This article has Open Peer Review reports available.
Rhodiola rosea for physical and mental fatigue: a systematic review
© Ishaque et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012
Received: 12 August 2011
Accepted: 10 April 2012
Published: 29 May 2012
Open Peer Review reports
Pre-publication versions of this article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
|12 Aug 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|31 Aug 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Malinee Laopaiboon|
|22 Oct 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Myeong Soo Lee|
|28 Feb 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Sunita Vohra|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|28 Feb 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|8 Mar 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Myeong Soo Lee|
|13 Mar 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Malinee Laopaiboon|
|27 Mar 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Sunita Vohra|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|27 Mar 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|10 Apr 2012||Editorially accepted|
|29 May 2012||Article published||10.1186/1472-6882-12-70|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article and author comments to reviewers are available by contacting email@example.com. All previous versions of the manuscript and all author responses to the reviewers are also available.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.