Open Access
Open Peer Review

This article has Open Peer Review reports available.

How does Open Peer Review work?

The antioxidant and antiproliferative activities of methanolic extracts from Njavara rice bran

  • Akiri SVC Rao1,
  • Sareddy G Reddy2,
  • Phanithi P Babu2 and
  • Attipalli R Reddy1Email author
BMC Complementary and Alternative MedicineThe official journal of the International Society for Complementary Medicine Research (ISCMR)201010:4

https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-10-4

Received: 26 August 2009

Accepted: 28 January 2010

Published: 28 January 2010

Abstract

Background

Free radical-induced oxidative stress is the root cause for many human diseases. Naturally occurring antioxidant supplements from plants are vital to counter the oxidative damage in cells. The main objective of the present study was to characterize the antioxidant and antiproliferative potential of rice bran extracted from an important Indian rice variety, Njavara and to compare the same with two commercially available basmati rice varieties: Vasumathi, Yamini and a non medicinal variety, Jyothi.

Methods

Methanolic extracts of rice bran from four varieties; Vasumathi, Yamini, Jyothi and Njavara were used to study their total phenolic and flavonoid contents, in vitro antioxidant activities including total antioxidant activity, scavenging of nitric oxide and 1,1-Diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) radical, reducing power and cytotoxic activity in C6 glioma cells. Correlation coefficient and regression analysis were done by using Sigmastat version 3.1 and Stata statistical package respectively.

Results

Rice bran methanolic extract from Njavara showed the highest antioxidant and cell cytotoxic properties compared to the other three rice varieties. IC50 values for scavenging DPPH and nitric oxide were in the range of 30.85-87.72 μg/ml and 52.25-107.18 μg/ml respectively. Total antioxidant activity and reducing power were increased with increasing amounts of the extract. Total phenolic and flavonoid contents were in the range of 3.2-12.4 mg gallic acid-equivalent (GAE)/g bran and 1.68-8.5 mg quercetin-equivalent (QEE)/g bran respectively. IC50 values of cytotoxic assay (MTT assay) were 17.53-57.78 μg/ml. Correlation coefficient and regression analysis of phenolic content with DPPH and NO scavenging, MTT (-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide) assay, total antioxidant assay and reducing power showed a highly significant correlation coefficient values (96-99%) and regression values (91-98%).

Conclusion

The results of the present study show that the crude methanolic extract from Njavara rice bran contains significantly high polyphenolic compounds with superior antioxidant activity as evidenced by scavenging of free radicals including DPPH and NO. Njavara extracts also showed highest reducing power activity, anti-proliferative property in C6 glioma cells. In conclusion, it is conceivable that the Njavara rice variety could be exploited as one of the potential sources for plant - based pharmaceutical products.

Background

Rice bran is a rich source of natural antioxidants which can be used as free radical scavengers. It is widely recognized that many of the today's diseases are due to the oxidative stress that results from an imbalance between formation and neutralization of pro-oxidants [1, 2]. Cells have developed antioxidant mechanisms to quench the free radicals but when the generation of free radicals exceeds the scavenging capacity of the cell, the excess free radicals seek stability through electron pairing with biological macromolecules such as proteins, lipids and DNA in healthy human cells resulting the induction of lipid peroxidation which leads to cancer, atherosclerosis, cardiovascular diseases, ageing and inflammatory diseases [37]. The free radicals are known to be scavenged by synthetic antioxidants, but due to their adverse side effects leading to carcinogenicity; search for effective and natural antioxidants has become crucial [8, 9]. Rice bran is a by-product of rice milling which contains a significant amount of natural phytochemicals including sterols, higher alcohols, gamma-oryzanol, tocopherols, tocotrienols and phenolic compounds [1012]. These bioactive molecules have known to reduce serum cholesterol, decrease the incidence of atherosclerosis and also have antitumor properties [1316].

Rice is a staple food for more than three billion people in the world. The ayurvedic treatise records show the existence of several medicinal rice varieties in India. Njavara is one of such important Indian medicinal rice variety, grown in Southern India and is used mainly for ayurvedic treatments [17, 18]. It is regarded as a special rice variety with beneficial properties for the circulatory, respiratory, digestive and nervous systems according to the Indian indigenous system of medicine or ayurveda [17].

Njavarakizhi and Navaratheppu are the two major treatments in ayurveda for arthritis, paralysis, neurological disorders, degeneration of muscles and tuberculosis. In addition to various medicinal properties, Njavara gruel is also included in the diet for developing immunity. Considered as gold among paddy varieties, recently Deepa et al., [17] reported certain nutritional properties of Njavara while Simi and Abraham studied the physiochemical, rheological and thermal properties of Njavara rice starch [18]. However, no scientific data are available on the free radical scavenging and cell cytotoxic properties of the Njavara rice bran extract. Our main objective in this investigation was to demonstrate antioxidative and radical scavenging properties of Njavara rice bran methanolic extract. Njavara rice bran properties were compared with commercially available two Indian basmati varieties: Vasumathi, Yamini and a non medicinal variety, Jyothi.

Methods

Chemicals

Folin-Ciocalteus's phenol reagent, sodium carbonate, gallic acid (GA), quercetin (QE), FeCl3, NaNO2, 1,1-Diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), ascorbic acid were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA). Sodium nitro preside (SNP), α-napthyl-ethylenediamine, potassium ferricyanide, trichloroacetic acid (TCA), ammonium molybdate, 3-[4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl]-2,5-diphenyl tetrazolium bromide (MTT), dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO) were purchased from Merck Chemical Supplies (Damstadt, Germany). All the chemicals used including the solvents, were of analytical grade.

Plant material

Seeds of Njavara variety were obtained from Kerala Agricultural University, Kerala, Vasumathi, Yamini and Jyothi varieties were obtained from Directorate of Rice Research, Hyderabad; Central Soil Salinity Research Institute, Karnal and National Seed Corporation, Warangal respectively.

Preparation and stabilization of rice bran

Rice bran from the four varieties was obtained by milling rice grain in a local grinding mill, followed by sieving to separate grain from bran. Stabilization of rice bran was done by heating the bran in microwave oven at 850W and with 2450 MHz. The microwave chamber was preheated to 100% power for 3 min. The moisture content of the raw rice bran was adjusted to 21% by adding deionized water [19]. The sample was heated for 3 min at 100% power. The temperature of the sample after heating in the microwave was 107 ± 2°C. The sample was allowed to cool to room temperature and stored in an ultralow freezer (-80°C) until further analysis.

Preparation of rice bran extract

Rice bran extract was prepared according to a modified method of Choi et al., [20]. Rice bran powder (5 g) was extracted thrice with 30 ml methanol for 3 h in an electrical shaker at 40°C. The extracts were filtered through Whatman No.2 filter paper and evaporated under vaccum using a rotary evaporator (Heidolph, Germany). The residual crude methanolic rice bran extract was weighed and dissolved in dimethyl sulphoxide (DMSO), and filtered through a 0.45 μm of Nylon membrane filter and stored at -20°C until further analysis.

Determination of total phenolic content

The total phenolic content of the bran extracts was determined using the Folin- Ciocalteu reagent [21]. The reaction mixture contained: 200 μl of diluted rice bran extract, 800 μl of freshly prepared diluted Folin Ciocalteu reagent and 2 ml of 7.5% sodium carbonate. The final mixture was diluted to 7 ml with deionized water. Mixtures were kept in dark at ambient conditions for 2 h to complete the reaction. The absorbance at 765 nm was measured. Gallic acid was used as standard and the results were expressed as mg gallic acid (GAE)/g bran.

Determination of total flavonoid content

Total flavonoid content was determined using aluminium chloride (AlCl3) according to a known method [22] using quercetin as a standard. The plant extract (0.1 ml) was added to 0.3 ml distilled water followed by 5% NaNO2 (0.03 ml). After 5 min at 25°C, AlCl3 (0.03 ml, 10%) was added. After further 5 min, the reaction mixture was treated with 0.2 ml of 1 mM NaOH. Finally, the reaction mixture was diluted to 1 ml with water and the absorbance was measured at 510 nm. The results were expressed as mg quercetin (QE)/g bran.

Determination of reducing power

The reducing power of rice bran extract was measured according to the method described by Yen and Duh [23] with some modifications. Various concentrations (100, 200, 300, 400 and 500 μg) of rice bran extract were mixed with 2.5 ml of 0.2 M sodium phosphate buffer (pH 6.6). The dilute sample was then mixed with 5.0 ml of 1% potassium ferricyanide and the mixture was incubated at 50°C for 20 min. 5.0 ml of 10% trichloroacetic acid was added to the mixture, which was then centrifuged at 3000 rpm for 10 min. 5.0 ml of the supernatant was mixed with 5.0 ml of distilled water and 1.0 ml of ferric chloride (1%). The absorbance was measured at 700 nm. Ascorbic acid was used for comparison.

Determination of total antioxidant activity

For total antioxidant assay various concentrations (20, 40, 60, 80 and 100 μg) of rice bran extract were mixed with 1 ml of the reagent solution (0.6 M sulfuric acid, 28 mM sodium phosphate and 4 mM ammonium molybdate). The reaction mixture was incubated in a water bath at 95°C for 90 min. After cooling to room temperature, the absorbance was measured at 695 nm [24]. Ascorbic acid was used for comparison.

Measurement of nitric oxide scavenging ability

Nitric oxide scavenging activity was determined according to Griess Illosvoy reaction [25]. The reaction mixture contained: 10 mM SNP in 0.5 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, and various doses (50-250 μg/ml) of the test solution in a final volume of 3 ml. After incubation for 60 min at 37°C, Griess reagent (α-napthyl-ethylenediamine 0.1% in water and sulphanilic acid 1% in H3PO4 5%) was added. The pink chromophore generated during diazotization of nitrite ions with sulphanilamide and subsequent coupling with α-napthyl-ethylenediamine was measured spectrophotometrically at 540 nm. Ascorbic acid was used as a positive control. Nitric oxide scavenging ability (%) was calculated by using the formula:

Determination of DPPH·scavenging assay

DPPH radical scavenging activity of rice bran extract was determined according to the method reported by Blois [26] with slight modifications. An aliquot of 0.5 ml of sample solution in methanol was mixed with 2.5 ml of 0.5 mM methanolic solution of DPPH. The mixture was shaken vigorously and incubated for 37 min in the dark at room temperature. The absorbance was measured at 517 nm using UV-vis spectrophotometer. Ascorbic acid was used as a positive control. DPPH free radical scavenging ability (%) was calculated by using the formula:

In vitro cell cytotoxicity activity (MTT assay)

The cell cytotoxicity of methanolic rice bran extracts against the C6 glioma cells was determined by MTT assay [27]. Cells were seeded into 96-well plate at 1 × 104 cells/well density and treated with different concentrations of rice bran extracts for 48 h. After 48 h MTT was added to each well and solubilized the formazan crystals by DMSO. Then absorbance was measured at 570 nm in a microplate ELISA reader. All experiments were performed in triplicate.

Statistical analysis

The data were subjected to correlation coefficient by using Sigmastat version 3.1 statistical analysis software. The correlation of the data was determined by Pearson's test and Stata statistical package was used for regression analysis. P < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant.

Results

Total phenolic content (TPC)

The total phenolic content (TPC) was expressed as gallic acid equivalents (Table 1). Significant differences were observed for TPC among the four rice varieties. TPC was in the range of 3.27-12.4 mg GAE/g bran. Highest TPC was observed in Njavara followed by Jyothi. Yamini and Vasumathi showed nearly equal TPC content which were in low quantities compared to Njavara.
Table 1

Total phenolic and flavonoid contents from methanolic rice bran extracts.

Rice Variety

Total phenolic extract

(mg GAE/g rice bran)

Total flavonoid content

(mg QE/g rice bran)

Vasumathi

3.31 ± 0.3

1.68 ± 0.032

Yamini

4.23 ± 0.4

2.57 ± 0.041

Jyothi

9.44 ± 0.2

5.33 ± 0.072

Njavara

12.72 ± 0.6

8.51 ± 0.053

Values are of three experiments ± SE

Total flavonoid content (TFC)

Total flavonoid content of the methanolic extract was significantly high in Njavara compared to the other three varieties as recorded in quercetin equivalents (Table 1). TFC of Vasumathi, Yamini, Jyothi, and Njavara were 1.68, 2.57, 5.33 and 8.5 mg QEE/g bran respectively.

Total antioxidant activity (TAA)

Total antioxidant activity of the rice bran extracts increased with the increasing concentration of the extracts and a significant change was observed at 0.02 to 0.1 mg/ml concentration of the extract (Figure 1). At 0.1 mg/ml of the methanolic rice bran extracts, the absorbance values of Vasumathi, Yamini, Jyothi and Njavara were 1.65, 2.21, 2.52 and 2.93 respectively. However, the total antioxidant activities of all the rice bran extracts were less than that of the positive control ascorbate (2.5-40 μg showed an absorbance 0.117-2.0).
Figure 1

Total antioxidant activity. TAA carried out with different concentrations of methanolic rice bran extracts from four rice varieties. Results represent means ± standard deviation (n = 3).

Reducing power (RP) assay

The methanolic extracts from all the samples had shown considerable amount of reducing activity. The reducing power of the rice bran extracts increased with the increasing concentration and a significant change was observed at 0.1 to 0.5 mg/ml concentration of the rice extract (Figure 2). 0.5 mg/ml of the methanolic rice bran extracts showed absorbance values of 0.59, 1.04, 1.93 and 2.98 corresponding to Vasumathi, Yamini, Jyothi and Njavara were respectively. While 5-25 μg of the positive control ascorbate showed an absorbance 0.06-0.28.
Figure 2

Reducing power. RP of different concentrations of methanolic rice bran extracts from four rice varieties. Results represent means ± standard deviation (n = 3).

DPPH radical scavenging activity

Free radical scavenging activities of the rice bran methanolic extracts were assessed by the DPPH assay. Figure 3 illustrates a significant decrease in the concentration of DPPH radical due to scavenging ability of the rice bran. The results show that Njavara had the highest DPPH scavenging activity with an IC50 value of 30.85 μg/ml. IC50 values of the other three varieties were 48.88, 70.58 and 87.72 μg/ml for Jyothi, Yamini and Vasumathi respectively. IC50 value of the positive control ascorbic acid was 3.2 μg/ml.
Figure 3

DPPH radical scavenging activity (%). DPPH scavenging activity of different concentrations of methanolic rice bran extracts from four rice varieties. Results represent means ± standard deviation (n = 3).

Nitic oxide (NO) scavenging

Njavara extract showed the highest nitric-oxide scavenging activity compared to the other three rice bran methanolic extracts in a moderate dose dependent inhibition of nitric oxide with an IC50 value of 52.25 μg/ml. IC50 values of Jyothi, Yamini and Vasumathi were 71.41, 107.18 and 102.48 μg/ml respectively (Figure 4). Ascorbic acid was used as a reference compound and its IC50 value is 4.6 μg/ml.
Figure 4

Nitric oxide scavenging activity (%). NO scavenging activity in the methanolic rice bran extracts from four rice cultivars. Results represent means ± standard deviation (n = 3).

In vitro cytotoxic activity (MTT assay)

The cytotoxic activity of the methanolic extracts from rice bran against C6 glioma cells were shown in figure 5. IC50 values of the methanolic rice bran extracts of Vasumathi, Yamini, Jyothi, and Njavara were 57.78, 44.83, 25.52 and 17.53 μg/ml respectively.
Figure 5

Cell cytotoxicity assay. MTT assay with different concentrations of methanolic rice bran extracts from four rice cultivars. Results represent means ± standard deviation (n = 3).

Statistical analysis

Table 2 shows highly positive significant correlation coefficient values for phenolic content with DPPH and NO scavenging; TAA and RP. A negative significant correlation coefficient was observed for phenolic content with MTT in the four rice varieties. Table 3 shows the regression analysis for the four rice varieties. The slope of Vasumathi showed higher significant value for phenolic content with DPPH scavenging (6.44) and TAA (0.087) compared to the other varieties. It also showed a higher slope (3.39) with NO but less significant over Jyothi. Yamini had a higher significant slope (0.012) for phenolic content with RP. Njavara had higher negative significant slope (-0.017) for phenolic content with MTT.
Table 2

Correlation of phenolic contents from the methanolic bran extracts of different rice varieties with DPPH radical scavenging, Nitric oxide (NO) scavenging, Total Antioxidant Assay (TAA), MTT assay and Reducing Power (RP).

 

TPC vs DPPH scavenging

TPC vs NO scavenging

TPC vs TAA

TPC vs MTT

assay

TPC vs RP

Vasumathi

     

R value

0.984

0.957

0.981

-0.976

0.955

P value

0.00247

0.0105

0.00313

0.00451

0.0114

Yamini

     

R value

0.968

0.952

0.953

-0.963

0.950

P value

0.00689

0.0125

0.0123

0.00862

0.0132

Jyothi

     

R value

0.981

0.992

0.985

-0.969

0.989

P value

0.00325

0.000938

0.00217

0.00655

0.00142

Njavara

     

R value

0.964

0.987

0.977

-0.961

0.992

P value

0.00826

0.00186

0.00427

0.00923

0.000800

In all the experiments number of samples (n) = 5. The pair(s) of variables with positive correlation coefficients and P values below 0.050 tend to increase together. For the pairs with negative correlation coefficients and P values below 0.050, one variable tends to decrease while the other increases. For pairs with P values greater than 0.050, there is no significant relationship between the two variables.

Table 3

Regression analysis of polyphenolic content from the methanolic bran extracts of different rice varieties with DPPH radical scavenging, Nitric oxide (NO) scavenging, Total Antioxidant Assay (TAA), MTT assay and Reducing Power (RP).

 

TPC vs DPPH scavenging

TPC vs NO scavenging

TPC vs TAA

TPC vs MTT assay

TPC vs RP

Vasumathi

     

R2 value

0.9678

0.9163

0.9624

0.9521

0.9120

Slope

6.435366

3.385976

0.0870031

-0.0743902

0.0077537

P value

0.0025

0.0105

0.0031

0.0045

0.0114

Growth rate

66.18

61.46

30.93

-20.63

57.52

Yamini

     

R2 value

0.9367

0.9067

0.9074

0.9267

0.9029

Slope

4.82466

3.172851

0.0123

-0.0579186

0.0123534

P value

0.0069

0.0125

0.0849

0.0086

0.0132

Growth rate

51.68

60.85

32.24

-23.35

59.25

Jyothi

     

R2 value

0.9615

0.9831

0.9705

0.9388

0.9777

Slope

2.045763

2.002225

0.0472744

-0.025

0.0089229

P value

0.0033

0.0009

0.0022

0.0066

0.0014

Growth rate

37.95

61.04

30.51

-30.9

41.61

Njavara

     

R2 value

0.9287

0.9733

0.9538

0.9233

0.9848

Slope

1.199922

1.561774

0.039325

-0.0171115

0.0101612

P value

0.0083

0.0019

0.0043

0.0092

0.0008

Growth rate

25.28

46.37

27.86

-38.09

46.91

R2 values are the regression coefficients by the least -- squared fits and P = probability values. In all the experiments number of observations (n) = 5.

Discussion

Total antioxidant activity of the rice bran methanolic extracts increased with increasing concentration of the extracts indicating the potential of rice bran extracts as antioxidants. Relatively high total antioxidant activity in the Njavara rice bran compared to the other samples showed a significant correlation with polyphenolic contents (Table 2) suggesting the importance of polyphenolics as potential antioxidant biomolecules. Reducing power has been used to evaluate the ability of natural antioxidants in the rice bran extracts to donate electrons [28]. Njavara had relatively higher reducing power than other samples, indicating a significantly higher correlation with polyphenolic content (Table 2 and 3). The results indicate that rice bran methanolic extracts are capable of donating electrons which can react with free radicals to convert them as more stable products and strongly inhibiting radical chain reaction.

DPPH radical scavenging is considered a good in vitro model widely used to assess antioxidant efficacy within a very short time. In its radical form, DPPH· has disappears on reduction by an antioxidant compound or a radical species to become a stable diamagnetic molecule resulting the colour change from purple to yellow, which could be taken as an indication of the hydrogen donating ability of the tested samples [29, 30]. DPPH radical scavenging abilities of the rice bran extracts were significantly lower than those of ascorbic acid. However, all the rice varieties in our study exhibited appreciable scavenging activity and there was a significant correlation between DPPH radical scavenging activity and polyphenolic content. IC50 value of Njavara indicates that it has a highest proton donating ability among the four tested rice varieties (Figure 3). The results indicate that the extracts with their proton-donating ability, could serve as free radical inhibitors or scavengers, acting possibly as primary antioxidants [29]. Our data demonstrate that the rice bran extracts inhibit nitrite formation by directly competing with oxygen in the reaction with nitric oxide [31]. The present study also proved that the rice bran methanolic extracts have potent nitric oxide scavenging activities and Njavara had the highest nitric oxide scavenging activity compared to the other three varieties. These oxy-radicals are to be toxic to the tissues and are responsible for various inflammatory responses and carcinomas. Excess nitric oxide which is known to accumulate in the acidic environment of stomach reacts with oxygen to form nitrite ions and induce mutagenic reactions [32]. It has recently been reported that phenolic compounds have a greater nitrite scavenging activity in environments with low pH [33]. The results of this study show that the bran from all the rice varieties contain a notable antiproliferative activity and the biomolecules from the rice bran, particularly from the Njavara variety could be exploited for the potential use in pharmaceutical formulations.

Our results indicate that rice bran extracts from all the four varieties contain significant amounts of flavonoids and Njavara possessed the highest flavonoid levels (Table 1) Flavonoids are the most ubiquitous groups of plant secondary metabolites [34]. This class of compounds have good antioxidant potential and their effects on human nutrition and health are considerable. Flavonoids have been widely used in cancer treatments, coronary heart diseases, gastrointestinal ulcers and rheumatic diseases [35]. Polyphenols are the major plant compounds with potential antioxidant activity. This activity is believed to be mainly due to their redox properties, which play an important role in adsorbing and neutralizing free radicals, quenching singlet and triplet oxygen, or decomposing peroxides [3639]. In the present study, antiradical efficiency in the rice bran extractswas highly positively correlated with total phenolic contents (Table 2). Our data also indicate that polyphenols are important components in rice bran methanolic extracts which could be exploited for their use in free radical scavenging activity.

Statistical analysis

Regression analysis of phenolic content with DPPH and NO scavenging, TAA and RP showed higher slope values in Vasumathi compared to the Njavara. Higher slope values in Vasumathi can be explained by the higher percentage of growth rate compared to Njavara. Minimum IC50 values of Njavara has been predicted to be responsible for the lesser growth rate compared to Vasumathi resulting lesser slope values. Correlation coefficient and regression analysis showed that total phenolic content was responsible for antiradical efficiency in the rice bran extracts.

Conclusion

Our results strongly suggest that medicinal rice plants can be promising sources of potential antioxidants and anticancer activity. The present results will form the basis for selection of Njavara species for further investigation in the potential drug discovery of new natural bioactive compounds. Njavara is a good choice for the plant scientists to develop new rice cultivars with high bioactive compounds with high nutritive value. This is the first report on the antiradical efficiency of the Indian medicinal rice, Njavara. Studies aimed at isolation and structural elucidation of the anticancer and antioxidative active constituents from Njavara are in progress.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The financial support through a grant from the Department of Science and Technology provided through Center for Nanotechnology, University of Hyderabad is gratefully acknowledge. ASVCR acknowledges the Senior Research Fellowship from Indian Council of Medical Research, New Delhi.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Plant Sciences, School of Life Sciences, University of Hyderabad
(2)
Department of Biotechnology, School of Life Sciences, University of Hyderabad

References

  1. Hazra B, Biswas S, Mandal N: Antioxidant and free radical scavenging activity of Spondias pinnata. Complem Altern Med. 2008, 8: 63-72. 10.1186/1472-6882-8-63.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  2. Braca A, Sortino C, Politi M, Morelli I, Mendez J: Antioxidant activity of flavonoids from Licania licaniaeflora. J Ethanopharmacol. 2002, 70: 379-381. 10.1016/S0378-8741(01)00413-5.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  3. Chotimarkorn C, Benjakul S, Silalai N: Antioxidant components and properties of five long-grained rice bran extracts from commercial available cultivars in Thailand. Food Chem. 2008, 111: 636-641. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.04.031.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  4. Lai P, Li KY, Lu S, Chen HH: Phtochemicals and antioxidant properties of solvent extracts from Japonica rice bran. Food chem. 2009, 117: 538-544. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.04.031.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  5. Devi RR, Arumughan C: Antiradical efficacy of phytochemical extracts from defatted rice bran. Food chem Toxicol. 2007, 45: 2014-2021. 10.1016/j.fct.2007.04.020.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  6. Hodzic Z, Pasalic H, Memisevic A, Srabovic M, Salatovic M, Poljakovic M: The influence of total phenols content on antioxidant capacity in the whole grain extracts. Eur J Sci Res. 2009, 28: 471-477.Google Scholar
  7. Aswatha RHN, Shreedhara CS, Falguni GP, Sachin ZB: Antioxidant studies of aqueous extract of Phyllanthus reticulates poir. Pharmacologyonline. 2008, 1: 351-364.Google Scholar
  8. Choi Y, Jeong HS, Lee J: Antioxidant activity of methanolic extracts from some grains consumed in Korea. Food Chem. 2007, 103: 130-138. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2006.08.004.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  9. Adeolu AA, Florence OJ, Srinivas K, Masika P, Anthony JA: Asessment of the medicinal potential of the methanol extracts of the leaves and stems of Buddleja saligna. Complem Altern Med. 2009, 9: 21-28. 10.1186/1472-6882-9-21.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  10. Nam SH, Choi SP, Kang MY, Koh HJ, Kozukue N, Friedman M: Antioxidative activities of bran extracts from twenty one pigmented rice cultivars. Food Chem. 2006, 94: 613-620. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2004.12.010.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  11. Isao K, Kazuhiro I, Hiroyuki K, Hiromu S: Antioxidative properties of extracts from ancient rice brans. Food Sci Technol Res. 2004, 10: 374-382. 10.3136/fstr.10.374.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  12. Devi RR, Arumughan C: Antiradical efficacy of phytochemical extracts from defatted rice bran. Food Chem Toxicol. 2007, 45: 2014-2021. 10.1016/j.fct.2007.04.020.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. Deepa G, Singh V, Naidu KA: Nutrient composition and physiochemical properties of Indian medicinal rice - Njavara. Food Chem. 2008, 106: 165-171. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2007.05.062.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  14. Simi CK, Abraham TE: Physicochemical rheological and thermal properties of Njavara rice (Oryza sativa) starch. J Agric Food Chem. 2008, 56: 12105-12113. 10.1021/jf802572r.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Halliwell B: The role of oxygen radicals in human disease, with particular reference to the vascular system. Haemostasis. 1992, 23 (Suppl 1): 118-126.Google Scholar
  16. Itani T, Ogawa M: History and recent trends of red rice in Japan. Nippon Sakumotsu Gakkai Kiji. 2004, 73: 137-147.Google Scholar
  17. Goffman FD, Bergman CJ: Rice Kernel phenolic content and its relationship with antiradical efficiency. J Sci Food Agric. 2004, 84: 1235-1240. 10.1002/jsfa.1780.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  18. Nam SH, Choi SP, Kang MY, Koh HJ, Kozukue N, Friedman M: Antioxidative, antimutagenic and anticarcinogenic activities of rice bran extracts in chemical and cell assays. J Agric Food Chem. 2005, 53: 816-822. 10.1021/jf0490293.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Malekian F: Functional, nutritional and storage characteristics of rice bran as affected by microwaveheat and extrusion stabilization methods. PhD Thesis. 1992, Louisiana State University, Baton RougeGoogle Scholar
  20. Choi Y, Jeong HS, Lee J: Antioxidant activity of methanolic extracts from some grains consumed in Korea. Food Chem. 103: 130-138. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2006.08.004.Google Scholar
  21. Gulcin I, Elmastas M, Aboul-Enein HY: Determination of antioxidant and radical scavenging activity of basil (Ocimum basilicum L. family Lamiaceae) assayed by different methadologies. Phytother Res. 2007, 21: 354-361. 10.1002/ptr.2069.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Zhishen J, Mengcheng T, Jianming W: The determination of flavonoid contents in mulberry and their scavenging effects on superoxide radicals. Food Chem. 1999, 64: 555-559. 10.1016/S0308-8146(98)00102-2.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  23. Yen GG, Duh PD: Antioxidative properties of methanolic extracts from peanut hulls. JAOCS. 1993, 70: 383-386. 10.1007/BF02552711.Google Scholar
  24. Preito P, Pineda M, Aguilar M: Spectrphotometric quantitation of antioxidant capacity through the formation of a phosphomolybdenum complex: specific application to the determination of vitamin E. Anal Biochem. 1999, 269: 337-341. 10.1006/abio.1999.4019.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  25. Garratt DC: The quantitative analysis of Drugs. 1964, Chapman and Hall Ltd, Japan, 3: 456-458.Google Scholar
  26. Blois MS: Antioxidants determinations by the use of stable free radical. Nature. 1958, 181: 1199-1200. 10.1038/1811199a0.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  27. Sun HX, Qin F, Pan YJ: In vitro and In vivo immunosuppressive activity of Spica prunellae ethanol extract on the immune responses in mice. J Ethanopharmacol. 2005, 101: 31-36. 10.1016/j.jep.2005.03.023.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  28. Chotimarkorn C, Benjakul S, Silalai N: Antioxidant components and properties of five long-grained rice bran extracts from commercial available cultivars in Thailand. Food Chem. 2008, 111: 636-641. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2008.04.031.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  29. Marxen K, Vanselow KH, Lippemeier S, Hintze R, Ruser A, Hansen UP: Determination of DPPH radical oxidation caused by methanolic extracts of some microalgal species by linear regression analysis of spectrophotometric measurements. Sensors. 2007, 7: 2080-2095. 10.3390/s7102080.View ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Lee YR, Woo KS, Kim KJ, Son JR, Jeong HS: Antioxidant Activities of Ethanol Extracts from Germinated Specialty Rough Rice. Food Sci Biotechnol. 2007, 16: 765-770.Google Scholar
  31. Tylor BS, Kion YM, Wang QI, Sharpio RA, Billiar TR, Geller DA: Nitric oxide down regulates hepatocyte-inducible nitric oxide synthase gene expression. Arch Surg. 1997, 132: 1177-1183.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  32. Yin JY, Kwon GJ, Wang MH: The antioxidant and cytotoxic activities of Sonchus oleraceus L. extracts. Nutr Res Pract. 2007, 1: 189-194.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Noh KS, Yang MO, Cho EJ: Nitrite scavenging effect of Umbelligeraeceae. Korean J Food Cookery Sci. 2002, 18: 8-12.Google Scholar
  34. Prasain JK, wang CC, Barnes S: Flavonoids and isoflavones (photoestrogens): absorption, metabolism, and bioactivity. Free Radical Bio Med. 2004, 37: 1324-1350. 10.1016/j.freeradbiomed.2004.07.026.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Havsteen BH: The biochemistry and medical significance of the flavonoids. Pharmacol Therapeut. 2002, 96: 67-202. 10.1016/S0163-7258(02)00298-X.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  36. Petti S, Scully C: Polyphenols, oral health and disease: a review. j dentistry. 2009, 37: 413-423. 10.1016/j.jdent.2009.02.003.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  37. Gumul D, Korus J, Achremowicz B: The influence of extrusion on the content of polyphenols and antioxidant/antiradical activity of rye grains (secale cereale l.). Acta Sci Pol Technol Aliment. 2007, 6: 103-111.Google Scholar
  38. Han SJ, Ryu SN, Kang SS: A new 2-arylbenzofuran with antioxidant activity from the black colored rice (oryza sativa l.) bran. Chem Pharm Bull. 2004, 52: 1365-1366. 10.1248/cpb.52.1365.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Amakura Y, Tsutsumi T, Sasaki K, Nakamura M, Yoshida T, Maitani T: Influence of food polyphenols on aryl hydrocarbon receptor-signaling pathway estimated by in vitro bioassay. Phytochem. 2008, 69: 3117-3130. 10.1016/j.phytochem.2007.07.022.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  40. Pre-publication history

    1. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here:http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6882/10/4/prepub

Copyright

© Rao et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2010

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement