This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
New perspectives on patient expectations of treatment outcomes: results from qualitative interviews with patients seeking complementary and alternative medicine treatments for chronic low back pain
© Hsu et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 20 March 2014
Accepted: 11 July 2014
Published: 30 July 2014
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|20 Mar 2014||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|10 Apr 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Felicity Bishop|
|23 Apr 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Johanna Hok|
|23 May 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Clarissa Hsu|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|23 May 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|5 Jun 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Clarissa Hsu|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|5 Jun 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|11 Jul 2014||Editorially accepted|
|30 Jul 2014||Article published||10.1186/1472-6882-14-276|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.