This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Cognitive interviews guide design of a new CAM patient expectations questionnaire
© Sherman et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 4 November 2013
Accepted: 17 January 2014
Published: 25 January 2014
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|4 Nov 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|22 Nov 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Paula Kersten|
|3 Dec 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Klaus Linde|
|3 Dec 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Tina Cartwright|
|14 Dec 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Karen Sherman|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|14 Dec 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|7 Jan 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Klaus Linde|
|7 Jan 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Tina Cartwright|
|14 Jan 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Paula Kersten|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|17 Jan 2014||Editorially accepted|
|25 Jan 2014||Article published||10.1186/1472-6882-14-39|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.