- Research article
- Open Access
- Open Peer Review
The effect of Lycium barbarum on spinal cord injury, particularly its relationship with M1 and M2 macrophage in rats
© Zhang et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
- Received: 7 August 2012
- Accepted: 25 February 2013
- Published: 22 March 2013
Our past researches suggested that L. barbarum exhibits direct neuroprotective and immune regulatory effects on the central nervous system, which are highly related to the events involved in the spinal cord injury, but not yet been investigated. Immune responses play an important role in the development of the pathology after secondary injury, particularly the M1 and M2 types of macrophage, on which special emphasis was laid in this study.
In our previous studies L. barbarum was administrated orally from 7 days before the injury to ensure a stabilized concentration in the blood. For clinical application, L. barbarum can only be administered after the injury. Therefore, both pre-injury and post-injury administration protocols were compared. In vivo and in vitro studies were conducted and analyzed immunohistochemically, including Western blotting.
The lesion size in the pre-treated group was much larger than that in the post-treated group. To explain this difference, we first studied the effect of L. barbarum on astrocytes, which forms the glial scar encircling the lesion. L. barbarum did not significantly affect the astrocytes. Then we studied the effect of L. barbarum on microglia/macrophages, particularly the M1 and M2 polarization. After spinal cord injury, the deleterious M1 cells dominant the early period, whereas the beneficial M2 cells dominate later. We found that in the pre-treated group L. barbarum significantly enhanced the expression of M1 cells and suppressed that of M2 cells, while in the post-treated group LBP markedly promoted the activity of M2 cells. This explained the difference between the pre- and post-treated groups.
Lycium barbarum has been wildly accepted to have beneficial effects in various central nervous system diseases. Our finding of deleterious effect of LBP administered at early period of spinal cord injury, indicates that its application should be avoided. The substantial beneficial effect of LBP when administered at later stage has an important impact for clinical application.
- L. barbarum
- Spinal cord injury
Spinal cord injury (SCI) has long been a focus of research, from both basic scientific and clinical therapeutic points of view [1, 2]. We have previous studied early neurosurgery after spinal cord contusion on 30 ASIA-A (complete paralytic) patients . All the patients had resumed certain degree of locomotion, the best results fell in a group of patients who were operated 4–14 days after SCI, in which 70% could walk with a pair of crutches or without any support. Immune response is one of the most important pathological events following SCI. Therefore, to further improve the clinical result, one of the crucial aspects is to investigate the changes and mechanism of immune responses after SCI. In SCI the immune response is a double edged sword [4–7], particularly the M1 and M2 types of macrophage . In general, M1 is detrimental, whereas M2 is protective [5, 7, 8].
Traditional Chinese medicines have many benefits. Lycium barbarum (also named Fructus Lycii or Wolfberry), an upper class Chinese medicine in Chinese pharmacopoeia, is believed to be beneficial to the eye, kidney and liver and anti-aging. Lycium barbarum polysaccharide (LBP), the main content of Lycium barbarum, was found to serve most beneficial functions of wolfberry [9, 10]. Our past researches suggested a direct neuroprotective effect on CNS of LBP, in models of Alzheimer's disease (Amyloid-β toxicity) [9–14], glutamate excitotoxicity , and Ocular hypertension [16–18], by down-regulation of c-Jun N-terminal signaling, RNA-dependent protein kinase phosphorylation, caspase-3 and caspase-2 activities, endoplasmic reticulum stress and up-regulation of Akt signaling or crystalline [11–13, 15, 17, 18]. In Ocular hypertension model, we found a correlation between microglial activation and protection of RGC by LBP [16, 17]. The immune regulation of LBP is also observed in mice and in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells [19–21]. It has been reported that LBP can be anti-oxidative [22–26].
The effects of LBP are highly related to SCI, but have not yet been studied. Its immune regulation and microglia/macrophage activation are particularly interesting, because of the importance of immune responses in SCI, especially the M1 and M2 types of macrophages. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of LBP in SCI and whether LBP could be a potential therapeutic medicine.
LBP was extracted as reported [16–18]. For animal experiments, the LBP was dissolved in warm double-distilled water, and fed through a nasogastric tube, 10 mg/kg, 2/day, throughout the experiment. For cell culture, 100 μg/ml of LBP was prepared and filtered through a 0.20 μm hole size microfilter (Dismic-25, Advantec, Stord, Norway).
Sixty male Sprague–Dawley (SD) rats (220 ~ 250 g), provided by the Animal Center of the Fourth Military Medical University, were maintained with temperature and light (12-h light/dark cycle) controlled. Food and water were provided ad libitum. Two plans of drug administration were designed. (1) In our previous studies, to ensure that the concentration of LBP in the blood had been stabilized at the time the insults happened, LBP was orally administered for 7 consecutive days in advance till the animals were sactificed. This was followed in the present study (LBP-pre group). (2) From clinical application of view, LBP can only be given after the injury. The administration of LBP started on the 7th day until the animals were sacrificed (LBP-aft group).
Animals were randomly divided into 6 groups. 1. LBP-pre group, 20 LBP treated and 20 vehicle control, with similar sub-grouping at 7 d and 14 d (n = 10, 6 for immunohistochemistry, 4 for western blotting). 2. LBP-aft group (14 d), 10 LBP treated and 10 vehicle control. In each of them, 6 rats for immunohistochemistry and 4 for western blotting.
The animal experiments were approved by the Animal Care Committee of the Fourth Military Medical University.
In vitro study
The primary astrocytes were isolated and purified from whole brain of newborn SD rat. Briefly, the brain was cut into small pieces and trypsinized to separate the cells, which were then cultured in 75 cm2 tissue culture flasks with DMEM medium containing 10% FBS, 100 μmol/L non-essential amino acids, 5 μg/ml insulin, 100 U/mL penicillin and 100 μg/mL streptomycin. When the cultured cells got confluent (7–10 d), the flask was shaken overnight (200 rpm at 37°C) to detach the microglia and oligodendrocytes. The remained cells were cultured 3 passages to purify the astrocytes. The purity of the primary astrocytes was determined by immunocytochemistry. Over 95% of the cells were GFAP immunoreactive. The primary astrocytes were seeded in identical density onto 10 mm circular slides in 24-well plate for immunocytochemistry, or directly into 6-well plate for western blotting, TNFα (20 ng/ml, Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA), IFNγ (20 ng/ml, Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA), LPS (200 ng/ml, Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) had been reported to induce astrocyte activation in vitro [29–32]. After incubating for 2 days with LBP, TNFα + IFNγ + LPS or TNFα + IFNγ + LPS + LBP, the level of GFAP expression was assessed. The incubation medium served as the negative control.
The murine N9 microglial cells, originally developed by P. Ricciardi-Castagnoli  were maintained in DMEM with 5% FCS. In experiment, cells were seeded in 6-well plate in an identical density. LPS (200 ng/ml) + IFNγ (20 ng/ml) and IL-4 (20 ng/ml, Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) were reported to induce M1 and M2 polarization of macrophages, respectively [5–7, 34].
Tazlaff’s spinal cord lateral compression model  was followed. Briefly, a thin metal plate was attached onto the inner side of one blade of the forceps to leave 0.5 mm between the tips of the forceps when fully closed. The rats were anesthetized with 1% sodium pentobarbital (50 mg/kg) i.p. A 3~4 cm dorsal midline incision, centering at T8 vertebral spine, was made, followed by bilateral laminectomy of T8 vertebra to expose the spinal cord. The blades of the forceps were lowered along the lateral sides of the spinal cord till the vertebral canal was reached. The spinal cord was compressed in 8–10 seconds and remained in place for 20 seconds before the blades were let loose in 8–10 seconds and the forceps withdrawn. The skin incision was then closed. Manual evacuation of urinary bladder was performed twice daily until normal micturition resumed.
The rats were sacrificed by an overdose of sodium pentobarbital (100 mg/kg) and perfused intra-cardially with 100 ml of warm normal saline followed by 400 ml 4% cold paraformaldehyde in phosphate buffer (pH 7.4). Following perfusion, a 2 cm spinal cord segment, with the injured site at the middle, was removed and put into 25% sucrose in phosphate buffer at 4°C until it sank. Serial 14 μm frozen sagittal sections were cut on a cryostat, and mounted on slides in 5 sets.
The immunostaining was conducted at room temperature. The tissue sections or cell culture slides were rinsed with 0.01 M PBS and then blocked with 1% BSA (Sigma) in PBS containing 0.5% Triton X-100 for 30 min. The sections were then incubated with primary antibody over night. After rinsed with PBS, the sections were incubated with the fluorescent second antibody for 2 h. Antibodies against markers of astrocyte (anti-GFAP, rabbit polyclonal, Dako Cytomaton, Denmark A/S, 1:5000, or), rat lysosomal membrane marker (anti-ED1, mouse monoclonal, Serotec, Raleigh, NC, USA; 1:400), iNOS (rabbit polyclonal, Cambridge, MA, USA, 1:50) and Arginase1 (goat polyclonal, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, California, USA,1:200) were used. The corresponding fluorescent secondary antibodies were purchased from Molecular Probes, Oregon, USA. Omission of the primary antibody served as the negative control. The sections were observed under Olympus BX-51 microscopy or FV1000 laser scanning confocal microscopy.
Tissue section selection
The most important pathological changes after SCI occur in the main mass of the gray matter. In the central region of the spinal cord, there is only a narrow gray commissure, but there are many branches of blood vessels in the ventral fissure. The bleeding following crushing can be rather profuse and the extent of the blood squeezing along the dorsal funiclus is unpredictable, adding in a factor of individual variation of the data, thereby interferes the statistic analysis. In our pilot experiment, we succeeded in solving the problem by omitting the central sagittal sections and selected sections 200 to 600 μm from the central canal, where the main body of the gray matter was located. We followed this protocol in the present study.
Microphotography for cultured cell
The primary astrocytes were cultured on 10 mm circular slide slides. By rotating 60°, 6 fields of each slide centering at the point 0.25 cm to the slide edge were micro-photographed under a 40 × objective.
Measurement of lesion area
The lesion areas in the 7 d and 14 d groups were outlined along the inner edge of the GFAP strongly positive astrocytes. The areas were measured in photoshop CS3.
Fluorescence intensity quantification
All the microphotos of an experiment group were taken with identical setting and the fluorescence intensity was measured.
For tissue sections, the integrated optical density (IOD) and area of the chosen region (AREA) were measured by Image-Pro Plus 6.0 and immunostaining intensity was expressed as IOD/AREA.
For primary astrocyte, the IOD and area of the whole picture (AREA) were measured, and the immunostaining intensity was calculated as above.
In sections triple-stained with GFAP, ED1 and iNOS or Arg1, cell counting was performed in the area within 1 mm rostral or caudal to the lesion edge. On each side (rostral or caudal) in each section, ED1+iNOS+ or ED1+iNOS+ cells were counted in areas of 250 × 250 μm. Due to the irregularity of the distal edge, at least three squares could be chosen at random. The cell counts were normalized to mm2 cord section.
For protein samples from the spinal cord, a 0.5 mm segment of the spinal cord, centering at the injury site, was dissected out from the sacrificed animal. The cord was placed in cold lysis buffer and homogenized on ice using a tissue homogenizer (Tissue Tearor 985370, Biospec Products, Bartlesville OK, USA). The samples were centrifuged (12000 RMP) 4°C for 5 min. Afterwards, the supernatants were flashly frozen and stored at −80°C until used.
For cultured microglia or astrocyte, 200 μL cold lysis buffer was added into the well of 6-well plate for harvesting. The samples were homogenized with a 200 ml transferpettor, and then treated as described above.
The samples were boiled for 5 min in strong denaturing conditions, loaded on SDS-polyacrylamide gels, and transblotted onto polyvinylidene difluoride membranes (Millipore Corporation, Bedford, MA). The blots were blocked with 1% defatted milk for 1 h at room temperature and incubated overnight at 4°C with the following antibodies: anti-GFAP (rabbit polyclonal, Anbo, San Francisco, C.A., USA, 1:800), anti-ED1 (mouse monoclonal, Serotec, Raleigh, NC, USA, 1:400), anti-iNOS (rabbit polyclonal, Cambridge, MA, USA, 1:500), anti-Arginase1 (goat polyclonal, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, California, USA,1:1000). After incubation with an HRP-conjugated secondary antibody, the samples were subjected to enhanced chemiluminescence and densitometric analysis. Band densitometric analysis was performed in Image-Pro Plus 6.0.
The mean value of selected sections in each rat or selected images on each slide was calculated for statistic analysis. Each in vitro experiment was repeated 3 independent times at least. For western blotting results, change of abundancy of protein was calculated by measuring IOD of a protein divided by IOD of the corresponding β-actin. All data was analyzed using SPSS 12.0. Unpaired student's t-test was used to compare each treated samples with the corresponding controls, and Correlation regression for correlation analysis. Statistic results were shown as mean ± standard error. P values less than 0.05 (p < 0.05) was taken as significant.
Effect of LBP on lesion area
Effect of LBP on astrocyte
In vivo study
At 7 d and 14 d after SCI, the GFAP immunofluorescence intensity of the astrocytes in the area 0.5 mm rostral and caudal to the lesion edge, where most of the reactive astrocytes in the gray matter were located, was evaluated. There was no significant difference between the LBP-pre, LBP-aft groups, and their respective vehicles, indicating that LBP does not have influence on astrocytes in SCI (Figure 1A-F and, H).
In vitro study
Given the complexity of in vivo environment that may counteract the deleterious effect on astrocytes, e.g. M2 macrophage, we conducted in vitro study to verify it.
Both the in vivo and in vitro studies demonstrated that LBP has no effect on astrocytes. We then thought, if the difference could be due to their effect on microglia/macrophage.
Effect of LBP on microglia/macrophage
Changes of ED1
Thus, both the Western blotting and immunohistochemical studies suggested that even the lesion size was highly correlated with the increase in ED1 immunoreacivity, it was not the result of LBP administration. We then turn to investigate whether it was their effect on M1 and M2 cells that makes the difference.
Effect of LBP on M1 and M2
In vivo study
In vitro study
The N9 microglial cell line was used. Various M1 activators, LPS + IFNγ, and M2 activator, IL-4, were applied. iNOS and Arg1 were used as M1 and M2 markers, respectively, the results were evaluated with Western blotting.
To investigate the difference between the LBP-pre and LBP-aft groups, two experiments were designed. For LBP-pre, the N9 cells were incubated with LBP on the first one day and LBP plus LPS + IFNγ + IL-4 on the next day. Omission of LBP served as the control. For LBP-aft, the N9 cells were treated with LPS + IFNγ + IL-4 on the first day and on the next day the cells were treated with LBP plus LPS + IFNγ + IL-4 or the control LPS + IFNγ + IL-4.
The lesion size in the LBP-pre group was larger than that in the LBP-aft group came as a surprise to us and we had to face the challenge of finding out the explanation.
Since the astrocytic scar is important in limiting the lesion size [36–38], we first examined the effect of LBP on astrocytes. The result of our in vitro study demonstrated that LBP had no effect on astrocytes. We then turn to study the effects of the LBP-pre and LBP-aft groups on microglia/macrophage. Our ED1 immunohistochemical study showed that, though the immunointensity was highly correlated with the lesion size, the enhanced immunointensity was not the result of LBP administration. There are reports demonstrating that after SCI the macrophages response actively and play an important role in the development of secondary injury [5–7]. Furthermore, M1 produces high level of oxidized metabolic substances, such as NO, superoxides, pro-inflammatory factors, IL-12, IL-1β, IL-15, IL-18, TNF-α, CCL15, and CCL20. Furthermore, its expression of chondroitin sulphate proteoglycan is 17 times higher than that on M2 cells. On the contrary, M2 secretes anti-inflammatory factor IL-10 and TGF-β. In addition, they can secrete various neurotrophines, like NGF, BDNF, NT-3 and neurotrophic factors, including CNTF, IGF, EGF, PDGF, GDNF [39, 40]. M1 can inhibit neurite outgrowth of dorsal root ganglion, while M2 has the opposite effects. In vitro evidence shows that M1 macrophage can directly induce neuronal death [41–43]. We then, therefore, focused on the changes in M1 and M2 macrophages. Our data showed that M1 dominated right after the insult and gradually sifted to M2 dominance. LBP treatment before the injury enhances M1 and suppresses M2, whereas LBP administered 7 days after the injury increased the number of M2 cells.
Lycium barbarum has been wildly accepted to have beneficial effects in various central nervous system illness. Our finding of deleterious effect of LBP administered at early period of spinal cord injury, so that its application should be avoided, and the substantial beneficial effect of LBP when administered at later stage has an important impact for clinical application.
Our previous studies have demonstrated that LBP has many beneficial effects in the central nervous system, including retina. But its effect had never been studied in spinal cord injury. The present study found that major effect of LBP in spinal cord injury is via its action on M1 and M2 types of macrophages. It is well known that M1 macrophages is deleterious, which dominate the first period of spinal cord injury and gradually shift to M2 dominance, which is benificial. Administration of LBP at the beginning of the injury enhances M1 and suppresses M2, whereas administration of LBP from 7th day on after injury has significant beneficial effect in reducing the secondary injury. This finding is an important issue that is valuable for its translation to clinical application.
This study was supported by Department of health of the General Department of Logistics of PLA, Grant CWS11J054.We are grateful to Dr. Fang Kuang for their valuable suggestions. We appreciate the technical assistance by Miss Fang-fang Liu.
- Kalb RG, Strimatter SM: Neurobiology of Spinal Cord Injury. 2000, Totowa, New Jersey: Humana PressView ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Kordower JH, Tuszynski MH: Basic science and Clinical Advances. 2008, New York: AcademicGoogle Scholar
- Zhu H, Feng YP, Young W, You SW, Shen XF, Liu YS, Ju G: Early neurosurgical intervention of spinal cord contusion: an analysis of 30 cases. Chin Med J (Engl). 2008, 121: 2473-2478.Google Scholar
- Trivedi A, Olivas AD, Noble-Haeusslein LJ: Inflammation and spinal cord injury: infiltrating leukocytes as determinants of injury and repair processes. Clin Neurosci Res. 2006, 6: 283-292. 10.1016/j.cnr.2006.09.007.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- David S, Kroner A: Repertoire of microglial and macrophage responses after spinal cord injury. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2011, 12: 388-399. 10.1038/nrn3053.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Walter L, Neumann H: Role of microglia in neuronal degeneration and regeneration. Semin Immunopathol. 2009, 31: 513-525. 10.1007/s00281-009-0180-5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Loane DJ, Byrnes KR: Role of microglia in neurotrauma. Neurotherapeutics. 2010, 7: 366-377. 10.1016/j.nurt.2010.07.002.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Kigerl KA, Gensel JC, Ankeny DP, Alexander JK, Donnelly DJ, Popovich PG: Identification of two distinct macrophage subsets with divergent effects causing either neurotoxicity or regeneration in the injured mouse spinal cord. J Neurosci. 2009, 29: 13435-13444. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3257-09.2009.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Ho YS, So KF, Chang RC: Anti-aging herbal medicine–how and why can they be used in aging-associated neurodegenerative diseases?. Ageing Res Rev. 2010, 9: 354-362. 10.1016/j.arr.2009.10.001.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chang RC, So KF: Use of anti-aging herbal medicine, Lycium barbarum, against aging-associated diseases. What do we know so far?. Cell Mol Neurobiol. 2008, 28: 643-652. 10.1007/s10571-007-9181-x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yu MS, Lai CS, Ho YS, Zee SY, So KF, Yuen WH, Chang RC: Characterization of the effects of anti-aging medicine Fructus lycii on beta-amyloid peptide neurotoxicity. Int J Mol Med. 2007, 20: 261-268.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ho YS, Yu MS, Lai CS, So KF, Yuen WH, Chang RC: Characterizing the neuroprotective effects of alkaline extract of Lycium barbarum on beta-amyloid peptide neurotoxicity. Brain Res. 2007, 1158: 123-134.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Yu MS, Ho YS, So KF, Yuen WH, Chang RC: Cytoprotective effects of Lycium barbarum against reducing stress on endoplasmic reticulum. Int J Mol Med. 2006, 17: 1157-1161.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Huang X, Yang M, Wu X, Yan J: Study on protective action of lycium barbarum polysaccharides on DNA imparments of testicle cells in mice. Wei Sheng Yan Jiu. 2003, 32: 599-601.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Ho YS, Yu MS, Yik SY SOKF, Yuen WH, Chang RC: Polysaccharides from wolfberry antagonizes glutamate excitotoxicity in rat cortical neurons. Cell Mol Neurobiol. 2009, 29: 1233-1244. 10.1007/s10571-009-9419-x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chiu K, Chan HC, Yeung SC, Yuen WH, Zee SY, Chang RC, SO KF: Modulation of microglia by Wolfberry on the survival of retinal ganglion cells in a rat ocular hypertension model. J Ocul Biol Dis Infor. 2009, 2: 47-56. 10.1007/s12177-009-9023-9.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Chan HC, Chang RC, Koon-Ching IA, Chiu K, Yuen WH, Zee SY, SO KF: Neuroprotective effects of Lycium barbarum Lynn on protecting retinal ganglion cells in an ocular hypertension model of glaucoma. Exp Neurol. 2007, 203: 269-273. 10.1016/j.expneurol.2006.05.031.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chiu K, Zhou Y, Yeung SC, Lok CK, Chan OO, Chang RC, SO KF, Chiu JF: Up-regulation of crystallins is involved in the neuroprotective effect of wolfberry on survival of retinal ganglion cells in rat ocular hypertension model. J Cell Biochem. 2010, 110: 311-320.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gan L, Zhang SH, Liu Q, Xu HB: A polysaccharide-protein complex from Lycium barbarum upregulates cytokine expression in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Eur J Pharmacol. 2003, 471: 217-222. 10.1016/S0014-2999(03)01827-2.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gan L, Hua ZS, Liang YX, Bi XH: Immunomodulation and antitumor activity by a polysaccharide-protein complex from Lycium barbarum. Int Immunopharmacol. 2004, 4: 563-569. 10.1016/j.intimp.2004.01.023.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zhu J, Zhao LH, Zhao XP, Chen Z: Lycium barbarum polysaccharides regulate phenotypic and functional maturation of murine dendritic cells. Cell Biol Int. 2007, 31: 615-619. 10.1016/j.cellbi.2006.12.002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Li XM, Ma YL, Liu XJ: Effect of the Lycium barbarum polysaccharides on age-related oxidative stress in aged mice. J Ethnopharmacol. 2007, 111: 504-511. 10.1016/j.jep.2006.12.024.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Niu AJ, Wu JM, Yu DH, Wang R: Protective effect of Lycium barbarum polysaccharides on oxidative damage in skeletal muscle of exhaustive exercise rats. Int J Biol Macromol. 2008, 42: 447-449. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2008.02.003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Tulsky JA: Ancient wisdom for modern medicine. The tradition of Judaism. N C Med J. 2000, 61: 141-144.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Li XM: Protective effect of Lycium barbarum polysaccharides on streptozotocin-induced oxidative stress in rats. Int J Biol Macromol. 2007, 40: 461-465. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2006.11.002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Xin YF, Wan LL, Peng JL, Guo C: Alleviation of the acute doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity by Lycium barbarum polysaccharides through the suppression of oxidative stress. Food Chem Toxicol. 2011, 49: 259-264. 10.1016/j.fct.2010.10.028.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Bodrato N, Franco L, Fresia C, Guida L, Usai C, Salis A, Moreschi I, Ferraris C, Verderio C, Basile G: Abscisic acid activates the murine microglial cell line N9 through the second messenger cyclic ADP-ribose. J Biol Chem. 2009, 284: 14777-14787. 10.1074/jbc.M802604200.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Lu X, Ma L, Ruan L, Kong Y, Mou H, Zhang Z, Wang Z, Wang JM, Le Y: Resveratrol differentially modulates inflammatory responses of microglia and astrocytes. J Neuroinflammation. 2010, 7: 46-10.1186/1742-2094-7-46.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Wu VW, Nishiyama N, Schwartz JP: A culture model of reactive astrocytes: increased nerve growth factor synthesis and reexpression of cytokine responsiveness. J Neurochem. 1998, 71: 749-756.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sofroniew MV: Molecular dissection of reactive astrogliosis and glial scar formation. Trends Neurosci. 2009, 32: 638-647. 10.1016/j.tins.2009.08.002.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Voskuhl RR, Peterson RS, Song B, Ao Y, Morales LB, Tiwari-Woodruff S, Sofroniew MV: Reactive astrocytes form scar-like perivascular barriers to leukocytes during adaptive immune inflammation of the CNS. J Neurosci. 2009, 29: 11511-11522. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1514-09.2009.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Bechmann I, Lossau S, Steiner B, Mor G, Gimsa U, Nitsch R: Reactive astrocytes upregulate Fas (CD95) and Fas ligand (CD95L) expression but do not undergo programmed cell death during the course of anterograde degeneration. Glia. 2000, 32: 25-41. 10.1002/1098-1136(200010)32:1<25::AID-GLIA30>3.0.CO;2-Y.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Corradin SB, Mauel J, Donini SD, Quattrocchi E, Ricciardi-Castagnoli P: Inducible nitric oxide synthase activity of cloned murine microglial cells. Glia. 1993, 7: 255-262. 10.1002/glia.440070309.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Roitbak T, Sykova E: Diffusion barriers evoked in the rat cortex by reactive astrogliosis. Glia. 1999, 28: 40-48. 10.1002/(SICI)1098-1136(199910)28:1<40::AID-GLIA5>3.0.CO;2-6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Plemel JR, Duncan G, Chen KW, Shannon C, Park S, Sparling JS, Tetzlaff W: A graded forceps crush spinal cord injury model in mice. J Neurotrauma. 2008, 25: 350-370. 10.1089/neu.2007.0426.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Eng LF, Ghirnikar RS: GFAP and astrogliosis. Brain Pathol. 1994, 4: 229-237. 10.1111/j.1750-3639.1994.tb00838.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rolls A, Shechter R, Schwartz M: The bright side of the glial scar in CNS repair. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009, 10: 235-241.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Reier PJ, Houle JD: The glial scar: its bearing on axonal elongation and transplantation approaches to CNS repair. Adv Neurol. 1988, 47: 87-138.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mantovani A, Sica A, Sozzani S, Allavena P, Vecchi A, Locati M: The chemokine system in diverse forms of macrophage activation and polarization. Trends Immunol. 2004, 25: 677-686. 10.1016/j.it.2004.09.015.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Martinez FO, Sica A, Mantovani A, Locati M: Macrophage activation and polarization. Front Biosci. 2008, 13: 453-461. 10.2741/2692.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Chan CC: Inflammation: beneficial or detrimental after spinal cord injury?. Recent Pat CNS Drug Discov. 2008, 3: 189-199. 10.2174/157488908786242434.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Gensel JC, Nakamura S, Guan Z, van Rooijen N, Ankeny DP, Popovich PG: Macrophages promote axon regeneration with concurrent neurotoxicity. J Neurosci. 2009, 29: 3956-3968. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3992-08.2009.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Murray PJ, Wynn TA: Protective and pathogenic functions of macrophage subsets. Nat Rev Immunol. 2011, 11: 723-737. 10.1038/nri3073.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6882/13/67/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.