Skip to content

Advertisement

Open Peer Review Reports for: Evaluation of a multi-herb supplement for erectile dysfunction: a randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled study

Back to article

Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

Original Submission
4 Aug 2011 Submitted Original manuscript
Resubmission - Version 2
Submitted Manuscript version 2
7 Nov 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - mario de siati
12 Dec 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Leonardo Reis
Resubmission - Version 3
Submitted Manuscript version 3
15 Dec 2011 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Douglas Curran-Everett
15 Mar 2012 Author responded Author comments - Navneet Sonawane
Resubmission - Version 4
15 Mar 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 4
Resubmission - Version 5
Submitted Manuscript version 5
25 Jun 2012 Reviewed Reviewer Report - Leonardo Reis
4 Aug 2012 Author responded Author comments - Navneet Sonawane
Resubmission - Version 6
4 Aug 2012 Submitted Manuscript version 6
Publishing
16 Aug 2012 Editorially accepted
15 Sep 2012 Article published 10.1186/1472-6882-12-155

How does Open Peer Review work?

Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting info@biomedcentral.com.

You can find further information about the peer review system here.

Advertisement