Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: A systematic review of how homeopathy is represented in conventional and CAM peer reviewed journals

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
15 Mar 2005 Submitted Original manuscript
22 Mar 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Katja Schmidt
25 Apr 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Matko Marusic
7 May 2005 Author responded Author comments - Timothy Caulfield
Resubmission - Version 2
7 May 2005 Submitted Manuscript version 2
12 May 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Matko Marusic
25 May 2005 Author responded Author comments - Timothy Caulfield
Resubmission - Version 3
25 May 2005 Submitted Manuscript version 3
7 Jun 2005 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Matko Marusic
9 Jun 2005 Author responded Author comments - Timothy Caulfield
Resubmission - Version 4
9 Jun 2005 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
14 Jun 2005 Editorially accepted
14 Jun 2005 Article published 10.1186/1472-6882-5-12

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement