This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Gender differences in prevalence and associations for use of CAM in a large population study
© Kristoffersen et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 18 June 2014
Accepted: 13 November 2014
Published: 3 December 2014
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|18 Jun 2014||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|10 Aug 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Cynthia Peterson|
|1 Sep 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Upali W. Jayasinghe|
|17 Oct 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Agnete Egilsdatter Kristoffersen|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|17 Oct 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|13 Nov 2014||Editorially accepted|
|3 Dec 2014||Article published||10.1186/1472-6882-14-463|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.