Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Factors associated with herbal use among urban multiethnic primary care patients: a cross-sectional survey

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
20 Mar 2004 Submitted Original manuscript
25 May 2004 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Robert Rhyne
10 Jun 2004 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ernesto Kahan
10 Sep 2004 Author responded Author comments - Grace Kuo
Resubmission - Version 2
10 Sep 2004 Submitted Manuscript version 2
10 Sep 2004 Author responded Author comments - Grace Kuo
4 Oct 2004 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Ernesto Kahan
Resubmission - Version 3
10 Sep 2004 Submitted Manuscript version 3
13 Nov 2004 Author responded Author comments - Grace Kuo
Resubmission - Version 4
13 Nov 2004 Submitted Manuscript version 4
14 Nov 2004 Author responded Author comments - Grace Kuo
Resubmission - Version 5
14 Nov 2004 Submitted Manuscript version 5
2 Dec 2004 Author responded Author comments - Grace Kuo
Resubmission - Version 6
2 Dec 2004 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
2 Dec 2004 Editorially accepted
2 Dec 2004 Article published 10.1186/1472-6882-4-18

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement