Skip to main content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Consumers' experiences and values in conventional and alternative medicine paradigms: a problem detection study (PDS)

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
20 Oct 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
21 Nov 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Heather Boon
22 Nov 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jo-Anne Rayner
2 Dec 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Aslak Steinsbekk
12 Jan 2012 Author responded Author comments - Susan Tett
Resubmission - Version 2
12 Jan 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 2
12 Jan 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Aslak Steinsbekk
23 Jan 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Heather Boon
31 Jan 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Jo-Anne Rayner
20 Feb 2012 Author responded Author comments - Susan Tett
Resubmission - Version 3
20 Feb 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 3
Publishing
10 Apr 2012 Editorially accepted
10 Apr 2012 Article published 10.1186/1472-6882-12-39

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement