This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
The subjectively perceived quality of postgraduate medical training in integrative medicine within the public healthcare systems of Germany and Switzerland: the example of anthroposophic hospitals
© Heusser et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 11 December 2013
Accepted: 4 June 2014
Published: 16 June 2014
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|11 Dec 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|17 Dec 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Peter Heusser|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|17 Dec 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|5 Feb 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Donald Marcus|
|21 Feb 2014||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Ursula Wolf|
|28 Apr 2014||Author responded||Author comments - Peter Heusser|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|28 Apr 2014||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|4 Jun 2014||Editorially accepted|
|16 Jun 2014||Article published||10.1186/1472-6882-14-191|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.