Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Differentiating intraprofessional attitudes toward paradigms in health care delivery among chiropractic factions: results from a randomly sampled survey

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
6 Oct 2013 Submitted Original manuscript
7 Oct 2013 Author responded Author comments - Marion McGregor
Resubmission - Version 2
7 Oct 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 2
28 Oct 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Cheryl Hawk
3 Nov 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Daniel Redwood
20 Nov 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Christopher Stevenson
3 Jan 2014 Author responded Author comments - Marion McGregor
Resubmission - Version 3
3 Jan 2014 Submitted Manuscript version 3
7 Jan 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Daniel Redwood
17 Jan 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Cheryl Hawk
23 Jan 2014 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Christopher Stevenson
Resubmission - Version 4
Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
6 Feb 2014 Editorially accepted
10 Feb 2014 Article published 10.1186/1472-6882-14-51

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement