Skip to main content

Table 2 Risk of bias of included RCTs*

From: Complementary and alternative medicine for patients with chronic fatigue syndrome: A systematic review

Study

Random sequence generation

Allocation concealment

Patient blinding

Assessor blinding

Reporting drop-out or withdrawal†

Intention-to-treat analysis†

Selective outcome reporting

Other potential bias

Clollinge (1998) [10]

Low

Low

High

Low

Low

High

High

Unclear

Dybwad (2007) [11]

Low

Low

High

Low

Low

Unclear

Low

Low

Surawy (2005) [12]

Unclear

Unclear

High

Unclear

High

Unclear

Unclear

Unclear

Walach (2008) [13]

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

High

Low

Low

Field (1997) [14]

Low

Unclear

High

High

Unclear

Unclear

Unclear

High

Wang (2009) [15]

Unclear

Unclear

Low

Low

High

Unclear

Low

Unclear

Liu (2010) [16]

Unclear

Unclear

High

Unclear

Unclear

Unclear

Unclear

Unclear

Weatherley-Jones (2004) [17]

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

Awdry (1996) [18]

Unclear

Unclear

Low

Low

High

High

Low

Unclear

Hartz (2004) [19]

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

Forsyth (1999) [20]

Unclear

Unclear

Low

Unclear

Unclear

High

Unclear

Unclear

Santaella (2004) [21]

Unclear

Unclear

High

High

High

High

Low

Unclear

Brouwers (2002) [22]

Unclear

High

Low

Low

Low

Low

Unclear

Low

De Becker (2001) [23]

Unclear

Low

Low

Unclear

Unclear

Unclear

Unclear

Low

The (2007) [24]

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

Unclear

Low

McDertmott (2006) [25]

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

High

Low

Low

Stewart (1987) [26]

Unclear

Unclear

High

High

Low

High

High

Unclear

Rothschild (2002) [27]

Unclear

Unclear

Low

Low

High

High

Unclear

Unclear

Vermeulen (2004) [28]

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

Behan (1990) [29]

Low

Low

High

High

Low

Unclear

High

Unclear

Warren (1999) [30]

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

Low

Unclear

Kaslow (1989) [31]

Unclear

Low

Low

Low

Low

Unclear

Unclear

Low

Ockerman (2000) [32]

Unclear

Low

Low

Low

Low

Unclear

Unclear

Low

Cox (1991) [33]

Unclear

Unclear

Low

Low

Unclear

High

Low

Unclear

Tiev (1999) [34]

Unclear

Unclear

Unclear

Unclear

Low

Unclear

Unclear

Unclear

Willams (2002) [35]

Unclear

Unclear

Unclear

Unclear

Low

Unclear

Unclear

Unclear

  1. *, Domains of quality assessment based on Cochrane tools for assessing risk of bias.
  2. †, Two domains referring to 'incomplete outcome data' in the Cochrane tools for assessing risk of bias.
  3. ‡, This study had a baseline imbalance in the subjective outcome values.
  4. Abbreviations; Low (low risk of bias);/High (high risk of bias); Unclear (uncertain risk of bias).