Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: “Until the trial is complete you can’t really say whether it helped you or not, can you?”: exploring cancer patients’ perceptions of taking part in a trial of acupressure wristbands

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
20 Mar 2013 Submitted Original manuscript
17 Apr 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Joseph Roscoe
20 Apr 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Andrew Long
22 Apr 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Felicity Bishop
24 Apr 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Johanna Hok
24 Jun 2013 Author responded Author comments - John Hughes
Resubmission - Version 2
24 Jun 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 2
7 Aug 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Felicity Bishop
8 Aug 2013 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Johanna Hok
9 Sep 2013 Author responded Author comments - John Hughes
Resubmission - Version 3
9 Sep 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 3
25 Sep 2013 Author responded Author comments - John Hughes
Resubmission - Version 4
25 Sep 2013 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Publishing
26 Sep 2013 Editorially accepted
8 Oct 2013 Article published 10.1186/1472-6882-13-260

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement