Open Peer Review Reports for: Decisions to use complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) by male cancer patients: information-seeking roles and types of evidence used
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 8 Jan 2007 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 26 Mar 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Janet Richardson |
| 16 May 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Dianne Shumay |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| Submitted | Manuscript version 2 | |
| 19 Jun 2007 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Dianne Shumay |
| 31 Jul 2007 | Author responded | Author comments - Deborah Sharp |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 31 Jul 2007 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| Publishing | ||
| 4 Aug 2007 | Editorially accepted | |
| 4 Aug 2007 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6882-7-25 |
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.
