011173302.htm. Accessed on 26 Feb 2015.
  48. Liu EH, Turner LM, Lin SX, Klaus L, Choi LY, Whitworth J, et al. Use of alternative medicine by patients undergoing cardiac surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2000;120:335–41.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Bahall; licensee BioMed Central. 2015

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement