Skip to content

Advertisement

You're viewing the new version of our site. Please leave us feedback.

Learn more

BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine

Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

An evaluation of the anti-angiogenic effect of the Korean medicinal formula “Sa-mi-yeon-geon-tang” in vitro and in ovo

BMC Complementary and Alternative MedicineThe official journal of the International Society for Complementary Medicine Research (ISCMR)201515:42

https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-015-0573-z

Received: 19 November 2014

Accepted: 21 February 2015

Published: 5 March 2015

Abstract

Background

Angiogenesis is a general hallmark of cancer; therefore, the inhibition of tumor-derived angiogenesis is considered to be an attractive target in the development of anti-cancer agents. Sa-mi-yeon-geon-tang (SMYGT), a decoction that consists of four natural medicinal products, has been traditionally prescribed in Oriental medicine to treat diverse diseases, including cancer. In the present study, we investigated the anti-angiogenic potential of SMYGT in vitro and in ovo.

Methods

The anti-angiogenic potential of SMYGT was evaluated using conventional in vitro assays with human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) and chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) assays with fertilized eggs. The expression changes of pro-angiogenic proteins and intracellular signaling in HUVECs following SMYGT treatment were determined by quantitative polymerase chain reaction, gelatinase zymography, and western blot analysis.

Results

SMYGT efficiently inhibited three-dimensional capillary-like tube formation by HUVECs on extracellular matrix supports, as well as new vessel formation on CAMs. SMYGT inhibited cell adhesion to the extracellular matrix and HUVEC cell invasion through Matrigel without affecting cell proliferation, viability, and motility. These anti-angiogenic effects of SMYGT in HUVECs were related to decreases in the phosphorylation of focal adhesion kinase and the expression of matrix metallopeptidase-2 activity.

Conclusions

SMYGT exhibited an anti-angiogenic potential in both in vitro and in ovo experiments, which may partially contribute to its anti-tumor effect in clinical conditions. We suggest that SMYGT may be a promising source material for the development of anti-cancer chemotherapeutics that target angiogenesis.

Keywords

Sa-mi-yeon-geon-tangAnti-angiogenesisAnti-cancerMedicinal formulaHUVEC

Background

Because cancer is a complex, multi-factorial disease, treating cancer based on a single-target/single-component strategy may be less effective than using a multi-target/multi-component strategy. In fact, oncology department currently administer various combination of chemical and/or recombinant drugs to cancer patients, and many ongoing clinical studies are investigating the efficacy of cocktail therapies in different types of cancer [1-4]. Medicinal herbs or the prescription drugs derived from them, which have been traditionally used for disease management, can be promising source materials in the development of anticancer drugs because they are originally based on multi-target/multi-component strategies. Additionally, medicinal herb extracts can be prescribed as adjuvants to produce synergistic effects with conventional anticancer drugs or to relieve the adverse side effects of the anticancer drugs. The rationale of using a combination of medicinal plants was demonstrated by Cheng’s research group, who showed that the four-herb Chinese medicine PHY906 reduced CPT-11 (irinotecan)-induced intestinal toxicity and increased the anticancer activity of CPT-11 through multiple mechanisms that act simultaneously [5]. Natural products, particularly botanical drugs, have been shown to be effective in cancer prevention or treatment on their own or in combination with chemotherapeutics [6-8].

In traditional Oriental medicine, cancer is referred to as an accumulation of mass in the body. Therefore, natural products that aim to soften and resolve the hard mass or lumps have long been used to treat cancer. Sa-mi-yeon-geon-tang (SMYGT) is a decoction composed of the combination of four natural products with medicinal values, including Sargassum, Laminariae Thallus, Prunellae Spica, and Ostreae Concha (Table 1) in an equal weight ratio. SMYGT and its component drugs have been used to soften and dissipate the abnormal hard mass [9]. The name of the formula translates as follows: Sa (four)-mi (taste)-yeon (soften)-geon (hardness)-tang (decoction). In 1983, a Chinese research group reported that SMYGT showed anti-tumor effects when administered to 511 cancer patients, including liver, stomach, and colorectal cancer [10]. Bae et al. demonstrated that modified SMYGT which included three additional herbs, showed anti-cancer or anti-metastatic effects by inhibiting DNA topoisomerase I activity and angiogenic events [9]. When administered to experimental mice with 1,2-dimethylhydrazine-induced murine colorectal cancer, modified SMYGT that included four additional herbs demonstrated anti-carcinogenic activity. However, the anticancer mechanism of SMYGT itself is unknown. In our preliminary in vitro activity screening, SMYGT was identified as a hit that showed anti-angiogenic potential. In this study, we demonstrate that SMYGT has anti-angiogenic potential in vitro and in ovo, and we suggest a feasible underlying mechanism.
Table 1

Four components of SMYGT

Herbal name

Latin name

Genus

Weight Ratio

Sargassum

Sargassum fusiforme

Sargassaceae

1

Laminariae Thallus

Laminaria japonica

Laminariaceae

1

Prunellae Spica

Prunella vulgaris

Labiatae

1

Ostreae Concha

Ostrea gigas

Ostreidae

1

Methods

Preparation of SMYGT extracts

The four components of SMYGT were purchased from Kwangmyungdang Medicinal Herbs (Ulsan, Republic of Korea). Their identities were confirmed by Dr. Go Ya Choi, Herbal Medicines Resources Group, Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine (KIOM). The voucher specimens of Sargassum (KIOM010011), Laminariae Thallus (KIOM010019), Prunellae Spica (KIOM010023), and Ostreae Concha (KIOM010022) were deposited at KM-Based Herbal Drug Development Group, KIOM. The crude water extract was prepared by boiling a 300 g of finely pulverized dried materials that consist of equal ratio of each component (75 g of each component) in 8 L of distilled water for 4 h. The extract was filtered through Whatman No.2 filter paper, concentrated in a rotary evaporator (EYELA, Tokyo, Japan), and lyophilized in a freeze dryer (Ilshin Bio Base, Dongducheon, Republic of Korea) The yield of the extraction (78.5 g) was approximately 26.2% (w/w). The extract was dissolved in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) at a concentration of 80 mg/mL and stored at −70°C until use.

Cell culture

Human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) were purchased from Lonza (Walkersville, MD, USA), and cultured with an EGM-2 endothelial cell growth media kit (Lonza) in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2 at 37°C. The culture medium was replaced every other day. All in vitro experiments were performed using HUVECs at a passage number less than 10.

Cell proliferation and viability

One day before drug treatment, 50,000 cells per well were inoculated into a 24-well tissue culture plate containing 475 μL of EGM-2. Cells were treated with 25 μL of serially diluted test drugs and were maintained for various periods. Sulforaphane (5 μM) and vehicle (PBS) were administered in parallel as positive and negative control drugs, respectively. To determine cell proliferation and viability, the cultured medium was saved, and the cells were washed with PBS and trypsinized. The cells were resuspended in the saved cultured medium. The numbers of total (viable and dead) and dead cells were determined using an ADAM-MC automatic cell counter (NanoEnTek, Seoul, Republic of Korea) as described by Yi et al. [11]. In brief, the number of total (viable and dead) cells was determined using the AccuStain T solution, a cell lysis solution supplemented with a cell membrane-impermeable fluorescent dye (propidium iodide, PI). The number of dead cells was determined using the AccuStain N solution, a normal saline solution containing PI. The 1:1 mixtures of cell suspension with AccuStain T or with AccuStain N were loaded into the T and N channels of AccuChip, respectively. The number of total cells and the cell viability were automatically calculated by the following equation: cell viability (%) = [No. of AccuStain T positive total cells – No. of AccuStain N positive dead cells]/[No. of AccuStain T positive total cells] × 100.

In vitro tube formation assay

The effect of SMYGT on HUVEC tube formation was evaluated using the Cultrex In Vitro Angiogenesis Assay Kit (Trevigen, Gaithersburg, MD, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Briefly, HUVECs were resuspended in EGM-2 containing SMYGT (100 ~ 400 μg/mL) or vehicle (PBS) and then seeded at 1.5 × 104 cells/well of 96‐well plates pre-coated with basement membrane extracts (BME). Sulforaphane (5 μM) was administered in parallel as a positive control drug. After a 12 h incubation period, images of the capillary-like tube networks were obtained using an inverted microscope. The quantification of tube length and branch points was performed with MetaMorph image analysis software (Molecular Devices, Downingtown, PA, USA).

Chick chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) assay

The anti-angiogenic potential of SMYGT was evaluated with an in ovo CAM assay. Fertilized eggs purchased from CJ (Seoul, Republic of Korea) were incubated at 37°C in an egg incubator (R-COM, Gimhae, Republic of Korea), with 70% relative humidity. This time point was designated as embryonic day (ED) 0. At ED 3, approximately 2 ~ 3 mL of albumin was removed, and an eggshell window was constructed. At ED 4.5, the test drugs dissolved in 80% ethanol were loaded on a one-quarter sized Thermanox coverslip (Nunc, Naperville, IL, USA) and the solvent was completely evaporated in a clean bench. The dried Thermanox coverslip containing drugs were then applied to the CAM. Solvent only and 1 μg/egg of retinoic acid (RA, Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) was loaded in parallel as a negative and a positive control, respectively. At ED 6.5, the inhibition zone of angiogenesis was visualized by injecting 10% skimmed milk into the CAM. The drug response was scored as positive when CAM showed an avascular zone that was similar to the RA-treated CAM.

Wound healing assay

HUVECs were cultured in 24-well plates to > 90% confluence. Using a 200 μL pipet tip, a straight scratch was made through the cell sheet. The cells were photographed (t = 0 h), rinsed with fresh growth medium and then further incubated in fresh growth medium containing SMYGT or a vehicle (PBS). Sulforaphane (5 μM) was administered in parallel as a positive control drug. After 12 h of incubation, digital images were recorded using an inverted microscope, and quantification of the healed area (%) was determined using the MetaMorph image analysis software according to the following formula: healed area (%) = [1-wounded area (t = 12 h)/wounded area (t = 0 h)] × 100.

Cell adhesion assay

HUVECs (2 × 104) were inoculated into 24-well plates pre-coated with Matrigel (BD, NJ, USA) in a growth medium containing SMYGT or a vehicle (PBS). Sulforaphane (5 μM) was administered in parallel as a positive control drug. After 2 h, wells were washed with PBS to remove unattached cells. The adherent cells were fixed with 70% ethanol for 10 min and visualized with a commercially available cell staining solution (Trevigen). The cells were washed with water and completely dried by turning the plates upside down. Stained cells in three randomly selected fields per well (× 100 magnification) were digitally captured and counted using an inverted microscope.

Cell invasion assay

The invasion assays were performed in 24-well plates equipped with cell culture inserts with a transparent PET membrane containing 8 μm pores (BD). One day before the assay, HUVECs were serum-starved in EBM basal medium (Lonza) supplemented with 0.5% FBS. The cells were harvested and resuspended at a concentration of 5 × 105/mL in serum-free medium. Two hundred microliters (1×105 cells) of resuspended cell solution with SMYGT or vehicle (PBS) were added to the inserts pre-coated with diluted Matrigel. EGM-2 complete medium was added to the bottom chamber as a chemo-attractant. Sulforaphane (5 μM) was administered in parallel as a positive control drug. After 16 h, the media were carefully aspirated from the inserts and the membrane filters were fixed with 70% ethanol for 10 min. The cells on the upper surface of the filters were completely removed using cotton swabs, and the invading cells on the opposite surface of the filter were stained with methylene blue. The GAPDH-visualized invading cells in three randomly selected fields per well (× 100 magnification) were digitally captured and counted using an inverted microscope.

Activity gel of matrix metallopeptidase-2 (MMP2)

The activity of MMP2 secreted by HUVECs into the culture media was determined using an MMP activity gel. The culture media containing 40 μg of protein were loaded onto a 7.5% sodium dodecyl sulphate -polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) gel that had been copolymerized with 1 mg/mL of gelatin (Sigma-Aldrich). After washing the gels 4 times to remove SDS, the enzyme activity was initiated by incubating the gel in a substrate buffer containing 50 mM Tris (pH 7.6), 1 μM ZnCl2, and 5 mM CaCl2 overnight at 37°C. The degradation of the gelatin substrate by MMP2 was visualized by staining the gel with a 0.1% Coomassie blue solution.

Quantitative polymerase-chain-reaction (qPCR)

The total RNA was extracted from HUVECs with an Easy-spin™ Total RNA Extraction Kit (iNtRON Biotechnology, Seoul, Republic of Korea). Complementary DNAs (cDNAs) were synthesized using the iScript™ cDNA Synthesis Kit (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. qPCR, which was performed with SsoAdvanced™ Universal SYBRR Green Supermix (Bio-Rad) on a CFX™ 96 Real-Time Detection System (Bio-Rad), was initiated by activation at 95°C for 30 s, followed by 40 cycles of amplification (denaturation at 95°C for 5 s, annealing/elongation at 60°C for 30 s). Gene expression was normalized to the housekeeping gene for glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH). Each sample was measured in triplicates. The sequences of gene specific primers and their amplicons are illustrated in Table 2.
Table 2

Sequences of gene specific primers

Target

Forward (5′ → 3′)

Reverse (5′ → 3′)

Amplicon (bp)

MMP2

ATGCCGCCTTTAACTGGAG

GGGAAGCCAGGATCCATTTT

103

GAPDH

AAGGCTGAGAACGGGAAG

GGACTCCACGACGTACTC

114

Western blot analysis

Western blot analysis was performed as previously described [11]. The total focal adhesion kinase (FAK) and phospho-FAK (pFAK, Y397) antibodies were obtained from Cell Signaling Technology (Danvers, MA, USA), and the β-actin antibody was obtained from Bio-Rad.

Statistics

Statistical data analysis was performed using one-way analysis of variance and the level of statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

Results

SMYGT inhibits angiogenesis in vitro and in ovo

The anti-angiogenic potential of SMYGT was evaluated with an in vitro tube formation assay mediated by HUVECs. In the absence of SMYGT, HUVECs constructed blood vessel-like tubes by connecting with neighboring cells (Additional file 1A, 0 μg/mL of SMYGT). However, the SMYGT treatment interrupted this intercellular connection by inhibiting tube formation (Additional file 1A, 100–400 μg/mL of SMYGT). Image analysis revealed that the degree of HUVEC-mediated angiogenesis, based on tube length and branch numbers, was decreased by SMYGT in a dose-dependent manner (Figure 1A). The inhibitory effect of 200 μg/mL of SMYGT was comparable to that of 5 μM of sulforaphane, a positive control drug, and tube formation was completely inhibited by 400 μg/mL of SMYGT.
Figure 1

Anti-angiogenic potential of SMYGT in vitro and in ovo. (A) HUVECs cultured on BME-pre-coated supports were exposed to different concentrations of SMYGT for 12 h. The tube length and branch numbers were determined by analyzing digitally captured images. Sulforaphane (Sulfo, 5 μM) was administered in parallel as a positive control drug. Relative tube formation was determined by comparing each group with the vehicle treated group (0 μg/mL SMYGT), and the data are presented as the means ± standard deviation (S.D.) of triplicate experiments. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001. (B) At ED4.5, A quarter size of thermanox coverslips containing variable amounts of SMYGT (0, 200, 400 μg/disc) were applied to the CAMs. After 2 days of incubation, 10% skimmed milk solution was injected into the CAM for observation of the inhibition zone of angiogenesis and digital images were captured. Retinoic acid (RA, 1 μg/disc) used as a control for inhibition of new vessel formation.

Next, we confirmed the anti-angiogenic potential of SMYGT in ovo. Fertilized eggs were treated with SMYGT (0-400 μg/egg) on ED4.5, and the degree of vessel formation on CAMs was scored 2 days later. Blood vessel formation was impeded, and the avascular zone was increased by SMYGT in a dose-dependent manner (Figure 1B). Retinoic acid (RA, 1μg/egg) was used as a positive control. The proportion of eggs exhibiting anti-angiogenic effects is summarized in Table 3. Dead embryo was not observed in the tested dose ranges of SMYGT, indicating that SMYGT-mediated anti-angiogenesis in ovo was not due to SMYGT toxicity.
Table 3

Summary of anti-angiogenic effect of SMYGT in chick CAM assays

Drugs

Dose (μg per egg)

Tested eggs (n)

Eggs showing anti-angiogenesis (n (%))*

Vehicle

-

10

1 (10.0)

RA

1

10

9 (90.0)

SMYGT

200

10

3 (25.0)

 

400

10

8 (66.6)

*CAM showing an avascular zone similar to RA-treated CAM was scored as positive.

SMYGT potently inhibits cell adhesion and the invasiveness of HUVECs

To understand the anti-angiogenic activity of SMYGT, the cellular responses of HUVECs to SMYGT treatment were investigated in vitro. First, we determined the cytotoxicity of SMYGT in HUVECs based on cellular membrane integrity. When HUVECs were exposed to increasing concentrations of SMYGT, no significant morphological changes was observed (Additional file 1B), and HUVECs maintained normal cell growth and a viability of > 90% in concentrations up to 400 μg/mL of SMYGT (Figure 2A). These data suggest that the anti-angiogenic potential of SMYGT, as demonstrated by HUVEC-mediated tube formation and in ovo CAM assays, was not due to its cytotoxicity. An in vitro wound healing assay used to determine cell mobility demonstrated that although a slight inhibitory effect was observed at SMYGT concentrations ≥200 μg/mL, but HUVECs showed normal cell movement when compared to cells treated with 5 μM of sulforaphane, a positive control drug (Additional file 1C). Image analysis did not reveal that SMYGT induced any significant changes in cell movement (Figure 2B). In contrast, SMYGT reduced endothelial cell adhesion to the extracellular matrix (Additional file 1D), and image analysis revealed that 400 μg/mL of SMYGT reduced cell adhesion by 80.6% (Figure 2C). Furthermore, SMYGT reduced cellular invasiveness through the membrane (Additional file 1E), and the inhibitory effect of 200 μg/mL of SMYGT was comparable to that of 5 μM of sulforaphane (Figure 2D).
Figure 2

Effects of SMYGT on the HUVEC-mediated angiogenic process in vitro. (A) HUVECs were cultured in the presence and absence of SMYGT for 24 h and measured using an automatic cell counter to determine cell growth and viability. (B) Scratches were applied to the lawn of HUVECs, and then cells were cultured in the presence or absence of SMYGT. After 12 h, the relative cell motility was determined by analyzing digital images. (C) HUVECs were resuspended in culture medium containing various concentrations of SMYGT and then inoculated in culture plates that were pre-coated with Matrigel. After 2 h, the adherent cells were fixed, stained, and then counted under a microscope. (D) Serum-starved HUVECs were inoculated into the cell culture inserts pre-coated with Matrigel and then cultured in the presence or absence of SMYGT. After 16 h, chemotactic HUVECs that invaded through the Matrigel were stained and counted under a microscope. Sulforaphane (Sulfo) was included in these assays for a positive control drug. All data, except viability, are presented as the relative means ± S.D. of triplicate experiments compared to the vehicle treatment group. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.

SMYGT down-regulates angiogenesis-related FAK signaling and MMP2 expression

As shown in Figure 2C, SMYGT potently inhibited the adhesion of HUVECs to matrix supports. Because integrin-FAK signaling plays a key role in cell adhesion, and activation of integrin leads to phosphorylation of FAK [12], we determined the level of phosphorylated FAK following SMYGT treatment in HUVECs. SMYGT reduced the phosphorylation of FAK compared to vehicle treatment (Figure 3A). The total FAK and β-actin, a loading control for western blot analysis, were not changed by SMYGT treatment. Therefore, SMYGT may affect cell adhesion by down-regulating integrin-FAK signaling pathway.
Figure 3

The effects of SMYGT on FAK signaling and MMP2 expression in HUVECs. (A) Time-(left, 200 μg/mL of SMYGT) and dose-(right, 24 h) dependent effect of SMYGT on phosphorylation of the intracellular FAK protein were determined using western blot analyses. β-actin was used to confirm equal loading of total proteins. (B) Time-(left, 200 μg/mL of SMYGT) and dose-(right, 24 h) dependent changes of MMP2 enzyme activities and mRNA induced by SMYGT were determined by zymography (top) and qPCR (bottom), respectively. A PAGE gel stained with Coomassie blue solution (middle) is presented to demonstrate equal loading of the proteins for the MMP2 zymography. V, vehicle; S, SMYGT.

Invasive cell migration is an important function of both endothelial and cancer cells during angiogenesis. Cellular invasiveness depends on the enzymatic degradation of the extracellular matrix, which is mediated by MMPs. We determined the effect of SMYGT on MMP2 and 9 enzyme activities and intracellular mRNA by gelatinase activity gels and qPCR, respectively. The activity gel assay demonstrated that SMYGT inhibited MMP2 enzyme activity in a time-(upper left) and dose-(upper right) dependent manner. MMP9 enzyme activity was too low to be detected in the activity gel assay. The decrease in MMP2 enzyme activity triggered by SMYGT was observed in parallel with a decrease in intracellular MMP2 mRNA, as determined by qPCR (Figure 3B, lower panel); therefore, SMYGT may inhibit HUVEC invasiveness by down-regulating MMP2 activity at the transcription level.

Discussion

Angiogenesis is a multi-stepped process of de novo vessel formation from the established blood vasculature by endothelial cells. It is essential for continuous tumor growth because it supplies tumors with nutrients and oxygen and removes cellular waste, which may be toxic to cancer cells, from the tumor mass. Since the idea of tumor angiogenesis was suggested in the 1970s by Folkman [13], the blockade of tumor-induced angiogenesis has been considered to be an attractive anticancer strategy because anti-angiogenic agents can be used irrespective of cancer types because tumor-induced angiogenesis is a general hallmark of cancer, and the agents target vascular endothelial cells with genomic stability, which rarely develop drug resistance [14,15]. Angiogenesis is a process that is coordinated by the functional balance between pro-angiogenic and anti-angiogenic factors. Therefore, anti-angiogenesis can be accomplished by blocking the signaling pathway mediated by pro-angiogenic proteins, such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and basic fibroblast growth factor, and/or by up-regulating the expression of endogenous anti-angiogenic proteins, such as endostatin and tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-1 (TIMP-1).

In this study, we described the novel anti-angiogenic effect of SMYGT, an extract that is a traditional Korean medicinal cocktail. We demonstrated that SMYGT exerts its anti-angiogenic potential in vitro by inhibiting the cell adhesion and invasiveness of endothelial cells. We also demonstrated that SMYGT inhibits intracellular FAK signaling by modulating its phosphorylation status and down-regulates MMP2 activity by reducing intracellular levels of MMP2 mRNA. In general, phosphorylation of FAK is known to be related to the adhesion of cells to the extracellular matrix, as well as the motility and survival of endothelial cells [16]. We observed that SMYGT down-regulated FAK signaling and inhibited endothelial cell adhesion to the extracellular matrix, but cell proliferation, viability, and mobility were not affected by SMYGT. This differential response of HUVECs to SMYGT may be related to the partial inhibition of FAK by SMYGT, which is adequate to affect cell adhesion but not sufficient to affect cell survival, proliferation, and motility. FAK signaling is considered to be a promising anti-cancer target because phosphorylation of FAK, particularly at Y397, is also critical for angiogenesis, metastasis, and the invasion of tumor cells because of its effects on regulating cell adhesion to the extracellular matrix, cell survival, motility, and proliferation [17,18]. MMPs also contribute to endothelial cell-mediated angiogenesis by loosening focal cell-to-cell interaction and by degrading the basement membrane and extracellular matrix surrounding blood vessels [19,20]. In this study, we demonstrated that SMYGT could down-regulate MMP2 activity in HUVECs. However, MMP9 was not detected in a gelatinase activity gel assay using HUVEC cultured medium which is consistent with our previous studies of other anti-angiogenic medicinal herb extracts [11]. MMP2 activity has also been reported to be effectively reduced by anti-cancer agents that target tumor vessel formation [21,22]. MMP2 activity can be regulated during the transcriptional, post-transcriptional (e.g., mRNA stability), translational, and post-translation (e.g., extracellular secretion) steps. In this study, we suggest that SMYGT can down-regulate MMP2 activity by decreasing intracellular level of mRNA. However, we did not investigate whether SMYGT-mediated MMP2 regulation is controlled transcriptionally or post-transcriptionally. It is known that when endothelial cells are subjected to hypoxic conditions (low PO2) such as inside of a tumor mass, MMP2 expression is elevated, and its specific endogenous inhibitor TIMP-2 and the hypoxic conditions enhance MMP2-dependent endothelial cell migration [19].

SMYGT, a traditional medicinal decoction, has been used to treat cancer patients in Korean Oriental medicine clinics [9], and it has been revealed that this herbal prescription has an inhibitory effect on inflammation and fecal enzyme activity in an ulcerative colitis animal model [10]. Modified SMYGT has also demonstrated potentially cytotoxic activity against various cancer cells, such as A549, SK-OV-3, B165-F10, and SK-MEL-2, and it has been shown to suppress lung metastasis and angiogenesis in an animal model [9]. SMYGT consists of four components in equal weights. Sargassum fusiforme and Laminaria japonica are members of the brown algae family, which is widely distributed in Far East Asia, including Korea, China, and japan; S. fusiforme and L. japonica have been used as therapeutic agents for thousands of years [23,24], and polysaccharides extracted from S. fusiforme and L. japonica are known to have various biological activities, such as anti-tumor [25], anti-oxidant [24], immunity enhancing [26], and anti-hyperlipidemia activities [27]. The shell of Ostrea gigas has been prescribed with other medicinal herbs to treat various symptoms, such as palpitations, insomnia, dizziness, tinnitus, scrofula, subcutaneous nodules, and abdominal masses [28]. Recent studies have revealed that Ostreae Concha pharmacologically functions to boost the immune system and relieves gastric ulcers, sedation, viral infections, and tumors [29]. Prunella vulgaris is widely distributed in the temperate zone, and it has been used to treat inflammation, eye pain, headaches, and dizziness [30]. P. vulgaris has anti-inflammatory, anti-bacterial, anti-viral, and anti-tumor effects, and these pharmacological functions may be attributed to its immunomodulatory activity [31]. In the prescription, Sargassum and Laminariae Thallus primarily help to soften and resolve hard masses, Prunellae Spica reduces pathogenic heat, and Ostreae Concha alleviates pains. These ingredients enhance the efficacy of SMYGT, according to traditional oriental medicine theory. We did not determine whether the anti-angiogenic potential of SMYGT is attributed to a single component or a combination of components of SMYGY.

Conclusion

In summary, in the present study, we demonstrated the novel anti-angiogenic activity of SMYGT, which has been traditionally used to treat diverse diseases, including cancer. SMYGT exerts its anti-angiogenic potential by down-regulating the pro-angiogenic protein MMP2 and by inhibiting the cell adhesion-related FAK signaling pathway. Further rigorous studies should be performed to determine the detailed anti-angiogenic mechanism of SMYGT and to identify its active constituents to develop anti-cancer drugs using SMYGT or its active constituents.

Abbreviations

SMYGT: 

Sa-mi-yeon-geon-tang

HUVEC: 

Human umbilical vein endothelial cells

CAM: 

Chorioallantoic membrane

BME: 

Basement membrane extracts

ED: 

Embryonic day

SDS-PAGE: 

Sodium dodecyl sulphate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis

MMP2: 

Metallopeptidase-2

qPCR: 

quantitative polymerase-chain-reaction

cDNA: 

complementary DNA

GAPDH: 

Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase

FAK: 

Focal adhesion kinase

VEGF: 

Vascular endothelial growth factor

TIMP-1/2: 

Tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-1/2

Declarations

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by a grant from the Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine (K14061).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
KM-Based Herbal Drug Development Group, Korea Institute of Oriental Medicine
(2)
Korean Medicine Life Science and Technology, Korea University of Science and Technology

References

  1. Hazama S, Nakamura Y, Tanaka H, Hirakawa K, Tahara K, Shimizu R, et al. A phase II study of five peptides combination with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy as a first-line therapy for advanced colorectal cancer (FXV study). J Transl Med. 2014;12:108–17.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Theodossiou TA, Galanou MC, Paleos CM. Novel amiodarone-doxorubicin cocktail liposomes enhance doxorubicin retention and cytotoxicity in DU145 human prostate carcinoma cells. J Med Chem. 2008;51:6067–74.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Dorff TB, Groshen S, Tsao-Wei DD, Xiong S, Gross ME, Vogelzang N, et al. A Phase II trial of a combination herbal supplement for men with biochemically recurrent prostate cancer. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2014;17:359–65.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Wei W, Lv PP, Chen XM, Yue ZG, Fu Q, Liu SY, et al. Codelivery of mTERT siRNA and paclitaxel by chitosan-based nanoparticles promoted synergistic tumor suppression. Biomaterials. 2013;34:3912–23.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Lam W, Bussom S, Guan F, Jiang Z, Zhang W, Gullen EA, et al. The four-herb Chinese medicine PHY906 reduces chemotherapy-induced gastrointestinal toxicity. The four-herb Chinese medicine PHY906 reduces chemotherapy-induced gastrointestinal toxicity. Sci Transl Med. 2010;2:45–59.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Liu SH, Cheng YC. Old formula, new Rx: the journey of PHY906 as cancer adjuvant therapy. J Ethnopharmacol. 2012;140:614–23.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Yue PY, Mak NK, Cheng YK, Leung KW, Ng TB, Fan DT, et al. Pharmacogenomics and the Yin/Yang actions of ginseng: anti-tumor, angiomodulating and steroid-like activities of ginsenosides. Chin Med. 2007;2:6.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Wang XL, Ma F, Wu XZ. Anticancer effects of 5-fluorouracil combined with warming and relieving cold phlegm formula on human breast cancer. Chin J Integr Med. 2012;18:599–604.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Bae MY, Kang IC, Kim SH. Study on antitumor activity of Samiyeongeontanggamibang (SYTG). J Korean Oriental Oncol. 1999;5:33–46.Google Scholar
  10. Kim SE, Ryu BH, Park JW. Effects of Samiunkyungtang on inflammation and fecal enzymes in ulcerative colitis animal model. J Korean Oriental Med. 2008;29:50–62.Google Scholar
  11. Yi JM, Park JS, Oh SM, Lee J, Kim J, Oh DS, et al. Ethanol extract of Gleditsia sinensis thorn suppresses angiogenesis in vitro and in vivo. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2012;12:243–52.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Qin L, Zhang M. Maspin regulates endothelial cell adhesion and migration through an integrin signaling pathway. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:32360–9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Folkman J. Tumor angiogenesis: therapeutic implications. N Engl J Med. 1971;285:1182–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Tosetti F, Ferrari N, De Flora S, Albini A. Angioprevention’: angiogenesis is a common and key target for cancer chemopreventive agents. FASEB J. 2002;16:2–14.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Kumaran G, Clamp AR, Jayson GC. Angiogenesis as a therapeutic target in cancer. Clin Med. 2008;8:455–8.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Mehta RR, Yamada T, Taylor BN, Christov K, King ML, Majumdar D, et al. A cell penetrating peptide derived from azurin inhibits angiogenesis and tumor growth by inhibiting phosphorylation of VEGFR-2, FAK and Akt. Angiogenesis. 2011;14:355–69.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Alessandro R, Masiero L, Lapidos K, Spoonster J, Kohn EC. Endothelial cell spreading on type IV collagen and spreading-induced FAK phosphorylation is regulated by Ca2+ influx. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1998;248:635–40.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Golubovskaya VM, Cance WG. Focal adhesion kinase and p53 signaling in cancer cells. Int Rev Cytol. 2007;263:103–53.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Ben-Yosef Y, Miller A, Shapiro S, Lahat N. Hypoxia of endothelial cells leads to MMP-2-dependent survival and death. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol. 2005;289:C1321–31.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Cardenas C, Quesada AR, Medina MA. Anti-angiogenic and anti-inflammatory properties of kahweol, a coffee diterpene. PLoS One. 2011;6:e23407.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Miyake JA, Benadiba M, Colquhoun A. Gamma-linolenic acid inhibits both tumour cell cycle progression and angiogenesis in the orthotopic C6 glioma model through changes in VEGF, Flt1, ERK1/2, MMP2, cyclin D1, pRb, p53 and p27 protein expression. Lipids Health Dis. 2009;8:8–17.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Lu C, Lee JJ, Komaki R, Herbst RS, Feng L, Evans WK, et al. Chemoradiotherapy with or without AE-941 in stage III non-small cell lung cancer: a randomized phase III trial. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010;102:859–65.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Peng Z, Liu M, Fang Z, Chen L, Wu J, Zhang Q. In vitro antiproliferative effect of a water-soluble Laminaria japonica polysaccharide on human melanoma cell line A375. Food Chemical Toxicol. 2013;58:56–60.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  24. Zhu W, Ooi VE, Chan PK, Ang Jr PO. Isolation and characterization of a sulfated polysaccharide from the brown alga Sargassum patens and determination of its anti-herpes activity. Biochem Cell Biol. 2003;81(1):25–33.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Chen X, Nie W, Yu G, Li Y, Hu Y, Lu J, et al. Antitumor and immunomodulatory activity of polysaccharides from Sargassum fusiforme. Food Chem Toxicol. 2012;50:695–700.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Huang X, Zhou H, Zhang H. The effect of Sargassum fusiforme polysaccharide extracts on vibriosis resistance and immune activity of the shrimp, Fenneropenaeus chinensis. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2006;20:750–7.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Mao WJ, Li BF, Gu QQ, Fang YC, Xing HT. Preliminary studies on the chemical characterization and antihyperlipidemic activity of polysaccharide from the brown alga Sargassum fusiforme. Hydrobiologia. 2004;512:263–6.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Yang X, Zhou SL, Ma AC, Xu HT, Guan HS, Liu HB. Chemical profiles and identification of key compound caffeine in marine-derived traditional Chinese medicine Ostreae concha. Mar Drugs. 2012;10:1180–91.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Zhou J, Hu N, Wu YL, Pan YJ, Sun CR. Preliminary studies on the chemical characterization and antioxidant properties of acidic polysaccharides from Sargassum fusiforme. J Zhejiang Univ Sci B. 2008;9:721–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Hwang YJ, Lee EJ, Kim HR, Hwang KA. In vitro antioxidant and anticancer effects of solvent fractions from Prunella vulgaris var. lilacina. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2013;13:310–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  31. Huang R, Zhao M, Yang X, Huang J, Yang Y, Chen B, et al. Effects of Prunella vulgaris on the mice immune function. PLoS One. 2013;8:e77355.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Yi et al.; licensee BioMed Central. 2015

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement