- Research article
- Open Access
- Open Peer Review
This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Effects of JSOG-6 on protection against bone loss in ovariectomized mice through regulation of osteoblast differentiation and osteoclast formation
© Chung et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014
Received: 13 December 2013
Accepted: 29 May 2014
Published: 6 June 2014
JSOG-6 is used as a traditional medicine to relieve the symptoms associated with inflammation, rheumatism, and osteoporosis in Korea. In the present study, we investigated the effects of JSOG-6 on bone loss prevention both in in vitro and in vivo as well as its underlying mechanism of action.
Protection against bone loss was assessed in an ovariectomized (OVX) mouse model. Bone microarchitecture was measured using a micro-computed tomography to detect the parameters of three-dimensional structure of a trabecular bone. Serum biomarkers were also evaluated in an OVX-induced model. Osteoclasts derived from mouse bone marrow cells (BMCs) and osteoblastic MC3T3-E1 cells were also employed to investigate the mechanism of action.
Oral administration of JSOG-6 significantly increased the bone mineral density (BMD) of the femur in OVX mice in vivo. Especially, the reduced Tb.No (trabecular bone number) in the OVX group was significantly recovered by JSOG-6 treatment. The serum levels of alkaline phosphatase (ALP), osteocalcin, C-terminal telopeptide, and tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase, biomarkers of bone resorption, were significantly elevated in OVX mice, but JSOG-6 effectively inhibited the increase in OVX mice. JSOG-6 was also found to enhance the osteoblastic differentiation and maturation with the increase of the density and ALP activity, a marker of osteoblastic differentiation, as well as calcium deposition, a marker of osteoblastic maturation in MC3T3-E1 cells. The effects of JSOG-6 on osteoblastic differentiation were also associated in part with the increase of ALP and OPN mRNA expressions and the decrease of RANKL mRNA expression in MC3T3-E1 cells.
The findings demonstrate that JSOG-6 induced protection against bone loss in OVX mice, and its anti-osteoporotic property might be, in part, a function of the stimulation of osteoblast differentiation and the inhibition of osteoclast formation. These findings suggest that JSOG-6 might be an applicable therapeutic traditional medicine for the regulation of the osteoporotic response.
Osteoporosis is an age-dependent metabolic bone disease characterized by the decrease in bone mass, the deterioration of bone tissue, and an increased risk of fractures [1, 2]. In the process of osteoporosis, the bone mineral density (BMD) is decreased, bone microarchitecture is deteriorated, and a variety of proteins in bone are also altered. Bone mass is regulated by continuous bone remodeling through bone resorption and bone formation by osteoclasts and osteoblasts, respectively [3, 4]. Indeed, bone homeostasis depends on maintaining a balance between the activities of bone-forming osteoblasts and bone-resorbing osteoclasts [5, 6], which is ultimately determined by the proliferation and differentiation of progenitors of these two bone-associated cells.
Osteoclasts are derived from hematopoietic cells within the monocyte/macrophage lineage  and regulated by the combined action of the receptor activator of the NF-κB ligand (RANKL) . However, osteoblasts induce the increase in bone mass by inhibiting the ability of osteoclasts. Osteoblasts also express RANKL and osteoprotegerin (OPG), a decoy receptor of RANKL, which are essential factors regulating the formation and activation of osteoclasts (osteoclastogenesis) [9, 10]. Therefore, the balance of RANKL and OPG mainly contributes to bone remodeling because RANKL stimulates osteoclastogenesis, while OPG suppresses bone resorption . Yet, excessive osteoclastogenesis and defects in osteoblastogenesis are associated with bone diseases such as osteoporosis and rheumatoid arthritis .
JSOG-6 (named Bogangyeongol-hwan) consists of a mixture of six crude drugs, and each drug has been widely used in traditional medicine to treat various bone disorders such as arthritis, degenerative disc disease and osteoporosis. Of the six components of JSOG-6, Harpagophytum procumbens var. sublobatum (Engl.) Stapf, radix, called Devil’s claw, is an herbal substance commonly used by patients with osteoarthritis (OA). Anti-inflammatory activities of the root extracts of H. procumbens var. sublobatum have also been reported in various inflammation models [13–15]. Another component of JSOG-6, Drynaria fortunei (Kunze ex Mett.) J. Sm., rhizome also showed an anti-osteogenic effect in a bone-resorption model  as well as anti-inflammatory properties . Poria cocos F.A.Wolf, sclerotium  and Rehmannia glutinosa (Gaertn.) DC., radix  exhibited anti-inflammatory effects. Furthermore, Panax ginseng C.A.Mey., radix showed an anti-osteoporotic effect in an OVX rat model . These reported data suggest that JSOG-6 might have the potential to alleviate the symptoms of bone loss-associated diseases.
In the present study, we investigated the activities of JSOG-6 in vitro and in in vivo bone-remodeling models and examined its underlying molecular mechanism.
Preparation of test samples
A mixture of six crude drugs (Harpagophytum procumbens var. sublobatum (Engl.) Stapf, radix (120 g), Drynaria fortunei (Kunze ex Mett.) J. Sm., rhizome (120 g), Equus asinus L., gelatinized (120 g), Poria cocos F.A.Wolf, sclerotium (120 g), Rehmannia glutinosa (Gaertn.) DC., radix (120 g), and Panax ginseng C.A.Mey., radix (120 g)) was boiled in tap water (10 L) for 6 h, and the extract was freeze-dried to obtain the JSOG-6 extracts (259 g, 35.6%). The crude drugs were purchased from an herbal market in Seoul, Korea, and authenticated by Dr. S.H. Lee, Jaseng Hospital of Korean Medicine in Seoul, Korea. Voucher specimens of the plants used in this study were deposited in the herbarium at Jaseng Hospital of Oriental Medicine.
Female ICR mice (18–20 g, ~8 weeks old) were purchased from Central Laboratory Animal Inc. (Seoul, Korea). Animals were housed under standard laboratory conditions with free access to food and water. The temperature was thermostatically regulated to 22°C ± 2°C, and a 12-hour light/dark schedule was maintained. Prior to their use, they were allowed one week for acclimatization within the work area environment. All animal experiments were carried out in accordance with the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee Guidelines of Ewha Womans University (permission number: EWHA2010-2-07).
At 9 weeks of age, mice were bilaterally OVX, and 8 mice were Sham-operated (Sham). After 1 week of recovery from surgery, the OVX mice were randomly divided into 5 groups of 8 mice per group (OVX control, 17β-estradiol (E2, 20 μg/kg), and JSOG-6 (50, 150, or 450 mg/kg)). JSOG-6 was orally administered in distilled water (0.3 mL) for 12 weeks, and the same volume of distilled water was used in the Sham- and OVX control groups. After 12 weeks of treatment, the animals were sacrificed, and blood samples were collected for serum isolation. The femur bones were dissected and divested of soft tissue for analysis of trabecular microarchitecture.
Analysis of serum bone biomarkers
Serum calcium (Ca) and phosphorus (P) were measured as previously described . The serum concentrations of osteocalcin (OCN) and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity were assayed using an ELISA kit (Biomedical Technologies Inc., Stoughton, MA, USA) and QuantiChrome ALP assay kit (DALP-250, BioAssay Systems, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions, respectively. The serum levels of C-terminal telopeptides (CTx), bone resorption biomarkers that indicate osteoclastic activity, were also analyzed using commercial ELISA kits (Serum CrossLaps, Nordic Bioscience, Herlev, Denmark). The tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) concentration was determined by a mouse TRAP assay kit (Suomen Bioanalytikka Oy, Turku, Finland).
Analysis of bone microarchitecture
Bone microarchitecture of the femur was scanned using a micro-computed tomography (μCT system, SkyScan 1076, Aart-selaar, Belgium) in the region of 0.6–2.1 mm from the growth plate. The X-ray source was set at a voltage of 50 kV and a current of 200 μA and filtered with a 0.5 mm aluminum filter. The scanning angular rotation was 180° with an angular step of 0.5°. The voxel size was fixed at 8.9 μm. The morphometric index of the bone region was determined from the microtomographic data using a 3D image (SkyScan). The following measures characterizing the three-dimensional structure of a trabecular bone were determined: the ratio of bone components to volume of interest (BV/TV,%), trabecular thickness (Tb.Th, mm), trabecular separation (Tb.Sp, mm), trabecular bone number (Tb.N, mm-1), and structure model index (SMI).
BV/TV indicates the ratio which a trabecular bone is occupied with a given volume of interest, usually measured as a% value. Tb.Th and Tb.Sp define the shape of a trabecular bone, whereas Tb.N implies the number of traversals made per unit length on a random linear path across a trabecular bone through a given volume of interest. SMI quantifies the relative prevalence of rod-, plate-, or sphere-shapes in a trabecular bone structure.
α-Modified minimal essential medium (α-MEM), fetal bovine serum (FBS), sodium pyruvate, L-glutamine, antibiotic-antimycotic solution, and trypsin-EDTA were purchased from Invitrogen Co. (Grand Island, NY, USA). RANKL and macrophage-colony stimulating factor (M-CSF) were purchased from R&D systems (Minneapolis, MN, USA). Ascorbic acid, β-glycerophosphate,3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT), and other chemicals were obtained from Sigma (St. Louis, MO, USA) unless otherwise indicated.
Mouse calvaria MC3T3-E1 cells, obtained from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Rockville, MD, USA), were cultured in α-MEM supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated FBS, 100 units/mL penicillin, 100 μg/mL streptomycin, and 0.25 μg/mL amphotericin B. Cells were incubated at 37°C and 5% CO2 in a humidified atmosphere.
Evaluation of growth inhibitory potential
MC3T3-E1 cells (1 × 104 cells/mL in 96-well plates) were treated with various concentrations of JSOG-6 and incubated at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2. After JSOG-6 treatment for 72 h, MTT solution (5 mg/mL in PBS) was added to the medium (final concentration 500 μg/mL) and further incubated for 4 h. The medium was discarded and 200 μL of (100% or 10%) DMSO was added to each well to dissolve the formazan. The absorbance was measured at 570 nm. The effect of JSOG-6 on cell growth was calculated as a percentage relative to solvent-treated control incubations, and the IC50 values were calculated using non-linear regression analysis (percent cell proliferation versus concentration).
Alkaline phosphatase (ALP) activity
The ALP activity was determined according to a previously described method . MC3T3-E1 cells were incubated in osteogenic medium containing 400 μM ascorbic acid and 5 mM β-glycerophosphate. The cells (2 × 104 cells/mL) were incubated with or without various concentrations of JSOG-6. After 4 days, the cells were washed with PBS and fixed with 70% ethanol for 5 min and then extracted into lysis solution (10 mM Tris, 0.1% Triton X-100 buffer (pH 7.5). Enzyme activity was determined using p-nitrophenylphosphate (p-NPP) as a substrate. The color change reflecting the conversion of p-NPP to p-nitrophenol was measured at 405 nm. The protein concentration of cell lysates was measured using the Bradford assay.
The calcium deposition of MC3T3-E1 cells was determined by a previously reported method . MC3T3-E1 cells (2 × 104 cells/mL) were incubated with or without various concentrations of JSOG-6 for 14 days. The cells were washed twice with PBS and fixed with 70% ethanol for 30 min. The fixed MC3T3-E1 cells were stained with 2% Alizarin Red S solution (pH 4.0) for 5 min. The plate was washed several times by distilled water, and then the cells were observed under a microscope.
Real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (Real-time RT-PCR)
Lipopolysaccharide (LPS), a cell component of Gram-negative bacteria, is an important mediator of pathological bone destruction associated with inflammation. MC3T3-E1 cells were stimulated with 1 μg/mL LPS in the presence or absence of JSOG-6 for 48 h. Total cellular RNA was extracted with TRI reagent (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) according to the manufacturer’s recommended procedure. Total RNA (1 μg) was reverse-transcribed using oligo-(dT)15 primers and avian myeloblastosis virus (AMV) reverse transcriptase (Promega, Madison, WI, USA).
Sequences of target gene-specific primers used in real-time PCR
Preparation of total cell lysates
MC3T3-E1 cells (5 × 105 cells/mL in 60 mm dish) were incubated with or without various concentrations of JSOG-6 for 48 h. To obtain total cell lysates, the cells were washed with ice-cold PBS and lysed in boiling 2X sample loading buffer (250 mM Tris–HCl (pH 6.8), 4% SDS, 10% glycerol, 0.006% bromophenol blue, 50 mM sodium fluoride, 5 mM sodium orthovanadate, and 2% β-mercaptoethanol). Cell lysates were boiled for an additional 20 min and stored at −20°C. The protein content of cell lysates was determined by the BCA method.
Western blot analysis
Equal amounts of cell lysates (40 ~ 50 μg) were subjected to 8% and 10% SDS-PAGE and electrotransferred onto polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) membranes (Millipore, MA, USA). Membranes were blocked in PBST (PBS with 0.1% Tween-20) containing 5% non-fat dry milk for 1 h at room temperature. After washing 3 times with PBST, membranes were incubated with primary antibodies against OPG, RANKL, c-Fos, and TRAF6 (Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA, USA), p-ERK, ERK (Cell Signaling, Danvers, MA, USA), and β-actin (Sigma) for 3 h at room temperature or overnight at 4°C. Membranes were washed 3 times with PBST and incubated with the corresponding secondary antibodies (Santa Cruz) for 90 min at room temperature. The blots were washed 3 times with PBST and visualized using an enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) Western blotting detection system (Lab Frontier, Suwon, Korea).
Murine bone marrow-derived osteoclasts
BMCs were isolated from 4-week-old mice as previously described . The cells were plated into 96-well plates in 30 ng/mL of M-CSF for 24 h. Next, the cells were treated with the indicated concentrations of JSOG-6 in the presence of 100 ng/mL of RANKL and 30 ng/mL of M-CSF. The medium was replaced with 50% volume with and without JSOG-6 every 2 days, and the culture was terminated after 5 days.
Tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) staining
Osteoclast differentiation was assessed by TRAP (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) activity. 5 days after stimulating the cells with M-CSF and RANKL (100 and 30 ng/mL, respectively), the cells were washed with PBS and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 5 min. The cells were rinsed in de-ionized water and incubated in tartrate-staining solution in the dark for 1 h at 37°C. The cells were rinsed in de-ionized water and allowed to air dry. TRAP-positive multinucleated cells containing 3 or more nuclei were counted as osteoclasts.
All experiments were repeated at least 3 times. Data are presented as the mean ± SD for the indicated number of independently performed experiments. The statistical significance within a parameter was evaluated by one-way analysis of variation (ANOVA) coupled with Dunnett’s t-test.
Effect of JSOG-6 on bone loss in an OVX-induced mouse model
Effect of JSOG-6 on serum biochemical markers in the OVX mouse model
Effect of JSOG-6 on the serum parameters in OVX mice
9.1 ± 0.4
8.0 ± 0.3
67.6 ± 2.8
9.1 ± 0.9
148.9 ± 5.3
69.5 ± 4.3
9.3 ± 0.3
8.3 ± 0.4
85.0 ± 3.1
19.8 ± 1.0
176.9 ± 4.7
95.7 ± 3.8
9.1 ± 0.6
7.9 ± 0.2
59.9 ± 3.1*
10.8 ± 1.0*
141.9 ± 4.9*
76.6 ± 4.7*
9.4 ± 0.5
7.9 ± 0.3
59.3 ± 3.8*
11.6 ± 1.4*
165.0 ± 6.6
92.3 ± 3.6
9.4 ± 0.6
7.9 ± 0.3
62.8 ± 4.6*
9.7 ± 1.1*
155.8 ± 5.1*
89.7 ± 5.2
9.6 ± 0.4
8.1 ± 0.4
65.9 ± 3.4*
8.3 ± 0.7*
153.0 ± 5.3*
83.6 ± 3.8*
Effect of JSOG-6 on the ALP activity of MC3T3-E1 cells
Effect of JSOG-6 on the mineralization of MC3T3-E1 cells
Effect of JSOG-6 on osteoblastic gene expression
Effect of JSOG-6 on the protein levels of OPG, RANKL, and ERK in MC3T3-E1 cells
Effect of JSOG-6 on osteoclast differentiation
Osteoporosis is an age-dependent skeletal metabolic disease in which patients suffer from lower bone density and lower bone mass compared to healthy individuals [27, 28]. The disease is also associated with a homeostatic imbalance between bone modeling and bone resorption. Although the main cause of the disease is not clear, endocrinologic, nutritional, and genetic factors are thought to be highly involved in osteoporosis.
JSOG-6 is an herbal preparation derived from six traditional medicines that have been clinically used to treat inflammation-associated diseases in oriental Korean medicine. However, the exact pharmacological effect and its underlying mechanisms of action remain to be elucidated. Therefore, the present study was performed to investigate the anti-osteoporotic activity of JSOG-6 in an OVX mouse model and to further elucidate its underlying mechanisms of actions both in vitro and in vivo.
The OVX animal model has been widely used to study postmenopausal osteoporosis mimicked by estrogen insufficiency [29, 30]. Deterioration of trabecular 3D microarchitecture is apparent in the OVX mouse model . We found that JSOG-6 prevented the deterioration of microstructural parameters in the distal femur in mice. Oral administration of JSOG-6 restored bone loss back in OVX mice (Figure 1). These results indicated that JSOG-6 was effective not only in preserving bone mass but also in rescuing the deterioration of bone microarchitecture associated with OVX mice.
Biochemical markers of bone turnover have been determined previously, allowing the evaluation of the status of bone remodeling . Analyses of the serum levels of ALP and OCN, typical biomarkers of osteoblastic activity, and CTx and TRAP, biomarkers of bone resorption, showed that the serum concentrations of ALP, OCN, CTx and TRAP in OVX mice were significantly higher than those in the Sham group. However, the levels of ALP and TRAP in the JSOG-6-treated group were equivalent to the levels in the Sham group (Table 2). These data suggest that JSOG-6 most likely prevents bone loss through decreased bone turnover.
In addition, the mechanisms underlying the cellular effects of JSOG-6 were investigated in osteoblasts and osteoclasts. Osteoblasts, bone-forming cells, synthesize and regulate the deposition and mineralization of the extracellular matrix of bone [33, 34]. In this study, JSOG-6 treatment was found to increase the ALP activity in a concentration-dependent manner in MC3T3-E1 cells (Figure 2). JSOG-6 also led to an increase of calcium deposition in MC3T3- E1 cells (Figure 3).
To further explore the mechanism responsible for the effect of JSOG-6 on the regulation of osteoblasts, the markers of bone formation in MC3T3-E1 cells were detected by real-time RT-PCR. LPS leads to the intracellular induction of p38, JNK phosphorylation, and NFκB in macrophages and monocytes, and promotes the differentiation and survival of osteoclasts through the production of several factors such as PGE2, interleukin 1, RANKL, and TNF . The levels of the bone formation biomarkers ALP, OPN, and OPG/RANKL mRNAs were up-regulated by JSOG-6 treatment (Figure 4).
RANKL drives osteoclastogenesis by providing an important signal to osteoclast progenitors through the membrane-anchored receptor RANK in osteoclasts. Osteoblasts also synthesize and secrete OPG, a decoy receptor of RANKL, which blocks the interaction between RANKL and RANK. Therefore, the expression of OPG/RANKL plays an essential role in modulating bone remodeling [36, 37]. OPG was also able to block the interaction of RANKL with osteoclast cells, thus suppressing osteoclastogenesis . The data showed that JSOG-6 up-regulated the protein expression of OPG and down-regulated that of RANKL (Figure 5A). Therefore, the suppression of the protein expressions of OPG and RANKL by JSOG-6 might be a plausible partial mechanism of action of its modulation of bone remodeling.
Various intracellular signaling pathways are involved in the regulation of osteoblast differentiation. ERK is considered to be an essential function in the proliferation and differentiation of osteoblasts [39, 40]. In this study, JSOG-6 treatment induced the activation of ERK (Figure 5). These findings also suggest that JSOG-6 might have potential in improving bone formation.
Bone formation is regulated by crosstalk between bone-forming osteoblasts and bone-resorbing osteoclasts. Unbalanced osteoclastogenesis causes bone loss in osteoporosis [41, 42]. M-CSF and RANKL are important cytokines that cause osteoclast precursors to differentiate into activated osteoclasts . The present study showed that JSOG-6 suppressed RANKL-induced differentiation of osteoclasts by down-regulating the protein expression of TRAF6 in BMCs (Figure 6). These in vitro findings were well correlated with the in vivo anti-osteoporotic effects of JSOG-6, and thus JSOG-6 might be applicable to the clinic for improving age-dependent bone destruction disease.
The present study provides evidence that JSOG-6 has a potential anti-osteoporotic activity both in vitro and in vivo. The underlying mechanisms of action of JSOG-6 are correlated with the induction of ALP activation in osteoblasts, the increase in calcified bone matrix, and the reduction of osteoclast formation. These data provide a pharmacological basis for the use of JSOG-6 as a potential therapeutic strategy for protecting against osteoporotic bone loss in clinic.
This work was supported by a grant from the JASENG Hospital of Korean Medicine (JS-2010-1).
- Alexander JM, Bab I, Fish S, Müller R, Uchiyama T, Gronowicz G, Nahounou M, Zhao Q, White DW, Chorev M, Gazit D, Rosenblatt M: Human parathyroid hormone 1–34 reverses bone loss in ovariectomized mice. J Bone Miner Res. 2001, 161: 665-673.Google Scholar
- Raisz LG: Pathogenesis of osteoporosis: concepts, conflicts, and prospects. J Clin Invest. 2005, 115: 3318-3325. 10.1172/JCI27071.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Takayanagi H: Inflammatory bone destruction and osteoimmunology. J Periodontal Res. 2005, 40: 287-293. 10.1111/j.1600-0765.2005.00814.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Papachroni KK, Karatzas DN, Papavassiliou KA, Basdra EK, Papavassiliou AG: Mechanotransduction in osteoblast regulation and bone disease. Trends Mol Med. 2009, 15: 208-216. 10.1016/j.molmed.2009.03.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Harada S, Rodan GA: Control of osteoblast function and regulation of bone mass. Nature. 2003, 15: 349-355.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Rahman MM, Bhattacharya A, Fernandes G: Conjugated linoleic acid inhibits osteoclast differentiation of RAW264.7 cells by modulating RANKL signaling. J Lipid Res. 2006, 47: 1739-1748. 10.1194/jlr.M600151-JLR200.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rodan GA, Martin TJ: Therapeutic approaches to bone diseases. Science. 2000, 289: 1508-1514. 10.1126/science.289.5484.1508.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Suda T, Takahashi N, Udagawa N, Jimi E, Gillespie MT, Martin TJ: Modulation of osteoclast differentiation and function by the new members of the tumor necrosis factor receptor and ligand families. Endocr Rev. 1999, 20: 345-357. 10.1210/edrv.20.3.0367.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Teitelbaum SL: Bone resorption by osteoclasts. Science. 2000, 289: 1504-1508. 10.1126/science.289.5484.1504.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Boyle WJ, Simonet WS, Lacey DL: Osteoclast differentiation and activation. Nature. 2003, 423: 337-342. 10.1038/nature01658.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Martin TJ: Historically significant events in the discovery of RANK/RANKL/OPG. World J Orthop. 2013, 4: 186-197. 10.5312/wjo.v4.i4.186.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Hadjidakis DJ, Androulakis II: Bone remodeling. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2006, 1092: 385-396. 10.1196/annals.1365.035.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Inaba K, Murata K, Naruto S, Matsuda H: Inhibitory effects of devil’s claw (secondary root of Harpagophytum procumbens) extract and harpagoside on cytokine production in mouse macrophages. J Nat Med. 2012, 64: 219-222.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Sanders M, Grundmann O: The use of glucosamine, devil’s claw (Harpagophytum procumbens), and acupuncture as complementary and alternative treatments for osteoarthritis. Altern Med Rev. 2011, 16: 228-238.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Fiebich BL, Muñoz E, Rose T, Weiss G, McGregor GP: Molecular targets of the antiinflammatory Harpagophytum procumbens (devil’s claw): inhibition of TNFα and COX-2 gene expression by preventing activation of AP-1. Phytother Res. 2012, 26: 806-811. 10.1002/ptr.3636.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chen LL, Lei LH, Ding PH, Tang Q, Wu YM: Osteogenic effect of Drynariae rhizoma extracts and Naringin on MC3T3-E1 cells and an induced rat alveolar bone resorption model. Arch Oral Biol. 2011, 56: 1655-1662. 10.1016/j.archoralbio.2011.06.008.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Anuja GI, Latha PG, Suja SR, Shyamal S, Shine VJ, Sini S, Pradeep S, Shikha P: Rajasekharan S. Anti-inflammatory and analgesic properties of Drynaria quercifolia (L.) J. Smith. J Ethnopharmacol. 2010, 11: 456-460.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Nukaya H, Yamashiro H, Fukazawa H, Ishida H, Tsuji K: Isolation of inhibitors of TPA-induced mouse ear edema from Hoelen, Poria cocos. Chem Pharm Bull. 1996, 44: 847-849. 10.1248/cpb.44.847.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Han Y, Jung HW, Lee JY, Kim JS, Kang SS, Kim YS, Park YK: 2,5-dihydroxyacetophenone isolated from Rehmanniae Radix Preparata inhibits inflammatory responses in lipopolysaccharide-stimulated RAW264.7 macrophages. J Med Food. 2012, 15: 505-510. 10.1089/jmf.2011.1940.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kim HR, Cui Y, Hong SJ, Shin SJ, Kim DS, Kim NM, So SH, Lee SK, Kim EC, Chae SW, Chae HJ: Effect of ginseng mixture on osteoporosis in ovariectomized rats. Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol. 2008, 30: 333-345. 10.1080/08923970801949125.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhang Y, Lai WP, Leung PC, Wu CF, Wong MS: Short- to mid-term effects of ovariectomy on bone turnover, bone mass and bone strength in rats. Biol Pharm Bull. 2007, 30: 898-903. 10.1248/bpb.30.898.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chen WF, Wong MS: Genistein modulates the effects of parathyroid hormone in human osteoblastic SaOS-2 cells. Br J Nutr. 2006, 95: 1039-1047. 10.1079/BJN20061735.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bhargavan B, Gautam AK, Singh D, Kumar A, Chaurasia S, Tyagi AM, Yadav DK, Mishra JS, Singh AB, Sanyal S, Goel A, Maurya R, Chattopadhyay N: Methoxylated isoflavones, cajanin and isoformononetin, have non-estrogenic bone forming effect via differential mitogen activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling. J Cell Biochem. 2009, 1: 388-399.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Takahashi N, Yamada H, Yosiki S, Roodman GD, Mundy GR, Jones SJ, Boyde A, Suda T: Osteoclast-like cell formation and its regulation by osteotropic hormones in mouse bone marrow cultures. Endocrinology. 1998, 122: 1373-1382.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Katagiri T, Yamaguchi A, Ikeda T, Yoshiki S, Wozney JM, Rosen V, Wang EA, Tanaka H, Omura S, Suda T: The non-osteogenic mouse pluripotent cell line, C3H10T1/2, is induced to differentiate into osteoblastic cells by recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1990, 172: 295-299. 10.1016/S0006-291X(05)80208-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yamaguchi A, Katagiri T, Ikeda T, Wozney JM, Rosen V, Wang EA, Kahn AJ, Suda T, Yoshiki S: Recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 stimulates osteoblastic maturation and inhibits myogenic differentiation in vitro. J Cell Biol. 1991, 113: 681-687. 10.1083/jcb.113.3.681.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hohenhaus MH, McGarry KA, Col NF: Hormone therapy for the prevention of bone loss in menopausal women with osteopenia: is it a viable option?. Drugs. 2007, 67: 2311-2321. 10.2165/00003495-200767160-00002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Levine JP: Effective strategies to identify postmenopausal women at risk for osteoporosis. Geriatrics. 2007, 62: 22-30.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Frolik CA, Bryant HU, Black EC, Magee DE, Chandrasekhar S: Time-dependent changes in biochemical bone markers and serum cholesterol in ovariectomized rats: effects of raloxifene HCl, tamoxifen, estrogen, and alendronate. Bone. 1996, 18: 621-627. 10.1016/8756-3282(96)00085-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sato M, Bryant HU, Iversen P, Helterbrand J, Smietana F, Bemis K, Higgs R, Turner CH, Owan I, Takano Y, Burr DB: Advantages of raloxifene over alendronate or estrogen on nonreproductive and reproductive tissues in the long-term dosing of ovariectomized rats. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1996, 279: 298-305.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Cano A, Dapía S, Noguera I, Pineda B, Hermenegildo C, del Val R, Caeiro JR, García-Pérez MA: Comparative effects of 17beta-estradiol, raloxifene and genistein on bone 3D microarchitecture and volumetric bone mineral density in the ovariectomized mice. Osteoporos Int. 2008, 19: 793-800. 10.1007/s00198-007-0498-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bahlous A, Kalai E, Hadj Salah M, Bouzid K, Zerelli L: Biochemical markers of bone remodeling: recent data of their applications in managing postmenopausal osteoporosis. Tunis Med. 2006, 84: 751-757.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Owen TA, Aronow MS, Barone LM, Bettencourt B, Stein GS, Lian JB: Pleiotropic effects of vitamin D on osteoblast gene expression are related to the proliferative and differentiated state of the bone cell phenotype: dependency upon basal levels of gene expression, duration of exposure, and bone matrix competency in normal rat osteoblast cultures. Endocrinology. 1991, 128: 1496-1504. 10.1210/endo-128-3-1496.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Stein GS, Lian JB: Molecular mechanisms mediating proliferation/differentiation interrelationships during progressive development of the osteoblast phenotype. Endocr Rev. 1993, 14: 424-442. 10.1210/edrv-14-4-424.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Suda K, Woo J-T, Takami M, Sexton PM, Nagai K: Lipopolysaccharide supports survival and fusion of preosteoclasts independent of TNF-α, IL-1, and RANKL. J Cell Physiol. 2002, 190: 101-108. 10.1002/jcp.10041.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yasuda H, Shima N, Nakagawa N, Mochizuki SI, Yano K, Fujise N, Sato Y, Goto M, Yamaguchi K, Kuriyama M, Kanno T, Murakami A, Tsuda E, Morinaga T, Higashio K: Identity of osteoclastogenesis inhibitory factor (OCIF) and osteoprotegerin (OPG): amechanism by which OPG/OCIF inhibits osteoclastogenesis in vitro. Endocrinology. 1998, 139: 1329-1337.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Teitelbaum SL: Osteoclasts, integrins, and osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Metab. 2000, 18: 344-349. 10.1007/s007740070007.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bord S, Ireland DC, Beavan SR, Compston JE: The effects of estrogen on osteoprotegerin, RANKL, and estrogen receptor expression in human osteoblasts. Bone. 2003, 32: 136-141. 10.1016/S8756-3282(02)00953-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hu Y, Chan E, Wang SX, Li B: Activation of p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase is equired for osteoblast differentiation. Endocrinology. 2003, 144: 2068-2074. 10.1210/en.2002-220863.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Jadlowiec J, Koch H, Zhang X, Campbell PG, Seyedain M, Sfeir C: Phosphophoryn regulates the gene expression and differentiation of NIH3T3, MC3T3-E1, and human mesenchymal stem cells via the integrin/MAPK signaling pathway. J Biol Chem. 2004, 17: 53323-53330.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Ross FP, Teitelbaum SL: Alphavbeta3 and macrophage colony-stimulating factor: partners in osteoclast biology. Immunol Rev. 2005, 208: 88-105. 10.1111/j.0105-2896.2005.00331.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Takayanagi H, Sato K, Takaoka A, Taniguchi T: Interplay between interferon and other cytokine systems in bone metabolism. Immunol Rev. 2005, 208: 181-193. 10.1111/j.0105-2896.2005.00337.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Khosla S: Minireview: the OPG/RANKL/RANK system. Endocrinology. 2001, 142: 5050-5055. 10.1210/endo.142.12.8536.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6882/14/184/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.