- Research article
- Open Access
- Open Peer Review
Understanding, perceptions and self-use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) among Malaysian pharmacy students
- Syed S Hasan†1Email author,
- Chew S Yong†2,
- Muneer G Babar†2,
- Cho M Naing†2,
- Abdul Hameed3,
- Mirza R Baig4,
- Shahid M Iqbal2 and
- Therese Kairuz1
© Hasan et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2011
- Received: 14 April 2011
- Accepted: 13 October 2011
- Published: 13 October 2011
In recent times the basic understanding, perceptions and CAM use among undergraduate health sciences students have become a topic of interest. This study was aimed to investigate the understanding, perceptions and self-use of CAM among pharmacy students in Malaysia.
This cross-sectional study was conducted on 500 systematically sampled pharmacy students from two private and one public university. A validated, self-administered questionnaire comprised of seven sections was used to gather the data. A systematic sampling was applied to recruit the students. Both descriptive and inferential statistics were applied using SPSS® version 18.
Overall, the students tend to disagree that complementary therapies (CM) are a threat to public health (mean score = 3.6) and agreed that CMs include ideas and methods from which conventional medicine could benefit (mean score = 4.7). More than half (57.8%) of the participants were currently using CAM while 77.6% had used it previously. Among the current CAM modalities used by the students, CM (21.9%) was found to be the most frequently used CAM followed by Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM) (21%). Most of the students (74.8%) believed that lack of scientific evidence is one of the most important barriers obstructing them to use CAM. More than half of the students perceived TCM (62.8%) and music therapy (53.8%) to be effective. Majority of them (69.3%) asserted that CAM knowledge is necessary to be a well-rounded professional.
This study reveals a high-percentage of pharmacy students who were using or had previously used at least one type of CAM. Students of higher professional years tend to agree that CMs include ideas and methods from which conventional medicine could benefit.
- Traditional Chinese Medicine
- Complementary Medicine
- Conventional Medicine
- Pharmacy Student
- Traditional Indian Medicine
National Center of Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NCCAM) defined complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) as a group of diverse medical and health care systems, practices, and products that are not presently considered to be part of conventional medicine . Due to the increasing demand from the public for more information regarding CAM, the understanding, perceptions and self-use of CAM among undergraduate health sciences students have become a topic of interest. This creates a challenge for the training of future pharmacists in order to gain adequate knowledge to recommend and counsel on CAM. Deeper understanding and acceptable perceptions about CAM among pharmacy students will be fundamental in developing a professional image as providers and advisors on conventional medicines and CAM.
In Malaysia, non-conventional medicines are usually referred to as Traditional and Complementary Medicine (T&CM) and are classified into six main types, namely Traditional Malay Medicine (TMM), Traditional Chinese Medicine (TCM), Traditional Indian Medicine (TIM), Complementary Medicine (CM), Homeopathy and, recently included, Islamic Medical Practice (IMP) [2, 3]. In the year 2001, the Malaysian government established National Policy on T&CM with the vision of integrating the use of these non-conventional medicines into the Malaysian healthcare system. The aim of the policy was to ensure quality and safe use of T&CM practices and products to attain optimal potential in healthcare delivery .
In view of the recent upsurge of interest in CAM, a number of studies about the understanding, perceptions and self-use of CAM amongst students undertaking healthcare professional courses have been conducted in different countries [5–10]. However, limited data on CAM has been published related to CAM use in Malaysia, and although legislation about T&CM has been introduced, formal incorporation of CAM into healthcare curricula has yet to be established. Most of the studies involved medical students and to a lesser extent, pharmacy students. Among the studies reported, Australia has the highest percentage (93.7% and 78%) of pharmacy students who used CAM [6, 7] followed by students in Hong Kong (38%) and United Kingdom (UK) (43%) [8, 9]. Generally, most of the studies reported positive attitudes towards CAM among a large proportion of undergraduates and a desire to include CAM education in their academic studies. For instance, in the United States (US) the majority of students surveyed (83%) supported the integration of CAM into their curricula . A Czech study revealed that 90% of the first and third year Czech pharmacy students would agree to recommend CAM to the patients during the consultations concerning healthcare .
Medical students in Canada were exposed to less education about CAM than their pharmacy student colleagues and viewed CAM as less useful in their future careers . On the contrary, a study in the US reported that medical students indicated more positive attitudes towards CAM than pharmacy and nursing students . Moreover, Australian pharmacists (91% of 484 respondents) also concurred that it is essential for them to possess knowledge on both conventional and complementary medicines . The aims of the current study were to assess the understanding and perceptions of CAM among pharmacy students in Malaysia, and their self-use of CAM.
Study design and population
This cross-sectional study was carried out among first to final-year (4th year) undergraduate pharmacy students using a self-administered questionnaire. In order to gain a general picture of understanding, perceptions and self-use of CAM among pharmacy students, both public and private university students were included in this study. The private universities that participated were International Medical University (IMU) and Asian Institute of Medicine, Science and Technology (AIMST) and the public University Technology Mara (UiTM). One staff member from each university coordinated the distribution and collection of questionnaires which were anonymous. The study was approved by the International Medical University's research and ethics committee.
Development of questionnaire
Sections divided and the respective type of question
Type of Question
Demographics and socio-economical information
Barriers to CAM use
Sources of information
Understanding about CAM
Self-practice or use of CAM
Perceptions about CAM
Integration of CAM into curriculum
Ten questions (section D) evaluated the understanding of CAM using a Likert scale of one to seven reflecting strongly disagree to strongly agree. Students' perception towards the impact of CAM (Section F) used a scale of one (very effective) to five (very harmful). Barriers to the use of CAM (Section B) were explored by providing options and participants could select more than one option. A 5-point Likert scale (strongly agree to strongly disagree) was used to assess opinions about the integration of CAM into the co-curriculum of pharmacy course (Section G). 'Current CAM use' was defined as the use of at least one type of CAM at the time of completing the questionnaire and 'previous CAM use' was defined as the use of at least one type of CAM at by time in past. The questionnaire was worded in English language and was not translated to other languages as English is the medium of instruction at both public and private universities in Malaysia. For the purpose of survey, "CAM was referred to practices, approaches, knowledge and beliefs incorporating plant, animal and mineral based medicines, spiritual therapies, manual techniques and exercises" (WHO 2003).
Validation of questionnaire
The content of the questionnaire was piloted among ten senior lecturers in the faculty of pharmacy at International Medical University (IMU) and their feedback was incorporated into the revised questionnaire. In the second phase of piloting, twenty pharmacy students from different cohorts were selected to complete the questionnaire on two different occasions fifteen days apart. Through identifying the similarities and differences in response at each occasion, the validity of the question was established; no significant differences were found during this phase. Furthermore, reliability of the questionnaire was assessed using Cronbach-alpha test and the value was found to be 0.78 which was considered reliable.
Estimated sample size
Sample size was calculated based on three factors; response rate (P), margin of error (D) and Q (1-P). Based on the calculation with response rate 50% and margin of error 5%, the total sample size required for this study was 369 students. However at the end of the data collection phase, 505 students participated in this study which was more than the calculated sample size of 369. Five questionnaires were excluded from the analysis due to incomplete information.
Eligible population size and students participated in this study
Year of study
Both descriptive and inferential data analyses were carried out using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, SPSS® version 18 with 0.05 as the level of significance. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze frequency, percentage and mean. Chi-square test was performed to measure the association between the demographic characteristics and responses to understanding, perceptions and self-use of CAM. The variables analyzed using Spearman test was similar to that analyzed using Chi-square test. Kruskal-Wallis test was used to analyze the overall differences in terms of their understanding of CAM, from first to fourth year. However, to analyze the difference between two variables such as two different professional years, Mann-Whitney was used.
Demographic characteristics of study participants (n = 500)
Gender, No (%)
Ethnicity, No (%)
Year of Study, No (%)
Religion, No (%)
Type of University, No (%)
Sources of information for CAM
The Internet was found to be the most commonly used source of information on CAM (69%) from the eight options provided in the questionnaire, followed by friends or family members (63%) and media (61%) which included television, radio and newspaper. Interestingly half of the students acquired information on CAM from CAM practitioners (53%) and healthcare providers (51%) compared to 27.4% of students who obtained information on CAM from their formal education.
Self-use of CAM among students
Self-use of CAM among study participants
Frequency, n (%)
Traditional Malay Medicine
Traditional Chinese Medicine
Traditional Indian Medicine
Self-use of CAM modalities (current use)
Year of study
Traditional Malay Medicine
p = 0.269
Rs = 0.067
p = 0.147
Traditional Chinese Medicine
p = 0.473
Rs = -0.044
p = 0.337
Traditional Indian Medicine
p = 0.023
Rs = -0.022
p = 0.625
p = 0.073
Rs = -0.061
p = 0.181
p = 0.099
Rs = -0.026
p = 0.574
Understanding of CAM
Overall differences and differences in mean score between each year of study and questions assessing understanding on CAM
Year of Study (Mean)
Differences between Years of Study
1. The physical and mental health is maintained by an underlying energy or vital force
2. Health and disease are a reflection of balance between positive life-enhancing forces and negative destructive forces
3. The body is essentially self-healing and the task of a health care provider is to assist in the healing process
4. A patient's symptoms should be regarded as a manifestation of general imbalance or dysfunction affecting the whole body
5. A patient's expectations, health beliefs and values should be integrated into the patient care process
6. Complementary therapies are a threat to public health
7. Treatments not tested in a scientifically recognized manner should be discouraged
8. Effects of complementary therapies are usually the results of a placebo effect
9. Complementary therapies include ideas and methods from which conventional medicine could benefit
10. Most complementary therapies stimulate the body's natural therapeutic powers
Perception towards CAM use
Association of perceptions towards CAM with demographic characteristics of the pharmacy students
Year of Study
Type of University
Traditional Malay medicine
Traditional Chinese medicine
Traditional Indian medicine
Faith healing/prayer healing
Music and art therapy
Barriers to the use of CAM
Integration of CAM
The participating pharmacy students in the public and private universities of Malaysia had, at the time of the investigation, a relatively high level of understanding and positive perception toward most aspects of CAM. Current self-use of CAM among the students was less than previous use. In Malaysia, the majority of the population is Malay (~54%) followed by Chinese (~ 25%) and Indian (~8%). However, this trend was not reflected in the study sample where the majority of the students were Chinese (58%). This is attributed to the participation of two private universities where the majority of students were Chinese. About one quarter of the students agreed that CMs are a threat to public health which is in contrast to a study in Australia where less than 5% of pharmacy students agreed with this statement . Respondents remained neutral when asked whether CMs caused a placebo effect. These two phenomena, in combination, reflect that pharmacy students in Malaysia had more skeptical attitudes towards CAM than students in the US, the UK and Australia [6, 7, 9, 10]. This could be attributed to the limited available evidence-based information regarding CAM in Malaysia compared to information that is not evidence-based.
More than half of the pharmacy students participating in this study thought that CAM includes beliefs and methods from which conventional medicine could benefit. This finding was lower than that reported in Australia and the US [6, 10, 13]. Interestingly, studies in Singapore and the US documented a higher percentage of medical students who agreed with this statement [15–17]. The response to this statement was significantly different among first year students and those from second year onwards; first year students tend to disagree that CAM includes ideas and methods from which conventional medicine could benefit. The teaching of the CAM module which starts, from the second year could be one of the possible factors contributed to this finding.
Similar to the previous studies, the students in this study perceived lack of scientific evidence as the greatest barrier for them to use CAM [6, 10, 16]. In addition, the students ranked 'lack of trained professionals' as the second potential barrier, followed by 'lack of government subsidy'. This ranking order was similar to that reported in other studies [6, 10]. However, the majority of students recognized the need for CAM knowledge as a well-rounded professional. This could explain why most of the students thought that trained professionals play an important role in convincing them to use CAM.
About 78% reported to have used at least one type of CAM in the past while 58% of them were using CAM at the time of survey. This percentage is higher than for pharmacy students in the US , the UK , and Hong Kong . More or less equal to that of medical students in the US [17, 18], and lower than the percentage of pharmacy students reported in Australia . However this study found that overall the current CAM use was reduced compared to previous use.
Almost half of the participants reported to have used TCM previously. This finding is consistent with that found in Hong Kong . The high percentage of TCM use seems to be related to the number of participating Chinese students (58%) and they perceived TCM as more effective than those of other races in this study. Interestingly, it was also found that the perceived impact and self-use of TCM were significantly associated with race. Family could be one of the factors that influence the students' use of TCM since family members were reported to be a (highly ranked) source from where students acquired their CAM information. This is supported by an Australian study which reported that the attitudes of the students towards CAM were strongly influenced by family . In the UK, one quarter of the students from different ethnic groups claimed to have used TCM, mainly ginseng and ginkgo . Similarly, this study also reveals that the type of TCM which was most frequently used by the students was ginseng. The increasing number of clinical trials that investigated ginseng may have contributed to its expanded popularity .
Prayer healing, meditation, massage and music and art therapy were among the most commonly used CMs reported by the participating students. In the US, significant proportions of pharmacy and medical students were reported to have used these four types of CM [15–18]. However, a higher percentage of pharmacy students in this study perceived massage and music therapy to be effective compared to that reported in the US . This difference could be due to the wider variety and availability of traditional massage in Asian countries namely Malay urutan (Malay Massage), Thai massage, Chinese Tui Na massage (Tui Na is an Oriental Bodywork Therapy) and others. This study revealed no differences in CM use among students from different years of study. On the other hand, in contrast to the study in the UK which reported aromatherapy and acupuncture to be most frequently used , none of the students reported using aromatherapy while only one student claimed to have used acupuncture previously. The CAM modalities listed in the questionnaire in this study were different to those in the UK study which listed a total of ten types of CAM without specific categories.
Surprisingly, homeopathy reported was found to be used more than TIM. A higher percentage of students claimed that they would recommend homeopathy to their friends, family members or patients compared to those who would recommend TIM. These findings imply that the popularity of the TIM is not as pronounced as homeopathy. The history of homeopathy in the Malay community began in the 1930s and could be the possible reason behind this phenomenon . Moreover, it has been reported that almost half of the students in Malaysia had consulted homeopathic practitioners in addition to conventional treatment . The current study reveals that the acceptance of homeopathy among students has grown more than TIM.
Limitations of the study
This study had several limitations that may affect its generalization. There were some limitations identified in this study pertaining to its design which did not allow a baseline assessment of specific type of CAM. There were large numbers of CAM used by the students which makes it difficult to concentrate on specific type of CAM. Since data was collected by the lecturers, potential desirable responses in a student-teacher relationship were possible. Self-reported information about CAM use did not rule out selection bias, the possibility of socially desirable responses, and probable variation in data collection, and hence may not reflect the actual behavior and/or practice of a student. Future studies may reveal specific type of CAM practice. A comprehensive comparison with other studies was difficult owing to the unique characteristics of each population, different healthcare systems, methodologies used and sample size.
This study reveals a relatively high and noticeable percentage of pharmacy students who were using (57.8%), or had previously used (77.8%), at least one type of CAM. Significant differences were found between students from different professional years in terms of their understanding about CAM, and students from higher year of study tended to agree that CMs includes beliefs and methods from which conventional medicine could benefit. Compared to Chinese students, Malay students were more likely to believe that CAM is a threat to public health. However, as the racial breakdown of the participating students did not correspond to the racial breakdown of Malaysia, the results of this study may not be representative of all the pharmacy students in the country. Integration of CAM education into curriculum gives students a chance to provide accurate and unbiased information on CAM in future as pharmacists and to work collaboratively with CAM users to develop treatment plans that optimize adherence to prescribed treatments, satisfaction with care, and health outcomes.
We wish to record our appreciation for the administrative assistance of the International Medical University Postgraduate Office and our gratitude to the management and students of participated institutions.
- National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine, National Institutes of Health. NCCAM Publication No. D156. 2002Google Scholar
- Global information hub on integrated medicine. Complementary and alternative medicine (CAM). [Online] [cited 30th June 2010], [http://www.globinmed.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&catid=114:background&id=111:complementary-and-alternative-medicine-cam&Itemid=153]
- Global information hub on integrated medicine. Traditional and complementary medicine (T&CM). [Online] [cited 30th June 2010], [http://www.globinmed.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&catid=114:background&id=112:traditional-and-complementary-medicine-tacm&Itemid=153]
- Global information hub on integrated medicine. National policy of traditional and complementary medicine. [Online] [cited 30th June 2010], [http://www.globinmed.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=category&layout=blog&id=195&Itemid=173]
- Johnson T, Boon H, Jurgens T, Austin Z, Moineddin R, Eccott L, Heschuk S: Canadian pharmacy students' knowledge of herbal medicine. Am J Pharm Educ. 2008, 72 (4): 75-10.5688/aj720475.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Tiralongo E, Wallis M: Attitudes and perceptions of Australian pharmacy students towards complementary and alternative medicine - a pilot study. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2008, 8: 2-10.1186/1472-6882-8-2.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Wilkinson JM, Simpson MD: Complementary therapy use by nursing, pharmacy and biomedical science students. Nurs Health Sci. 2001, 3: 19-27. 10.1046/j.1442-2018.2001.00067.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hon EKL, Leeb K, Tse HM, Lam LN, Tam KC, Chu KM: A survey of attitudes to traditional Chinese medicine in Hong Kong pharmacy students. Complement Ther Med. 2004, 12: 51-56. 10.1016/j.ctim.2003.12.002.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Freymann H, Rennie T, Bates I, Nebel S, Heinrich M: Knowledge and use of complementary and alternative medicine among British undergraduate pharmacy students. Pharm World Sci. 2006, 28: 13-18. 10.1007/s11096-005-2221-z.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Harris IM, Kingston RL, Rodriguez R, Choudary V: Attitudes towards complementary and alternative medicine among pharmacy faculty and students. Am J Pharm Educ. 2006, 70 (6): 129-10.5688/aj7006129.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Pokladnikova J, Lie D: Comparison of attitudes, beliefs, and resource-seeking behavior for CAM among first- and third-year Czech pharmacy students. Am J Pharm Educ. 2008, 72 (2): 24-10.5688/aj720224.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Baugniet J, Boon H, Ostbye T: Complementary/alternative medicine: comparing the view of medical students with students in other health care professions. Fam Med. 2000, 32 (3): 178-84.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kreitzer M, Mitten D, Harris I, Shandeling J: Attitudes toward CAM among medical, nursing, and pharmacy faculty and students: a comparative analysis. Altern Ther Health Med. 2002, 8 (6): 44-7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
- Naidu S, Wilkinson J, Simpson M: Attitudes of Australian pharmacists toward complementary and alternative medicines. Ann Pharmacother. 2005, 39 (9): 1456-61. 10.1345/aph.1G089.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
- Halterman-Cox M, Sierpina VS, Sadoski M, Sanders C: CAM attitudes in first and second year medical students: A pre- and post-course survey. IMCJ. 2008, 7 (6): 31-42.Google Scholar
- Angela YSH, Jonathan CHY, Colin Y, Lee CH, Lim LF, Lee TL: Perceptions of complementary and alternative medicine amongst medical students in Singapore. Acupunct Med. 2005, 23: 19-26. 10.1136/aim.23.1.19.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Chaterji R, Tractenberg RE, Amri H, Lumpkin M, Amorosi SBW, Haramati A: A large sample survey of first- and second-year medical student attitudes toward complementary and alternative medicine in the curriculum and in practice. Altern Ther Health Med. 2007, 13 (1): 30-5.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Lie D, Boker J: Development and validation of the CAM Health Belief Questionnaire (CHBQ) and CAM use and attitudes amongst medical students. BMC Med Educ. 2004, 4: 2-10.1186/1472-6920-4-2.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
- Coleman CI, Hebert JH, Reddy P: The effect of Panax ginseng on quality of life. J Clin Pharm Therapeut. 2003, 28: 5-15. 10.1046/j.1365-2710.2003.00467.x.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
- Eppenich H: Malay identity and the Islamising of Homepathy in Malaysia. Medline. 1998, 17: 149-75.Google Scholar
- Razali S, Yassin A: Complementary treatment of psychotic and epileptic patients in malaysia. Medline. 2008, 45 (3): 455-69.Google Scholar
- The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6882/11/95/prepub
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.