Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Prevalence and factors associated with the use of alternative (folk) medicine practitioners in 8 countries of the former Soviet Union

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
22 Sep 2012 Submitted Original manuscript
25 Sep 2012 Author responded Author comments - Andrew Stickley
Resubmission - Version 2
25 Sep 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 2
15 Oct 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Samuel Brown
22 Oct 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Barbara Stussman
31 Oct 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Brian Hinote
7 Nov 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Audhild Lohre
8 Dec 2012 Author responded Author comments - Andrew Stickley
Resubmission - Version 3
8 Dec 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
8 Dec 2012 Author responded Author comments - Andrew Stickley
Resubmission - Version 4
8 Dec 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 4
3 Jan 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Barbara Stussman
14 Jan 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Brian Hinote
27 Jan 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Samuel Brown
6 Mar 2013 Author responded Author comments - Andrew Stickley
Resubmission - Version 5
6 Mar 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 5
Publishing
19 Mar 2013 Editorially accepted
11 Apr 2013 Article published 10.1186/1472-6882-13-83

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement