Homeopathic and conventional treatment for acute respiratory and ear complaints: A comparative study on outcome in the primary care setting
- Max Haidvogl†1,
- David S Riley†2,
- Marianne Heger^†9, 3,
- Sara Brien†4,
- Miek Jong5Email author,
- Michael Fischer†6,
- George T Lewith†4,
- Gerard Jansen†7 and
- André E Thurneysen†8
© Haidvogl et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007
Received: 19 September 2006
Accepted: 02 March 2007
Published: 02 March 2007
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|19 Sep 2006||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|14 Nov 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Robert Mathie|
|13 Dec 2006||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Claudia Witt|
|30 Jan 2007||Author responded||Author comments - Miek Jong|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|30 Jan 2007||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|5 Feb 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Claudia Witt|
|19 Feb 2007||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Robert Mathie|
|27 Feb 2007||Author responded||Author comments - Miek Jong|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|27 Feb 2007||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|2 Mar 2007||Editorially accepted|
|2 Mar 2007||Article published||10.1186/1472-6882-7-7|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.