Skip to main content

Table 2 Overall quality of reporting rating using items from STRICTA (n = 15)

From: Quality of reporting on randomized controlled trials of acupuncture for stroke rehabilitation

Item

Criteria

Description

No. of positive trials

%

95% CI

Cohen’sк coefficient

95% CI

1

Acupuncture rationale

(1a) Style of acupuncture (e.g., Traditional Chinese Medicine, Japanese, Korean, Western medical, Five Element, ear acupuncture, etc.)

12

80

57 to 100

0.65

0.38 to 0.98

  

(1b) Reasoning for treatment provided, based on historical context, literature sources and/or consensus methods, with references where appropriate

12

80

57 to 100

0.78

0.60 to 1.00

  

(1c) Extent to which treatment was varied

10

67

40 to 94

0.72

0.48 to 0.95

2

Details of needling

(2a) Number of needle insertions per subject per session (mean and range where relevant)

10

67

40 to 94

0.75

0.60 to 0.99

  

(2b) Names (or location if no standard name) of points used (uni-/bilateral)

12

80

57 to 100

0.83

0.65 to 1.00

  

(2c) Depth of insertion, based on a specified unit of measurement or on a particular tissue level

8

53

25 to 82

0.92

0.81 to 1.00

  

(2d) Responses sought (e.g., de qi or muscle twitch response)

9

60

32 to 88

0.63

0.38 to 1.00

  

(2e) Needle stimulation (e.g., manual or electrical)

13

87

67 to 100

0.74

0.50 to 0.99

  

(2f) Needle retention time

14

93

79 to 100

0.78

0.62 to 1.00

  

(2 g)Needle type (diameter, length and manufacturer or material)

10

67

40 to 94

0.70

0.53 to 1.00

3

Treatment regimen

(3a) Number of treatment sessions

10

67

40 to 94

0.62

0.33 to 0.98

  

(3b) Frequency and duration of treatment sessions

10

67

40 to 94

0.69

0.43 to 1.00

4

Other components of treatment

(4a) Details of other interventions administered to the acupuncture group (e.g., moxibustion, cupping, herbs, exercises, lifestyle advice)

3

20

−3 to 43

0.85

0.68 to 0.99

  

(4b) Setting and context of treatment, including instructions to practitioners, and information and explanations to patients

5

33

6 to 60

0.64

0.35 to 0.98

5

Practitioner background

(5) Description of participating acupuncturists (qualification or professional affiliation, years in acupuncture practice, other relevant experience)

8

53

25 to 82

0.76

0.62 to 1.00

6

Control or comparator interventions

(6a) Rationale for the control or comparator in the context of the research question, with sources that justify the choice(s)

9

60

32 to 88

0.78

0.65 to 1.00

  

(6b) Precise description of the control or comparator. If sham acupuncture or any other type of acupuncture-like control is used, provide details as for items 1–3 above

9

60

32 to 88

0.73

0.56 to 1.00