Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Evaluation and implications of natural product use in preoperative patients: a retrospective review

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
9 Feb 2009 Submitted Original manuscript
6 Jun 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Sunita Vohra
16 Jun 2009 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Kathi Kemper
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
10 Jul 2009 Author responded Author comments - Allison King
Resubmission - Version 6
10 Jul 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 6
21 Sep 2009 Author responded Author comments - Allison King
Resubmission - Version 7
21 Sep 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 7
Resubmission - Version 8
Submitted Manuscript version 8
22 Sep 2009 Author responded Author comments - Allison King
Resubmission - Version 9
22 Sep 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 9
Resubmission - Version 10
Submitted Manuscript version 10
7 Oct 2009 Author responded Author comments - Allison King
Resubmission - Version 11
7 Oct 2009 Submitted Manuscript version 11
Publishing
13 Oct 2009 Editorially accepted
13 Oct 2009 Article published 10.1186/1472-6882-9-38

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement