Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Measuring perceived effects of drinking an extract of basidiomycetes Agaricus blazei murill: a survey of Japanese consumers with cancer

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
27 Feb 2007 Submitted Original manuscript
15 May 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Wim Verbeke
5 Jun 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Philip Harris
8 Jun 2007 Author responded Author comments - James Talcott
Resubmission - Version 2
8 Jun 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 2
2 Jul 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Wim Verbeke
2 Jul 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Philip Harris
20 Aug 2007 Author responded Author comments - James Talcott
Resubmission - Version 3
20 Aug 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 3
24 Aug 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Philip Harris
19 Sep 2007 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Wim Verbeke
16 Oct 2007 Author responded Author comments - James Talcott
Resubmission - Version 4
16 Oct 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 4
17 Oct 2007 Author responded Author comments - James Talcott
Resubmission - Version 5
17 Oct 2007 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
29 Oct 2007 Editorially accepted
29 Oct 2007 Article published 10.1186/1472-6882-7-32

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement