This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Questions about complementary and alternative medicine to the Regional Medicines Information and Pharmacovigilance Centres in Norway (RELIS): a descriptive pilot study
© Schjøtt and Erdal; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 12 September 2013
Accepted: 11 February 2014
Published: 14 February 2014
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|12 Sep 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|1 Nov 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ulla Hedegaard|
|29 Nov 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Karen Pilkington|
|1 Jan 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Jan Schjøtt|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|1 Jan 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|15 Jan 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ulla Hedegaard|
|24 Jan 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Karen Pilkington|
|29 Jan 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Jan Schjøtt|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|29 Jan 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|11 Feb 2014||Editorially accepted|
|14 Feb 2014||Article published||10.1186/1472-6882-14-56|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.