Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: How parents choose to use CAM: a systematic review of theoretical models

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
1 Sep 2008 Submitted Original manuscript
2 Oct 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lynda Balneaves
7 Oct 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Aslak Steinsbekk
15 Oct 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Fuschia M. Sirois
16 Oct 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Andre Busato
30 Dec 2008 Author responded Author comments - Mitchel Blair
Resubmission - Version 2
30 Dec 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
16 Jan 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Andre Busato
19 Jan 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Fuschia M. Sirois
21 Jan 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Aslak Steinsbekk
17 Mar 2009 Author responded Author comments - Mitchel Blair
Resubmission - Version 4
17 Mar 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 4
1 Apr 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Fuschia M. Sirois
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
21 Apr 2009 Author responded Author comments - Mitchel Blair
Resubmission - Version 7
21 Apr 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Publishing
22 Apr 2009 Editorially accepted
22 Apr 2009 Article published 10.1186/1472-6882-9-9

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement