This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
A survey of Canadian regulated complementary and alternative medicine schools about research, evidence-based health care and interprofessional training, as well as continuing education
© Toupin April and Gaboury; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013
Received: 3 April 2013
Accepted: 18 December 2013
Published: 28 December 2013
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com.
|3 Apr 2013||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|3 May 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - William Elder|
|6 Sep 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Martina Kadmon|
|1 Nov 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Karine Toupin April|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|1 Nov 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|13 Dec 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Martina Kadmon|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|18 Dec 2013||Editorially accepted|
|28 Dec 2013||Article published||10.1186/1472-6882-13-374|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.