Open Peer Review Reports for: Prevalence and factors associated with the use of alternative (folk) medicine practitioners in 8 countries of the former Soviet Union
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
| Original Submission | ||
|---|---|---|
| 22 Sep 2012 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
| 25 Sep 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Andrew Stickley |
| Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
| 25 Sep 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
| 15 Oct 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Samuel Brown |
| 22 Oct 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Barbara Stussman |
| 31 Oct 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Brian Hinote |
| 7 Nov 2012 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Audhild Lohre |
| 8 Dec 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Andrew Stickley |
| Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
| 8 Dec 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
| 8 Dec 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Andrew Stickley |
| Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
| 8 Dec 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
| 3 Jan 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Barbara Stussman |
| 14 Jan 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Brian Hinote |
| 27 Jan 2013 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Samuel Brown |
| 6 Mar 2013 | Author responded | Author comments - Andrew Stickley |
| Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
| 6 Mar 2013 | Submitted | Manuscript version 5 |
| Publishing | ||
| 19 Mar 2013 | Editorially accepted | |
| 11 Apr 2013 | Article published | 10.1186/1472-6882-13-83 |
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.
