Skip to main content

Table 2 Sequential logistic regression analysis of variables predicting “Orthodox/Unorthodox” variable (n = 459); X 2 (where applicable) directly compares the model through a likelihood ratio test with the previous model

From: Differentiating intraprofessional attitudes toward paradigms in health care delivery among chiropractic factions: results from a randomly sampled survey

  

Wald 95% confidence limits on OR

   

Model number and predictors

Odds-ratio (P value)

Lower

Upper

Model AIC

Log likelihood

Likelihood ratio χ2(P value) (df = 1)

Model 1.1

Non-evidence-based treatment choices (1/0)

9.00 (<0.0001)

5.02

16.15

377.0

-186.50

 

Model 1.2

Non-guidelines-based x-ray use (1/0)

6.10 (<0.0001)

3.62

10.27

394.6

-195.30

 

Model 1.3

Negative vaccination attitude (3–15)

1.55 (<0.0001)

1.40

1.72

353.1

-174.56

 

Model 2.1

Negative vaccination attitude (3–15)

1.44 (<0.0001)

1.30

1.60

323.9

-158.95

31.2 (<0.0001)

Non-evidence-based treatment choices (1/0)

5.37 (<0.0001)

2.87

10.04

Model 2.2

Negative vaccination attitude (3–15)

1.41 (<0.0001)

1.27

1.57

312.5

-152.23

13.4 (<0.0002)

Non-evidence-based treatment choices (1/0)

4.18 (<0.0001)

2.19

7.98

Non-guidelines-based x-ray use (1/0)

2.99 (<0.0001)

1.65

5.42