Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Motivations for consulting complementary and alternative medicine practitioners: A comparison of consumers from 1997–8 and 2005

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
5 Dec 2007 Submitted Original manuscript
7 Jan 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Marja Verhoef
7 Jan 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Aslak Steinsbekk
14 Jan 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lynda Balneaves
5 Feb 2008 Author responded Author comments - Fuschia M. Sirois
Resubmission - Version 2
5 Feb 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 2
11 Feb 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Aslak Steinsbekk
17 Feb 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Marja Verhoef
19 Mar 2008 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Lynda Balneaves
8 Apr 2008 Author responded Author comments - Fuschia M. Sirois
Resubmission - Version 3
8 Apr 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 3
14 Apr 2008 Author responded Author comments - Fuschia M. Sirois
Resubmission - Version 4
14 Apr 2008 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
29 Apr 2008 Editorially accepted
29 Apr 2008 Article published 10.1186/1472-6882-8-16

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement