The Alexander Technique and musicians: a systematic review of controlled trials
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|14 Jul 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|7 Oct 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Romy Lauche|
|25 Oct 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Thomas Ostermann|
|25 Oct 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Julia Woodman|
|21 Apr 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Ursula Wolf|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|21 Apr 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|28 May 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Romy Lauche|
|29 May 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Julia Woodman|
|23 Jul 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Ursula Wolf|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|23 Jul 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|5 Aug 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Julia Woodman|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|9 Oct 2014||Editorially accepted|
|24 Oct 2014||Article published||10.1186/1472-6882-14-414|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.