- Research article
- Open Access
- Open Peer Review
Oral squamous cell carcinoma proliferative phenotype is modulated by proanthocyanidins: a potential prevention and treatment alternative for oral cancer
- Michael King1,
- Kourt Chatelain1,
- Dustin Farris1,
- Dayne Jensen1,
- Jason Pickup1,
- Aaron Swapp1,
- Susan O'Malley†1 and
- Karl Kingsley†1Email author
© King et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2007
- Received: 09 February 2007
- Accepted: 19 June 2007
- Published: 19 June 2007
Despite the recently reported drop in the overall death rate from cancer, the estimated survival rate and number of deaths from oral cancer remain virtually unchanged. Early detection efforts, in combination with strategies for prevention and risk-reduction, have the potential to dramatically improve clinical outcomes. The identification of non-toxic, effective treatments, including complementary and alternative therapies, is critical if the survival rate is to be improved. Epidemiologic studies have suggested a protective effect from certain plant-derived foods and extracts; however, it has been difficult to isolate and identify the compounds most responsible for these observations. The primary purpose of this study was to investigate the response of human oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) to proanthocyanidin (PAC), a plant-derived compound that may inhibit the progression of several other cancers.
Using a series of in vitro assays, we sought to quantify the effects of PAC on OSCC, cervical carcinoma, and non-cancerous cell lines, specifically the effects of PAC on cell proliferation. Recent data suggest that infection with the human papillomavirus (HPV) may also modulate the proliferative potential of OSCC; therefore, we also measured the effects of PAC administration on HPV-transfected OSCC proliferation.
Our results demonstrated that PAC administration was sufficient to significantly suppress cellular proliferation of OSCC in a dose-dependent manner. In addition, the increased proliferation of OSCC after transfection with HPV 16 was reduced by the administration of PAC, as was the proliferation of the cervical cancer and non-cancerous cell lines tested. Our results also provide preliminary evidence that PAC administration may induce apoptosis in cervical and oral cancer cell lines, while acting merely to suppress proliferation of the normal cell line control.
These results signify that PAC may be a compelling candidate for testing in both animal and human models. Furthermore, these data provide adequate justification for elucidating the divergent mechanisms of PAC-induced proliferation, inhibition, and apoptosis among these and other cell lines.
- Oral Cancer
- Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma
- Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma
- Grape Seed
- GH354 Cell
More than 30,000 people are diagnosed with oral cancer annually in the United States, and due to a poor survival rate that has remained relatively static, of those who are diagnosed, approximately 7,500 die of this disease each year . Many of these patients will subsequently develop regional tumors, as a result of spreading of the disease to other organs and lymph nodes .
Risk factors are anything that significantly increases the chance of a person developing a disease, such as oral cancer. Scientists now agree that the use of tobacco and alcohol, human papillomavirus (HPV) infection, and in the case of lip cancers, exposure to ultraviolet light, are risk factors that increase the likelihood of developing oral cancers . Thus, many oral cancers are believed to have a multifactorial etiology in which environmental and genetic cofactors influence the development and progression of the disease. Recent evidence suggests that among these factors, nutrition may play an important role in retarding the development and progression of oral cancers [4, 5]. A recent meta-analysis examining the association between fruit and vegetable consumption and the incidence of oral cancer, found a nearly 50% reduction in oral cancer risk for each additional portion of fruit or vegetable consumed per day .
It is generally accepted that fruit and vegetable intake may be correlated with a reduction in the incidence of oral cancers even among tobacco and alcohol users. The knowledge gained thus far, however, does not provide enough specific detail upon which to base effective or comprehensive nutrition or dietary intervention recommendations. More detailed information is needed to identify the active components of fruits and vegetables, to evaluate dose-response relationships, and to adjust for potential confounders. The stratification of these studies, for example, has revealed that citrus fruit consumption was associated with a larger protective effect against oral cancer than overall fruit consumption, and was greater than green- or overall vegetable consumption .
Based upon these and other observations, a growing interest has been developing in alternative and complementary medicine to identify botanical and dietary components for their chemopreventive and chemotherapeutic potential. One such class of compounds, the proanthocyanidins (PACs), are polyphenolic compounds that are highly concentrated in certain dietary fruits and nuts, such as grapes, blueberries, cranberries, and almonds, as well as cacao beans and chocolate [7–10].
PACs belong to a larger class of abundant, plant-derived compounds, flavonoids, which appear to provide many beneficial health effects, largely due to their antioxidant properties. PACs have been shown to protect against oxidative stress and tobacco-induced DNA damage, and to exhibit selective cytotoxicity against some human cancers, including breast, lung, prostate, and gastric carcinomas [11–15]. Extracts from grape peels, grape seeds, and black raspberries, sources that contain high concentrations of PAC, have demonstrated selective suppression of tumorigenic phenotypes in oral cancers, specifically in oral squamous cell carcinomas (OSCC) [16, 17].
The possible mechanisms of PACs effects on tumor proliferation are complex and are likely to involve multiple pathways, which may differ according to the type of cancer. For example, PAC derived from grape seed, green tea, and lowbush blueberry, exhibited broad, anti-proliferative properties against multiple cell lines, including colon , prostate [14, 19–21], breast [22, 23], and oral cancers . Grape seed extract (GSE), a rich source of proanthocyanidin, was found to be a potent inhibitor of aromatase activity, an enzyme expressed in higher levels in cancerous than in normal breast tissues . GSE also induced apoptosis of MCF-7 and MDA-MB-235 breast cancer cells through modulation of both Bcl-2 and MEK/ERK signalling pathways . GSE and other flavonoid extracts were also found to induce apoptosis in colon, leukemia, and oral cancer cell lines via caspase-3 activation [15, 18, 24], and were reported to inhibit ornithine decarboxylase (ODC), an enzyme involved in epithelial tumor cell proliferation [13, 25, 26].
To further evaluate the potential relationship between oral cancer inhibition and PAC, we sought to identify any specific or dose-dependent effects that may exist between the administration of GSE-derived PAC and the proliferation of oral cancers. In this way, we hope to more definitively characterize the effects of this non-toxic agent for its chemopreventive or chemotherapeutic value. Quantitative and dose-dependent relationships between PAC administration and oral cancer proliferation could, therefore, be established prior to the identification and elucidation of the pathways involved, and prior to animal and in vivo studies of this compound.
Based upon the observation that flavonoid-rich extracts, including PAC, inhibited proliferation of multiple tumor cell lines, this study examined the potential for PAC to modulate the proliferative phenotype of OSCC in vitro. While the aforementioned studies have increased our understanding of flavonoid- and nutrition-based inhibition of oral cancer proliferation, none to date have adequately investigated the role of PAC in modulating the proliferative phenotype of OSCC. This study tested the hypothesis that PAC modulates, in a dose-dependent manner, the proliferative phenotype of OSCC in vitro.
We determined that PAC significantly reduced the proliferation of the OSCC cell line, CAL 27, in vitro. Furthermore, this inhibition was dose-dependent and was more pronounced in this oral cancer cell line than in either of the cervical cancer cell lines that we evaluated, Ca Ski and GH354. In addition, the maximal growth inhibitory concentration (GIMAX) of PAC was sufficient to induce a net loss of cells (cytotoxic) in CAL 27, but not in either Ca Ski or GH354 cell lines.
Our previous work established that infection of OSCC with high-risk HPV 16 strongly promoted the proliferative potential of OSCC in vitro . Therefore, we further sought to determine if PAC was capable of modulating HPV-driven OSCC proliferation in vitro. Our results provide one of the first demonstrations of HPV modulating the OSCC proliferative response to PAC. We also found that PAC inhibited HPV-positive OSCC proliferation and that the inhibitory concentration of PAC, providing the maximal proliferation inhibition and cytotoxicity (GIMAX), was the same for both HPV-positive and HPV-negative OSCC. These results suggest that PAC may exhibit selective inhibition of OSCC proliferation and that PAC administration may be sufficient to inhibit the increased proliferation of OSCC in the presence of HPV 16.
Standard chemotherapies and radiation treatment, frequently used to treat oral cancer patients, often have harsh and severe side effects that include tissue damage and malfunction. The discovery and validation of novel treatments and prevention strategies, lacking these harmful side effects, is one of our main short-term goals. This report provides evidence that PAC may provide one possible complementary or alternative therapy for oral cancer patients, as a safe, effective, cost-saving, and non-toxic treatment. We propose that this study provides compelling in vitro data to justify the exploration and elucidation of the mechanisms of PAC-induced proliferation inhibition of oral cancers and for testing of PAC in animal models.
Grape seed proanthocyanidin (PAC) extract (Lot #3717HF7361) was obtained from GNC Preventive Nutrition® (Pittsburgh, PA). This commercial source of PAC was extracted from U.S. grown wine grapes, Vitus vinifera. Such commercial sources of grape seed PAC extract are demonstrated to contain 95% PAC and contain approximately 80–90% oligomeric PACs, including dimers, trimers, tetramers, and a small amount of monomeric flavonoids [28, 29].
Cell lines and cell culture
Human oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) CAL 27, human cervical carcinoma (CC) Ca Ski, human cervical adenocarcinoma (CAC) GH354, and human foreskin fibroblasts (hFF) Hs27 cell lines were obtained from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC: Manassas, VA). CAL 27, GH354, and Hs27 cells were maintained in Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium (DMEM) with 4.0 mM L-glutamine adjusted to contain 3.7 g/L sodium bicarbonate, 4.5 g/L glucose, and 110 mg/L sodium pyruvate, obtained from HyClone (Logan, UT). Ca Ski cells were maintained in RPMI-1640 medium with 2 mM L-glutamine, adjusted to contain 1.5 g/L sodium bicarbonate, 4.5 g/L glucose, 10 mM HEPES, and 1.0 mM sodium pyruvate, obtained from ATCC. Media was supplemented with 1% Penicillin (10,000 units/mL)-Streptomycin (10,000 μg/mL) solution and 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), obtained from HyClone, except that GH354 was supplemented with 20% FBS. Cells were cultured in 75 cm2 BD Falcon tissue-culture treated flasks (Bedford, MA) at 37°C and 5% CO2 in humidified chambers.
CAL 27 cells were seeded in 25 cm2 BD Falcon tissue-culture treated flasks in appropriate media as described above and allowed to achieve 70% confluence. Cells were then transiently transfected by adding 1 μg/mL of the full-length HPV type 16 virus, cloned into the pBluescript SK-vector (ATCC #45113). The transfection was performed using the Stratagene Mammalian Transfection Kit (La Jolla, CA) according to the manufacturer's recommended protocol for CaPO4 transfection, and as previously described . Transfected CAL 27 cells (CAL 27-TF16) were maintained in the same cell culture conditions as described above for non-transfected CAL 27 cells. Mock transfectants of CAL 27 (CAL 27-mTF) were also established by performing the transfection protocol, but without using virus.
Microscopy of cell morphology and viability
Cells were visualized with a Zeiss Axiovert 40 inverted microscope (Gottingen, Germany), and images were captured at 100× magnification with a Canon PowerShot G6 digital camera (Tokyo, Japan). Digital images were subsequently processed using Adobe Photoshop (San Jose, CA) Image Analysis tools. In brief, several wells of unstained Ca Ski, GH354, CAL 27, CAL 27-TF16, and Hs27 cells were photographed at each time point of the proliferation assays (day 1 – day 4) and at each concentration of PAC (0 – 100 μg/mL) to visualize any effects on cell morphology. In addition, several wells of cells were also fixed at these time points using 50 μL of 10% buffered formalin and subsequently stained using crystal violet 1% aqueous solution (Fisher Scientific: Fair Lawn, NJ) to quantitatively document cell morphology, percent of cell spreading, and confluence. Additionally, at each time point, several wells were stained using Trypan Blue (Sigma: St. Louis, MO) and live cells were enumerated to determine viability, as previously described [30, 31].
In vitro proliferation assays of CAL 27, CAL 27-mTF, CAL 27-TF16, Ca Ski, GH354, and Hs27 cells were performed in the appropriate complete media, with and without the addition of PAC. The total concentrations of PAC used were between 10 and 100 μg/mL. Cells were plated in Corning Costar 96-well assay plates (Corning, NY) at a density of 1.2 × 104 cells per well, maintained at 37°C and 5% CO2 in humidified chambers, and their proliferation was measured over four days. Cultured cells were fixed every 24 hrs (day 1 – day 4) using 50 μL of 10% buffered formalin, and were stained using crystal violet 1% aqueous solution. The relative absorbance was measured at 630 nm using a Bio-Tek ELx808 microplate reader (Winooski, VT). Data were analyzed and graphed using Microsoft Excel (Redmond, WA). Three separate, independent replications of each experiment were performed.
The differences between treatments were measured using a t distribution, α = .05. All samples were analyzed using two-tailed t tests as departure from normality can make more of a difference in a one-tailed than in a two-tailed t test. As long as the sample size is even moderate (>20) for each group, quite severe departures from normality make little practical difference in the conclusions reached from these analyses .
RNA was isolated from 1.5 × 107 cells of CAL 27, CAL 27-mTF, and CAL 27-TF16, using ABgene Total RNA Isolation Reagent (Epsom, Surrey, UK) and the procedure recommended by the manufacture. RT-PCR was performed with the ABgene Reverse-iT One-Step RT-PCR Kit (ReadyMix Version) and a Mastercycler gradient thermocycler (Eppendorf: Hamburg, Germany) using the following primers synthesized by SeqWright (Houston, TX): HPV16 forward primer, ATGTTTCAGGACCCACAGGA; HPV16 reverse primer, CCTCACGTCGCAGTAACTGT. One μg of template RNA was used for each reaction. The reverse transcription step ran for 30 min at 47°C, followed by denaturation for 2 min at 94°C. Thirty-five amplification cycles were run, consisting of 20 sec denaturation at 94°C, 30 sec of annealing at 58°C, and 6.5 min of extension at 72°C. Final extension was run for 5 min at 72°C. Reaction products were separated by gel electrophoresis using Reliant 4% agarose gels (Cambrex: Rockland, ME). Bands were visualized by UV illumination of ethidium-bromide-stained gels and captured using a Kodak Gel Logic 100 Imaging System and 1D Image Analysis Software (Eastman Kodak: Rochester, NY).
DNA was isolated from 1.5 × 107 CAL 27 and CAL 27-TF16 cells, cultured with and without PAC, with the GenomicPrep DNA isolation kit (Amersham Biosciences: Buckinghamshire, UK), using the procedure recommended by the manufacturer. DNA was separated by gel electrophoresis using Cambrex Reliant 1% agarose gels and the bands were visualized by UV illumination of ethidium-bromide-stained gels and captured using a Kodak Gel Logic 100 Imaging System and 1D Image Analysis Software.
PAC-induced effects on cell viability, cell spreading, and confluence
- PAC [0 μg/ml]
+ PAC [50 μg/ml]
Cell viability (%)
Cell spreading (%)
An examination of the OSCC cell line, CAL 27, revealed PAC-related changes in morphology that paralleled the changes that were observed for both cervical cancer cell lines (Fig. 1C, 1H). The overwhelming majority of attached, spreading cells that were seen in the control were absent in the PAC experimental wells, with most PAC-treated cells exhibiting an apoptosis-like morphology, including rounded clustering of cells with surface blebbing and bubbling. In addition, many cells appeared to be detaching from the growth substrate or were found as floating cells which could be recovered from the culture medium. PAC also demonstrated reduction in the number, spreading, and viability of CAL 27 cells observed in each assay (Table 1).
Our previous work with CAL 27 demonstrated that transfection with HPV 16 increased the proliferation and induced the spreading of these cells, even when plated at low density . In this study, CAL 27-TF16 cells (Fig. 1D) demonstrated a more heterogeneous mixture of cellular morphologies in the presence of PAC (Fig. 1I) than was observed for non-transfected CAL 27. Some CAL 27-TF16 cells retained typical spreading, adherent morphologies, while a smaller proportion of cells exhibited morphologies characteristic of the initial stages of apoptosis. These early stage-specific features included smaller groupings of rounding, clustering cells, cell-surface microspikes, and blebbing. A less pronounced reduction in cell spreading and cell viability was observed for CAL 27-TF16 (Table 1).
The non-cancerous fibroblast control cell line, Hs27 (Fig. 1E), demonstrated the ability to proliferate and spread in the presence of PAC at all concentrations (Fig. 1J). In addition, these cells did not exhibit characteristics of apoptosis; however, a reduction in the overall number of cells was evident at the higher concentration. This apparent inhibition of cellular proliferation was sustained and became more pronounced over time, although these effects on cell viability and cell spreading were less pronounced than for any of the other cell lines tested (Table 1).
Ca Ski (CC) and GH354 (CAC)
To quantitate our observation that the administration of PAC may inhibit the proliferation of these cancer cell lines, in addition to the possible induction of apoptosis, the cervical carcinoma cell lines, Ca Ski and GH354, were grown in 96-well assay plates and their proliferation was measured over four days in three separate, independent experiments. Our results demonstrated that PAC elicited selective responses in the Ca Ski (HPV 16-containing) and GH354 (HPV 18-containing) cell lines. Low dose administration of PAC stimulated Ca Ski proliferation, while higher doses were inhibitory in a dose-dependent manner. All doses of PAC were inhibitory in GH354 cells, although the level of inhibition was determined to be dose dependent.
The effects of PAC administration on GH354 cells produced slightly different proliferative responses compared with the effects on Ca Ski cell proliferation (Fig. 2C). For example, all doses of PAC tested inhibited GH354 proliferation. Although these results suggest that the lowest dose of PAC (10 μg/mL) had the smallest effect of inhibiting proliferation, an analysis of the relative change in proliferation revealed a more complicated interaction between PAC effects and GH354 proliferation (Fig. 2D). These results revealed that all doses of PAC tested were growth inhibitory; GIMAX was established at 30 μg/mL, with higher doses exhibiting slightly less robust proliferation-inhibitory effects.
A control cell line, Hs27, human foreskin fibroblasts, was also tested as described above. Our results demonstrated that Hs27 cells exhibited dose-dependent responses to PAC administration (Fig. 2I). GIMAX was determined to be 60 μg/mL, which closely approximated the maximum inhibitory dosages observed for the other cell lines tested (Fig. 2J). As with Ca Ski and GH354 cell lines, no dosage of PAC resulted in a net loss of cells over the course of these assays.
CAL 27 (OSCC) and CAL 27-TF16 (OSCC)
To test our hypothesis that PAC administration inhibits proliferation of OSCC, the OSCC cell line, CAL 27, was assayed and proliferation was measured over four days in three, separate independent experiments. Our results demonstrated that PAC induced variable responses, similar to the effects on Ca Ski cells, in a dose-dependent manner (Fig. 2E). The proliferation of CAL 27 cells was slightly increased by the lowest concentration of PAC (10 μg/mL), while increasing doses produced an inhibitory effect on proliferation over the range of 20–100 μg/mL (Fig. 2F). To determine the growth inhibitory dose, we analyzed the relative change in proliferation and found that PAC doses between 20–40 μg/mL exhibited increasing inhibitory effects on proliferation, GIMAX was determined to be 50 μg/mL, while larger doses, between 60–80 μg/mL, displayed ever-diminishing inhibitory effects as the dose was increased. All PAC doses above 40 μg/mL resulted in a net loss of cells over the course of the assay.
Our previous studies with OSCC proliferation revealed that CAL 27 cells proliferated more rapidly after transfection with HPV 16 . To contextualize our results from this current study, we assayed HPV 16-transfected CAL 27 cell proliferation under PAC administration over four days in three, separate independent experiments. Our results revealed that PAC induced dose-dependent effects, similar to the responses of CAL 27, with some notable differences (Fig. 2G). The proliferation of CAL 27-TF16 cells was increased by the two lowest concentrations of PAC (10–20 μg/mL), while further increasing doses produced inhibitory effects on proliferation within the range of 30–100 μg/mL. GIMAX was also determined to be 50 μg/mL, with higher doses exhibiting no greater inhibitory effects than at GIMAX (Fig. 2H). The maximal inhibitory PAC dose of 50 μg/mL resulted in a net loss of these cells over the course of the assay.
Dose-dependent cell morphology responses
Inhibition of proliferation was induced by treatment of cells with low concentrations of PAC, sustained over time (Fig. 4F–J). In examining the cervical carcinoma cell lines, Ca Ski and GH354, we observed that cell number was reduced in Ca Ski cultures (Fig. 4F), but that both morphology and cell number were altered in GH354 cells (Fig. 4G) at low PAC concentration (20 μg/mL). The same concentration of PAC reduced the overall number of Hs27 cells, without inducing demonstrable changes in cell morphology (Fig. 4J). The OSCC cell lines, CAL 27 (Fig. 4H) and CAL 27-TF16 (Fig. 4I), also exhibited reduced proliferation in response to this PAC concentration, but exhibited no specific evidence of apoptotic events.
Higher concentrations of PAC, on the other hand, elicited different responses in cell morphology and appearance. Cell clustering and rounding was induced in all cancer cell lines (K-N) with PAC (50 μg/mL). Possible evidence of apoptosis at this concentration was first observed in all cell lines, except Hs27 (Fig. 4O), between 18 and 24 hours, and was observed as a relatively slow event that resulted in a rounding of cells together followed by intense surface blebbing. Surface blebbing continued from day 1 to day 4 until more active blistering and lytic events resulted in the net loss of cells in each assay.
The cervical carcinoma cell line, Ca Ski (Fig. 4F), and HPV16-transfected OSCC cell line, CAL 27-TF16 (Fig. 4I), were more resistant to lysis and cell death at the lower PAC concentration (20 μg/mL) and appeared to be rounded and blebbing at day 4, while the majority of GH354 cells (Fig. 4G) and non-transfected CAL 27 cells (Fig. 4H) may have already undergone these transformations. The higher PAC concentration (50 μg/mL approximating GIMAX) further reduced absolute cell number and induced these morphologic changes in all cell lines (Fig. 4K–N), except Hs27 cells which exhibited no evidence suggesting apoptotic changes (Fig. 4O).
Nucleic acid analysis
The administration of PAC had multiple effects, including a dose-dependent reduction in cellular proliferation and changes in cellular morphology among cancer cell lines. This study also assessed total DNA isolated from CAL 27 and CAL 27-TF16 cells in the absence and presence of PAC at 50 μg/mL (Fig. 5B), revealing that PAC administration induced some alteration and fragmentation of total DNA, resulting in a more diffuse and less compact banding pattern. In addition, PAC administration reduced the overall molecular weight of the chromosomal DNA extracted, which may represent one stage in the process of DNA fragmentation, characteristic of cells undergoing necrosis or apoptosis.
Proanthocyanidins are part of a larger group of compounds that have been demonstrated to have anti-proliferative and anti-tumor effects [13, 26, 33]. PAC can be isolated from multiple sources and the therapeutic benefits of PAC may be determined, in part, by the fruit or vegetable from which it is derived . GSE and other fruit-derived flavonoid extracts have demonstrated robust anti-proliferative effects on other oral and epithelial cancers [17, 24, 35, 36].
Although other studies have demonstrated that particular fractions of GSE or raspberry extracts may be cytotoxic against oral tumor cell lines, none have yet examined PAC specifically to analyze its effects on oral cancer proliferation. Through this study, we have demonstrated that PAC exhibited dose-dependent inhibitory and cytotoxic effects on cervical cancer cell lines, with these effects more selective and intensely specific for OSCC. In addition, HPV, now believed to initiate oral cancers among non-smokers, and to modulate OSCC proliferation and progression among smokers, was modulated and reduced, in a dose-dependent manner, by the administration of PAC.
A closer examination of PAC administration among these various cell lines revealed that the effects of PAC were less intense and more gradual in the foreskin and cervical cancer cell lines, Hs27 and Ca Ski, respectively. In contrast, at even the lowest dosages, PAC substantially inhibited the proliferation of both the cervical cancer cell line, GH354, and the OSCC cell line, CAL 27. Furthermore, the level of inhibition was dissimilar between these two cancers – only limiting proliferation of the cervical cell line, GH354, but resulting in a net loss of cells in the oral cancer line, CAL 27. This level of cytotoxicity may represent a selective effect which suggests that OSCC may be rendered more susceptible to this treatment.
Although we found that PAC exhibited a general inhibitory effect on all cell lines tested, a morphological change was observed after PAC administration in both the cervical and oral cancer cell lines that suggested the possible induction of apoptosis. Images obtained from live cell cultures under PAC administration demonstrated that many of the cells were clustering, rounding, and blebbing – morphologic changes that are often suggestive of apoptosis. However, once the cells were fixed and stained to quantify these effects on proliferation, only Ca Ski cells and non-cancerous controls Hs27 were sufficiently adhered to remain in the assay plates at the GIMAX concentration of PAC. One possible reason for this phenomenon may be the degree of progression toward apoptosis or cell death; the more susceptible cell lines, such as GH354, CAL 27, and CAL 27-TF16, could be further along the apoptotic pathway and therefore less capable of adhering and more likely to be removed by mechanical forces during the fixation and staining process. The DNA analysis revealed fragmentation, but no banding patterns indicative of internucleosomal cleavage, suggesting further experimentation will be necessary to delineate the pathways and mechanisms associated with these changes.
Aside from demonstrating that PAC may exhibit differential effects among different cancers, we found convincing evidence that HPV may modulate, and in turn be modulated by, the effects of PAC with respect to the OSCC proliferative response. Our previous research found that HPV 16 strongly induced OSCC proliferation and our findings here indicate that HPV 16 also influenced OSCC response under PAC administration. The introduction of HPV 16 into these cells not only increased their relative levels of proliferation, but also mediated their response to PAC, with lower dosages actually stimulating proliferation of CAL 27-TF16 cells. Interestingly, the GIMAX was determined to be invariable for both transfected and non-transfected cells, suggesting that despite this modulating effect, the HPV 16-specific effect was not sufficient to alter OSCC proliferation in response to incremental increases of PAC administration at or beyond GIMAX.
One critical goal of cancer treatment is to find chemopreventive and therapeutic agents that selectively target cancer cells without detrimental effects to healthy cells and tissues. Although many chemotherapeutic agents are currently being used in the treatment of oral cancers, such as cisplatin (CDDP) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), it is known that most tumors may be more or less resistant to these drug therapies because they are not dependent on a single receptor or signal transduction pathway for growth and progression . Thus, compounds or combinations of compounds that may activate multiple apoptotic pathways, such as PACs, may provide new and more effective treatment regimens for patients with oral cancer.
Recent studies have determined that PACs can be administered orally as a dietary supplement and are subsequently bioavailable, in both serum and tissues at μg/mL concentrations, without any significant toxicity, implying that PACs may represent one class of promising candidates for use as an adjuvant therapeutic agent in patients receiving chemotherapy for oral cancer [37, 38]. The supporting evidence that GSE and other flavonoid extracts are effective as adjuvants and treatments for breast, colon, and prostate cancer, combined with the results of this study, demonstrate that PAC may act even more selectively on OSCC than other cell lines. This suggests the possibility that PACs may act synergistically to induce selective inhibition and apoptosis of oral cancers in vivo.
PAC-containing commercial products, such as ActiVin®, OptiBerry®, Grape Seed Proanthocyanidin Extract, and others, have been verified as well-tolerated and non-toxic [33, 34, 39]. However, due to incomplete information regarding alternative and combination therapies, we advocate here for systematic animal, and subsequently human chemoprevention trials, to confirm that PAC may suppress tumor proliferation or induce tumor apoptosis, without eliciting deleterious effects on viability and growth of normal tissue. This study provides convincing evidence that PAC administration is sufficient to reduce OSCC proliferation in vitro and that it may also effectively modulate the proliferation-enhancing effects of concomitant HPV infection. Consequently, if these effects can be substantiated, it will then become vital to decipher which of the signalling pathways PAC may influence in OSCC, including the possible inhibition of MAPK (mitogen activated protein kinase), ODC (ornithine decarboxylase), EGFR (epidermal growth factor receptor), or caspase-dependent pathways.
This research was supported, in part, by an Institutional Research Grant (IRG) from the American Cancer Society (ACS) to KK (ACS-IRG#103719). KK and SO are especially grateful to G Galbraith and the Department of Biomedical Sciences at the UNLV School of Dental Medicine for additional support and also to K Howard for her assistance. KK would also like to thank M Keiserman for special assistance and patience during the preparation of this manuscript.
- Davies L, Welch HG: Epidemiology of head and neck cancer in the United States. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006, 135: 451-457. 10.1016/j.otohns.2006.01.029.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ragin CCR, Modugno F, Gollin SM: The epidemiology and risk factors of head and neck cancer: a focus on human papillomavirus. J Dent Res. 2007, 86: 104-114.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Miller CS, Johnstone BM: Human papillomavirus as a risk factor for oral squamous cell carcinoma: A meta-analysis, 1982–1997. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 2001, 91: 622-635.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Le Marchand L: Cancer preventive effects of flavonoids-a review. Biomed Pharmacother. 2002, 56: 296-301. 10.1016/S0753-3322(02)00186-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hsu S, Singh B, Schuster G: Induction of apoptosis in oral cancer cells: agents and mechanisms for potential therapy and prevention. Oral Oncol. 2004, 40: 461-473. 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2003.09.012.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Pavia M, Pileggi C, Nobile CGA, Angelillo IF: Association between fruit and vegetable consumption and oral cancer: a meta-analysis of observational studies. Am J Clin Nutr. 2006, 83: 1126-1134.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- de Pascual-Teresa S, Santos-Buelga C, Rivas-Gonzalo JC: Quantitative analysis of flavan-3-ols in Spanish foodstuffs and beverages. J Agric Food Chem. 2000, 48: 5331-5337. 10.1021/jf000549h.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gu L, Kelm M, Hammerstone JF, Beecher G, Cunningham D, Vannozzi S, Prior RL: Fractionation of polymeric procyanidins from lowbush blueberry and quantification of procyanidins in selected foods with an optimized normal-phase HPLC-MS fluorescent detection method. J Agric Food Chem. 2002, 50: 4852-4860. 10.1021/jf020214v.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gu L, Kelm MA, Hammerstone JF, Beecher G, Holden J, Haytowitz D, Gebhardt S, Prior RL: Concentrations of proanthocyanidins in common foods and estimations of normal consumption. J Nutr. 2004, 134: 613-617.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ricardo da Silva JM, Cheynier V, Sansom A, Bourziex M: Effect of pomace contact, carbonic maceration, and hypoeroxidation on the procyanidin composition of Grenache blanc wines. Am J Enol Vitic. 1993, 44: 168-172.Google Scholar
- Bagchi D, Bagchi M, Stohs SJ, Das DK, Ray SD, Kuszynski CA, Joshi SS, Pruess HG: Free radicals and grape seed proanthocyanidin extract: importance in human health and disease prevention. Toxicology. 2000, 148: 187-197. 10.1016/S0300-483X(00)00210-9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kim H, Hall P, Smith M, Kirk M, Prasain JK, Barnes S, Grubbs C: Chemoprevention by grape seed extract and genistein in carcinogen-induced mammary cancer in rats is diet dependent. J Nutr. 2004, 134: 3445S-3452S.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Seeram NP, Adams LS, Hardy ML, Heber D: Total cranberry extract versus its phytochemical constituents: antiproliferative and synergistic effects against human tumor cell lines. J Agric Food Chem. 2004, 52: 2512-2517. 10.1021/jf0352778.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Vayalil PK, Mittal A, Kativar SK: Proanthocyanidins from grape seeds inhibit expression of matrix metalloproteinases in human prostate carcinoma cells, which is associated with the inhibition of MAPK and NF kappa B. Carcinogenesis. 2004, 25: 987-995. 10.1093/carcin/bgh095.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hong H, Yi-Min Q: Grape seed proanthocyanidin extract induced mitochondria-associated apoptosis in human acute myeloid leukaemia 14.3D10 cells. Chinese Med J. 2006, 119: 417-421.Google Scholar
- Shirataki Y, Kawase M, Saito S, Hurihara T, Tanaka W, Satoh K, Sakagami H, Motohashi N: Selective cytotoxic activity of grape peel and seed extracts against oral tumor cell lines. Anticancer Res. 2000, 20: 423-426.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rodrigo KA, Rawal Y, Renner RJ, Schwartz SJ, Tian Q, Larsen PE, Mallery SR: Suppression of the tumorigenic phenotype in human oral squamous cell carcinoma cells by an ethanol extract derived from freeze-dried black raspberries. Nutr Cancer. 2006, 54: 58-68. 10.1207/s15327914nc5401_7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Kaur M, Singh RP, Gu M, Agarwal R, Agarwal C: Grape seed extract inhibits in vitro and in vivo growth of human colorectal carcinoma cells. Clin Cancer Res. 2006, 12: 6194-6202. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-06-1465.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tyagi A, Agarwal R, Agarwal C: Grape seed extract inhibits EGF-induced and constitutively active mitogenic signaling but activates JNK in human prostate carcinoma DU145 cells: possiblerole in antiproliferation and apoptosis. Oncogene. 2003, 22: 1302-1316. 10.1038/sj.onc.1206265.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Katiyar SK: Matrix metalloproteinases in cancer metastasis: molecular targets for prostate cancer prevention by green tea polyphenols and grape seed proanthocyanidins. Endocr Metab Immune Disord Drug Targets. 2006, 6: 17-24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Matchett MD, MacKinnon SL, Sweeney MI, Gottschall-Pass KT, Hurta RAR: Inhibition of matrix metalloproteinase activity in DU145 human prostate cancer cells by flavonoids from lowbush blueberry (Vaccinium angustifolium): possible roles for protein kinase C and mitogen-activated protein-kinase-mediated events. J Nutrl Biochem. 2006, 17: 117-125. 10.1016/j.jnutbio.2005.05.014.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Aruoma OI, Sun B, Fujii H, Neergheen VS, Bahorun T, Kang KS, Sung MK: Low molecular proanthocyanidin dietary biofactor Oligonol: Its modulation of oxidative stress, bioefficacy, neuroprotection, food application and chemoprevention potentials. Biofactors. 2006, 27: 245-265.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kijima I, Phung S, Hur G, Kwok SL, Chen S: Grape seed extract is an aromatase inhibitor and a supressor of aromatase expression. Cancer Res. 2006, 66: 5960-5967. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-0053.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sakagami H, Jiang Y, Kusama K, Atsumi T, Ueha T, Toguchi M, Iwakura I, Satoh K, Fukai T, Nomura T: Induction of apoptosis by flavones, flavonols (3-hydroxyflavones) and isoprenoid-substituted flavonoids in human oral tumor cell lines. Anticancer Res. 2000, 20: 271-277.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kandil Fe, Smith MAL, Rogers RB, Pepin MF, Song LL, Pezzuto JM, Seigler DS: Composition of a chemopreventive proantho-cyanin-rich fraction from cranberry fruits responsible for the inhibition of TPA-induced ODC activity. J Agric Food Chem. 2002, 50: 1063-1069. 10.1021/jf011136z.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Neto CC: Cranberry and its phytochemicals: A review of in vitro anticancer studies. J Nutr. 2007, 137: 186S-193S.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kingsley K, Johnson D, O'Malley S: Transfection of oral squamous cell carcinoma with human papillomavirus-16 induces proliferative and morphological changes independent of cellular adhesion in vitro. Cancer Cell Int. 2006, 6: 14-10.1186/1475-2867-6-14.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Bagchi M, Kuszynski CA, Balmoori J, Joshi SS, Stohs SJ, Bagchi D: Protective effects of antioxidants against smokeless tobacco-induced oxidative stress and modulation of bcl-2 and p53 genes in human oral keratinocytes. Free Rad Res. 2001, 35: 181-194. 10.1080/10715760100300731.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sano T, Oda E, Yamashita T, Naemura A, Ijiri Y, Yamakoshi J, Yamamota J: Anti-thrombotic effect of proanthocyanidin, a purified ingredient of grape seed. Thromb Res. 2005, 115: 115-121. 10.1016/j.thromres.2004.07.015.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Felsher DW, Zetterberg A, Zhu J, Tisty T, Bishop JM: Overexpression of MYC causes p53-dependent G2 arrest of normal fibroblasts. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000, 97: 10544-10548. 10.1073/pnas.190327097.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Kingsley K, Huff JL, Rust WL, Carroll K, Martinez AM, Fitchmun M, Plopper GE: ERK 1/2 mediates PDGF-BB stimulated vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation and migration on laminin-5. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2002, 293: 1000-1006. 10.1016/S0006-291X(02)00331-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hays WL: Inferences about population means. Statistics. 1994, International Thomson Publishing, 311-342. 5Google Scholar
- Bagchi D, Sen CK, Bagchi M, Atalay M: Anti-angiogenic, antioxidant, and anti-carcinogenic properties of a novel anthocyanidin-rich berry extract formula. Biochemistry. 2004, 69: 75-80.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Park EJ, Pezzuto JM: Botanicals in cancer chemoprevention. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2002, 21: 231-255. 10.1023/A:1021254725842.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bagchi D, Bagchi M, Stohs S, Ray SD, Sen CK, Preuss HG: Cellular protection with proanthocyanidins derived from grape seeds. Ann NY Acad Sci. 2002, 957: 260-270.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bagchi D, Roy S, Patel V, He G, Khanna S, Ojha N, Phillips C, Ghosh S, Bagchi M, Sen CK: Safety and whole-body antioxidant potential of a novel anthocyanin-rich formulation of edible berries. Mol Cell Biochem. 2006, 281: 197-209. 10.1007/s11010-006-1030-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sano A, Yamakoshi J, Tokutake S, Tobe K, Kubota Y, Kikuchi M: Procyanidin B1 is detected in human serum after intake of proanthocyanidin-rich grape seed extract. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem. 2003, 67: 1140-1143. 10.1271/bbb.67.1140.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Manach C, Williamson G, Morand C, Scalbert A, Remesy C: Bioavailability and bioefficacy of polyphenols in humans. I. Review of 97 bioavailability studies. Am J Clin Nutr. 2005, 81: 230S-242S.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bagchi D, Sen CK, Ray SD, Das DK, Bagchi M, Press HG, Vinson JA: Molecular mechanisms of cardioprotection by a novel grape seed proanthocyanidin extract. Mutat Res. 2003, 523–524: 87-97.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6882/7/22/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.