Skip to main content

Advertisement

Table 3 Differences between conventional GPs and Homeopaths in requirements for preferred educational media

From: Usage and appraisal of educational media by homeopathic therapists – A cross sectional survey

 How important do you rate the following requirements in medical information media? 
   Unimportant Less important Very important Chi-Square p-value
Fast GP 13 (5.2%) 91 (36.4%) 146 (58.4%) 12.759 0.0017
  Hom 13 (12.9%) 48 (47.5%) 40 (39.6%)   
Reliable / scientific GP 0 23 (9.1%) 229 (90.9%) 13.453 < 0.001
  Hom 3 (2.9%) 19 (18.1%) 83 (79.0%)   
Concise GP 0 71 (28.2%) 181 (71.8%) 33.591 < 0.001
  Hom 6 (5.9%) 51 (50.0%) 45 (44.1%)   
Relevant to practice GP 0 17 (6.7%) 236 (93.3%) 21.889 < 0.001
  Hom 5 (4.7%) 18 (17.0% 83 (78.3%)   
With graphical material GP 59 (23.2%) 151 (59.4%) 44 (17.3%) 0.375 0.829
  Hom 23 (22.8%) 63 (62.4%) 15 (14.9%)   
German language GP 25 (9.9%) 125 (49.4%) 103 (40.7%) 8.48 0.014
  Hom 21 (19.8) 39 (36.8%) 46 (43.4%)   
Interactive GP 79 (31.1%) 137 (53.9%) 38 (15%) 0.321 0.852
  Hom 29 (28.4%) 56 (54.9%) 17 (16.7%)   
User friendly GP 8 (3.2%) 72 (28.7%) 171 (68.1%) 0.56 0.756
  Hom 4 (3.9%) 33 (32.0%) 66 (64.1%)   
Cost-effective GP 30 (12%) 130 (51.8%) 91 (36.3%) 10.76 0.005
  Hom 9 (9.4%) 68 (70.8%) 19 (19.8%