Patients’ preconceptions of acupuncture: a qualitative study exploring the decisions patients make when seeking acupuncture
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|16 Oct 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|29 Nov 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Marie Polley|
|4 Dec 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Karen Willis|
|7 Dec 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Caragh Brosnan|
|1 Feb 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Felicity Bishop|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|1 Feb 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|17 Feb 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Karen Willis|
|25 Feb 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Caragh Brosnan|
|28 Mar 2013||Author responded||Author comments - Felicity Bishop|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|28 Mar 2013||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|14 Apr 2013||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Caragh Brosnan|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|9 May 2013||Editorially accepted|
|13 May 2013||Article published||10.1186/1472-6882-13-102|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting email@example.com.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.