Evaluation of a multi-herb supplement for erectile dysfunction: a randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled study
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|4 Aug 2011||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|7 Nov 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - mario de siati|
|12 Dec 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Leonardo Reis|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|15 Dec 2011||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Douglas Curran-Everett|
|15 Mar 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Navneet Sonawane|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|15 Mar 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|Resubmission - Version 5|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 5|
|25 Jun 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Leonardo Reis|
|4 Aug 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Navneet Sonawane|
|Resubmission - Version 6|
|4 Aug 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 6|
|16 Aug 2012||Editorially accepted|
|15 Sep 2012||Article published||10.1186/1472-6882-12-155|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.