The Red flag! risk assessment among medical homeopaths in Norway: a qualitative study
Pre-publication versions of this article are available by contacting email@example.com.
|13 Mar 2012||Submitted||Original manuscript|
|Resubmission - Version 2|
|Submitted||Manuscript version 2|
|3 Apr 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Caroline Eyles|
|10 May 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Edzard Ernst|
|12 Jun 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Heather Boon|
|17 Jul 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Trine Stub|
|Resubmission - Version 3|
|17 Jul 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 3|
|18 Jul 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Caroline Eyles|
|26 Jul 2012||Reviewed||Reviewer Report - Heather Boon|
|21 Aug 2012||Author responded||Author comments - Trine Stub|
|Resubmission - Version 4|
|21 Aug 2012||Submitted||Manuscript version 4|
|8 Sep 2012||Editorially accepted|
|11 Sep 2012||Article published||10.1186/1472-6882-12-150|
How does Open Peer Review work?
Open peer review is a system where authors know who the reviewers are, and the reviewers know who the authors are. If the manuscript is accepted, the named reviewer reports are published alongside the article. Pre-publication versions of the article are available by contacting firstname.lastname@example.org.
You can find further information about the peer review system here.