Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Synthetic versus natural curcumin: bioequivalence in an in vitro oral mucositis model

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
1 Jun 2013 Submitted Original manuscript
5 Jun 2013 Author responded Author comments - Christoph Aebi
Resubmission - Version 2
5 Jun 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 2
21 Jun 2013 Author responded Author comments - Christoph Aebi
Resubmission - Version 3
21 Jun 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 3
26 Oct 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Gaurang Shah
7 Nov 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - preeti desai
7 Nov 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Amita Joshi
21 Nov 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - ciddi Veeresham
23 Dec 2013 Author responded Author comments - Christoph Aebi
Resubmission - Version 4
23 Dec 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 4
23 Dec 2013 Author responded Author comments - Christoph Aebi
Resubmission - Version 5
23 Dec 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 5
9 Jan 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Amita Joshi
Resubmission - Version 6
Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
30 Jan 2014 Editorially accepted
11 Feb 2014 Article published 10.1186/1472-6882-14-53

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement