This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Differentiating intraprofessional attitudes toward paradigms in health care delivery among chiropractic factions: results from a randomly sampled survey
- Marion McGregor†1Email author,
- Aaron A Puhl†2,
- Christine Reinhart2,
- H Stephen Injeyan1 and
- David Soave1
© McGregor et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 6 October 2013
Accepted: 6 February 2014
Published: 10 February 2014
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|6 Oct 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|7 Oct 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Marion McGregor|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|7 Oct 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|28 Oct 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Cheryl Hawk|
|3 Nov 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Daniel Redwood|
|20 Nov 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Christopher Stevenson|
|3 Jan 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Marion McGregor|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|3 Jan 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|7 Jan 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Daniel Redwood|
|17 Jan 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Cheryl Hawk|
|23 Jan 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Christopher Stevenson|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|6 Feb 2014||Editorially accepted|
|10 Feb 2014||Article published||10.1186/1472-6882-14-51|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.